One Democrat on the panel tried to politicize it using the lack of funds nonsense and how he had voted against it and blah, blah, blah, and got blown out of the water with one question.<quoted text>
Typical of low intelligence voters like you to have any interest in that trial.
Apparently, some official was already on the record having stated the funding cuts had nothing to do with the events surrounding the attack.
That was the end of his horn blowing. His time was up once it had been confirmed. Perfect timing.