Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1278220 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Realtime

Deltona, FL

#901498 May 12, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>The CIA director at the time of the attacks was Petreaus, Panetta preceded Petreaus in the role.
Are you too learning History from Carol?
Here's your first post again stooge__wanna mull it over a little and get back?

Petreaus was CIA director during Benghazi.

Brennan is current CIA director.

Stupid and a liar to boot.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#901508 May 12, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>
Stay in your Virginia assisted living center, gay ghost. You will be sure to get your taxpayer-funded 3 squares in that leftist shthle, and we like sending our mass shooting psychotic, disenchanted dumocrats out to your gun-free zones. Who knows? Maybe your Betty Boop parlor might be the next drugged-up leftist psycho's next stop??
Careful there old miserable clueless one, don't hate me because I'm handsome, smart and loved by all the women, maybe you should try a woman for a change butter butt?
Lincoln

United States

#901509 May 12, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
I never pay any attention to this deluded individual called Ortiz. Anyone that touts Obama's record on unemployment is obviously delusional. It's still 7.6% after Obama has been in office going on 5 years now!
https://www.google.com/publicdata/explore...
This is theoeconomics/quarterly-update -us-economic-recovery-historic al-context/p25774
Abysmal! Obama gets an F-!!
Another Hate America First Post.
You seem to delight in Americas Proplems
Lincoln

United States

#901510 May 12, 2013
Waxman wrote:
Your tax dollars hard at work implementing the fascism of Obama & the leftwing:
"Senior officials at the Internal Revenue Service were aware as early as 2011 that its agents were targeting Tea Party groups to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status, Fox News confirms."
The left hates American values of fairness and a free country. The left wants to persecute YOU!
Totalitarianism is a fundamental principle of the "Control Freak" Democrat Party.
The Federal Government is now singling out people who do not believe like the nutcase Democrats do.
Obamaism.
If You Hate America why not move to another country?
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#901512 May 12, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
OK leftist phags!! Remember that when one man's beard is on fire; another man warms his hands on it. All you liberal trannys be advised it's a chilly AZ morning, and I would be obliged if you would set your face on fire so I can beat the chill.....
Here butt breath I have something you can beat, I'll bet you can't even remember what a hard on looks like...Well your own anyway.
Lincoln

United States

#901513 May 12, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush's Watch Without a Peep from Fox News
The Republican inquisition over the attacks against Americans in Benghazi has never really gone away, but it appears as though in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing and the House Oversight Committee's Benghazi hearings this week there are renewed psycho-histrionics over Benghazi.
Lindsey Graham and Fox News Channel in particular are each crapping their cages over new allegations from an alleged whistleblower, while they continue to deal in previously debunked falsehoods about the sequence of events during and following the attacks. Fox News is predictably helming the biggest raft of hooey on the situation -- turning its attention to Hillary Clinton in an abundantly obvious early move to stymie her presidential run before it even begins.
So I thought I'd revisit some territory I covered back in October as a bit of a refresher -- especially since it appears as if no one, including and especially the traditional press, intends to ask any of these obnoxious, opportunistic liars about why they're so obsessed by this one attack yet they entirely ignored the dozen-plus consulate/embassy attacks that occurred when George W. Bush and Dick Cheney were allegedly "keeping us safe."
The Benghazi attacks (the consulate and the CIA compound) are absolutely not unprecedented even though they're being treated that way by Republicans who are deliberately ignoring anything that happened prior to Inauguration Day, January 20, 2009.
....Where was your inquest after the Karachi attacks, Mr. Graham? Where were you after the Sana'a attacks, Mr. Hannity? What about all of the embassy attacks in Iraq that I didn't even list here, Mr. McCain? Do you realize how many people died in attacks on U.S. embassies and consulates when Bush was supposedly keeping us safe, Mr. Ailes? Just once I'd like to hear David Gregory or George Stephanopoulos or Wolf Blitzer ask a Republican member of Congress about the above timeline and why they said nothing at the time of each attack. Just once.
Nearly every accusation being issued about Benghazi could've been raised about the Bush-era attacks, and yet these self-proclaimed truth-seekers refused to, in their words, undermine the commander-in-chief while troops were in harm's way (a line they repeated over and over again during those years).
So we're only left to conclude the obvious. The investigations and accusations and conspiracy theories are entirely motivated by politics and a strategy to escalate this to an impeachment trial. In doing so, the Republicans have the opportunity not only to crush the president's second term, but also to sabotage the potential for a Hillary Clinton presidency.
Even if they never arrive at that goal, they have in their possession a cudgel formed of horseshit -- a means of flogging the current administration with the singularly effective Republican marketing/noise machine, including the conservative entertainment complex. Very seldom does this machine fail to revise history and distort the truth. Ultimately, they don't even need a full-blown impeachment proceeding when they have a population of way too many truthers and automatons who take all of these lies at face value -- not to mention dubiously sourced chunks of "truth" proffered by radio and cable news conspiracy theorists who, if nothing else, are masters at telling angry conservatives precisely what they want to hear: that the probably-Muslim president is weak on terrorism. And so they'll keep repeating "Benghazi-Gate, Benghazi-Gate, Benghazi-Gate!" without any regard for history or reality. Like always.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/13-be...
Funny reading the fox sock puppets - blind to all but fox.
Stalin 's useful idiots
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#901515 May 12, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>
I WILL give you points for consistency (even though you are consistently "wrong", retarded, and gay).....
For consistently making you eat s!it.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#901517 May 12, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
If You Hate America why not move to another country?
That idiot don't have a pot to p!ss in and would be a miserable jerk where ever he was,
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#901518 May 12, 2013
Waxman wrote:
How many of you libtards believe, as the White House claims, that the CIA altered the Benghazi talking points?
How many have confidence in Leon Panetta who heads up the CIA. Of course, Obama picked a frikking "lawyer" and "political hack".
Here is your first post scumbag__you clearly are lost on current events. Petreaus was CIA director during the Benghazi mess, Brennan is now.

Your job as master judgit freak must be wearing on you.

“Bill Clinton could have ”

Since: May 10

Prevented this

#901519 May 12, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> You quote Clinton like he's some kind of God! Just because he did nothing wrong, doesn't mean he did everything right! Understand that we're talking about 2 different times & climates. Retaliation may have sparked a war in these fragile times. Obama did what he did for his reasons. Nothing you can say can make him guilty so it's a waste of time!
Yes O'bama like Clinton did lie for political posturing. And now we know-First O'bama and the democrats came for the Tea Party...and then they came for the Jews...O'bama, his administration and now the IRS are unable to govern.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#901520 May 12, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>
Its easy to be loved by all the gals when they are catatonic, blind, deaf, and toothless. Besides, I love you man!! Your retarded posts rock my world.....:-)
And you know that how?????LMAO

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#901521 May 12, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
Go Rand, go! An actual fiscally-Conservative Libertarian positioning himself nicely against all the leftist phags....:-)
Rand Paul , a bigger political opportunist than even his father Ron.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#901522 May 12, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
Go Rand, go! An actual fiscally-Conservative Libertarian positioning himself nicely against all the leftist phags....:-)
What's one more right wing idiot?
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#901523 May 12, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> Rand Paul , a bigger political opportunist than even his father Ron.
Much crazier too! This one's right up there with Bachmann.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#901524 May 12, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> Rand Paul , a bigger political opportunist than even his father Ron.
Hard to believe that there are those that would follow and curtsy to that cracker head? Stupid is as stupid does....Fight song for the baggers.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#901525 May 12, 2013
Face the Nation was excellent this morning__particularly the Robt Gates interview.
new yawk

Tonawanda, NY

#901526 May 12, 2013
Why? Because he hammered Holder for 13 hours on an important Executive Order .. IE: Obama's drone strikes.
AND:
If Holder had been straight with Rand from the beginning and JUST answered the question, instead of his bold-faced, defiant refusal, behaving as if they/he don't have to answer to the American People, and can do as they un-Constitutionally please and NOT be held accountable.
THEN:
Rand wouldn't have had to Stand His Ground ... For 13 HOURS.

AND Holder and Obama wouldn't have been left punked n' played with egg on their petulant pubescent foolish faces.

Note: Besides, Cruz had Rand's Back ... No win situation for The Boy Stupid and StoopID The Junior.

frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text> Rand Paul , a bigger political opportunist than even his father Ron.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#901527 May 12, 2013
new yawk wrote:
Why? Because he hammered Holder for 13 hours on an important Executive Order .. IE: Obama's drone strikes.
AND:
If Holder had been straight with Rand from the beginning and JUST answered the question, instead of his bold-faced, defiant refusal, behaving as if they/he don't have to answer to the American People, and can do as they un-Constitutionally please and NOT be held accountable.
THEN:
Rand wouldn't have had to Stand His Ground ... For 13 HOURS.
AND Holder and Obama wouldn't have been left punked n' played with egg on their petulant pubescent foolish faces.
Note: Besides, Cruz had Rand's Back ... No win situation for The Boy Stupid and StoopID The Junior.
<quoted text>
Rand Paul is a political lackey(sock puppet?) for the powerful N.R.A. gun lobby. His infamous filibuster on the Manchin-Toomey gun safety bill was a blatant example of political opportunism --Rand Paul found an issue that he could attack and garner Republican support for his run for the Presidency in 2016. Rand Paul was thinking of his career ; not the Public Interest.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#901528 May 12, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
I hope he doesn't release anything. This is a non story.
That's what Nixon said about Watergate.
Lincoln

United States

#901529 May 12, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what Nixon said about Watergate.
IRS would be a problem.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 7 min Jacques in Orleans 197,095
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Into The Night 54,596
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr contrary opinion 100,673
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr 40ish 6,443
News Should prostitution be less illegal-or more? 3 hr beastman 2
abby9-3-15 6 hr Kuuipo 9
abby9-2-15 7 hr boundary painter 6
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages