Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1277388 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Waxman

Windsor, CT

#890961 Apr 20, 2013
U.S. Government blocks sales of fuel-efficient cars

http://www.naturalnews.com/036183_fuel-effici...

So what's the catch? Why are cars in the U.S. less fuel efficient than cars in Europe and South America?

You guessed it - money.

American roads are maintained by, in large part, a federal gasoline tax. That tax is levied per gallons.

Meanwhile, the Obama administration continues to wail about "greener" cars, less reliance on fossil fuels, and better fuel efficiency, all the while refusing - as have past administrations - to allow car makers to offer a genuine solution. Sound about right?

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#890962 Apr 20, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>The uncle has also been estranged from the family for over 3 years and apparently never visited his nephew's YouTube Channel which is loaded with Jihad videos. HuffPo or you are denying what every other news source is very much aware of.

An side, the younger brother's Twitter feed showed that he supported Obama. Not that a POTUS is responsible for what his supporters do-I will leave that nutty viewpoint to you alone-but it is one more defeat for the Left who went out of their way to make it somehow the fault of Tea-baggers or whomever their deranged minds create for false flag ships. Been a bad day for the LEFT-terrorism still exists and will continue despite false claims of the POTUS of the opposite. Maybe it is time for the Left to deny the fantasy. Reality is calling.
Liberals will never admit the are wrong even when they themselves KNOW they are wrong!

Then claimed Sarah Palin shot Guifford and they STILL believe it!!!

The also say Bush flew the planes of Sept. 11.

They also say Bush secretly detonated the levies in New Orleans!!!

Thanks God for the few Conservatives still around, otherwise we would all be screwed!

Cway

United States

#890963 Apr 20, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>Again I ask, out of the 33 nations the US has bombed and/or invaded since 1946, which one was to protect our freedom?
.
Footnote: Of all the nations the US has ever bombed and/or invaded they have had one major item in common. The US NEVER goes in on a nation that has nukes. This is why Iran needs a nuke. It's their only protection from the US.
Their only protection from the Israelis as well.

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#890964 Apr 20, 2013
Whatever wrote:
<quoted text>No kidding, that was one of the strangest group of interviews all the way from the uncle to the parents. It was more about an agenda than the truth of the situation. Half of the family claiming the kids were framed and the uncle who had very little contact with the family making unsupported claims.

Never lived in Russia, maybe this is what happens when you live under an oppressive government- everything becomes political including the death of your son.
Welcome to Obama's America!!!

Get ready for more is coming from the deranged Muslim Liberals* because they hate us as much as Mitchell hates America.

*Muslim Liberals in the sense of American political Liberals.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#890965 Apr 20, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope! He will "die of his injuries" because dead man can talk!
The Saudi guy NEEDS to be protected first! The connection can not be revealed so the younger Chechen can not be allowed to talk!
Fox started this lie & every right whiner blog posted t & every one of you dumbass right whiners keep repeating it.

The Saudi student is NOT a suspect and is NOT being deported

My God you people are so stupid.

http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/terro...

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#890966 Apr 20, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Heritage’s Carafano: Obama’s ‘Head in the Sand’ on Terror: http://tinyurl.com/buap2v2
Enjoy listening to the Boy Messiah sing lullabies to you, ImaginaryDave?:]
Newsflash: ShiningEretion has head up his azz.

Why else would that lowlife POS post racial slurs.
Lincoln

United States

#890968 Apr 20, 2013
martinezjosei wrote:
<quoted text>
Liberals will never admit the are wrong even when they themselves KNOW they are wrong!
Then claimed Sarah Palin shot Guifford and they STILL believe it!!!
The also say Bush flew the planes of Sept. 11.
They also say Bush secretly detonated the levies in New Orleans!!!
Thanks God for the few Conservatives still around, otherwise we would all be screwed!
which meds did you skip?
Cway

United States

#890969 Apr 20, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Notice also how the Boy Messiah is suddenly quoting Scripture?
He plays his parts well. Hollywood help, ya know.
I'm fed up with both parties and mean it. They've sold us out. Time to go third party.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#890970 Apr 20, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"flack"
Have you noticed that most liberals who post on this thread are envious?
Peace
Who would be jealous of you uneducated uninformed, hateful people.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#890971 Apr 20, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Are really you THAT fkn stupid?
Yesterday, troops at a training facility in the western Iraqi desert came across a bottle labelled "tabun," a nerve gas and chemical weapon Iraq is banned from possessing.
Closer to Baghdad, troops at Iraq's largest military industrial complex found nerve agent antidotes, documents describing chemical warfare and a white powder that appeared to be used for explosives.
UN weapons inspectors went repeatedly to the vast al Qa Qaa complex, most recently on March 8. But they found nothing during spot visits to some of the 1,100 buildings at the site 40 kilometres south of Baghdad.
Col. John Peabody, engineer brigade commander of the 3rd Infantry Division, said troops found thousands of five-centimetre by 12-centimetre boxes, each containing three vials of white powder, together with documents written in Arabic that dealt with how to engage in chemical warfare.
A senior U.S. official familiar with initial testing said the powder was believed to be explosives. The finding would be consistent with the plant's stated production capabilities in the field of basic raw materials for explosives and propellants.
According to UN weapons inspectors, who spoke on condition of anonymity, the Iraqis filled warheads and artillery shells with explosives at the site and manufactured bomb casings there. The activities, for conventional weaponry, were allowed under UN resolutions. But the resolutions, passed after the 1991 Gulf War, ban Iraq from possessing chemical, biological and nuclear weapons and the long-range missiles to deliver them.
Peabody told an Associated Press reporter that troops at al Qa Qaa also discovered atropine, used to counter the effects of nerve agents, and 2-Pam chloride, which is used in combination with atropine in case of chemical attack.
Sources: "Testbook of Military medicine," Office of the Surgeon General, John Pike, GlobalSecurity.org , "Weapons: An International Encyclopedia," CIS maps, "Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction: The Assessment of the British Government," Sept. 24, 2003.
Perry, R . U.S. troops find signs of chemical readiness. A.P 5/2003. Web. GLOBALSECURITY.org . Retrieved 4/20/2013.
I guess you think George W Bush invaded Iraq because they had old rusted out-of-date no longer effective gas canisters.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#890972 Apr 20, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"real dumb"
Give it up. Your definition was BS. In your world it is right and moral to penalize those who work hard and produce. In your mind it is right that they redistribute their wealth to take care of the lazy, those with their hands out. Working hard is a topic you are not familiar with. In your world the fruits of success are not for those who earned them, they should be happy they are donating to the lazy.
Peace
KMA
I knew you were to uneducated to get it.

My definition was 100% correct.
Right is Right

West Babylon, NY

#890973 Apr 20, 2013
Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>Strange most other nations around the world don't spend 20% of all their income on war and seem to be quite free. Never hear about Canada always ready to go to war.
Socialist countries have the luxury of American tax dollars defending THEM while they spend their money on their cradle to grave welfare, free inferior medical care and their wealthy come here for the best treatments.
Right is Right

West Babylon, NY

#890974 Apr 20, 2013
Waxman wrote:
U.S. Government blocks sales of fuel-efficient cars
http://www.naturalnews.com/036183_fuel-effici...
So what's the catch? Why are cars in the U.S. less fuel efficient than cars in Europe and South America?
You guessed it - money.
American roads are maintained by, in large part, a federal gasoline tax. That tax is levied per gallons.
Meanwhile, the Obama administration continues to wail about "greener" cars, less reliance on fossil fuels, and better fuel efficiency, all the while refusing - as have past administrations - to allow car makers to offer a genuine solution. Sound about right?
Watch out. Solar fueled airplanes are next.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#890975 Apr 20, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Redistribution of wealth is taking, usually by taxes (legalized theft), from those who earned it to give to those who didn't. PERIOD! You left wing BS is just that. BS!
No, it is not.

Maybe in dumbass right whiner world.

But in economics it is not.

Redistribution would be a change in the distribution.

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/638...

"Distribution in economics refers to the way total output, income, or wealth is distributed among individuals or among the factors of production (such as labour, land, and capital)."

http://economic-consultants.com/consultancy/d...

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#890976 Apr 20, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> No what you posted was some left wing libtard BS. Spouting off about some stupid pie chart. Let me give you a clue! To use a pie (chart) is to say the pie is only one size. That there is a finite amount of wealth. There is no pie. By one person getting wealthy does not mean some one else is getting poorer. That only works in libtard la-la land.
Every year the amount of wealth would change.(hint: this does not mean the physical size of the chart gets bigger).

I did not say the when the redistribution of wealth towards the wealthy had to do with taking from anyone to giving to another.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#890977 Apr 20, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you admitting you don't know anything about the 5000 Kurds who were wiped out by a Saddam chemical weapon?
over ten years before Bush invaded. Little stupid to use that as an excuse in 2003
TSM

El Paso, TX

#890981 Apr 20, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it is not.
Maybe in dumbass right whiner world.
But in economics it is not.
Redistribution would be a change in the distribution.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/638...
"Distribution in economics refers to the way total output, income, or wealth is distributed among individuals or among the factors of production (such as labour, land, and capital)."
http://economic-consultants.com/consultancy/d...
RealDave…Let me replace Social Engineering with Redistribution, Robbing Peter to Pay Paul, another words….telling someone they have a Right to someone else’s money even if they hadn’t Earn it!!

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#890982 Apr 20, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
Bipartisan harmony was an early casualty of the [Iraq] war. It didn’t matter that virtually everyone — Republicans and Democrats, UN inspectors and CIA analysts, coalition allies, even Hussein’s own military officers — had been sure the WMD would be found. Nor did it matter that Hussein had previously used WMD to exterminate thousands of men, women, and children. The temptation to spin an intelligence failure as a deliberate “lie” was politically irresistible.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2013/03/19...
I've been reading recent pieces blasting Liberal historians for dumping on Bush(and, to a lesser extent, Reagan and Margaret Thatcher) without their first reading through archives, declassified documents or yet-to-be declassified documents, pouring through interviews or actually interviewing past members of that administration, etc., etc., etc....

Historians(READ: Academia)(READ: Liberal) are no longer neutral, uninterested parties documenting the passing scene but are instead full-fledged Progressive Operatives.

He who controls history controls the future.

The Boy Messiah has legions of liars throughout academia and the media sworn to his evil movement. It is no big surprise when we see such widespread, incredible, disingenuous tripe filling the airways, internet media and social networks.

It is the age of Liberal disinformation gone wild.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#890983 Apr 20, 2013
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting story about the older brother and boxing
and his beating of women....

Allah Akbar!

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#890984 Apr 20, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Divided us??? Thanks for the "opinion pieces" authored by respectable sources.
Iraq was a massive failure of a war based on a lie, even George W Bush admits that there were no WMD's while your right wing self believes Saddam sent them to Syria.
Would you just happen to be another 'Historian'?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
abby9-2-15 16 min Mister Tonka 5
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 46 min IB DaMann 54,562
Ask amy 9-2-15 47 min Stina 9
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 55 min Ferrerman unplugg... 100,659
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Rogue Scholar 05 196,978
2000 Chevy astro dies after I take off on a com... 2 hr AAvila 1
129Steps- Steps to a brighter future 3 hr 129Steps 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages