Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
819,741 - 819,760 of 1,100,074 Comments Last updated 6 min ago
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#891826 Apr 23, 2013
Leadville Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
If the democrats hadn't nominated 2 traitorous fools named Gore and Kerry Bush likely wouldn't have been elected president. Blame your own party for Bush.
Be that as it may, numerous politicos had been warning of Saddam for years. Remember?
Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
Want some more?
more? no, i have no need to hear more about the backlash from Reagan giving some psychopath chemical weapons.

you guys really are gluttons for punishment.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#891827 Apr 23, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/mcwilliams.php...
Because Saddam was a "duplicitous" dirtbag.
so he had a lot in common with Don?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#891828 Apr 23, 2013
Help wrote:
<quoted text>He has already reached that point and beyond.
FDR was by far worst which I have to agree with CATO and we are still paying for it just look at Social Security the Greatest SCAM ever created by FDR which since 1937 there has never been a Social Security Trust Fund because of the 1937 SCOTUS case of Helvering v. Davis which ruled that Social Security taxes are not contributions or savings, but simply taxes, and that Social Security benefits are simply a government spending program, no different than, say, farm price supports. Congress and the president may change, reduce, or even eliminate benefits at any time.

Social Security’s Sham Guarantee

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/s...

Why Did FDR’s New Deal Harm Blacks?

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/w...
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#891829 Apr 23, 2013
Leadville Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
You never answered, when are you putting on a uniform for Oblamers war with Iran ?
war with Iran?

right wing fear mongering don't seem to work anymore when it comes to starting wars. wonder why that is?
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#891830 Apr 23, 2013
Leadville Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Where's the jobs lying douchebag Oblamer promised, Doorknob?
Where's the $92 billion wasted on green energy boondoggles?
Where's your spine? MIA ?
Dumb Dave is a Jellyfish. Don't expect any honesty from him.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#891832 Apr 23, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
war with Iran?
right wing fear mongering don't seem to work anymore when it comes to starting wars. wonder why that is?
Maybe it's because of the Democrats huge failure called:

Vietnam

airhead
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#891833 Apr 23, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Leave it to you to believe a terrorist.
So far, no group is taking credit for it.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#891834 Apr 23, 2013
Leadville Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Liar. Conservatives know dems have been ignoring the constitution for 70 years. Check out the 10th amendment, dummy.

The hypocrisy of “states’ rights” conservatives

The 10th Amendment is sacred to the right -- except when it comes to fighting abortion and gay rights

http://www.salon.com/2011/08/07/kilgore_state...

that was too easy.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#891836 Apr 23, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/mcwilliams.php...
Because Saddam was a "duplicitous" dirtbag.
So are the Bush's
Jane Says

New York, NY

#891837 Apr 23, 2013
Obama’s 'war’
April 22, 2013

Is Dzhokhar Tsarnaev an “enemy combatant”? The Obama administration says “No.” Then again, it almost had to.

From the day he ran for president, Barack Obama has advanced two certainties: that military commissions are bad, and that the way his predecessor prosecuted the War on Terror was not just wrong but immoral, unconstitutional and perhaps criminal.

He staffed his White House with people who thought the same. Attorney General ERIC HOLDER LAUNCHED A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AGAINST THE CIA INTERROGATORS. Harold Koh, once State’s legal adviser, worried Bush’s legal structure could “license genocide.” And let’s not forget Obama’s pick for the Office of Legal Counsel at Justice, Dawn Johnsen, a lawyer who called for “outrage” over the supposedly lawless nature of virtually every aspect of Bush war policy.

As these views hardened into policy, we have had incoherence in the face of attack. A man tries to blow up a plane as it is landing over Detroit — and we discover that a new elite interrogation unit designed for such terrorists is not yet in place. An attack on Fort Hood soldiers by an Army major shouting “Allahu Akbar!” is labeled “WORKPLACE VIOLENCE.”

Even if we accept the administration’s version of events in the Benghazi killings on 9/11, its first instinct was to blame an anti-Muslim video.

And with the Boston bombing and the apparent foiling of what Canadian authorities yesterday called “an al Qaeda-supported attack” on a passenger train, the White House dances around the obvious: the planned murder of innocent Americans by men inspired by radical Islam.

The Bush administration made its mistakes. But it did recognize something Obama has not: Our legal system was not designed to handle this new threat. SO AMONG THE BUSH GOALS WAS TO PASS ON A LEGAL INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WOULD MAKE IT EASIER FOR SUCCEEDING PRESIDENTS TO DEFEND THIS NATION AGAINST ATTACKS.

FOR YEARS, PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS DONE ALL HE COULD TO DE-LEGITIMATE THESE EFFORTS. By now, even some on his own team must recognize that the effect has been to limit Obama’s own options. The disturbing part is that so long as he makes his political point, the president doesn’t seem to care.

Read more: Obama’s 'war’- NYPOST.com http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editoria...
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#891838 Apr 23, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe it's because of the Democrats huge failure called:
Vietnam
airhead
lol

your selective memory is a real hoot. you've almost got carol beat.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#891839 Apr 23, 2013
moshx wrote:
<quoted text> dave maybe you could solve this question I have, acording to libs it would be racist to ask for id when someone votes because minoritys can't afford id . So wouldn't it also be considerd racist to ask for background checks as well seeing one would need an id to have one done? I tell you what dave, I'll take your side on background checks as long as no one has to provide an id to do one. I wouldn't want to be considerd a racist by you libs for wanting proof of id.
First of al, voters now can be asked for ID. The question was a Photo ID.

Republicans passed voter photo ID requirements even though there is no statistical evidence o any voter fraud that this photo ID would prevent.

In other words, it was voter suppression. No one said it was racist. The motivation was to reduce the number of Democrats voting. Not racially motivated.

With background checks for gun purchases, the motivation is public safety.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#891840 Apr 23, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
The hypocrisy of “states’ rights” conservatives
The 10th Amendment is sacred to the right -- except when it comes to fighting abortion and gay rights
http://www.salon.com/2011/08/07/kilgore_state...
that was too easy.
Salon? Fer chris sake, why don't you also post a link to Media Matters if you want to demonstrate you frequent anti-American extreme left websites.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#891841 Apr 23, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
lol
your selective memory is a real hoot. you've almost got carol beat.
It's easy to point out your hypocrisy. You don't like being a fool, do you? Then why are you such a big one? Keep posting...

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#891842 Apr 23, 2013
Leadville Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Where's the jobs lying douchebag Oblamer promised, Doorknob?
Where's the $92 billion wasted on green energy boondoggles?
Where's your spine? MIA ?
Obama has created millions of jobs.

92 billion was never spent on green initiatives

Let me know when you have something more concrete to whine about.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#891843 Apr 23, 2013
Here comes the sun, here comes the sun,
And I say it's all right

Little darling, it's been a long cold lonely winter
Little darling, it feels like years since it's been here
Here comes the sun, here comes the sun
And I say it's all right

Little darling, the smiles returning to the faces
Little darling, it seems like years since it's been here
Here comes the sun, here comes the sun
And I say it's all right

RIP Richie Havens, died yesterday, age 72
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#891844 Apr 23, 2013
Jane Says wrote:
Obama’s 'war’
April 22, 2013
Is Dzhokhar Tsarnaev an “enemy combatant”? The Obama administration says “No.” Then again, it almost had to.
From the day he ran for president, Barack Obama has advanced two certainties: that military commissions are bad, and that the way his predecessor prosecuted the War on Terror was not just wrong but immoral, unconstitutional and perhaps criminal.
He staffed his White House with people who thought the same. Attorney General ERIC HOLDER LAUNCHED A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AGAINST THE CIA INTERROGATORS. Harold Koh, once State’s legal adviser, worried Bush’s legal structure could “license genocide.” And let’s not forget Obama’s pick for the Office of Legal Counsel at Justice, Dawn Johnsen, a lawyer who called for “outrage” over the supposedly lawless nature of virtually every aspect of Bush war policy.
As these views hardened into policy, we have had incoherence in the face of attack. A man tries to blow up a plane as it is landing over Detroit — and we discover that a new elite interrogation unit designed for such terrorists is not yet in place. An attack on Fort Hood soldiers by an Army major shouting “Allahu Akbar!” is labeled “WORKPLACE VIOLENCE.”
Even if we accept the administration’s version of events in the Benghazi killings on 9/11, its first instinct was to blame an anti-Muslim video.
And with the Boston bombing and the apparent foiling of what Canadian authorities yesterday called “an al Qaeda-supported attack” on a passenger train, the White House dances around the obvious: the planned murder of innocent Americans by men inspired by radical Islam.
The Bush administration made its mistakes. But it did recognize something Obama has not: Our legal system was not designed to handle this new threat. SO AMONG THE BUSH GOALS WAS TO PASS ON A LEGAL INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WOULD MAKE IT EASIER FOR SUCCEEDING PRESIDENTS TO DEFEND THIS NATION AGAINST ATTACKS.
FOR YEARS, PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS DONE ALL HE COULD TO DE-LEGITIMATE THESE EFFORTS. By now, even some on his own team must recognize that the effect has been to limit Obama’s own options. The disturbing part is that so long as he makes his political point, the president doesn’t seem to care.
Read more: Obama’s 'war’- NYPOST.com http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editoria...
Go buy some exlax; you're backed up again. Who wrote that? Pamela Geller?
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#891845 Apr 23, 2013
Jumping to Delusions: Liberal Media Damage Their Reputations Covering Boston Marathon Bombings

Numerous media outlets jumped on the horrific Boston marathon bombings to levy unfounded accusations and smear-job insinuations that “right-wing” extremists and even the GOP were possibly responsible.

http://www.ijreview.com/2013/04/46970-left-wi...

Liberals are scumbags
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#891846 Apr 23, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Salon? Fer chris sake, why don't you also post a link to Media Matters if you want to demonstrate you frequent anti-American extreme left websites.
oh sure, because you pretty much have to ignore the message.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#891847 Apr 23, 2013
Waxman wrote:
Oh look. Stupid is back.
What a bunch of crap.
Earth to libtard...
30 round magazines jam and as Boston just proved, criminals & terrorists get the weapons anyways. Take away guns and you just get bombs that kill and maim more efficiently.
Moron
next...
<quoted text>
Yes, I already acknowledged your return.

This is the right whiner thinking that is so stupid.

Despite our drunk driving laws, we still have accidents & deaths caused by drunk driving.

According to Waxman, we should just make drunk driving legal because, hey, people still get drunk & drive.

You people get dumber every GD day.

BTW, I love this right whiner's argument.

"we need the assault type rifles with 30 round clips for self defense" " 30 round clips jam"

What kind of fricken moron would want a gun that jams for self defense???

Evidently a dumbass right whiner.

You people are too stupid to be alive.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
check out this chicago video 10 min KingThad 1
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 30 min Frijoles 68,966
Amy 8-29 41 min Kuuipo 13
VIDEO: Nuclear Putin Says Don’t Mess With Russia 57 min Infowars 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr edogxxx 97,929
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr SpaceBlues 46,307
The LIE behind the LYNCH MOB 1 hr Balance or article 2
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr LRS 177,366
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••