Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Cway

United States

#887666 Apr 13, 2013
Leadville Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Not true, they were just better than having the communists take over and enslave the majority of the people. Like in Cuba, N. Korea, Viet Nam, etc.
Venezuela is still an elective democracy. And according to the UN, Chavez has raised the standard of living.

Now defend Reagan's support of such torture/secret police regimes as Chile under Pinochet. Or the Christiani government of El Salvador. These rightists are guilty of mass murder. Nothing Chavez has done comes close.
Cway

United States

#887668 Apr 13, 2013
Leadville Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
can you do better?
I sure can. By keeping my mouth shut rather than coming up with dumbazzed jokes like that one.
Cway

United States

#887669 Apr 13, 2013
Leadville Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
I have it on good authority Dave and his goat's relationship would be strictly platonic, something about Dave losing his manhood in a steel mill accident.
Weak.
Cway

United States

#887670 Apr 13, 2013
Leadville Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah, I got it, the spy agencies are working for the president, the politicians, Johnson, Kennedy,Eisenhower, Nixon, they were calling the shots.
Do you ever get down on your hands and knees and thank Zeus, God, Allah you were born here and not some 3rd world hellhole?
I do.
I've been thinking about it more in recent times.

Still, this is no justification for us to play world bully in the same manner as cold war Russia.

We have come a long way since FDR's Good Neighbor policy. And I don't mean that as a compliment.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#887671 Apr 13, 2013
FROM a "moron" that won't SHUT UP about Romney losing ...
He KNOWS it
WE know it!
He conceded :) A looooooong time ago!

BUT
moronic libTURDS want to keep bringing it up ...
Here IS his answer
and
ALSO
for his ILK!

:)
Uncle Tab wrote:
Wonder why Romney didn't take this election to the SCOTUS??
Nevermind.... Even they know he lost. Only ones who don't get it?? Uneducated republicans.
Who's the leader of the idiots? Karl Rove.
Thank You, thank You very much.
Heh
Why the GOP won’t challenge vote fraud
Posted on November 15, 2012 by Dr. Eowyn

Friends and Patriots,

It’s major duct tape time ’cause you’ll need it to keep your head from exploding.

Are you ready for this?

Here we go...
...
ut our screaming and hollering are to no avail. No one is listening to us. Not even the Republican Party.

Here’s why...

The Republican Party made an agreement 30 years ago with the Democrat Party NOT to ensure voting integrity and NOT to pursue suspected vote fraud.

Yes. You read it correctly.

As modified in 1987, the Consent Decree defined “ballot security activities” to mean “ballot integrity, ballot security or other efforts to prevent or remedy vote fraud.”

Since 1982, that Consent Decree has been renewed every year by the original judge, Carter appointee District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, now 88 years old. Long retired, Debevoise comes back yearly for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year.

Surprise! The judge who denied the RNC’s appeal to “vacate” the 1982 Consent Decree is an

Obama appointee ...

Judge Joseph Greenaway, Jr.,

of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

MORE HERE:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/1...

joandarc November 15, 2012 at 10:50 am ...
Indeed, Dr. Eowyn, this is the most important post you have ever written. What happened in this Consent Decree is absolutely unthinkable, unfathomable and frankly, I have no words to describe how crooked it is and the fact that the same judge came back every year, although retired, to tend to this Decree is an indictment in and of itself.

All of these facts are really remarkable reflecting that Obama was chosen for the presidency many years ago. It is also incredible that Obama’s court appointee denied the recent Republican Party’s attempt to eradicate this Consent Decree, most probably because of the recent voter fraud issues. The fact that the DNC’S 2012 Platform excluded any mention of God, also verifies that the Communists, atheists, have taken over the Democratic Party and its platforms and issues, insuring that the five non-negotiable issues, intrinsically evil practices, go their way, i.e. abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research, human cloning and homosexual marriage.

As you know, we are faced with more than a breakdown of the Republican Party, we are faced with pure evil,“in your face” evil and the Democrats and their regime know it and they don’t care about it.
``````````

AMEN!
Cway

United States

#887672 Apr 13, 2013
Leadville Lou wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah, I got it, the spy agencies are working for the president, the politicians, Johnson, Kennedy,Eisenhower, Nixon, they were calling the shots.
You should read Fletcher Prouty's "The Secret Team" which I am slowly and painfully grinding my way through.

Prouty, a former USAF focal point officer (coordinated with the CIA in black ops) had both an intimate knowledge of CIA covert operations and knew many of the top officials within the agency.

Much of the secrecy surrounding the CIA is not for the purpose of national security, but to shield it from revelation of its criminal activities.

Prouty further makes the case that the agency has its own agenda. Many of the presidential advisors in State, Defense and the Pentagon are Agency assets pretending to be independent voices of reason.
Cway

United States

#887673 Apr 13, 2013
St Black Pope wrote:
<quoted text>Your hypocrisy is telling...So, which is it, a president is responsible for what happens under his watch or the former president is responsible.
Depends on the circumstances, doesn't it?
If it is the former president, the Bill Clinton started the economic disaster by repealing the Glass-Steagall Act
Under Clinton, the repeal of Glass-Steagall Act was passed by a GOP majority in Congress. Yes, Clinton signed off on it. But we all know why the GOP deregulates in this fashion, which is to turn loose the business wolves on the public. The Jeff Skillings of this world, so to speak.

The Republican congress of that period also passed legislation which grossly weakened accounting standards, allowing corporations to play fast and loose with their financial reports. This led to the Enron, Tyco and Worldcom meltdowns.

They also pressured the Clinton administration so heavily in pursuit of their agenda, they shut down the government at one point. Not to mention constant investigations of Clinton which went nowhere.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#887674 Apr 13, 2013
Emaam wrote:
<quoted text>
Anyone else notice that conservatives are the only ones that ever mention animals as potential sex partners?
Mentioning it is one thing but participating in it is another. Talk to Emergency Ward techs about how Gerbils are routinely pulled out dead from gay sex orifices.

...along with spatulas, bottles, etc.....

“Plays well with others.”

Since: Jun 07

LIVING WELL*THE BEST REVENGE

#887675 Apr 13, 2013
KALI SPELL wrote:
I Have Started To Say by Philip Larkin
I have started to say
"A quarter of a century"
Or "thirty years back"
About my own life.
It makes me breathless
It's like falling and recovering
In huge gesturing loops
Through an empty sky.
All that's left to happen
Is some deaths (my own included).
Their order, and their manner,
Remain to be learnt.
MONTANA!!! Happy Easter!!!! And Aloha.....off to Hawaii this week for a cruise around the islands. Mama and Sister and I are heading WEST!
Cway

United States

#887676 Apr 13, 2013
St Black Pope wrote:
<quoted text>So, Bush inherited it and the CIA and Clinton knew of a possible attack like 911 and did nothing.
A true Republican you are, meaning you play fast and loose with history.

To begin, there were terror attacks under Reagan such as the Achille Lauro incident and Pan Am bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland.

The first atttack on the Twin Towers occurred in February, 1993 just five weeks into Clinton's first term.

Using your logic, that means Reagan and GHW Bush were responsible.

Clinton had no advance knowledge of 9-11, nor of the attacks on the African embassies or USS Cole. I might add, the Navy was fully aware of the risks in having the Cole where it was.

Bush was warned by Tenet five weeks before 9-11 struck and did nothing. Did Clinton freeze Bush's brain? Something must have.
So, when the new president is in place in 2016, then his problems will be because of Obama.
Strictly your opinion. I would argue Bush's two unfinished wars, doubling of the national debt and the Republican Party's failure to rein in the banks created a point of no return.
Cway

United States

#887677 Apr 13, 2013
St Black Pope wrote:
<quoted text>Clinton did nothing regarding Iraq and Afghanistan, Saddam and Bib Haden.
You mean Bin Laden, I presume.

The issue with regard to Iraq was disarmament, and there is a fluctuating history there. In 1998, concern was expressed by UN weapon inspectors over whether Iraq was in compliance.

In response, Clinton authorized a cruise missile strike and imposed severe economic sanctions. These actions appear to have had effect because by 1999, the inspectors shifted from their earlier view to one that Iraq was largely disarmed.

Former inspector, Scott Ritter, who resigned in 1998 in protest over the lack of UN vigor with regard to Iraq had this to say in June, 1999:

"When you ask the question,'Does Iraq possess militarily viable biological or chemical weapons?' the answer is no! It is a resounding NO. Can Iraq produce today chemical weapons on a meaningful scale? No! Can Iraq produce biological weapons on a meaningful scale? No! Ballistic missiles? No! It is 'no' across the board. So from a qualitative standpoint, Iraq has been disarmed. Iraq today possesses no meaningful weapons of mass destruction capability."

So Clinton did do something and it worked.

Afghanistan was not a major issue during the Clinton years. Bush paid no attention to it at all until after 9-11.

As for Bin Laden, you will have to spell your case in more detail. Unlike you Republicans, I don't use a crystal ball to decipher my opponent's lack of clarity.
Leadville Lou

Denver, CO

#887678 Apr 13, 2013
Cway wrote:
<quoted text>
I sure can. By keeping my mouth shut rather than coming up with dumbazzed jokes like that one.
so you're a stick in the mud with no sense of humor?
Leadville Lou

Denver, CO

#887679 Apr 13, 2013
Cway wrote:
<quoted text>
A true Republican you are, meaning you play fast and loose with history.
To begin, there were terror attacks under Reagan such as the Achille Lauro incident and Pan Am bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland.
The first atttack on the Twin Towers occurred in February, 1993 just five weeks into Clinton's first term.
Using your logic, that means Reagan and GHW Bush were responsible.
Clinton had no advance knowledge of 9-11, nor of the attacks on the African embassies or USS Cole. I might add, the Navy was fully aware of the risks in having the Cole where it was.
Bush was warned by Tenet five weeks before 9-11 struck and did nothing. Did Clinton freeze Bush's brain? Something must have.
<quoted text>
Strictly your opinion. I would argue Bush's two unfinished wars, doubling of the national debt and the Republican Party's failure to rein in the banks created a point of no return.
Bush was warned of what? Tell us, exactly what the warning was , what would happen and where?

Tell us where in our history the bad guys were willing to die ?
Leadville Lou

Denver, CO

#887680 Apr 13, 2013
Cway wrote:
<quoted text>
Depends on the circumstances, doesn't it?
<quoted text>
Under Clinton, the repeal of Glass-Steagall Act was passed by a GOP majority in Congress. Yes, Clinton signed off on it. But we all know why the GOP deregulates in this fashion, which is to turn loose the business wolves on the public. The Jeff Skillings of this world, so to speak.
The Republican congress of that period also passed legislation which grossly weakened accounting standards, allowing corporations to play fast and loose with their financial reports. This led to the Enron, Tyco and Worldcom meltdowns.
They also pressured the Clinton administration so heavily in pursuit of their agenda, they shut down the government at one point. Not to mention constant investigations of Clinton which went nowhere.
Merely your ill informed opinion. No where was the "public" forced to give one dime to any bank.
Leadville Lou

Denver, CO

#887681 Apr 13, 2013
Education for ignorant libs tonight:

The Government-Created Subprime Mortgage Meltdown

by Thomas J. DiLorenzo

The thousands of mortgage defaults and foreclosures in the "subprime" housing market (i.e., mortgage holders with poor credit ratings) is the direct result of thirty years of government policy that has forced banks to make bad loans to un-creditworthy borrowers. The policy in question is the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), which compels banks to make loans to low-income borrowers and in what the supporters of the Act call "communities of color" that they might not otherwise make based on purely economic criteria.

The original lobbyists for the CRA were the hardcore leftists who supported the Carter administration and were often rewarded for their support with government grants and programs like the CRA that they benefited from. These included various "neighborhood organizations," as they like to call themselves, such as "ACORN" (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now). These organizations claim that over $1 trillion in CRA loans have been made, although no one seems to know the magnitude with much certainty. A U.S. Senate Banking Committee staffer told me about ten years ago that at least $100 billion in such loans had been made in the first twenty years of the Act.

So-called "community groups" like ACORN benefit themselves from the CRA through a process that sounds like legalized extortion. The CRA is enforced by four federal government bureaucracies: the Fed, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The law is set up so that any bank merger, branch expansion, or new branch creation can be postponed or prohibited by any of these four bureaucracies if a CRA "protest" is issued by a "community group." This can cost banks great sums of money, and the "community groups" understand this perfectly well. It is their leverage. They use this leverage to get the banks to give them millions of dollars as well as promising to make a certain amount of bad loans in their communities.

Something for nothing, the libs have been using it for decades.
Leadville Lou

Denver, CO

#887682 Apr 13, 2013
Cway wrote:
<quoted text>
You should read Fletcher Prouty's "The Secret Team" which I am slowly and painfully grinding my way through.
Prouty, a former USAF focal point officer (coordinated with the CIA in black ops) had both an intimate knowledge of CIA covert operations and knew many of the top officials within the agency.
Much of the secrecy surrounding the CIA is not for the purpose of national security, but to shield it from revelation of its criminal activities.
Prouty further makes the case that the agency has its own agenda. Many of the presidential advisors in State, Defense and the Pentagon are Agency assets pretending to be independent voices of reason.
OK, what has your hero Oblamer done to rein them in? Many countries do what is best for their countries, only in this country do liberals expect us to do what is best for other people, not us. This will be the ruin of this country, libs refuse to see it. Deny it.
Leadville Lou

Denver, CO

#887683 Apr 13, 2013
Cway wrote:
<quoted text>
Depends on the circumstances, doesn't it?
<quoted text>
Under Clinton, the repeal of Glass-Steagall Act was passed by a GOP majority in Congress. Yes, Clinton signed off on it. But we all know why the GOP deregulates in this fashion, which is to turn loose the business wolves on the public. The Jeff Skillings of this world, so to speak.
The Republican congress of that period also passed legislation which grossly weakened accounting standards, allowing corporations to play fast and loose with their financial reports. This led to the Enron, Tyco and Worldcom meltdowns.
They also pressured the Clinton administration so heavily in pursuit of their agenda, they shut down the government at one point. Not to mention constant investigations of Clinton which went nowhere.
This present government needs shut down , it is out of control. Example-$90-100 billion wasted on green energy failures, many got extremely rich, taxpayers got stuck with the bill.
Leadville Lou

Denver, CO

#887684 Apr 13, 2013
Cway wrote:
<quoted text>
I've been thinking about it more in recent times.
Still, this is no justification for us to play world bully in the same manner as cold war Russia.
We have come a long way since FDR's Good Neighbor policy. And I don't mean that as a compliment.
I would love nothing more than for all of our troops to be brought home, neither party will do it.
Leadville Lou

Denver, CO

#887685 Apr 13, 2013
Cway wrote:
<quoted text>
You should read Fletcher Prouty's "The Secret Team" which I am slowly and painfully grinding my way through.
Prouty, a former USAF focal point officer (coordinated with the CIA in black ops) had both an intimate knowledge of CIA covert operations and knew many of the top officials within the agency.
Much of the secrecy surrounding the CIA is not for the purpose of national security, but to shield it from revelation of its criminal activities.
Prouty further makes the case that the agency has its own agenda. Many of the presidential advisors in State, Defense and the Pentagon are Agency assets pretending to be independent voices of reason.
You should read "Animal farm"
Leadville Lou

Denver, CO

#887686 Apr 13, 2013
Cway wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL... NO, I didn't!
WW I was the result of German militarism. They declared war on Russia and France, then invaded Belgium. European colonialism was not a major factor. The Balkan crisis was the key conflict, with Austria backed by Germany on one side, and the Serbs backed by Russia on the other. With France allied to Russia by a defensive alliance.
WW II was also the result of German militarism, although to be more fair, it was the Nazi political movement which brought it about. Very few Germans would have given Hitler their vote had they known of his plan to launch another European war.
European turf wars, we should have stayed out.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 8 min Maude 181,861
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 46 min KiMerde 51,262
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 50 min JOEL 71,100
Family of slain Loyola student seeks 'peace not... 1 hr Searcy 2
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Mothra 49,236
women are so shallow these days (Nov '11) 3 hr Silk 87
Obama pardons 2 Illinoisans, including former M... 3 hr barefoot2626 20
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 5:16 pm PST

Bleacher Report 5:16PM
Full Game Grades for Colts vs. Cowboys
Bleacher Report 5:21 PM
Trestman's QB Change Fails to Provide Spark
Bleacher Report 5:38 PM
Indianapolis Colts vs. Dallas Cowboys: Video Highlights and Recap from Week 16
Bleacher Report 6:00 PM
Colts Have Puncher's Chance in Playoffs Despite Flaws
Bleacher Report 7:50 PM
Colts Collapse Around Andrew Luck in Another Prime-Time Blowout