Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#903401 May 15, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
Who might that be, God, Mohammed, Buddha, one of the Hindu Gods perhaps or is it Jesus. Which one is watching me ?
If you have to run to the bible for inspiration to back up your racist segregated BS themes then you are a poor excuse for a human being. You were more convincing when you were running the Birther conspiracy!
Democrats: We started the "birther" movement before we were against it..

Idiot retard liberals along with Hillary start and are the "proud parents" of the birther movement, sellout, then blame someone else because you're the idiot.. Why are you idiots so stupid OzRitz??

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#903402 May 15, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you happen to catch the NAACP's response today to the Magic Negro's using the IRS to browbeat Conservatives?
They played the Race Card. SURPRISE!!!
They called the Tea Party racist and that the IRS had every right to investigate racist organizations!!!!
Following this formula, the NAACP should have been put out of bidniss ages ago.
You are a Tea Party member & you post racial slurs all the time.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#903403 May 15, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree totally. So that makes it official. Looking forward to another day of whining, bellowing, crying, snarling, wallowing in lies and hatred from all of the nut job righties. LMAO. Baggers are like pigs they love wallowing and snorting in mud all day.
You're not a complete idiot -- Some of your parts are just missing ghost...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#903404 May 15, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a Tea Party member & you post racial slurs all the time.
"There is a class of people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs and hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs - partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs."... Quote: Former Slave Booker T. Washington 1911..

One Hundred years later RealDave??... NO! Hope and NO! Change you bigoted idiot...

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#903405 May 15, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"real dumb"
Answer one question. Why did not the IRS ask a single liberal 501 (c)(4) organization the same illegal questions?
Peace
KMA
There have been liberal groups targeted also.

I am not advocating that it would be OK for the IRS to target groups based on the political affiliation. I am saying that it is difficult for the IRS to determine whether these groups meet the criteria because these rules are not very precise. With the flood of new groups forming, the IRS had to do something to determine who to look at.

Maybe the investigation will shed more light on the statistics & who directed this type of targeting.

It makes you wonder what went on in the past since these are not typically political appointments or under direct control of the executive branch.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#903406 May 15, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a Tea Party member & you post racial slurs all the time.
Kinda funny how all the righties on here are forever posting racist comments yet deny that they are racist. Seemingly unaware of just how filled with hatred that they are. Some of them even deny that they are Republicans and love to pretend that they have an open mind..Old retarded Eed and Flakey Flack come to mind.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#903407 May 15, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
There have been liberal groups targeted also.
I am not advocating that it would be OK for the IRS to target groups based on the political affiliation. I am saying that it is difficult for the IRS to determine whether these groups meet the criteria because these rules are not very precise. With the flood of new groups forming, the IRS had to do something to determine who to look at.
Maybe the investigation will shed more light on the statistics & who directed this type of targeting.
It makes you wonder what went on in the past since these are not typically political appointments or under direct control of the executive branch.
LOL... you certified ignorant idiot... Doing the same thing over and over, lying making up bullshit and expecting a new result... LMFAO... You are an idiot RealDave...
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#903408 May 15, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>You're not a complete idiot -- Some of your parts are just missing ghost...
So says the repetitive, redundant hater in denial.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#903409 May 15, 2013
GOP idiots wrote:
<quoted text>
More bullcrap from rightwhiners.
Holder stopped the BUSH program and fired the 2 men in charge.
In 2009 Holder went to Mexico and discussed this very program with the Mexican government. After Holder's discussions with the government of Mexico, Holder ordered the GPS tracking devices previously used to track the guns not be used. After Holder's discussions with the government of Mexico, Holder ordered the guns not be intercepted before they entered Mexico. After Holder's discussions with the government of Mexico, Holder increased the number of guns in the program from 300 to 2000.
After the public became aware of Eric Holder running guns for the Mexican drug cartels, Holder fired some government workers that were only doing what they were ordered to do.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#903410 May 15, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Kinda funny how all the righties on here are forever posting racist comments yet deny that they are racist. Seemingly unaware of just how filled with hatred that they are. Some of them even deny that they are Republicans and love to pretend that they have an open mind..Old retarded Eed and Flakey Flack come to mind.
A pretty face is nothing if you have an ugly heart you stupid old fool.

The DNA of the democratic party is inbred with hate, ignorance and racism you idiot. Mass killings by democrats in schools and such, or Chicago ghetto style killings and bombing from your "Culture of Violence" ghost are not by angry old white men conservatives clinging to their guns and religion you GD ignorant bigot ghost.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#903411 May 15, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> You still did not answer. Avoiding the question or what.
By the time Bin Laden went into Pakistan, Bush declared him irrelevant.
Let me ask again. If Bin Laden was not in Afghanistan would Bush have invaded it?
Bush was going to invade the country that attacked us on 9/11(2001). That country happened to be Afghanistan.
Question answered. End of discussion.
Next topic?
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#903412 May 15, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
So says the repetitive, redundant hater in denial.
You idiot old man continue to provide the moronic justification for the need of academic redundancies you sick piece of shit......

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#903413 May 15, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush says feds can open mail without warrant
http://seattletimes.com/html/nationworld/2003...
i guess he never read it.
The Constitution says:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
End of discussion. Next topic? Or, do we need to fight ANOTHER war over this principle?

And, if you think Bush was such a great president, why didn't you get out there and push for Bush to have a third term?
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#903414 May 15, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>You idiot old man continue to provide the moronic justification for the need of academic redundancies you sick piece of shit......
If you are going to cry, I will have to place you on ignore. So either suck it up or grow a pair, lightweight.But please continue those sessions with your "SHRINK".

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#903415 May 15, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
What’s hard to figure out is why the United States would choose to follow Israel’s path. Yet over the course of the Bush/Clinton/Bush/Obama quarter-century, that’s precisely what we’ve done. The pursuit of global military dominance, a proclivity for preemption, a growing taste for assassination—all justified as essential to self-defense. That pretty much describes our present-day MO.
Israel is a small country with a small population and no shortage of hostile neighbors. Ours is a huge country with an enormous population and no enemy, unless you count the Cuban-Venezuelan Axis of Ailing Dictators, within several thousand miles. We have choices that Israel does not. Yet in disregarding those choices the United States has stumbled willy-nilly into an Israeli-like condition of perpetual war, with peace increasingly tied to unrealistic expectations of adversaries and would-be adversaries acquiescing in Washington’s will.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articl...
you nutjobs seem to forget that some folks see us, and Israel, as terrorists.
Or, as Obama and Bill Clinton think, why assassinate Americans overseas when you can assassinate them right here in the United States.

The bottom line is, there are two factions at war in the Middle East. One of those factions is also at war with the United States.
Pick a side, dufus.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#903416 May 15, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
The Diminishing Returns of Republican “Pro-Israel” Politics
Romney’s frequent declarations that there would be “not an inch” of difference between the U.S. and Israel under his administration summed up the ridiculous degree of “pro-Israel” fervor that Republican politicians in particular now feel obliged to express. It has already become commonplace to acknowledge that there is a growing partisan gap in opinion polls on U.S. Israel policy. A Pew survey from the start of this year found the gap to be very wide:
You’ll notice that Republican sympathy with Israel started skyrocketing at the start of the last decade and has now climbed to an all-time high. What Republicans consistently keep missing is that all of this is gradually working to their disadvantage. Part of this comes from ignoring the fact that most Americans now tend to recoil from knee-jerk hawkishness in general, but it’s also a result of grossly overestimating how popular the status quo on Israel policy is. As Republicans become more resolutely and uniformly a party of “pro-Israel” hawks, they are separating themselves more and more from the rest of the country. As they are on other issues, Republicans are increasingly at odds the views of younger voters, who are more likely to sympathize with neither side or even take a more “pro-Palestinian” view of the conflict:
American sympathy for Israel is real enough (especially when contrasted with general lack of sympathy with Israel’s neighbors), but it doesn’t translate into broad support for extremely one-sided U.S. backing of Israel. Polls have consistently found that a large majority believes that the U.S. shouldn’t take sides in the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. It was an article of faith endorsed by members of both parties during Hagel’s confirmation hearing that Israel is an extremely important ally, but most Americans don’t perceive Israel as an ally at all. As new cohorts of voters begin participating more regularly in elections, Republicans will find that their increasingly hard-line “pro-Israel” position has taken them into a political cul-de-sac.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...
http://www.people-press.org/2013/01/08/as-hag...
So, you support the Wahhabists and conservative Arab agenda of destroying Israel, right?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#903417 May 15, 2013
GOPIdiots wrote:
<quoted text>
HOT AIR LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
I say keep those congressional hearings coming. The GOP will overplay their hand, and most Americans have a pretty dim view of the GOP Congress already.
You really think a normal, middle class, non- FOX loon cares about any of this? Think again.
As soon as there is the next shiny new distraction ( OJ back in court, a kidnapping, another building collapsing) or we have the next mass shooting,all of this goes away in the mainstream media.
Polling already confirms that a large majority trust Hillary and Obama more than the GOP on everything.
I can barely hear you with your head buried in the sand....

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#903418 May 15, 2013
GOPIdiots wrote:
<quoted text>
Or this...which was totally OK by Bonehead and McChinless
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
President Bush signed a secret order in 2002 authorizing the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens and foreign nationals in the United States, despite previous legal prohibitions against such domestic spying, sources with knowledge of the program said last night.
The super-secretive NSA, which has generally been barred from domestic spying except in narrow circumstances involving foreign nationals, has monitored the e-mail, telephone calls and other communications of hundreds, and perhaps thousands, of people under the program, the New York Times disclosed last night.
Did you just say "Bush did it, too"?
If you thought Bush was such a great president, why didn't you get out in the streets and push for an amendment to the Constitution so Bush could have a third term?
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#903419 May 15, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
If you are going to cry, I will have to place you on ignore. So either suck it up or grow a pair, lightweight.But please continue those sessions with your "SHRINK".
The eyes are useless when your mind is blind with idiot ghost...Deranged idiot is not what you do. It's who you are.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#903420 May 15, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush was going to invade the country that attacked us on 9/11(2001). That country happened to be Afghanistan.
Question answered. End of discussion.
Next topic?
How many Afghani citizens participated in 9-11?

But hey, first we have a flock of right whiners say we would have invaded Afghanistan if Bin Laden was not there.

& now we have you declaring that Afghanistan attacked us.

Al Qaeda had camps in Sudan & Yemen, why wasn't it Yemen & Sudan that attacked us?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 10 min AGW sheep 51,549
Mrs. Bush: History will vindicate her husband (Jun '08) 1 hr swedenforever 54,547
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Stella 185,098
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 4 hr Ratloder 69,133
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 4 hr Non _cents 5,726
Word (Dec '08) 4 hr Non _cents 5,079
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 4 hr SLY WEST 7,964
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:47 am PST

Bleacher Report 9:47AM
Insider Buzz: Mutual Interest Between Andre Johnson and Indianapolis Colts
Bleacher Report 8:57 PM
Weighing Pros and Cons of Bears' Top FA Targets
NBC Sports 9:46 PM
Colts agree to terms on extension for long snapper Matt Overton
Bleacher Report 3:59 AM
Weighing the Pros and Cons of Top Free-Agent Targets
Bleacher Report 5:50 AM
Report: Hasselbeck's Contract with Colts Worth $3M