And this exemplifies the fundamental breakdown in critical thinking.<quoted text>
That's the problem with gay marriage. Once the definition is changed to "include" gays, it would "exclude" someone else.
My guess is pleuralists would be next demanding multiple wives under the new definition.
Who's to say their alternate lifestyle shouldn't be included too?
What makes you think they can't make their argument right now?
A man and two wives is much more closely analogous to a man and one wife than it is to two men. In fact, most Mormons who would be interested in polygamy would be offended if you compared them to two men.
They have their best argument right now. You just don't think very carefully.
You can't say that "anything different" = "everything different." That's simpleton nonsense.
I guess if we let black people into the white country club then we have to let polygamists into the white country club. See how stupid that sounds?