Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Waxman

Phoenix, AZ

#889398 Apr 18, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
WRONG STUPID! You don't have a right to make a profit by taking someone's money, promising to take care of their medical expenses and then use every trick in the book to renege on what you said you were going to do. That's fraud.
You're an idiot!
Hey idiot. You just described Obamacare and how it was going to save money and "cover everyone" and "be better".

Baaawwwaahhhh....

You are an idiot! Frikking little Hitler Youth zombie.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#889399 Apr 18, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
How about if a gay person like you takes your partner to Terhan and then flout your petunias around and then you will see how Christian the Muslims in Terhan will treat you, fruitcake. They will jail your gay ass just for being gay, ignoramus.
In Iran, they purge people who aren't extreme enough, sometimes by killing them back after they ousted the Shah to more recently purging professors who aren't extreme enough. I realize you Democrats would do the same here if you could, but nonetheless, it's fascism.
It figures a complete moron like you support the fascists.
Sounds like your bigotry would fit right in with those Iranians.
nobamaredux

Philadelphia, PA

#889400 Apr 18, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
I still hope the bomber is a white American
You and all the rest of the black racists.

Terrorist attack number 2 on Obama's watch.

Attending memorial services instead of preventing terrorism is a worthless gesture, Obama's stock in trade.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#889401 Apr 18, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You & Rand Paul? Lets repeal the 13th Amendment? Really.
Freeing slaves was the problem????
You forget that blacks were legally discriminated against until just 50 years ago in many areas before the Civil Rights Act passed
That's less than two generations.
They had fewer educational opportunities. Fewer economic opportunities.
I lived in Kentucky for a couple of years & racism is alive & considered normal there.
This idea that blacks have had equal opportunity since the 13th amendment is ridiculous. To think they did after 1964 is ridiculous.
You don't hold a entire race under your thumb for 250 years, & then expect the effects to dissipate in one generation.
Being smart in school is frown upon by many kids regardless of race.
You ignorant POS. STFU till you learn to understand what you read. Until then please don't respond to my posts. I'm tired of you ignorant dumbass!!!
nobamaredux

Philadelphia, PA

#889402 Apr 18, 2013
Obama's anti-gun bill was defeated for the simple reason that America cannot trust Obama and the Democrats to honor the Second Amendment.

Confiscatory anti-gun legislation in New York and Connecticut sent that message loud and clear.

Obama never wanted reasonable legislation, just a campaign issue, as illustrated by his shameful use of grieving parents as political props.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#889403 Apr 18, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how your post attracts positive judge it's less than 10 secs after its posted. Has to be a new record for another moronic canned response. The NRA represents only 3% of the total population yet controls government. If you want real government then let the people vote on gun control & see who wins then.
Sorry we don't govern by mob rule in this country. Sorry libtard we are a republic!
nobamaredux

Philadelphia, PA

#889404 Apr 18, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
WRONG STUPID! You don't have a right to make a profit by taking someone's money, promising to take care of their medical expenses and then use every trick in the book to renege on what you said you were going to do. That's fraud.
You're an idiot!
No insurance contract promises to "take care of medical expenses." All such contracts have specific provisions for what is covered and what is not covered. The problem is that most people are too lazy (or stupid) to read the contract.
nobamaredux

Philadelphia, PA

#889405 Apr 18, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Sorry we don't govern by mob rule in this country. Sorry libtard we are a republic!
The same people who want a referendum on gun control oppose the right of California voters(and those in other states) to set the criteria for marriage.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#889406 Apr 18, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
You should write a book, ImaginaryDave.
On toilet paper.
So why do you post slurs?

Its a simple question.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#889407 Apr 18, 2013
Aunt Bettie Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
They are fed a regular diet of victimization in the cycle of poverty - sometimes self-inflicted, sometimes not - by their parents, other blacks and the government.
They are not getting the right message from enough black leaders on how to break the cycle.
It's really that simple...in my opinion.
I agree Carol. My daughters see and live with it every day. Yet there are people even on here who will deny this. We need to turn this plague around before it is too late.

Since: May 11

Gettysburg, PA

#889408 Apr 18, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
The head of the National Rifle Association misfires when he claims the president’s proposal to require background checks for all gun sales will result in a “massive federal registry” of firearms. Current law bars federal agencies from retaining records on those who pass background checks, and nothing in the president’s plan would change that.
Wayne LaPierre, chief executive officer of the NRA, criticized President Obama’s proposal for universal background checks in a Jan. 22 speech in Reno, Nev. He falsely equated the proposal to a de facto federal gun registry, an argument the NRA has made before.
http://factcheck.org/2013/01/nra-misfires-on-...
Wayne La Pierre is paid nearly a million dollars a year to promote the lies of the NRA in order to dupe the feeble minded right whiners into thinking the NRA really give a crap about anything except fomenting the sale of guns to whoever wants to buy them regardless of their background.

Se Grassley said the criminals avoid background checks. Well, then, expanding background checks would shrink the places where criminals can buy guns making it more difficult.

But hey., you right whiners are just too stupid top get it.

"Instead we hear "OMG OMG OMG they're taking our guns" "OMG OMG OMG they making a registry" " OMG OMG OMG

You people are so ridiculous it would be funny if it weren't killing our children.
nobamaredux

Philadelphia, PA

#889410 Apr 18, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Wayne La Pierre is paid nearly a million dollars a year to promote the lies of the NRA in order to dupe the feeble minded right whiners into thinking the NRA really give a crap about anything except fomenting the sale of guns to whoever wants to buy them regardless of their background.
Se Grassley said the criminals avoid background checks. Well, then, expanding background checks would shrink the places where criminals can buy guns making it more difficult.
But hey., you right whiners are just too stupid top get it.
"Instead we hear "OMG OMG OMG they're taking our guns" "OMG OMG OMG they making a registry" " OMG OMG OMG
You people are so ridiculous it would be funny if it weren't killing our children.
Anybody who believes that background check records are not maintained to create a gun registry is naive.
nobamaredux

Philadelphia, PA

#889411 Apr 18, 2013
Republicans who defected and voted "yes" on gun-grabbing:

Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey

Illinois Sen. Mark Kirk

Maine Sen. Susan Collins

Arizona Sen. John McCain

Democrats who defected and voted "no" on gun-grabbing:

North Dakota Sen. Heidi Heitkamp

Arkansas Sen. Mark Pryor

Alaska Sen. Mark Begich

Montana Sen. Max Baucus

Nevada Sen. Harry Reid
nobamaredux

Philadelphia, PA

#889412 Apr 18, 2013
A senior Democratic senator who helped write President Obama's health care law stunned administration officials Wednesday, saying openly he thinks it's headed for a "train wreck."

"I just see a huge train wreck coming down," Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., told Obama's health care chief during a routine budget hearing that suddenly turned tense.

Baucus is the first top Democrat to publicly voice fears about the rollout of the new health care law, designed to bring coverage to some 30 million uninsured Americans through a mix of government programs and tax credits for private insurance that start next year.

The six-term Democrat is also expected to face a tough re-election in 2014. Baucus is still trying to recover from approval ratings that nosedived amid displeasure with the health care law in his home state.

Normally low-key and supportive, Baucus challenged Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius at Wednesday's hearing.

He said he's "very concerned" that new health insurance marketplaces for consumers and small businesses will not open on time in every state, and that if they do, they might just flop because residents don't have the information they need to make choices.

"The administration's public information campaign on the benefits of the Affordable Care Act deserves a failing grade," he told Sebelius. "You need to fix this."

Responding to Baucus, Sebelius pointedly noted that Republicans in Congress last year blocked funding for carrying out the health care law, and she had to resort to raiding other departmental funds that were legally available to her.

The administration is asking for $1.5 billion in next year's budget, and Republicans don't seem willing to grant that either.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#889413 Apr 18, 2013
nobamaredux wrote:
<quoted text>
You and all the rest of the black racists.
Terrorist attack number 2 on Obama's watch.
Attending memorial services instead of preventing terrorism is a worthless gesture, Obama's stock in trade.
yada, yada, and you hate drones but the Iraq body count should be ignored because then you couldn't hate drones.

so much right wing hypocrisy, and so little time to express it.
Jimmy

Newington, CT

#889414 Apr 18, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like your bigotry would fit right in with those Iranians.
Hey sockpuppet. Explain how I am a bigot for pointing out how Iran has no tolerance. They have stoned gay people.

Human Rights Group: Two Gay Men Face Stoning in Iran

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2011/01/18/hu...

Your side is the intolerant one. Case in point - what you extremist Democrats did to NJ Raider here recently because he didn't tow your line.

You are the bigot, Dumb Dave.
nobamaredux

Philadelphia, PA

#889415 Apr 18, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
yada, yada, and you hate drones but the Iraq body count should be ignored because then you couldn't hate drones.
so much right wing hypocrisy, and so little time to express it.
Every American life is valuable. Iraqis not so much.

Obama is murdering American soldiers in Afghanistan at the same time that he prosecutes/persecutes the same soldiers for defending themselves against a population where it is impossible to separate civilians from the enemy.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#889416 Apr 18, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
an OWS Democrat who lives in Mississippi?
LOL
Isn't that near where that fruitcake that was harassing Carol was from?
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#889417 Apr 18, 2013
Paul Kevin Curtis identified by FBI as suspect who sent ricin letters, described body-parts conspiracy

http://www.newsday.com/news/nation/paul-kevin...

he's white. he thinks he's Elvis. he thinks there's a national conspiracy concerning the sale of body parts. so yes, he's nutjob crazy.

right wing all the way.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#889418 Apr 18, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
and let's see how many more Americans will be killed by guns this year!
but i bet you're all for making abortions illegal. and if that's the case, why not outlaw guns for those who have children under the age of 10? or should we just brush off the daily deaths of those innocents as the price we pay for our 'freedom'?
but hell, you azzholes complain about drones whilst you ignore the body count in Iraq, so why am i even asking one of you hypocrites to answer a question you'll refuse to answer with anything approaching reality?
How much you want to bet that 3 times as many people will be killed by abortion than by guns.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 5 min loose cannon 177,958
In Chicago's war zones, the tragedy extends bey... 9 min SMH 3
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 19 min litesong 46,575
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) 24 min what a loser 4,017
Song Title Game (Dec '11) 49 min SLY WEST 1,121
Antarctic Ice Sheet Largest by Far in 25 Years 1 hr joey 2
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr Mister Tonka 98,196
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••