Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
lily waxman raton fl

Pompano Beach, FL

#892276 Apr 24, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Only a racist would say that people voted for President Obama because he is black.
You ring the rightwing republican bell everyday.
We listened to President Obama; and voted for him twice. And, we will vote for Hillary the next time.
lily boca obviously loves the race card more than the truth card, although her denial card is quickly moving right up there. You really blew ANY credibility you might have had with this one! LOL

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
NuculurNutsurpri Zed

Pompano Beach, FL

#892278 Apr 24, 2013
waxywaxturd wrote:
Hello again!! Good Morning!!!
As you all can see I have been up all night into the wee hours maniacally judging your posts and chit-chatting back and forth to myself using my sockpuppets!! A "labor of love" though tiring!! I had to change my "industrial strength" depends three times last night but it was worth every diaper as it was challenging and exciting!!
I will be on board all day today making idiotic and mentally deranged comments, the sole pupose being to harass the legitimate posters who use this forum.
I will also be juding your posts all day.
I plan to be here for the entire day and night with my sockpuppets so get ready for an all out judgit blowout shitshow!!!! Please JOIN in!! I will give you a head start if needed. Just remember, double up on those depends!!!!
I try and eat foods that are constipating to give me that extra edge I need for marathon judging competitions.(my secret is mac n cheese and double strength depends, try it!!!)
Most sincerely, Not Surprized!!
And boys, phone numbers please!!
Call me!
A quick reminder!!!!!!!!
I run scripts when judging as they allow me a huge advantage when it comes to judging the posts! I realize it's cheating but it makes me feel so much better about our team losing the election!! The judgits to me are like a consolation prize when I think about how badly our Obama-worshipping friends are doing right now. I delude myself with them and try to convince myself we are winning!!! Join me!!
I enjoy spending the day here giving out judgits to anyone who doesn't agree with me and I like to think I have full control of this thread!!! I consider it "mine"!!!!!! PLEASE join me!
Hugs, Not Surprized!
Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO!
NuculurNutsurpri Zed

Pompano Beach, FL

#892279 Apr 24, 2013
waxywaxturd wrote:
I recently purchased a $30M home in an embarrassing hidden location and want to know if any of you Obamabots wants me to post some photos to tinyurl.
The here Obamatrons cannot contain their jelousy. I'd love my topix family to see the pics.
I think I'm going postal. The mental illness is so pronounced I can't keep up!
Gloating, Not Surprized!!
Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO!
NuculurNutsurpri Zed

Pompano Beach, FL

#892280 Apr 24, 2013
waxywaxturd wrote:
My psychiatrists here at the Institute of Living in my embarrassing hidden location feel it is now time to try and reconstuct the life of Not Surprized.
They want to round up all the members of my sock brigade and banish them permanently from my mind. They plan to evaluate me and the sockpuppets that continually go berserk with the judgits. Then they remove them all from my mind , cure my psychotic disorder, Voila!, we save myself!
Any thoughts my topix friends??
Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO!
NuculurNutsurpri Zed

Pompano Beach, FL

#892281 Apr 24, 2013
waxywaxturd wrote:
When my treatment is over and topix lets me register again as Not Surprized I want to start fresh with a new avatar. Tossing a couple of pics around in my one brain cell, any thoughts? I came up with these, don't know,, feedback anyone?
Don't know if I should profile it, or go with the full frontal face shot.
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mceycyu1db1...
http://media.avclub.com/images/338/338045/16x...
Very excited, Not Surprized!!
Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO!

Since: Apr 13

Orlando, FL

#892282 Apr 24, 2013
Always Right wrote:
<quoted text> and who is the current president carol? Does it really matter where bush's approval rating stands at? he is history, and most americans know the failure he was as president, turn the page, it's time.
The propagandist media working on behalf of their beloved power hungry liberal politicians painted a picture of Bush that you bought hook, line and sinker.

The problem is it was a distorted and biased picture. You just obediently adjusted your lenses to see only what they wanted you to see.

They are doing the same with Obama but Obama gets halos and accolades and any cricism is strictly taboo.

If Bush had dropped the ball as many times as this administration or had done even some of the things this administration has done, his approval ratings would be in the one digits. But Obama somehow continues to shine without being held accountable for anything.

Common sense should dictate the obvious conclusion here. But that would mean being disloyal to your liberal ideology of "everyone is wrong but us" and "pretend no one is lying to us".

Let me put this as succinctly as possible. The progagandist media has been lying to you.
NuculurNutsurpri Zed

Pompano Beach, FL

#892283 Apr 24, 2013
waxywaxturd wrote:
Look my topix friends!! Lily Boca Raton Fl has taken the helm and is now commandeering my sinking sockpuppet ship of fools. Show her some topix love, she's one of my favorites!!! Hoping "Homer 2016" and "Cway" surface before my shrink does his rounds this morning!!
Inspired, Not Surprized!!!
Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO!
Patriot

Boulder, CO

#892284 Apr 24, 2013
4/24/2013 -- Tornadoes created by Microwaves -- Experiments PROVE THEORY

&fe ature=youtu.be
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#892287 Apr 24, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
The propagandist media working on behalf of their beloved power hungry liberal politicians painted a picture of Bush that you bought hook, line and sinker.
The problem is it was a distorted and biased picture. You just obediently adjusted your lenses to see only what they wanted you to see.
They are doing the same with Obama but Obama gets halos and accolades and any cricism is strictly taboo.
If Bush had dropped the ball as many times as this administration or had done even some of the things this administration has done, his approval ratings would be in the one digits. But Obama somehow continues to shine without being held accountable for anything.
Common sense should dictate the obvious conclusion here. But that would mean being disloyal to your liberal ideology of "everyone is wrong but us" and "pretend no one is lying to us".
Let me put this as succinctly as possible. The progagandist media has been lying to you.
Teflon Presidents and the Rally Effect

There is another point Dan McCarthy makes in his post on Benghazi and Republicans that I’d like to discuss a bit more:

The specifics are not exactly comparable, of course: Carter’s humiliations were seen as part of a deteriorating strategic picture for the U.S. in general, while Reagan’s Middle East debacle was not. But it seems clear that differences in each president’s reputation—a reputation influenced by his party’s overall brand—played as great a role as differences in the world situation in shaping voters’ responses to these setbacks.

The GOP is now in the position that Carter’s party was in, and in contrast Obama has acquired something like Reagan’s “Teflon” coating—as the Benghazi episode illustrates.

The comparison to the barracks bombing is a useful one, and it may help explain why the Benghazi attack didn’t become more of an issue in the election. Libya and Lebanon are comparable in the history of U.S. foreign interventions for being unnecessary and unpopular at the beginning, but having little or no effect on the president’s popularity at home. Reagan’s intervention in Lebanon was unwise and unnecessary, and when it turned into a disaster one would think that it should have damaged him politically, but that didn’t happen. Public support for the Libyan war was the lowest of any U.S. intervention since Lebanon, but it never translated into a political liability for Obama. Between the invasion of Grenada and the natural, albeit somewhat odd, tendency to rally to the president in the wake of an attack, Reagan’s approval rating actually improved in the fall of 1983 and public support for the mission in Lebanon likewise increased.

The more generally satisfied the public is with a president, the easier it is for him to absorb the damage from failures. In the event of attacks on Americans, a reasonably popular president is going to receive the benefit of the doubt whether he deserves it or not. Unlike Carter, whose reputation was daily taking a beating as the hostage crisis dragged on month after month, Reagan and Obama didn’t have to endure the constant drip-drip of negative coverage that such a prolonged problem brought with it. It also helped that Reagan and Obama could point to successes, whether here or overseas, that gave most of the public confidence that they generally seemed to know what they were doing. In the end, the public perceived these attacks as aberrations because they couldn’t be fitted into a story about general incompetence or failure, and the public was more inclined to hold the attackers responsible.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...

"The GOP is now in the position that Carter’s party was in..."

own up to it and you will start to regain some credibility. you can't just go on blaming everyone else for the failures of the Republicans and expect to be taken seriously.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#892290 Apr 24, 2013
What Benghazi Tells Us About the GOP Brand

Robert Merry sees brighter prospects for the GOP in the near future than I do. He notes that American presidential elections are “largely referendums” on the party in power, and it’s inevitable that either one will mess up sooner or later, yielding the other its turn.

That much I don’t disagree with, and I concur that “strong presidents can reshape their parties just as their parties can bring down weak presidents.” The problem for the GOP is that strong presidents don’t come along with any regularity, and thanks to the errors of the Bush administration, the next Republican president will have to struggle against his party’s present reputation.

The overall brand of a party, as colored by events as significant as a failed war, modifies how much margin for error a president gets. A party that started a war it couldn’t finish is cut less slack for future mistakes, while the other party may get a pass for blunders that would be fatal to its rival. Consider Carter, Reagan, and now Obama and Benghazi.

....The GOP is now in the position that Carter’s party was in, and in contrast Obama has acquired something like Reagan’s “Teflon” coating—as the Benghazi episode illustrates. Benghazi was a national humiliation, caught the administration in a tangle of its own words, and should have raised serious questions about why we were in Libya in the first place. Americans, including an ambassador, had died, and Obama’s signature foreign-policy intervention was the strategic backdrop. It happened shortly before an election, yet Obama took no damage from it. Instead, Republicans who insisted that this was a great scandal came off looking like unpatriotic kooks to non-Republicans. Why?

It’s a simple matter of trust: the nation now trusts Democrats more than Republicans on foreign policy, and Iraq is largely the reason for that. This gives Obama and his party a margin for error: his Benghazi screw-up is seen as an aberration, much as Reagan’s Lebanon humiliation was. It doesn’t fit the brand’s reputation for leadership, and that reputation is stronger in the public mind than the impression made by an incident even as gruesome as the Beirut barracks attack or the murder of an ambassador.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccart...

easy to see why we have Iraq apologists. now if only it would work.....
FoolsForObama

Tampa, FL

#892292 Apr 24, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Only a racist would say that people voted for President Obama because he is black.
You ring the rightwing republican bell everyday.
We listened to President Obama; and voted for him twice. And, we will vote for Hillary the next time.
Really? You honestly think that?

Do you also think the Earth is flat too?
Jane Says

New York, NY

#892296 Apr 24, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
How's the weather on the Moon today, lily?
are you implying that Looney Lily, who is perpetually under House Arrest, left home? not possible.
Patriot

Boulder, CO

#892298 Apr 24, 2013
Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Boston bombing: citizen video-analysts create major problems for controlled media

You’re a reporter for a TV news outlet.

You’ve become aware of a disturbing trend. Thousands of private citizens are now analyzing video and photographs of crime scenes and posting their findings.

They’re hounds, and they can’t be stopped. They’re looking at news footage, casual video, photos, and what they’re coming up with challenges the official story lines your network pushes.

Some of the their analysis is ridiculous, but some of it isn’t.

For example, video footage of the first bomb in Boston doesn’t appear to show any shrapnel damage to the fencing near the explosion, or to the blue canopy just above the street. You, the reporter, wonder about that.

The now-famous 78-year-old runner who fell down in the street, just after the first explosion? Security personnel wearing yellow jackets were standing closer to the bomb, but they didn’t wobble or duck or waver. You, the reporter, wonder about that, too.

You, the reporter, see a photo of a storefront which was presumably right next to the first bomb. The windows are blown out. But all the glass is lying in the street, which would indicate the force of the explosion was coming from inside the store. How is that possible, you ask yourself.

Then there are the quickly circulating photos of the man in the wheelchair. He’s missing large parts of both legs. People are pushing the chair. His legs are bleeding. But other posted photos? Do they show he already was wearing prosthetics? Is it true he should already be dead from the massive blood loss? You, the reporter, are disturbed by this.

You also look at several photos of the pressure-cooker bomb. In the twisted metal remains, you see discoloration, but no signs the nails or ball bearings in the bomb penetrated the pressure cooker or pitted it or ended up embedded in it.

You look at photos of men standing near the Marathon finish line, the men in identical uniforms, who have variously been described as Navy Seals, Coast Guard, and Craft International security personnel.

What were they doing there? Running a drill? Watching suspects or patsies or bomb-planters? What was going on?

You look at a photo of the younger Tsarnaev brother leaving the scene after the bombs went off. He’s still…wearing his backpack? And another photo, the one of the ripped-apart backpack on the ground. Is that a white square on it? Because one of the Seal-Craft-Coast Guard guys had a white square on his intact backpack…and is that him, leaving the scene of the bombing without that backpack? Hmmm…

You, the reporter, now face several quandaries.

First, if you decide to look into all this, you’ll have to do actual work...

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/04/boston-bo...
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#892299 Apr 24, 2013
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>
Morning, abdul. You fire up your pressure cooker today?
you see where bomber #1 was an Infowars fan?

no wonder he was so pissed off. had his head full of right wing conspiracy theories.
Jane Says

New York, NY

#892300 Apr 24, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Republican-controlled legislatures in several states have passed or introduced bills that would prohibit state-run health insurance exchanges from covering abortion in any of their plans. But Pennsylvania State Rep. Brian Sims (D) attempted to halt such a bill in his state on Tuesday with a scathing speech about freedom and personal responsibility.
"This legislation is about advancing an ideology of oppression and suppression, even if such a plan means ignoring the oath of office that each of us swore," Sims told his colleagues during a floor debate in the House of Representatives. "As a reminder, Mr. Speaker, I do believe this has been forgotten entirely by many of my colleagues today: Each of us put our hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. We did not place our hands on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/23/bria...
"I'm not sure how I find myself in this room of all rooms as one of the men who respects women the most, but as is so often the case, I see that respect for the person and personal responsibility is clearly more of a slogan than a reality. For these reasons, as well as those given by my colleagues, I ask that members vote no on House Bill 881 and reaffirm the constitution, the freedom of marketplace, and freedom from an oppressive legislature."
ObamaCare is unraveling.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#892301 Apr 24, 2013
This is going to send them spinning!

Runaway Slave
by
Rev. C.L. Bryant

Find it and watch it today!!!
Jane Says

New York, NY

#892303 Apr 24, 2013
O’Care pot, Meet O’Care kettle
April 23, 2013

We never thought we’d say this, but we feel Kathleen Sebelius’s pain.

Up to a point.

Obama’s Health and Human Services secretary recently found herself in the hot seat when Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus grilled her over reports that ObamaCare may not be ready for prime time when it kicks in fully next January.

ON BEHALF OF SMALL-BUSINESS OWNERS, BAUCUS WARNED OF “A HUGE TRAIN WRECK COMING DOWN.”

Now, we’ve never been fans of Sebelius, but we’d forgive her for rolling her eyes on this one. If the Affordable Care Act is so full of contradictions that an on-schedule debut is proving impossible, Baucus might take a good look in the mirror.

Because unlike other lawmakers — who might justifiably complain they weren’t given time to read the 2,000-page bill before it passed — Baucus has no such excuse: HE WAS OBAMACARE'S PRIMARY AUTHOR.

We’re not surprised to see him now turn on Sebelius. That’s far easier than ’fessing up to the truth, which is that ALL THOSE WHO PUSHED THROUGH OBAMACARE UNDERSTOOD THAT IF AMERICANS KNEW THE DETAILS, IT COULD NEVER HAVE PASSED.

WITH THE FACTS NOW COMING OUT, BAUCUS THIS WEEK ANNOUNCED HE WOULD NOT RUN FOR RE-ELECTION.

He’s not the only one looking for cover. Cracks are appearing everywhere, and the rats are jumping ship faster than you can say “rising insurance rates.”

West Virginia’s Jay Rockefeller now whines that the health bill he, too, pushed through is “beyond comprehension.”

Last month, 33 Senate Democrats voted to repeal the ObamaCare tax on medical devices.

And the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers International, which backed Obama in 2008 and 2012, is now calling for repeal because it will raise the cost of insuring its members.

We’re making progress. At least they didn’t blame George W. Bush.

O’Care pot, Meet O’Care kettle - NYPOST.com http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editoria...
NuculurNutsurpri Zed

Pompano Beach, FL

#892304 Apr 24, 2013
waxywaxturd wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, that is one of my personal favorite cooking utensils!! That and crock pots!! Have you seen my tupperware video??
If anyone is interested I will be selling Tupperware from my room on the psych ward for the entire week coming up!! I am the top Tupperware seller here in my embarrassing hidden location. Here I am doing what I do best, when I'm not here on Topix, judging all your posts that is!! They call me Aunt Tony C! Just another moniker I suppose!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =l8-fvyq7yZYXX
Leave your phone numbers in my Topix private messaging box if you're interested.
Call me!!!!
Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO!

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#892305 Apr 24, 2013
Mars One starts search for first humans on Mars in 2023
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#892306 Apr 24, 2013
Jane Says wrote:
<quoted text>ObamaCare is unraveling.
oh sure. and how many times have the Republicans try to repeal it? 40?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 26 min wojar 180,530
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 31 min STEFANO COLONNA 70,549
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 34 min KiMare 51,227
This guy is GOD to Piano Legs & the Malignant M... 1 hr YUPHesThe Devil 11
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Black Teacher 48,347
Fatal shooting in Humboldt Park 1 hr reality is a crotch 2
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr RACE 98,671
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:24 am PST

NBC Sports 9:24AM
Lance Briggs: Chicago should remember Lovie with Ditka and Halas
NBC Sports11:23 AM
Soldier Field: Problem with clocks has been rectified
NBC Sports 1:11 PM
Spokesman says Soldier Field game clocks are fixed - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 2:04 PM
Can the Texans Steal the AFC South?
NBC Sports 2:10 PM
For Cutler, McCown was steadying force - NBC Sports