Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
826,921 - 826,940 of 1,100,625 Comments Last updated 2 min ago

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#900393 May 10, 2013
Seal Team 6 funerals, no coverage from the Lame Stream Media, Why not??
Lincoln

United States

#900394 May 10, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Democrats chose to suppress the truth for political gain. Not Republicans.
The witchhunts even without documented proof by the liberal media and the Democrats against Republicans don't count though, do they?
FACT: An ambassasdor hasn't been killed abroad since the 1970s.
FACT: Someone gave the order to deny that embassy more security a month before the attack after repeated and urgent requests.
QUESTION: Who denied them that request and why?
FACT: A 4 to 5 hour time span between the first attack that killed the ambassador and one American and the second attack that killed the other two Americans was time enough to save the second two Americans.
QUESTION: Who gave the order for the CIA to step down resulting in two more Americans' deaths and why?
FACT: The information the WH received was changed from a terrorist attack to a spontaneous mob blamed on a video.
QUESTION: Who made that decision and why?
QUESTION: Why was that lie continued in televised interview and at the victims' funerals and in front of the UN two weeks later?
QUESTION: What were the motives for perpetrating that lie?
QUESTION: Why was the second in command on the ground, Hicks, who became the first in command after the attacks demoted by Hillary Clinton when he chose to come forward?
QUESTION: Why would the former Secretary of State do that if there was nothing to hide?
None of these questions have been answered. Even after 8 months.
Republicans chose to enter the Neo Con war in Iraq resulting in the death of 4000 troops.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#900395 May 10, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
Scarborough: Benghazi Would Get More Public Scrutiny If Conservatives Hadn’t ‘Overplayed Their Hand’
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/s...
you act like a nutjob and no one cares if you're right or wrong. no one wants to be seen supporting a nutjob cause unless they're a nutjob. are you a nutjob? well sure you are. and because you're a nutjob i could give a shyte less about whatever mythical FOXbot ideas you have about Benghazi. so please, can you just shutup about it? no one is listening to FOX silliness. just ask FOX. they've been complaining since minute one that no one else will lower their journalistic standards so they can 'cover' the story like FOX does. i mean gee whiz, what's the point of having so many old white folks watching your network every night if you can't get away with lying to them on a regular basis? the rest of us just need to dumb down and see what living in your head would be like for a few days. i'm sure Big Pharma could use the infusion of new customers never mind the ratings at FOX finally matching the nightly network news, so come on everybody and get stupid like a FOXbot! though i may need some help. carol?
The lame stream media will sooner or later along with other democrats, eventually throw obama under the bus to save Hillary from Benghazi and get her elected.

If NOT for obama, Hillary and Susan Rice lying, Benghazi would NOT be an issue you idiot...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#900396 May 10, 2013
Rep. Darrell Issa must be ruing his bad luck. The hearing he carefully orchestrated to pick at the scab of Benghazi was stepped on by the verdict in the Jodi Arias murder trial and by the story of three women held captive and brutalized for a decade in Cleveland. He was out-sensationalized and out-tawdried this week despite his own best efforts and those of his committee colleagues and staff members.[...] Nothing spoken of in the hearing suggested a cover-up by a Cabinet secretary, who instantly took personal responsibility for the attacks and swiftly appointed an independent commission led by two of the most distinguished, nonpartisan career civil servants in recent American history to investigate them. To say otherwise is more than a reach. It's an effort by the Republican Party to damage the person most likely to be the next Democratic presidential candidate.

In the calculus of Washington today, Clinton is a bigger and more valuable target even than her former boss, the president.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/10/1208...

'We're sly, we're sly!'

no, you're not.
Lincoln

United States

#900397 May 10, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Republicans lead a witch hunt on Benghazi
The only coherent purpose I can discern in all of this is to sully Clinton’s record as secretary of state in case she runs for president in 2016.[...]
Did Clinton’s State Department fail to provide adequate security for the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi? In retrospect, obviously so. But the three diplomats who testified at the hearing gave no evidence that this failure sprang from anything other than the need to use limited resources as efficiently as possible.
House Republicans who voted to cut funding for State Department security should understand that their philosophy — small government is always better — has consequences. Bureaucrats have to make judgment calls. Sometimes they will be wrong.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/eugene...
Republicans are divided and confused.
They need minority votes but can't drop their racist base
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#900398 May 10, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
answer me this....when are Republicans going to own up to cutting security funding for our ambassadors?
kinda makes one wonder about motives for useless 'hearings'.
If NOT for obama, Hillary and Susan Rice lying, Benghazi would NOT be an issue you idiot...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#900399 May 10, 2013
Fox-Promoted Claim That Benghazi Witness Was Threatened Falls Apart

After Fox News pushed a claim that a Benghazi witness had been "subjected to threats and intimidation" by State Department employees, the witness' lawyer admitted on the network that his client never said he had been threatened by anyone.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/05/09/fox-p...

“Come Home America!”

Since: Nov 11

Claymont, Delaware 19809

#900400 May 10, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>You have to admit sonicfiller - Obama, Hillary and Susan Rice do what they do best for the past 8 months LIE.
No Surprize has no counter argument but to repeat himself like a 'Chatty Cathy doll. He must be neighbors with Auntie Roo(Lou.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#900401 May 10, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
Republicans chose to enter the Neo Con war in Iraq resulting in the death of 4000 troops.
Neo-Nazis liberals opposed the Invasion of Iraq. YOU Neo-Nazi liberals support any Arab country because they all oppose Israel and support exterminating the Jews...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#900402 May 10, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
Republicans are divided and confused.
They need minority votes but can't drop their racist base
Why do you Hate America? Let democrats kill the planet with stupid and ghetto ignorance, so all will suffer. Why do you hate intelligence Patrick?

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#900403 May 10, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
answer me this....when are Republicans going to own up to cutting security funding for our ambassadors?
kinda makes one wonder about motives for useless 'hearings'.
BS, Give us chapter & verse on these 'cuts'? To say your full of something smelly, doesn't go far enough?
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#900404 May 10, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Fox-Promoted Claim That Benghazi Witness Was Threatened Falls Apart
After Fox News pushed a claim that a Benghazi witness had been "subjected to threats and intimidation" by State Department employees, the witness' lawyer admitted on the network that his client never said he had been threatened by anyone.
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/05/09/fox-p...
I guess you prefer that Louis Farrahkan tells you liberals at the Nation of Islam that Obama is "the Messiah." Your obsession with Fox is amusing sonicfiller, your assisted living center...
TSM

El Paso, TX

#900405 May 10, 2013
Benghazi has a little mix of Watergate/ Valeria Plame, Cover-Ups/Lies!!
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#900406 May 10, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>BS, Give us chapter & verse on these 'cuts'? To say your full of something smelly, doesn't go far enough?
You have to admit - Now sonicfiller and most liberals, Obama, Hillary and Susan Rice do what they do best LIE...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#900407 May 10, 2013
frontporchreactionary wrote:
<quoted text>No Surprize has no counter argument but to repeat himself like a 'Chatty Cathy doll. He must be neighbors with Auntie Roo(Lou.
You have to admit frontporchmonkey - Obama, Hillary and Susan Rice do what they do best LIE. Admit it you idiot??
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#900412 May 10, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Democrats chose to suppress the truth for political gain. Not Republicans.
The witchhunts even without documented proof by the liberal media and the Democrats against Republicans don't count though, do they?
FACT: An ambassasdor hasn't been killed abroad since the 1970s.
FACT: Someone gave the order to deny that embassy more security a month before the attack after repeated and urgent requests.
QUESTION: Who denied them that request and why?
FACT: A 4 to 5 hour time span between the first attack that killed the ambassador and one American and the second attack that killed the other two Americans was time enough to save the second two Americans.
QUESTION: Who gave the order for the CIA to step down resulting in two more Americans' deaths and why?
FACT: The information the WH received was changed from a terrorist attack to a spontaneous mob blamed on a video.
QUESTION: Who made that decision and why?
QUESTION: Why was that lie continued in televised interview and at the victims' funerals and in front of the UN two weeks later?
QUESTION: What were the motives for perpetrating that lie?
QUESTION: Why was the second in command on the ground, Hicks, who became the first in command after the attacks demoted by Hillary Clinton when he chose to come forward?
QUESTION: Why would the former Secretary of State do that if there was nothing to hide?
None of these questions have been answered. Even after 8 months.
Pathetic slop every word of it lies.

Who ordered the CIA to stand down?

Pitiful
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#900413 May 10, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Democrats chose to suppress the truth for political gain. Not Republicans.
The witchhunts even without documented proof by the liberal media and the Democrats against Republicans don't count though, do they?
FACT: An ambassasdor hasn't been killed abroad since the 1970s.
FACT: Someone gave the order to deny that embassy more security a month before the attack after repeated and urgent requests.
QUESTION: Who denied them that request and why?
FACT: A 4 to 5 hour time span between the first attack that killed the ambassador and one American and the second attack that killed the other two Americans was time enough to save the second two Americans.
QUESTION: Who gave the order for the CIA to step down resulting in two more Americans' deaths and why?
FACT: The information the WH received was changed from a terrorist attack to a spontaneous mob blamed on a video.
QUESTION: Who made that decision and why?
QUESTION: Why was that lie continued in televised interview and at the victims' funerals and in front of the UN two weeks later?
QUESTION: What were the motives for perpetrating that lie?
QUESTION: Why was the second in command on the ground, Hicks, who became the first in command after the attacks demoted by Hillary Clinton when he chose to come forward?
QUESTION: Why would the former Secretary of State do that if there was nothing to hide?
None of these questions have been answered. Even after 8 months.
What makes you think that you are that important as to have access to classified information? Instead of whining on here about it, maybe you should write a letter to the President and Hillary Clinton directly, see if they answer your demands!!!!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#900414 May 10, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>BS, Give us chapter & verse on these 'cuts'? To say your full of something smelly, doesn't go far enough?
Jason Chaffetz Admits House GOP Cut Funding For Embassy Security:'You Have To Prioritize Things'

For the past two years, House Republicans have continued to deprioritize the security forces protecting State Department personnel around the world. In fiscal year 2011, lawmakers shaved $128 million off of the administration's request for embassy security funding. House Republicans drained off even more funds in fiscal year 2012 -- cutting back on the department's request by $331 million.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10/jaso...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#900416 May 10, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Pathetic slop every word of it lies.
Who ordered the CIA to stand down?
Pitiful
You are pathetic Realtime... You have to admit - Obama, Hillary and Susan Rice do what they do best LIE.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#900417 May 10, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Rep. Darrell Issa must be ruing his bad luck. The hearing he carefully orchestrated to pick at the scab of Benghazi was stepped on by the verdict in the Jodi Arias murder trial and by the story of three women held captive and brutalized for a decade in Cleveland. He was out-sensationalized and out-tawdried this week despite his own best efforts and those of his committee colleagues and staff members.[...] Nothing spoken of in the hearing suggested a cover-up by a Cabinet secretary, who instantly took personal responsibility for the attacks and swiftly appointed an independent commission led by two of the most distinguished, nonpartisan career civil servants in recent American history to investigate them. To say otherwise is more than a reach. It's an effort by the Republican Party to damage the person most likely to be the next Democratic presidential candidate.
In the calculus of Washington today, Clinton is a bigger and more valuable target even than her former boss, the president.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/05/10/1208...
'We're sly, we're sly!'
no, you're not.
Darryl Issa, car thief and arsonist; chairman of the ethics committee!!!
This felon could never get a job in the private sector

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr Deserve 49,537
ISIS Plans to Blow Up an Entire American City a... 1 hr Retired SOF 45
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr LRS 177,412
Word (Dec '08) 2 hr andet1987 4,658
who here likes pooping themself either in a dia... 2 hr poopforluck 1
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 hr Yumpin Yimminy 68,380
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 5 hr J RULES 68,997
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 8 hr edogxxx 97,938
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••