Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#903033 May 14, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>We were discussing Iraq dumbazz__Vietnam was way long ago, forty years ago for me.
But you didn't know dik about Vietnam either having to lie about where you were located, what you did.
In conclusion you're a total dirtbag__now go away.
To some of us that lost family during Vietnam, it seems like yesterday. During the Vietnam War, seven million men volunteered for the military; only two million were drafted. Over 75 percent of those who served in Vietnam itself were volunteers. They were the best-educated and most egalitarian military forces in America's history. The commie liberals did a number on the American people and they continue to lie today. Here is the best study and information, I have seen about the Vietnam war:
http://www.vhpa.org/info/stolenvalor.htm

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#903034 May 14, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
You specifically said a secured compound...Put down that pipe, pill popper.
I didn't say by the US. Secured could mean simply not allowing him to leave. Didn't have to be under guard.
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#903035 May 14, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
An attack on the United States territory that kills 3000 people necessitates a full-scale invasion.
I don't expect the willfully ignorant party-line regurgitators to acknowledge the fact that Afghanistan attacked us on September 11, 2001. Hell, they lied about Al Qaeda not attacking us just recently.
But, you may have a point. The Japanese Navy attacked us on December 7, 1941. I don't recall Hirohito being involved in that attack. Tojo wasn't there, either. According to your logic, we had no reason to invade: Guadacanal, Tarawa, North Africa, Sicily, New Guinea, or Normandy,... or even Germany. Germany never attacked us.
The government of Afghanistan willingly allowed Al Qaeda to operate in Afghanistan, condoned their attack on the United States, and protected them as a country would their standing armed forces when we went after them. Afghanistan attacked us on September 11, 2001.
Anywhere the Wahhabists are, there will be "suicide" bombers. I think it is interesting that the only known survivor of a "suicide" bomb attack was coerced by the terrorists into driving a car toward an American convoy when the terrorists detonated a bomb he didn't even know was in the car. Coercion has been the tool of despots throughout the ages. The communists were notorious for this throughout the Cold War.
To be honest you are the first person I have ever come across(rightwinger/leftwinger oor middlewinger) that has stated unequivocally that Afghanistan attacked the United States.

You remind me of Colonel Flagg on M*A*S*H*.

IMO you are insane.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#903036 May 14, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Anything to defend Obama!!!
Looks like Fetch Almighty just schooled you on reality!!!
Pelosi did requested Obama to use IRS as a political tool to punish anyone with different points of views!
Hairball Reid just gave a news conference supporting the IRS inquisition and effectively criticizing the IRS for not going far enough.

Hairball wants to silence all political dissent.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#903037 May 14, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> Promoting LSD will not permit your obvious resistance to answer the question. Would we have invade Afghanistan if Bin Laden was not there? So far, you have basically said yes. He is a chance to confirm that in a direct way.
The terrorist training camps were a more important target than bin Laden.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#903038 May 14, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So, was that a yes or no. Would we have invaded Afghanistan if Bin Laden was not there.
Let me get my crystal ball...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#903039 May 14, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
Isn't Planned Parenthood's primary objective to prevent unplanned parenthood?
Shouldn't they be advertising that more?
No profit in that.

Abortion pays the fat salaries.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#903041 May 14, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So, was that a yes or no. Would we have invaded Afghanistan if Bin Laden was not there.
He escaped into pakistan. Did we invade pakistan?
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#903043 May 14, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Overlook Homers remarks on the topic, he's still working out question number one!
I see you survived your meth lab explosion.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#903044 May 14, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Everyone does not have access to birth control. The best most effective methods are expensive. They require a doctor's appointments, prescriptions & follow ups.
As for better availability of these more reliable options, talk top the Pope & Republicans.
Sterilization is the most effective and least costly method of birth control.
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#903045 May 14, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
An attack on the United States territory that kills 3000 people necessitates a full-scale invasion.
I don't expect the willfully ignorant party-line regurgitators to acknowledge the fact that Afghanistan attacked us on September 11, 2001. Hell, they lied about Al Qaeda not attacking us just recently.
But, you may have a point. The Japanese Navy attacked us on December 7, 1941. I don't recall Hirohito being involved in that attack. Tojo wasn't there, either. According to your logic, we had no reason to invade: Guadacanal, Tarawa, North Africa, Sicily, New Guinea, or Normandy,... or even Germany. Germany never attacked us.
The government of Afghanistan willingly allowed Al Qaeda to operate in Afghanistan, condoned their attack on the United States, and protected them as a country would their standing armed forces when we went after them. Afghanistan attacked us on September 11, 2001.
Anywhere the Wahhabists are, there will be "suicide" bombers. I think it is interesting that the only known survivor of a "suicide" bomb attack was coerced by the terrorists into driving a car toward an American convoy when the terrorists detonated a bomb he didn't even know was in the car. Coercion has been the tool of despots throughout the ages. The communists were notorious for this throughout the Cold War.
My comment about the invasion was regarding Iraq, you named one terrorist there so I was asking you if one terrorist necessitated a full scale invasion of IRAQ.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#903046 May 14, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Big surprise, Eman jumps in to protect the use of slurs. Calling a black man "boy" is a racist slur. Everyone know this.
If Obama doesn't want to be called "boy", then he should act like a man and accept responsibility for his failures.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#903047 May 14, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, if Bin Laden was hiding in the Sudan again, Flack says we would still have invaded Afghanistan.
Terrorists have camps in a wide range of countries & remain there with little government hassle. Why Afghanistan??? There were camps in North Africa, Yemen, Sudan, etc.
You people are wacked out.
The last I looked we are doing just that. Not to the extent of Afghanistan or Iraq but we are there. Scale of force to threat is a good scale to have. Besides the last three are not governments that support terrorism, I don't think. They are states with terrorism in them. You reading comprehension does you in again.

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#903048 May 14, 2013
I need some personal advise from anyone who is retired and receiving SS.

Do you have to wait two months after your birth date and turning 62 for the first SS check to arrive?

It was explained to me that you have to be one month "eligible" and then the check is one month behind that.

I always thought you were officially retired upon turning 62, SS checks and all, which isn't really the case if you have to work two more months.
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#903049 May 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Afghanistan had no viable government in 2001. The Taliban was the government and harbored the terrorists who conducted the 9/11 attack.
The only mistake made by Bush in Afghanistan was not using nuclear weapons to kill every one of the bastards.
Tell it to DBWriter aka Colonel Flagg he is insisting Afghanistan attacked the U.S. and a full scale invasion of Iraq was necessary because there was one terrorist there who by all accounts was already dead at the hands of Saddam. He's making all this stuff up not me, take it up with him. You'd think he worked for the Bush administration.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#903050 May 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
No difference. Women in combat are a joke because they lack the physical ability and put the men in danger because of a perceived need to protect them.
Helicopter pilots, Medivac nurses and more.

Women are not serving in the infantry/artillery/armored you stupid fk__but those exposed to combat, as Jessica Lynch was, should be awarded for their contributions through pay and promotion.

Pay attention mutt__or STFU.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#903051 May 14, 2013
...nothing to see here...

"EPA waives fee requests for friendly groups, denies conservative groups"

http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2529609...
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#903052 May 14, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> I didn't say by the US. Secured could mean simply not allowing him to leave. Didn't have to be under guard.
Flack now throwing dirt over himself as he stands in his self dug hole.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#903053 May 14, 2013
Homer 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>I dunno, maybe it's better to raise a child by the mother as they are the nurturers and caregivers, look at the Momrmons and their multiple wives. Is it better to have a single mom raising a child or a mother and abusive father, or at least verbally abusive, domineering, wife-beater t-shirt wearing rightwinger-type father?
Culture decides the whole family unit but who is to say what's best?
I think for the most part money/finances is more the issue and not necessarily being raised by one parent.
Homer is partially correct in that families headed by an unwed mother are way more likely to be living in poverty.

However, male children need their father in the house to show them how to be men instead of wimps.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#903054 May 14, 2013
democrats and nothing to see here...

"It gets worse: IRS leaked conservative groupsí confidential documents to ProPublica"

http://twitchy.com/2013/05/13/it-gets-worse-i...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 4 min Jacques Ottawa 183,765
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 11 min Earthling-1 50,309
More than 300 miles of Chicago roadway to be re... 12 min reality is a crutch 1
amy 1-27 12 min Mister Tonka 6
abby 1-26 16 min Mister Tonka 37
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 24 min Mother Superior 51,363
abby 1-27 1 hr Cass 8
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:04 am PST

NFL10:04AM
Richardson was suspended for two Colts playoff games
ESPN10:58 AM
Colts won't commit to RB Richardson for 2015
Yahoo! Sports11:49 AM
League conducts nearly 40 interviews into 'deflate-gate'
Yahoo! Sports11:50 AM
NFL: No decision yet on deflated balls
NBC Sports12:54 PM
Grigson goes silent on NFL investigation into Patriots