Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
TheIndependentMa jority

Hazard, KY

#891765 Apr 23, 2013
Cway wrote:
<quoted text>
I think Dave dishes out a lot more than he gets.
That aside, with the National Defense Authorization Act, I've given up on both major parties.
I find it incredible the Congressional boobs haven't read the Posse Comitatus Act or the Supreme Court case of Ex Parte Milligan. Or perhaps they've gotten to the point where they don't give a damn. A plague on both their houses.
I just read a picto-graph article wit some of them thare kinds of descriptive in it...something about "indefatigus officeseekas" more commonly known as perpetual poliTicians.

Woof woof woof, give us all yer money...wooof woof woof, campaign promise number blah blah blah...(give us some more of all yer money)...next campiagn promise of nuffin but hotairus BS-us blah blah blah.

Poke 'em all with pitchforks, till they start actually having to use some braincellage again!
TheIndependentMa jority

Hazard, KY

#891766 Apr 23, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
What’s the Difference Between McVeigh and Tsarnaev?
The federal government managed to hunt down, arrest, charge, try, convict and execute Timothy McVeigh without junking due process.
When Jared Lee Loughner attempted to assassinate Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, and shot dead a federal judge and a 9-year-old, grandstanding lawmakers did not demand that he be taken into military custody. Nor did they make that demand when James Holmes was arrested for killing 12 people and wounding 70 others at an Aurora, Colo., movie theater.
But now Senator Lindsey Graham is calling for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to be classified as an enemy combatant and “held and questioned under the law of war,” without a lawyer.
What’s the difference? The Boston Marathon bombings are closer to the colloquial and legal definitions of terrorism than the Aurora shooting, but not the Oklahoma bombing, or the Arizona attack.
The real difference is that Mr. Tsarnaev is a Muslim, and the United States has since the 9/11 terrorist attacks constructed a separate and profoundly unequal system of detention and punishment that essentially applies only to Muslims.
Mr. Graham and others who are demanding that prosecutors treat Mr. Tsarnaev differently from Mr. McVeigh are not even trying very hard to disguise the fact that they’re drawing distinctions based on religion and ethnicity.
http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/2...
Send 'em BOTH to Gitmo!!!

Dirtbags.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#891767 Apr 23, 2013
Cway wrote:
<quoted text>
I think Dave dishes out a lot more than he gets.
That aside, with the National Defense Authorization Act, I've given up on both major parties.
I find it incredible the Congressional boobs haven't read the Posse Comitatus Act or the Supreme Court case of Ex Parte Milligan. Or perhaps they've gotten to the point where they don't give a damn. A plague on both their houses.
Yes, the moron, like you, dishes out more moronic bullshit than anyone on the thread. Usually you liberals are completely devoid of honesty, integrity, loyalty, sincerity and many good qualities.

Why are you being honest, plastic liberal?

Let's guess what you will post today. I'll go out on a limb and say the Iraq War and more about Bush! You are a very creative person.

Baaawwwaaaahhhh!!!!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#891768 Apr 23, 2013
Americans don’t believe in shredding Constitution to fight terror

Defending the civil liberties of suspected terrorists is generally not considered a popular position. And yet, in a bit of a surprise, a new poll released today finds that a plurality worries more about government trampling constitutional rights while battling terrorism than it does about government not doing enough to fight it. From the Post:

Which worries you more: that the government will not go far enough to investigate terrorism because of concerns about constitutional rights, or that it will go too far in compromising constitutional rights in order to investigate terrorism?

Will not go far enough: 41

Will go too far: 48

Interestingly, despite the fact that the push for Tsarnaev to be held as an enemy combatant is coming from GOP officials, Republican respondents to the poll are even more strongly tilted towards worrying about government compromising constitutional rights, by 56-34. Conservatives tilt this way by 46-41. Democrats also agree by 48-43.

On top of this, the poll was taken from April 17-18 — well after the bombings had taken place, on April 15th.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line...
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#891769 Apr 23, 2013
So why do the senators — whose call was echoed by Massachusetts senatorial candidate Gabriel Gomez — persist? Some candidates seem to feel that asserting a manly contempt for defendants’ rights is a winning political stance. But it’s also hard to avoid the impression that McCain, Graham, and some other hawks are rehashing the battles of the Bush era, in search of vindication. During the recent confirmation hearings for Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, McCain and Graham seemed most concerned about preventing a one-time Iraq war critic from heading the Pentagon, as if elevating him to the job would discredit a war that both senators vigorously supported.

http://www.bostonglobe.com/editorials/2013/04...

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#891770 Apr 23, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
I thank people who have something to offer.
That's why I will never thank you.
I always knew you were a Glenn Beck follower.

An uneducated ignorant uninformed racist fool following another uneducated ignorant uninformed racist fool.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#891772 Apr 23, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
HEY STUPID! Saddam invaded Kuwait in 1990, 13 years before. He no longer had the capability to invade anyone.
You're an idiot!
HEY STUPID!

You just proved you are a liar and an idiot! We have video recordings of Democrats contradicting what you just said, numbnuts. In the video (link provided), there is Bill Clinton as president in 1998 warning us about Saddam/Iraq and WMD (including NUCLEAR!!!!) followed by John Kerry in 2002, and several other DemocRATS.

Get a flocking clue, Hitler Youth Boy. All you do is propagandize and lie, zero.



You, being a brain dead zombie buy into the Democrats politicization of that war (second link - below). It's OK to make an argument we should have never gone, but then you would need to blame Democrats as much as Republicans, which a Jim Jones moron like you wouldn't do! All you DemocRATS are just extreme leftwing idiots nowadays.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

You area liar and an idiot!
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#891773 Apr 23, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I always knew you were a Glenn Beck follower.
An uneducated ignorant uninformed racist fool following another uneducated ignorant uninformed racist fool.
Dumb people love to use the race card.
NO MORE GUN LAWS

Davenport, IA

#891774 Apr 23, 2013
The AP reports that the men who detonated explosives to kill innocents at the Boston Marathons and later engaged in a shoot-out with police (after shooting an MIT security guard execution-style) didn't have gun permits, according to Massachusetts state police.

But wait a minute. I thought a rigorous system for regulating gun permits was supposed to prevent gun violence (that's what Massachusetts state officials insisted upon passing the nation's toughest gun laws back in 1998).

It's almost as if the Tsarnaev brothers -- terrorists, murderers, carjackers -- had no respect for the (gun) laws . WE HAVE TO MANY GUN LAWS,WHEN YOU SEE OBAMA CRYING ABOUT NEWTOWN AND NOT THE OTHER KIDS THAT HAVE GOT KILLED IN THE USA BY OUT LAWS HE IS CRYING TO TAKE
WE THE PEOPLE GUNS SO THAT WE CAN NOT PROTECT OUR KIDS!!!!VOTE OUT IN 2014 ALL THE PEOPLE THAT WANT MORE
GUN CONTROL!!!!!OBAMA HAS AND WILL HAVE 24/7 ARMED GUARDS AND HE DOES NOT AND I REPEAT HE DOES NO GIVE A
DAMN ABOUT YOU AND YOUR LOVE ONES ! HE IS NOTHING BUT
A CON MAN AND BULL SHITER!!

"Gunwalking", or "letting guns walk", was a tactic of the Arizona Field Office of the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). They ran a series of "gunwalking" sting operations[2][3] between 2006[4] and 2011[2][5] in the Tucson and Phoenix area where the ATF "purposely allowed licensed firearms dealers to sell weapons to illegal straw buyers, hoping to track the guns to Mexican drug cartel leaders."[6] These operations were done under the umbrella of Project Gunrunner, a project intended to stem the flow of firearms into Mexico by interdicting straw purchasers and gun traffickers within the United States.[7]President Obama and Attorney General Holder to severely curtail gun rights in America. This is not to say that the subject isn’t relevant to the overall narrative; in fact, it is very important to consider the evidence Pavlich presents in support of her assertion that,“Under Eric Holder, the ATF was deputized to change the nation’s gun laws by putting in place a shadowy operation designed to prove a falsehood: that weapons sold by U.S. gun shops, especially ‘assault weapons,’ are the cause of Mexico’s drug violence. By creating public outrage, President Obama, Eric Holder, and other administration officials, all with longstanding records of hostility against the Second Amendment, hoped to reinstate the assault weapons ban, which had been one of their early, but failed, political goals”(p. 154). However, while Pavlich demonstrates the existence of these efforts, the overall narrative might have been better served by relegating commentary on them to a chapter or two at the end of the book.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#891775 Apr 23, 2013
NO MORE GUN LAWS wrote:
The AP reports that the men who detonated explosives to kill innocents at the Boston Marathons and later engaged in a shoot-out with police (after shooting an MIT security guard execution-style) didn't have gun permits, according to Massachusetts state police.
But wait a minute. I thought a rigorous system for regulating gun permits was supposed to prevent gun violence (that's what Massachusetts state officials insisted upon passing the nation's toughest gun laws back in 1998).
It's almost as if the Tsarnaev brothers -- terrorists, murderers, carjackers -- had no respect for the (gun) laws . WE HAVE TO MANY GUN LAWS,WHEN YOU SEE OBAMA CRYING ABOUT NEWTOWN AND NOT THE OTHER KIDS THAT HAVE GOT KILLED IN THE USA BY OUT LAWS HE IS CRYING TO TAKE
WE THE PEOPLE GUNS SO THAT WE CAN NOT PROTECT OUR KIDS!!!!VOTE OUT IN 2014 ALL THE PEOPLE THAT WANT MORE
GUN CONTROL!!!!!OBAMA HAS AND WILL HAVE 24/7 ARMED GUARDS AND HE DOES NOT AND I REPEAT HE DOES NO GIVE A
DAMN ABOUT YOU AND YOUR LOVE ONES ! HE IS NOTHING BUT
A CON MAN AND BULL SHITER!!
"Gunwalking", or "letting guns walk", was a tactic of the Arizona Field Office of the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). They ran a series of "gunwalking" sting operations[2][3] between 2006[4] and 2011[2][5] in the Tucson and Phoenix area where the ATF "purposely allowed licensed firearms dealers to sell weapons to illegal straw buyers, hoping to track the guns to Mexican drug cartel leaders."[6] These operations were done under the umbrella of Project Gunrunner, a project intended to stem the flow of firearms into Mexico by interdicting straw purchasers and gun traffickers within the United States.[7]President Obama and Attorney General Holder to severely curtail gun rights in America. This is not to say that the subject isn’t relevant to the overall narrative; in fact, it is very important to consider the evidence Pavlich presents in support of her assertion that,“Under Eric Holder, the ATF was deputized to change the nation’s gun laws by putting in place a shadowy operation designed to prove a falsehood: that weapons sold by U.S. gun shops, especially ‘assault weapons,’ are the cause of Mexico’s drug violence. By creating public outrage, President Obama, Eric Holder, and other administration officials, all with longstanding records of hostility against the Second Amendment, hoped to reinstate the assault weapons ban, which had been one of their early, but failed, political goals”(p. 154). However, while Pavlich demonstrates the existence of these efforts, the overall narrative might have been better served by relegating commentary on them to a chapter or two at the end of the book.
(right wing blog. fodder for the idiots.)
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#891776 Apr 23, 2013
NO MORE GUN LAWS wrote:
The AP reports that the men who detonated explosives to kill innocents at the Boston Marathons and later engaged in a shoot-out with police (after shooting an MIT security guard execution-style) didn't have gun permits, according to Massachusetts state police.
But wait a minute. I thought a rigorous system for regulating gun permits was supposed to prevent gun violence (that's what Massachusetts state officials insisted upon passing the nation's toughest gun laws back in 1998).
It's almost as if the Tsarnaev brothers -- terrorists, murderers, carjackers -- had no respect for the (gun) laws . WE HAVE TO MANY GUN LAWS,WHEN YOU SEE OBAMA CRYING ABOUT NEWTOWN AND NOT THE OTHER KIDS THAT HAVE GOT KILLED IN THE USA BY OUT LAWS HE IS CRYING TO TAKE
WE THE PEOPLE GUNS SO THAT WE CAN NOT PROTECT OUR KIDS!!!!VOTE OUT IN 2014 ALL THE PEOPLE THAT WANT MORE
GUN CONTROL!!!!!OBAMA HAS AND WILL HAVE 24/7 ARMED GUARDS AND HE DOES NOT AND I REPEAT HE DOES NO GIVE A
DAMN ABOUT YOU AND YOUR LOVE ONES ! HE IS NOTHING BUT
A CON MAN AND BULL SHITER!!
"Gunwalking", or "letting guns walk", was a tactic of the Arizona Field Office of the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). They ran a series of "gunwalking" sting operations[2][3] between 2006[4] and 2011[2][5] in the Tucson and Phoenix area where the ATF "purposely allowed licensed firearms dealers to sell weapons to illegal straw buyers, hoping to track the guns to Mexican drug cartel leaders."[6] These operations were done under the umbrella of Project Gunrunner, a project intended to stem the flow of firearms into Mexico by interdicting straw purchasers and gun traffickers within the United States.[7]President Obama and Attorney General Holder to severely curtail gun rights in America. This is not to say that the subject isn’t relevant to the overall narrative; in fact, it is very important to consider the evidence Pavlich presents in support of her assertion that,“Under Eric Holder, the ATF was deputized to change the nation’s gun laws by putting in place a shadowy operation designed to prove a falsehood: that weapons sold by U.S. gun shops, especially ‘assault weapons,’ are the cause of Mexico’s drug violence. By creating public outrage, President Obama, Eric Holder, and other administration officials, all with longstanding records of hostility against the Second Amendment, hoped to reinstate the assault weapons ban, which had been one of their early, but failed, political goals”(p. 154). However, while Pavlich demonstrates the existence of these efforts, the overall narrative might have been better served by relegating commentary on them to a chapter or two at the end of the book.
Excellent point. Have you ever seen a program or agenda from Democrats lately that has helped anything?

Democrats have no respect for the Constitution. Connecticut just passed an anti-freedom gun law that does nothing except harass law abiding citizens and does absolutely ZERO to prevent a future act against children at schools.

Your post just pointed out how fake Democrat/Socialist gun laws are.

Democrats are idiots and liberalism is a mental disorder.

“wake up”

Since: Jan 10

utica ny

#891777 Apr 23, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
The Conservative Paranoid Mind
There’s a common thread linking conservatives’ positions on gun control, immigration, and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev: the constant need to stoke fear.
Conservatism, I fear (so to speak), can never be cleansed of this need to instill fear. Whether it’s of black people or of street thugs or of immigrants or of terrorists or of jackbooted government agents, it’s how the conservative mind works. I don’t even think it’s always cynical and manipulative; conservatives often do see enemies under every bed. But that doesn’t mean they’re there, and it most definitely doesn’t mean the rest of us ought to make law and policy based on their nightmares.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04...
funny how
libs talk of fear and never mention their own. The fear of personal responsibility,the fear of haveing to provide for themselves,the fear of the rights of others , the fear of consequence,and the fear of standing on their own without a nanny goverment to care for them from cradle to grave. Libs cowar in fear over these things and cry for laws to ensure their iresponsibilty will be protected.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#891778 Apr 23, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
(right wing blog. fodder for the idiots.)
If it was fodder for idiots, you would remain there all day.
TheIndependentMa jority

Hazard, KY

#891779 Apr 23, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I always knew you were a Glenn Beck follower.
An uneducated ignorant uninformed racist fool following another uneducated ignorant uninformed racist fool.
aka crankheadius's-thinktheyknowit allius's?

Disgustingly ignorant lot those kinds lol
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#891780 Apr 23, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
HEY STUPID!
You just proved you are a liar and an idiot! We have video recordings of Democrats contradicting what you just said, numbnuts. In the video (link provided), there is Bill Clinton as president in 1998 warning us about Saddam/Iraq and WMD (including NUCLEAR!!!!) followed by John Kerry in 2002, and several other DemocRATS.
Get a flocking clue, Hitler Youth Boy. All you do is propagandize and lie, zero.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =FCVZlLBchVEXX
You, being a brain dead zombie buy into the Democrats politicization of that war (second link - below). It's OK to make an argument we should have never gone, but then you would need to blame Democrats as much as Republicans, which a Jim Jones moron like you wouldn't do! All you DemocRATS are just extreme leftwing idiots nowadays.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
You area liar and an idiot!
any video of Reagan talking about giving aid to Saddam? how we didn't find those chemical weapons that were clearly labeled 'Made In The USA' is probably no mystery to Don Rumsfeld.
TheIndependentMa jority

Hazard, KY

#891781 Apr 23, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Dumb people love to use the race card.
Edit-

ingno-crankheadius's-thinkthey knowitalluses!

lol.
TheIndependentMa jority

Hazard, KY

#891782 Apr 23, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
HEY STUPID!
You just proved you are a liar and an idiot! We have video recordings of Democrats contradicting what you just said, numbnuts. In the video (link provided), there is Bill Clinton as president in 1998 warning us about Saddam/Iraq and WMD (including NUCLEAR!!!!) followed by John Kerry in 2002, and several other DemocRATS.
Get a flocking clue, Hitler Youth Boy. All you do is propagandize and lie, zero.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =FCVZlLBchVEXX
You, being a brain dead zombie buy into the Democrats politicization of that war (second link - below). It's OK to make an argument we should have never gone, but then you would need to blame Democrats as much as Republicans, which a Jim Jones moron like you wouldn't do! All you DemocRATS are just extreme leftwing idiots nowadays.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
You area liar and an idiot!
PDuhpont-category-

Idiotoedesperadobigotus-

One who spews Anything to DEFLECT from the FACT-terrorists attacked Boston right under the current Opotus's nose-and there's no "Bush" around to blame on, so must resort to PRIOR years of ignorance in partisan blame, in desperation of anything, anything...not to hold the current potusical administration responsible for the FAILURES while on their watch!!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#891783 Apr 23, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
If it was fodder for idiots, you would remain there all day.
though i'm sure you've visited that tea party bastion, re: Townhall, i've only heard of it because you nutjobs are usually too embarrassed to cite your sources and i've done a Google search to see which site you right wing idiots have chosen for your daily propaganda fix.

i can't even go to those kind of sites without suffering a giggling fit. the faux 'anger' posed as 'journalism' makes Jon Stewart look like an amateur. and that despite the fact that the right wing crazies don't even seem to know that they're writing for a satire site.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#891784 Apr 23, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
The Conservative Paranoid Mind
There’s a common thread linking conservatives’ positions on gun control, immigration, and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev: the constant need to stoke fear.
Conservatism, I fear (so to speak), can never be cleansed of this need to instill fear. Whether it’s of black people or of street thugs or of immigrants or of terrorists or of jackbooted government agents, it’s how the conservative mind works. I don’t even think it’s always cynical and manipulative; conservatives often do see enemies under every bed. But that doesn’t mean they’re there, and it most definitely doesn’t mean the rest of us ought to make law and policy based on their nightmares.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04...
Be afraid-Be very afraid
TheIndependentMa jority

Hazard, KY

#891785 Apr 23, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Americans don’t believe in shredding Constitution to fight terror
Defending the civil liberties of suspected terrorists is generally not considered a popular position. And yet, in a bit of a surprise, a new poll released today finds that a plurality worries more about government trampling constitutional rights while battling terrorism than it does about government not doing enough to fight it. From the Post:
Which worries you more: that the government will not go far enough to investigate terrorism because of concerns about constitutional rights, or that it will go too far in compromising constitutional rights in order to investigate terrorism?
Will not go far enough: 41
Will go too far: 48
Interestingly, despite the fact that the push for Tsarnaev to be held as an enemy combatant is coming from GOP officials, Republican respondents to the poll are even more strongly tilted towards worrying about government compromising constitutional rights, by 56-34. Conservatives tilt this way by 46-41. Democrats also agree by 48-43.
On top of this, the poll was taken from April 17-18 — well after the bombings had taken place, on April 15th.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line...
Someone gag the ACL(own)U(nit) so they can't flock things up with their patheTic, treasonous poison propoganda of "rights" for ditbags.

Rights...they should've thought about OTHER peoples rights to LIVE, with limbs and lives in tact.
Let us now reciprocate their "thoughtfulness" of RIGHTs of OTHERS.

Hate America? LEAVE.
Wish to bombs, maim and murder innocent people?
Option-
A. Die
B. Rot in Gitmo-"rights" adjusted accordingly, to match the same provided to other
Enjoy your three bowls of gruel and water a day, for life.

Dirtbags.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 12 min Jacques Ottawa 181,945
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 49,255
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr KiMare 51,267
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr Yumpin Yimminy 68,897
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 2 hr Frijoles 71,138
French researchers find new strain of HIV virus... (Aug '09) 2 hr dango64 6
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr PEllen 98,858
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 1:21 pm PST

NBC Sports 1:21PM
Brandon Marshall on Dominic Raiola: Dirty player, worse person
NBC Sports 1:23 PM
Lions' Raiola suspended 1 game for stomping on opponent - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 1:31 PM
Allen (Knee) to Get MRI; Considered Day-to-Day
ESPN 2:14 PM
Bears' Marshall blasts Raiola: A dirty player
NBC Sports 4:10 PM
PFT Whiparound: Jay Cutler will return in Week 17