I had not even seen this mess of a post to which you were responding - what a disaster of spelling, grammar, and lack of thought:<quoted text>
lily is a nutjob, acting as if her self-righteous "opinion" is superior. If that was the case, then why do the majority of states that have referendum, vote gay marriage down.
To most of us, sex between two men is sickening, as is reading lily's posts.
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> Nothing you said made any fucking sense, yet you posted it like you were God talking to a peasant. I know what every last definition of all 4 mental disorders are. That does nothing to refute the morality of the topic. If it's scientifical fact that a child can be easily influence (ie. A pervert using candy or toys to lower a child into his car after the child has been taught never talk to strangers), then the same should be applied for gays. This is where people calling gays special interest group. Fuck the effect things have on the kids. You'reputting the interest of confused adults over of innocent children . You're confused yourself! You're damn right, I'll never think 2 dude is right. And tho it's enticing, I know 2 women ain't right either. The rights of gays over children. Still can't get over that bullshit! I stand behind Iranian president when he said,"I don't go looking in peoples windows, but when a man leaves his home, a man better be a man & a woman a woman!
Dear stupid embarrassment to NJ:
You can't influence a kid to be gay. Game over. You lose.