It would have likely been used against him because he had been telling Americans that, by killing bin Laden, terrorism was on the run and it happened on 9/11. And there would still be questions of why security was denied and help was not sent.<quoted text> So even if that were the case, what would it really have changed, nothing? Those people who voted for Obama was gonna vote for him anyway. Just like those weep voted for Romney would've voted for him anyway. Benghazi didn't change anything!
But it probably wouldn' have made that much difference in his reelection if he had told the truth from the very beginning. So why did he chose not to?
That's the big question. Apparently, he chose not to in order to have a better chance of winning. That's the problem.