Cutting embassy funding for unnecessary expenses in embassies who are not located in the most dangerous parts of the world has nothing to do with the Obama administration doing nothing for an ambassador and Americans in grave danger and trying to pretend like it wasn't a terrorist attack for days and days and days and, in Obama's case, weeks and weeks and weeks afterwards.<quoted text>
Didn't republicans slash embassy security funds?
Perhaps Andy didn't know that.
This coverup and "dereliction of duty" had nothing to do with cutting unnecessary expenses in embassies where there was no imminent danger and resucing the ones who were.
It costs nothing to tell the friggin' truth why they were not.