Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.
#904315 May 16, 2013
BP Oil Crisis Exposed Democrats’ Race
based Double Standard
Contrast the media’s reaction to the Hurricane Katrina disaster with how they focused attention toward BP and away from
President Obama’s incompetent handling of the G
ulf oil crisis that resulted in oil sludge reaching the Gulf Coast,
devastating that region’s economy and adversely affecting ten percent of our nation’s gross national product (GDP). With
the callousness of a committed ideologue, Obama used the oil spill
catastrophe to push his cap
tax agenda. That
reckless legislation will skyrocket the cost of energy and spend billions of dollars on green energy programs that even
Spain abandoned because such green schemes are unworkable and economically disastrous.
Obama’s green energy
along with his takeover of parts of our private sector industry, as well as our entire health care system
make all Americans poorer and less free.
The Democratic Party today is anti
Democrats have been running black communities for the past 50 years, and the socialist
policies of the Democrats have turned black communities into economic and social
wastelands. Democrats have the audacity to blame Republicans for the crisis in black
ghborhoods created by the Democrats.
Democratic Party operatives trashed black Democrat Juan Williams, calling him a “Happy
Negro” for daring to expose the failed socialist policies of the Democrats in his book
“Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead
End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are
dermining Black America”.
Without remorse, Democrats deliberately keep blacks in poverty because Democrats have
built their political power base on the backs of poor blacks, just as Democrats built their economic power base on the
backs of poor blacks dur
ing the days of slavery. The centuries
old election year strategy of the Democrats is to keep
blacks poor, angry and voting for Democrats. Every election cycle, Democrats preach hatred against Republicans and
incite blacks to cast a protest vote against Re
publicans, not for Democrats.
With the complicity of the liberal press, Democrats hide their actions that keep blacks in
poverty. For instance, Democrats are aligned with teachers’ unions and block efforts of
Republicans to provide school choice scholar
ships to black parents so they can get their
children out of failing schools. Democrats put the special interests of teachers’ unions over
that of poor blacks. Democrats do not want to acknowledge that the money belongs to the
people, not the buildings t
hat are controlled by the teachers. Democrats are also aligned with
the AARP, one of the Democratic Party’s biggest special interest groups, and block Social
Security reform, even though blacks on average lose $10,000 in the system because blacks on
ge have a five
year shorter life expectancy.
Since: May 11
#904316 May 16, 2013
So, they never supported any candidate or endorsed any candidates?
How many Democrats have they endorsed & How many Republicans?
#904317 May 16, 2013
Meet the new neighbor: Howard Stern reportedly pays $52 million for Palm Beach home
Radio personality said to be the buyer of County Road property
#904318 May 16, 2013
Barack Obama and the Betrayal of Black America
When Barack Obama was elected as the president of the United States, black
liberals dreamily believed that the numerous maladies in the black community
would cease to exist. They believed that his election was indicative of a
vigorous wind of polit
ical and social change that was blowing across the
country. Barack Obama himself vowed that his election would demarcate the
conclusion of grisly "politics as usual" from the commencement of political and democratic freshness. However, as this
tion continues on, it is abundantly clear that Obama has not only failed to deliver in a general sense, but he has
also completely betrayed his most loyal constituency
the black community.
After passing a gargantuan stimulus plan that was supposed to f
ix the economy, the unemployment rate continued to rise
until it only recently began falling. Although we are currently at a 9.1 percent unemployment rate, the rate in the black
community is at an unpardonably enormous 16.1 percent
the highest of an
y ethnic group in the country. It is also
important to note that black unemployment was lower under Bush than it has been at any point during Obama's
administration. In point of fact, black unemployment was even lower under Bush than it was under Clinton
More egregious than the high rate of black unemployment is the fact that Obama has been completely disconnected with
the black community. He has failed to articulate any policy that would deal with the crisis that is evident in urban
America. Rather, O
bama is much more focused on articulating and enacting policies about issues that are close to his
heart, such as allowing gays to serve openly in the military, as well as becoming a potent mouthpiece for the immoral
Arab scam to steal Israeli land and ann
ihilate the Jewish people.
Any intellectually honest person in America must look at Obama's demonstrable disregard for black issues and come to
the unavoidable conclusion that black America is the very least of Obama's concerns. So obvious is this fact t
some of Barack Obama's most ardent supporters in the black intelligentsia have begun voicing strident denunciations of
the president. The latest assault on Obama from his left
wing compatriot Cornel West is evidence of this phenomenon.
est's critique of Obama was partly personal and laden with his characteristically asinine divisive racial
rhetoric, there was some substance to his criticism to which left
wing Obama cheerleaders in the black community remain
willfully blind. West accused
Obama of being "a black mascot of Wall Street oligarchs and a black puppet of corporate
While West foolishly assumes that support for black issues and being in favor of business are mutually exclusive, the
unstated and basic premise in West'
s critique is that Obama does not care enough about, and expresses no interest in,
black people and black issues. As absurd as the rest of his intellectually messy ramblings are, West is right about that
Obama's sycophants are used to
writing off all criticism of the president coming from whites as racist, and they are
equally used to describing all criticism from black conservatives as being the puerile rants of Uncle Toms obsequiously
looking for approval from "the white man"; however
, although Cornel West is one of the black left's most revered
academics, they would much rather write him off as entirely crazy than to admit that any criticism he has of Barack
Obama contains even a scintilla of merit.
#904319 May 16, 2013
Another indication that progress is being made was found in the recent presidential election in the United States. The American people revealed great maturity by overwhelmingly rejecting a presidential candidate who had become identified with extremism, racism, and retrogression. The voters of our nation rendered a telling blow to the radical right. They defeated those elements in our society which seek to pit white against Negro and lead the nation down a dangerous Fascist path.
“Bill Clinton could have ”
Since: May 10
#904320 May 16, 2013
regardless of what you democrats think: O'bama is not the King of Narnia, he is a Chicago street thug-one of the same ones that robbed a 69 year old women of all her jewelry on Michigan avenue yesterday--in plain sight--O'bamasons. And then you have the rest of the liberals standing around and letting the O'bamasons rob this woman. You loon o ticks do the same thing and applaud the wrong-doing.
#904321 May 16, 2013
What a bunch of beauts on here.
#904322 May 16, 2013
OBAMA Is Not The President of African Americans?
One of the talking points formulated by Obama's apologists in the media is the
notion that Obama is not the president of black A
merica. They argue he is the
president of the United States of America. This pathetically feeble argument exists
for the sole purpose of deflecting legitimate criticism of Obama's failure to meet
the needs of the black community.
The fact of the matter i
s that Obama is the president of African Americans, just as
he is the president of white Americans. It takes a shocking display of intellectual dishonesty to suddenly release Obama
of any responsibility for black America, especially when previous presiden
ts have always been held responsible for their
treatment of the black community.
In 1998, the Nobel
winning writer Toni Morrison gave Bill Clinton the honorary moniker of "America's first black
president" because, according to her, he "display[ed] a
lmost every trope of blackness: single
parent household, born poor,
loving boy from Arkansas."
Leaving aside the recognizably insulting view of what constitutes blackness in Morrison's perverse mi
nd, had white,
southern Clinton possessed all these qualities while presiding over 16.1 percent unemployment, I am positive that this
endearing nickname would never have been created
much less believed by black liberals for many years until the
e of Obama.
By contrast, the left, with unutterable alacrity, vociferously argued that George W. Bush's less
stellar handling of
Hurricane Katrina was indicative of his incurable allergy toward black skin. Even largely apolitical rapper Kanye West
ok the time out to accuse Bush of not caring about blacks. The fact that Bush packed his administration with
qualified minorities was completely disregarded when the black left gave Bush his failing report card.
One can only imagine th
stricken cries of racism that would have been heard for years if Bush had overseen 16.1
percent black unemployment.
It is nothing more than liberal hypocrisy to see the crisis evident in the black community under Obama's watch and simply
th the contemptible shibboleth stating, "Obama is not the president of black America; he's the president of the
United States of America"
especially when every other president in recent history has been critically judged on their
treatment of the black
Mr. Okeem is a freelance writer and can be contacted at [email protected] His blog on politics and culture can be
read at voiceofchid.com . Th
an excerpt. The full a
rticle is posted on the Internet at:
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure,
creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy,
inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
“Bill Clinton could have ”
Since: May 10
#904323 May 16, 2013
O'bama couldn't get through his own audit without going to jail.
#904324 May 16, 2013
Life is improving only for the moochers, government drones and welfare bums sucking the blood of the taxpayers.
Since: Apr 13
#904325 May 16, 2013
Didn't the New Yorker just publish another BS article just recently that was discredited as liberal horse manure?
Pretty sure it did.
The words "New York" in "New Yorker" should give you a hint they aren't going to be fair and balanced in their elitist bias.
Since: Dec 10
#904326 May 16, 2013
Yeah... until someone leaks it out. We all know how unlikely it would be for information to be leaked out of the government.
Al Qaeda wasn't losing men during the attack because the White House (Vallerie Jarrett, Obama isn't even involved in government) ordered all units to not engage Al Qaeda while they attempted to kidnap Stevens.
Al Qaeda had explosives, RPGs and hand grenades. Why didn't they just blow the door away and light him up with their AKs? Because blowing the door might kill Stevens, and the intent was to kidnap Stevens, not kill him.
The only reason Al Qaeda attacked a, how did you denigrate it, "temporary rented consular building in Bumfuck Libya" was to kidnap an ambassador of the United States of America. Here's what the plan was:
The security for the ambassador would be reduced by the administration making it easier to kidnap the ambassador. During the attack, the White House (Vallerie Jarrett) would issue orders with presidential authority to stand down any US Armed Forces assets that were pre-positioned specifically to respond to specifically a terrorist attack specifically on our embassy specifically in Libya. Then, the White House would lie to cover up Al Qaeda's involvement while the network "news" programs would mislead the country concentrating on where Stevens was, what condition he was in, and the progress of the "negotiations" with the Muslim Brotherhood, who has a permenant presence in the White House, to exchange Stevens for that terrorist blind sheik in prison for attempting to murder 30 THOUSAND Americans.
However, Plan A went wrong and the ambassador died of smoke inhalation when Al Qaeda tried to smoke him out of the room he baricaded himself in.
And, just like Al Bundy, nobody in the White House had a plan B.
Even you have to laugh at the bufoonery in the White House today.
I'd laugh if it were happening in some other country.
#904327 May 16, 2013
For sure, especially you.
“Bill Clinton could have ”
Since: May 10
#904328 May 16, 2013
AND NOW...the next scandal...DOJ sought to surveil several thousand U.S. citizens in 2012 AND they weren't Moslems.
#904329 May 16, 2013
oh yeah, a street crime in Chicago really relates to the issues at hand.
so one must wonder...why not just the issues at hand? why go after those that i presume are black?
but heck, folks pick on the tea party/FOXbot crowd because they're old and white, so why am i complaining?
#904330 May 16, 2013
In Wake of Scandal, Obama Fires IRS Boss — Who Was Leaving Anyway...
You can trust me!
I never practice fascism, corruption or never tell a lie.
Who? Little old me?
#904331 May 16, 2013
State Dept. Tried to Dodge Criticism, Docs Show ...
You can trust me "and" Hillary to take that 3AM phone call.
See what a good job we did!
Since: Aug 11
#904332 May 16, 2013
you mean pseudo liberal Democrats & Republicans Dumbazz and another example of failure & affects by the Pseudo Liberals Great Society.
Since: Dec 10
#904333 May 16, 2013
nobody knows who won the election. In just the state of Ohio, there were 70 precincts around the city of Cleveland where, in hundreds of thousands of votes, not one crackhead, not one illiterate dropout, not one confused elderly voter (remember Florida?), nobody pressed the wrong button by mistake. That is an impossibility.
It's child's play to find the location where the computers were programmed to steal 100 percent of the vote. It's impossible to find the locations where programs were written to steal one in three or one in four votes.
Well, let's have a recount.
Oh. Well, that can't happen because THERE'S NOTHING TO COUNT.
We no longer have a democracy. Next on the agenda is the Constitution.
What do you think it will take to restore democracy to this country?
Since: Apr 13
#904334 May 16, 2013
The best case scenario is he will just limp through the rest of his second term.
Of course, Obamacare will be right on the heels of the crippling injuries if he even survives them.
The "train wreck" Sen. Max Baucus (D) said is coming seems like such a long time ago now.
Add your comments below
|BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09)||15 min||Jacques Ottawa||239,232|
|Graduation in Detroit.||1 hr||Another Chance||1|
|Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08)||1 hr||Dudley||8,065|
|Man charged with shooting near 26/Cal courthouse||2 hr||former democrat||1|
|Aurora man charged with kidnapping, murder of 1...||2 hr||former democrat||1|
|Chicago had a record year of dog poop complaints||11 hr||Trump is the man||1|
|Trumps travel ban discussion||11 hr||The truth is out ...||1|
Find what you want!
Search Chicago Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC