The possibility is still there. Nobody knows which side used them, yet you're on the side of the Al Queda led rebels.<quoted text>
Here you go, stupid. I'm sure you'll be running off soon.
"The United Nations is now saying it has no conclusive evidence of chemical weapons use in Syria.The statement marks an about-turn from statements made by Investigator Carla Del Ponte at the weekend when she suggested that rebels had been using the banned nerve agent sarin."
"A UN commission investigating human rights abuses in Syria has distanced itself from comments made by one of its investigators indicating that Syrian rebel forces have used chemical weapons, saying on Monday that it had “no conclusive proof”"
Libturds are so stupid.
All the UN said was it has 'no conclusive proof' the rebels used sarin.
Obama said he has 'no conclusive proof' that Assad used them, Nancy.
Yet nitwits like you clamor for US involvement and attack Obama for seeking 100% proof of who used the sarin.
You nitwits attacked Obama for helping in Libya, you only want him to get involved so you can accuse him of starting a war.
You attack him for not intervening, and you will attack him for intervening.
Only traitors like you want to be on both sides of an issue, Nancy.
You're an idiot. But we've all know that for years.