Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#886839 Apr 11, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Surely this post is not supposed to be taken seriously.
Is it?
It's a joke right?
Must be those Little Debbie cakes she's been scarfing down, or, she listens to Beck.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#886840 Apr 11, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Why did you leave "boom" out? And why do you always try to discredit people who know a hell of a lot more about a subject than you? It must suck going through life hating everyone.
The blank Czech speaketh! You're the dumbest one on here.
SapphireInBlue

Orlando, FL

#886842 Apr 11, 2013
Jane Says wrote:
What Dead Kids?
There used to be a formulation of cynical news editors to determine American news priorities for mass murder. It ran something like: 1,000 dead Bangladeshis = 100 dead Italians = 10 dead Americans.
So how many dead American babies does it take to make the news? I wrote two-and-a-half weeks ago about the U.S. media’s determination to ignore a story that’s inconvenient to their biases. But, given the gun-banners’ ceaseless grief-feasting on Sandy Hook, at some point doesn’t the corpse count in Philadelphia merit maybe, oh, a thousandth of the attention?
"He also claimed he saw about 100 babies born alive and then ‘snipped’ with surgical scissors in the back of the neck, to ensure their ‘demise’."
That’s from a story about Gosnell’s Pennsylvania abattoir in the Daily Mail, a British newspaper DOING THEJOB AMERICA MEDIA WON'T DO.
Headline:
’Fetuses And Blood All Over The Place’: Medic’s Graphic Account Of ‘Beheading Live Babies’ At Abortion ‘House Of Horrors’ In Philadelphia
More dead baby testimony:
There an 18-to-24-inch baby, who did not yet have eyes, was lying in a clear glass pan, she recalled in horror. It was “screeching, making this noise” that “sounded like a little alien,” she said.
It “really freaked me out,” she said, causing her to leave the room.
Sorry it “freaked you out,” but as the Pundette comments:“Making this noise”“like an alien”? That’s called crying. It’s what human babies do when they’re in distress, in this case, the ultimate distress. The “aliens” here are the inhuman monsters who caused that distress.
So ... if a baby screams during an outside-the-uterus “abortion,” does it make a sound?
OR, TO PUT IT ANOTHER WAY, IF AN ABORTIONIST GOES ON TRIAL FOR MURDERING INFANTS, BUT THE MEDIA REFUSES TO COVER IT, IS IT REALLY HAPPENING?
THE U.S. MEDIA’S UNANIMOUS AGREEMENT TO SEE NO EVIL IS SICK AND TOTALITARIAN.
A very small consolation is that, with news judgments like these, the wretched American press is doing a pretty good job of sawing through its own neck.
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/345111/w...
Some would even call it barbaric. Me, for instance.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#886843 Apr 11, 2013
He is Coming Soon wrote:
www.scribd.com/doc/106586592.. .
"mines inns meet"
I Come In PEACE

Bronx, NY

#886844 Apr 11, 2013
Is This Barack Obama's 2nd Term? Is it Bill Clinton's 3rd? Or Is It Ronald Reagan's 9th?
They say that elections do matter, and that there are real differences between Republican and Democratic presidents. But backing up the view to 30 years, that difference looks a lot more like continuity, both at home and in America's global empire. The answer is yes to all three. Ronald Reagan hasn't darkened the White House door in decades. But his policy objectives have been what every president, Democrat and Republican have pursued relentlessly ever since. Barack Obama is only the latest and most successful of Reagan's disciples.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#886845 Apr 11, 2013
Jane Says wrote:
<quoted text>so that's another Lily of boca boca porpoise spit florida on here all weekend? who knew? i thought it was you who spends every waking moment arguing on topix. and don't flatter yourself about anyone stalking you. i'm not on here enough nor would i care to bother. unlike you, I HAVE A LIFE.
but i do enjoy as each day progresses and The One--the O'Blamer-Chief-Vacationer-Clue less-Empty-Suited-Perpetual-Ca mpaigner is still a huge failure and we get to say, "told you." unless you consider singing along with Justin Timberlake an accomplishment.
Yes, we know all about your life, beating up and stalking the homeless, spitting on them, picking up diapers in the hallway of your project building. You're a pathetic old wretch, comes out in every post.
But, karmas gonna gitcha Janey, hit you right in the head, better get yourself together, soon you're gonna be dead.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#886846 Apr 11, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Surely this post is not supposed to be taken seriously.
Is it?
It's a joke right?
The joke is you. You must think the Constitution is optional.
I Come In PEACE

Bronx, NY

#886847 Apr 11, 2013
In Barack Obama's case all he had to say was that he wasn't necessarily against wars, just against what he called “stupid wars.” Corporate media and “liberal” shills morphed that lone statement into a false narrative that Barack Obama opposed the war in Iraq, making him an instantly viable presidential candidate at a time when the American people overwhelmingly opposed that war. Once in office, Barack Obama strove mightily to abrogate the Status of Forces Agreement with Iraq which would have allowed US forces to remain there indefinitely. But when the Iraqi puppet government, faced with a near revolt on the part of what remained of Iraqi civil society, dared not do his bidding, insisting that uniformed US troops (but not the American and multinational mercenaries we pay to remain there) stick to the withdrawal timetable agreed upon under Bush, liberal shills and corporate media hailed the withdrawal from Iraq as Obama's “victory.”

Barack Obama doubled down on the invasion and occupation of large areas of Afghanistan, and increased the size of the army and marines, which in fact he pledged to do during his presidential campaign. Presidential candidate Obama promised to end secret imprisonment and torture. The best one can say about President Obama on this score is that he seems to prefer murderous and indiscriminate drone attacks, in many cases, over the Bush policy of international kidnapping secret imprisonment and torture. The Obama administration's reliance on drones combined with US penetration of the African continent, means that a Democratic, ostensibly “antiwar” president has been able to openly deploy US troops to every part of that continent in support of its drive to control the oil, water, and other resources there.

The objectives President Obama's Africa policies fulfill today were put down on paper by the Bush administration, pursued by Bill Clinton before that, and still earlier pursued by Ronald Reagan, when it funded murderous contra armies of UNITA in Angola and RENAMO in Mozambque. It was UNITA and RENAMO's campaigns, assisted by the apartheid regimes of Israel and South Africa that pioneered the genocidal use of child soldiers. Today, cruise missile liberals hail the Obama administration's use of pit bull puppet regimes like Uganda, Burundi and Rwanda, all of which shot their way into power with child soldiers, to invade Somalia and Congo, sometimes ostensibly to go after other bad actors on the grounds that they are using child soldiers.
Whatever

Gering, NE

#886848 Apr 11, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
"mines inns meet"
lily continues her disturbing OCDing over a Topix thread.
I Come In PEACE

Bronx, NY

#886849 Apr 11, 2013
If either George Bush, or if Ronald Reagan had openly deployed US troops to Africa on anything like the scale President Obama has, black America would be up in arms. They wanted to. They couldn't. It seems that now, by giving us a black president, the empire can get just about whatever it wants.

It works the same way at home. Ronald Reagan and the first George Bush would have liked to tamper with social security, but dared not. All Reagan could do was tell welfare queen jokes, and despite Reagan's open disdain of organized labor, NAFTA was a distant wet dream of corporations and billionaires. The first president Bush proposed NAFTA but could never get it through Congress. It took a Democratic president, Bill Clinton, who marshaled a minority of Democrats in Congress to vote with Republicans both to pass NAFTA and to eliminate welfare. It was Bill Clinton who publicly embraced Republican myths about balancing the US budget, while allowing liberals to imagine he would deliver a “peace dividend.” The second president Bush openly trumpeted right wing lies about the solvency of social security and the (lies which Barack Obama happily repeats to this day) and tried more than once to privatize it. Again, that's continuity across administrations and parties.

True to form, Obama picked the ball up where his predecessors left it and has run relentlessly righward ever since. Barack Obama uses the language of the elites when he calls social security, Medicaid and Medicare and other federal benefits “entitlements” and asserts that their growth must be trimmed. He championed the formation of a deficit reduction commission chaired by Democrat Erskine Bowles and Republican Alan Simpson, both advocates of privatizing social security and drastic cuts to Medicaid, Medicare and federal benefits and tried to fast-track their recommendation through Congress. Fortunately that recommendation never came.

Just last week, Obama offered as his opening position in negotiations with Republicans, the chaining of social security and all other federal benefits to the consumer price index --- a monstrous betrayal that will reduce social security benefits by as much as $100 monthly by a decade from now. It wasn't anything he had been cornered into by Republicans. It was the point from which Barack Obama decided to start. That's continuity. Only a Republican president, like Richard Nixon, could go to China in the 1970s. Only a black Democrat can break his promises to labor on championing a card check law, refute his commitments to a just and fair media with network neutrality, and do nothing to roll back the prison state which has engulfed black and brown youth. Only a black Democrat could deport more Latinos than all the last three Republicans together, in his first term alone.

JIM CROW BLACKS lololololol
I Come In PEACE

Bronx, NY

#886851 Apr 11, 2013
Democrats and Republicans are not mutual opponents. They are a tag team, each one pushing the ball further and further down the field in the wrong direction. It's still winter in America, and the dead hand of Ronald Reagan still guides this nation, decades after his exit from the White House. Welcome to the 9th term of Ronald Reagan, in the person of Democrat Barack Hussein Obama.

One could also argue, since we are in the grips of the greatest depression, although we don't call them that any more, since the 1930s, and Obama's economic policies bear more in common to Herbert Hoover than to Franklin Roosevelt, that we're living through Herbert Hoover's third term as well. But we'll save that for another day.
SapphireInBlue

Orlando, FL

#886853 Apr 11, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Surely this post is not supposed to be taken seriously.
Is it?
It's a joke right?
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing."

- Adolf Hitler

On November 11, 1938, the Minister of the Interior, Wilhelm Frick, passed Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons. This regulation effectively deprived all Jews of the right to possess firearms or other weapons.

In 1935, Jewish residents were no longer considered citizens to prevent any resistance under the 1938 German Weapons Act.

The 1938 revisions introduced restrictions specifically to prohibit Jews from holding firearms but made it easier for the one-party nazi regime to gain acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns as the possession of ammunition.

And then there's China...

Although gun laws in China are becoming difficult to enforce, China's weapons laws are among the world's toughest. Its blanket ban on private ownership of rifles, pistols and even gun replicas is a core tenet of social policy.

Need more?

By the way, Obama has been hellbent on destroying the Republican Party and any and all opposition with the help of his Cheerleaders. Doesn't the notion of a "one-party" system and that one party demonizing law-abiding gun owners even raise a little red flag?
I Come In PEACE

Bronx, NY

#886854 Apr 11, 2013
Obama Aims To Cut Social Security & Other Federal Benefits? And This is a Surprise?
President Obama's proposal to cut Social Security by "chaining" it to the consumer price index will cost seniors a good 10% of monthly benefits a decade from now. Republicans didn't force him into this, it's his opening proposal for negotiating. Is anybody even surprised?

OBAMA CRIES FOR SANDY HOOK AND TELLS MOOCHELLE TO CRY FOR YOUR PEOPLE lolololol in your FACE
I Come In PEACE

Bronx, NY

#886855 Apr 11, 2013
The Country Cousin is wise to our folks’ ways.



My Wise Country Cousin On: How Negroz See Quest Stray Shun…

by Raymond Nat Turner

When de bagman brown,
Dey jes might clown;
When de bagman white—
Dey march all nite;
When de bagman black…
Dey turn dey back…
Jane Says

New York, NY

#886856 Apr 11, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, we know all about your life, beating up and stalking the homeless, spitting on them, picking up diapers in the hallway of your project building. You're a pathetic old wretch, comes out in every post.
But, karmas gonna gitcha Janey, hit you right in the head, better get yourself together, soon you're gonna be dead.
you confuse me with your inner city inlaws. you're a typical wannabe limousine liberal who preaches far removed from anything that is a result of liberal viewpoints. like the homeless--out on the streets because Democrats got rid of psychiatric hospitals and involuntary hospitalization and thugs because limousine liberals champion criminal rights over protecting the public and the decline in the family in conjunction with the progressive anti-marriage movement (except now for gays).

what comes out in your posts, other than you are a symptom of the decline in our society and support killing anything in the birth canal for convenience?

karma is your perpetual existence on topix, arguing with strangers. how often does the ambulance chaser ever trot you out for a meal? it is really sad.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#886857 Apr 11, 2013
St Black Pope wrote:
<quoted text>"Some" is such a CONvenient word. You can take 2 out 10,000 similar cases and call it some. Do you even understand the concept of bias and bigotry, or do you just apply it conveniently.
You suggest that gays are under no obligation to include straights and religious people, but yet you think that straights must add gays to marriage and religious organizations, that are opposed to such an idea. Your comparison of the KKK and black groups supports our point.
The difference is that straight men can not cruise for sex in places where women and little girls are commonly found, bathrooms, lockers and showers, and with gays/lesbians those are the common places that gays cruise. Perhaps, gays/lesbians should not be allowed in private exposing places where they find people they are sexually attracted to. You know, allowing such is discrimination.
Remember when you said this?
"As for homophobia, when you choose to stop being gay then your homophobia will disappear"

LOL
Jane Says

New York, NY

#886858 Apr 11, 2013
I Come In PEACE wrote:
Obama Aims To Cut Social Security & Other Federal Benefits? And This is a Surprise?
President Obama's proposal to cut Social Security by "chaining" it to the consumer price index will cost seniors a good 10% of monthly benefits a decade from now. Republicans didn't force him into this, it's his opening proposal for negotiating. Is anybody even surprised?
OBAMA CRIES FOR SANDY HOOK AND TELLS MOOCHELLE TO CRY FOR YOUR PEOPLE lolololol in your FACE
just wait until the lower income seniors get dumped into Medicaid, which many decent doctors no longer accept.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#886859 Apr 11, 2013
SapphireInBlue wrote:
<quoted text>
"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing."
- Adolf Hitler
On November 11, 1938, the Minister of the Interior, Wilhelm Frick, passed Regulations Against Jews' Possession of Weapons. This regulation effectively deprived all Jews of the right to possess firearms or other weapons.
In 1935, Jewish residents were no longer considered citizens to prevent any resistance under the 1938 German Weapons Act.
The 1938 revisions introduced restrictions specifically to prohibit Jews from holding firearms but made it easier for the one-party nazi regime to gain acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns as the possession of ammunition.
And then there's China...
Although gun laws in China are becoming difficult to enforce, China's weapons laws are among the world's toughest. Its blanket ban on private ownership of rifles, pistols and even gun replicas is a core tenet of social policy.
Need more?
By the way, Obama has been hellbent on destroying the Republican Party and any and all opposition with the help of his Cheerleaders. Doesn't the notion of a "one-party" system and that one party demonizing law-abiding gun owners even raise a little red flag?
Oh, they don't need any help; they're self destructing.
I Come In PEACE

Bronx, NY

#886860 Apr 11, 2013
The story goes that some mice became very upset about the cat in the house and convened an emergency meeting. They finally came up with the idea of tying a bell around the cat’s neck, so the dangerous feline could no longer catch victims unawares. The plan gained a lot of enthusiastic praise, until one mouse piped up with a question that preceded a long silence:“Who’s going to bell the cat?”

In recent days, the big cat in the White House has provoked denunciations from groups that have rarely crossed him. They’re upset about his decision to push for cuts in Social Security benefits.“Progressive outrage has reached a boiling point,” the online juggernaut MoveOn declared a few days ago.

Obama’s move to cut Social Security is certainly outrageous, and it’s encouraging that a wide range of progressive groups are steamed at Obama as never before. But this kind of outrage should have reached a “boiling point” a long time ago. The administration’s undermining of civil liberties, scant action on climate change, huge escalation of war in Afghanistan, expansion of drone warfare, austerity policies serving Wall Street and shafting Main Street, vast deference to corporate power... The list is long and chilling.

So is the evasive record of many groups that are now denouncing Obama’s plan to cut Social Security. Mostly, their leaders griped in private and made nice with the Obama White House in public.

Yet imagine if those groups had polarized with President Obama in 2009 on even a couple of key issues. Such progressive independence would have shown the public that there is indeed a left in this country — that the left has principles and stands up for them — and that Obama, far from being on the left, is in the center. Such principled clarity would have undermined the right-wing attacks on Obama as a radical, socialist, etc.— and from the beginning could have gotten some victories out of Obama, instead of waiting more than four years to take him on.

Whether or not Obama’s vicious assault on Social Security is successful, it has already jolted an unprecedented number of longtime supporters. It should be the last straw, suffused with illumination.

That past is prologue. We need to ask: Do such groups now have it in them to stop pretending that each of the Obama administration’s various awful policies is some kind of anomaly?
Time to Bell the Obama Cat
SapphireInBlue

Orlando, FL

#886861 Apr 11, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Surely this post is not supposed to be taken seriously.
Is it?
It's a joke right?
In case you're referring to the purpose of the Second Amendment...

"What then was the purpose of the Second Amendment? It was to prevent the establishment of large standing armies by the federal government by guaranteeing the right of the people to keep and bear arms so as to provide the foundation for a national militia as the preferred armed service of the federal government to suppress insurrections and repel invasions.

"The Second Amendment was proposed by Madison and the First Congress not to guarantee to the states the right to maintain state militia but to prevent large standing armies by guaranteeing to the people, all of them potential militia, the right to keep and bear arms."

http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/Bordenet1.htm

Maybe you should have just told me which part you thought was a joke.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Deat Abby 12-16 13 min RACE 53
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 14 min Jacques Ottawa 181,714
women are so shallow these days (Nov '11) 54 min Go Blue Forever 82
CHICAGO BEARS ARE SHYT. Boycott them 1 hr Go Blue Forever 20
Obama pardons 2 Illinoisans, including former M... 2 hr Le Duped 2
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 hr Yumpin Yimminy 68,876
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 10 hr JOEL 70,988
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 5:07 pm PST

Bleacher Report 5:07PM
Lions vs. Bears: Breaking Down Detroit's Game Plan
Bleacher Report 5:55 PM
Indianapolis Colts vs. Dallas Cowboys Betting Odds, Analysis, NFL Pick
NBC Sports 6:29 PM
Reports: Bears benching Cutler - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 7:26 PM
Trestman May Never Get 2nd Shot After Bears Meltdown
Bleacher Report 7:27 PM
What Are Experts Saying About Detroit?