Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
824,981 - 825,000 of 1,100,245 Comments Last updated 8 min ago
Mile

Burnley, UK

#898230 May 7, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
The Anti-American Derelict & Thief Obama deserves impeachment & conviction. He is a scumbag, like all DemocRATS are.
Wouldn't go as far as all Democrats but this current lot are dangerous and weakening not just Americas but the security and stability of its allies.

It's too vast to be naive, so it has to be by design, it's treachery is what it is.

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
TheIndependentMa jority

Manchester, KY

#898231 May 7, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, a selective bigot. Gee, you're more of an idiot than I thought.
Hey, he made a great stride in being able to show some distinction between a-holism and common sense.

SOME of those Westboro people w/their noses stuck in OTHER peoples business where they don't belong, get WAY out of line-just as badly as some of the Occupy anyone else's anything ghetto streeter types, inflicting their foulness of ignorance in where they have no business, do so too.

Both types of lunaTics are uncouth.

So, we have to cut worm duhmmy Duh A Vey a break on that one lol.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#898232 May 7, 2013
Not Surprized wrote:
<quoted text>
Well "flake", until I find myself spending my entire day, week after week, year after year discussing my marital and child-rearing problems, and various other details of my personal life here, as you and Waxturds do, it's not a problem. While we're on the subject of getting a life, seriously dude, when are you getting your's?
LOL! Ouch, that's gonna leave a mark.

Judged:

11

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#898233 May 7, 2013
Mile wrote:
<quoted text>
Ask Maddeline Albright and other high ranking Democrats of the day if WMD was found in Iraq? Even they admit they were.
Yes the smoking gun failed to materialise but ridding the world of an evil dictator was no bad thing. Unfortunately the aftermath was handled in a deplorable manner but not just by The United States. Besides take a look at Syria today. Where do you think they got their stockpile of WMD from?
Nothing Bush did was impeachable, he never lied directly to The American people and the wider world. He went on intelligence from many world agencies. This current Government has decided to censor it's own agencies for what? To win an election. Spot the difference?
It's diabolical no matter which party you support.
Yeah right, that's why Bush cannot visit Europe for fear of prosecution.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#898234 May 7, 2013
The lack of thoughtful, reasoned thinking on the part of the rightwinger I find somewhat intriguing.

How do you go through life taking everything at face value?

I'm just curious, don't get angry.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#898235 May 7, 2013
Homer 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah right, that's why Bush cannot visit Europe for fear of prosecution.
LOL... Let democrats kill the planet with stupid and ghetto ignorance, so all will suffer. Why do you hate intelligence Homer?
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#898236 May 7, 2013
Homer 2016 wrote:
The lack of thoughtful, reasoned thinking on the part of the rightwinger I find somewhat intriguing.
How do you go through life taking everything at face value?
I'm just curious, don't get angry.
I guess you prefer that Louis Farrahkan tells his liberal followers at the Nation of Islam that Obama is the "Messiah." Your deranged obsession with rightwingers is amusing Homer.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#898237 May 7, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Are the destructive of others property Occupy anyone else anything streeters a-Holes?
Answer-Yayus
But are ALL "Christians" or all protestors, ahteful, destructive a-holes?
Answer, No, not necessarily always
Why collectively lumping and labeling ANYTHING as absolute and all the same, is ignowent.
Duh A Vey...jack-boot, heel licking duhmmy.
I grouped a segment of Christians that are overly aggressive in pushing their religion.

This is not bigotry.

This is " I don't like people that try to shove their religious beliefs down my throat.

I don't like Muslims who use violence in the name of their religion.

I don't like "Tea Party" Republicans.

I don't like people that abuse animals.

Note that I describe actions, not attributes such as race, creed, sexual orientation, religion, skin color, etc.

ACTIONS

During the 2012 Presidential race, Romney's religion was a factor. Some members of the religious right stayed home. My saying that does not make me a bigot.

Now, I can understand your desire to pin that label on me because I have pointed out your use of racial slurs over & over. So why does a racist POS like you care? To you, being a racist f*ck is fine but OMG don't talk about a certain group of Christians? Really?

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#898238 May 7, 2013
so says a right winger....

Beware of right-wingers peddling snake oil on immigration reform

If you listen to anti-immigration voices (and let’s be clear — the vast majority oppose an increase in legal immigration), you’d think immigration is hugely unpopular with the base and will be enormously expensive. These are both false and so easily proved that you have to question the intellectual integrity of those parroting these talking points.

...The Heritage Foundation will be out shortly with a study that will preposterously claim that the Gang of 8 reform will cost more than $2 trillion. Understand that there are about 11 million people who may be legalized. Really — each one is going to cost the taxpayers about half a million bucks and contribute nothing? The Cato Institute has already come up with a detailed pre-rebuttal of Heritage’s work. And, ironically, even the Congressional Budget Office can figure out that with dynamic scoring of the type pioneered by Heritage (when it was an intellectual trailblazer for conservatives), the country and the Treasury come out ahead.

Such are the perils of a once-respected think tank hiring a reactionary pol instead of a bona fide scholar to head its institution.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-tur...

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“N.E.R.D.”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#898239 May 7, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>The Anti-American Derelict & Thief Obama deserves impeachment & conviction. He is a scumbag, like all DemocRATS are.
How so very American of you to say!!! Freedom to people like you means everyone has to believe EVERYTHING you believe in. Even our forefathers didn't see eye to eye!!!!! Frigging ignorant radicals, man I swear.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#898240 May 7, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you watch the foreign policy debate? The last one? The opportunity to put Obama directly in the spotlight on Benghazi - why he continued to call it a sponataneous mob attack and blaming a video two weeks afterwards when everyone knew by then it was a terror attack the night it happened - would have cinched the election for Romney.
That's he opporutnity that slipped through his fingers.
My God Carol, did you watch it?? Evidently not if you think Benghazi did not come up.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#898241 May 7, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I grouped a segment of Christians that are overly aggressive in pushing their religion.
This is not bigotry.
This is " I don't like people that try to shove their religious beliefs down my throat.
I don't like Muslims who use violence in the name of their religion.
I don't like "Tea Party" Republicans.
I don't like people that abuse animals.
Note that I describe actions, not attributes such as race, creed, sexual orientation, religion, skin color, etc.
ACTIONS
During the 2012 Presidential race, Romney's religion was a factor. Some members of the religious right stayed home. My saying that does not make me a bigot.
Now, I can understand your desire to pin that label on me because I have pointed out your use of racial slurs over & over. So why does a racist POS like you care? To you, being a racist f*ck is fine but OMG don't talk about a certain group of Christians? Really?
An exploding population of wild horses, idiots and ghetto ignorance... And the government still wants to control your numbers RealDave.

The eyes are useless when your mind is blind with bigotry and hate RealDave.... Yet RealDave is good for making up excuses and is seldom good for anything else..

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#898242 May 7, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
The Magic Negro stuck his foot in his mouth when he bellowed some cheap threat about Syria crossing a red line and what the Boy Messiah would do if Assad crossed it.
Well, the line was crossed and the Big Mouth began stuttering.
I strongly suspect that he cut a deal with Israel to go into Syria as his proxy and says like Wimpy would: "I will gladly pay you on Monday for a hamburger on Friday"...
The Israeli's are making political hay with the Jerk-In-Chief because he has no balls to back up his earlier threats. Those Israelis have gonads.
Obama's got his tail so far beneath his crotch that he looks like a comedic Hitler right now.
Nw evidence that the rebels used chemical weapons. Now what.

Do you dimbasses ever think that knowing the US would get more involved if Syria used chemical weapons that sone rebels might think that it was a way to get more US aid?

Of course not because you are dumber than sh*t.

Yep, let's nuke them all before we know for sure.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#898243 May 7, 2013
War Criminals in the Syrian Opposition?

....just two weeks ago, the White House informed Congress:

“Our intelligence community does assess, with varying degrees of confidence, that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons on a small scale in Syria, specifically, the chemical agent sarin.”

A clamor then arose demanding Obama make good on his threat that the Syrian regime’s use of poison gas would cross a “red line” and be a “game changer,” calling forth “enormous consequences.”

If the Syrian military did not use sarin, but the rebels did, who in the U.S. intelligence community blew this one? From whom did U.S. agencies get their evidence that sarin had been used by Damascus? Were we almost suckered by someone’s latest lies about weapons of mass destruction into fighting yet another unnecessary war?

When allegations of the Syrian government’s use of sarin arose, many in Congress, especially in the Republican Party, denounced Obama for fecklessness in backing off of his “red line” threat.

It now appears that Obama may have saved us from a strategic disaster by not plunging ahead with military action. And the question should be put to the war hawks:

If Assad’s use of sarin should call forth U.S. air strikes, ought not the use of sarin by the rebels, if confirmed, cause this country to wash its hands of those war criminals?

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/war-cr...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#898244 May 7, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Nw evidence that the rebels used chemical weapons. Now what.
Do you dimbasses ever think that knowing the US would get more involved if Syria used chemical weapons that sone rebels might think that it was a way to get more US aid?
Of course not because you are dumber than sh*t.
Yep, let's nuke them all before we know for sure.
Honesty may be the best policy RealDave, but deranged insanity and you posting dumber than shit is your best defense you bigot.

Since: May 11

Newville, PA

#898245 May 7, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
The only reference I could find to the CIA base which wasn't even relevant was protecting the names of those who might be in covert operations.
So what does that have to do with Hillary telling one of the victims's families at the funeral they would find who was responsible for "that video"?
"That video" is just the top layer of many layers of the entire coverup controversy. The CIA base had nothing to do with lying to the American public and the timing of an upcoming election.
So, there was this video.

This video caused rioting in numerous Middle Eastern cities & in other Muslim communities.

But Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooo. Not in Benghazi.

Nope.

It was just impossible!!!!!!!!!!

Couldn't have been a factor at all so lets just ignore it and not consider it.

In the days following the Benghazi attack, that video was cited as a possible cause. There was not enough information to eliminate it.

So off goes Carol, Romney, McCain having a GD fit because this possibility was stated. OMG OMG the word "terror" wasn't used enough or fast enough. OMG OMG OMG.

You people are dumber than sh*t. WTF difference would it make if Obama ran screaming though the streets screaming "Terrorist Attack" or if we proceed with caution to actually find out for sure?

Republicans are using the death of a US ambassador for political gain. First to attack Obama & Now to try to eliminate their number one opponent in 2016, Hilary Clinton

And you are dumb enough to believe it.

Lets take this State Department worker who was in Tripoli use his extensive military experience to critique the military response. Oh wait, Hicks has not the military experience & knowledge.

Benghazi will end up being just anther example of Republicans putting their party ahead of country.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#898247 May 7, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> I'd hate to be picking on a retarded woman but, are you retarded or something. The whole reason the system is a 2 party system & 2/3 majority is, which ever party wins the presidency & can manage to win either the house, or the , has the right to expose America to their ideology. After all, that's what they were hired to do. No matter the party affiliation, govt officials only reach across the isle, to assure the passage of their policies. Stop trying to make the republicans out to be Angels, & the democrats Demons. Obama was elected & reelected, so America must want to see his vision of America. Republicans have to wait their turns!
The only goal of the republicans is to obstruct. All one needs to do is look at Speaker Boehners record and approval rating, and, that of congress.
Then, look at the record of Speaker Pelosi and the approval rating of congress when she was Speaker.
I doubt the republicans will win the presidency for many years to come; but, their goal is to maintain control of congress and obstruct, obstruct, obstruct. This is incredible that these paid officials are getting paid to do nothing. They'd have been fired in a day in the private sector. There are over 80 federal judgeships not filled, why? Take a guess.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#898248 May 7, 2013
Krauthammer Whitewashes Bush's History To Bash Obama Over Embassy Attack

On Fox News, Charles Krauthammer suggested that "under other presidents, particularly Bush," there was "no storming of the U.S. embassy in Cairo." In fact, there were seven attacks on U.S. embassies and consulates during the Bush years, and numerous other such attacks have happened under recent presidents.

http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/09/14/k...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#898249 May 7, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So, there was this video.
This video caused rioting in numerous Middle Eastern cities & in other Muslim communities.
But Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooo. Not in Benghazi.
Nope.
It was just impossible!!!!!!!!!!
Couldn't have been a factor at all so lets just ignore it and not consider it.
In the days following the Benghazi attack, that video was cited as a possible cause. There was not enough information to eliminate it.
So off goes Carol, Romney, McCain having a GD fit because this possibility was stated. OMG OMG the word "terror" wasn't used enough or fast enough. OMG OMG OMG.
You people are dumber than sh*t. WTF difference would it make if Obama ran screaming though the streets screaming "Terrorist Attack" or if we proceed with caution to actually find out for sure?
Republicans are using the death of a US ambassador for political gain. First to attack Obama & Now to try to eliminate their number one opponent in 2016, Hilary Clinton
And you are dumb enough to believe it.
Lets take this State Department worker who was in Tripoli use his extensive military experience to critique the military response. Oh wait, Hicks has not the military experience & knowledge.
Benghazi will end up being just anther example of Republicans putting their party ahead of country.
This morning RealDave got his preparation "H" mixed up with his Poli-Grip. Now you talk like a shit-hole RealDave, at least your gums don't itch.

And... Everyone has a right to be stupid, you just abuse the privilege RealDave. The lame stream media will sooner or later, eventually throw obama under the bus to get Hillary elected you idiot....
TSM

El Paso, TX

#898250 May 7, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So, there was this video.
This video caused rioting in numerous Middle Eastern cities & in other Muslim communities.
But Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooo. Not in Benghazi.
Nope.
It was just impossible!!!!!!!!!!
Couldn't have been a factor at all so lets just ignore it and not consider it.
In the days following the Benghazi attack, that video was cited as a possible cause. There was not enough information to eliminate it.
So off goes Carol, Romney, McCain having a GD fit because this possibility was stated. OMG OMG the word "terror" wasn't used enough or fast enough. OMG OMG OMG.
You people are dumber than sh*t. WTF difference would it make if Obama ran screaming though the streets screaming "Terrorist Attack" or if we proceed with caution to actually find out for sure?
Republicans are using the death of a US ambassador for political gain. First to attack Obama & Now to try to eliminate their number one opponent in 2016, Hilary Clinton
And you are dumb enough to believe it.
Lets take this State Department worker who was in Tripoli use his extensive military experience to critique the military response. Oh wait, Hicks has not the military experience & knowledge.
Benghazi will end up being just anther example of Republicans putting their party ahead of country.
RealDave are you really this Stupid…The Video?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 9 min gcaveman1 46,321
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 16 min Dale 177,398
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 42 min edogxxx 97,935
Abby 8-30 45 min edogxxx 1
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 45 min Jonah1 49,505
Amy 8-30 50 min edogxxx 1
Putin warns enemies of Russia: 'It's best not t... 1 hr I like Putin 1
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••