Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1251888 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

carol

Orlando, FL

#882029 Mar 30, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Gotta love Peggy Noonan and Peter Robinson among others for writing all those things Reagan said eh?
Reagan actually had a lot of input into his speeches. But his quips and wit were from the hip, I'm quite sure.
carol

Orlando, FL

#882030 Mar 30, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Gotta love Peggy Noonan and Peter Robinson among others for writing all those things Reagan said eh?
Did you know he was advised not to add the part about telling Mr. Gorbachev to tear down the wall in his speech at the Berlin Wall but at the last minute on the drive there, decided to do it anyway?

Just thought that was an interesting bit of history trivia.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#882031 Mar 30, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
Your peasant like envy is amusing.
It's not that others think they[re better than you.
It's you who thinks they're better than you.
Peasant.
<quoted text>
Everyone jokes about the Harvard elitist mentality.

I admire their intellect. Just not their collective ideology.

Don't most Harvard graduates go on to become a part of those evil 1%'ers?

Judged:

11

11

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#882033 Mar 30, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did your hero Mitt Rmoney go to school, Carol??
And George W. Bush??
Wouldn't be Haw-vard, would it, nitwit??
You're really dumb to throw the term liberal around, when like a boomerang, it comes back and hits you upside the head.
I'm lovin' it!!
Maybe you need to lighten' up a bit?

O'Reilly went to Harvard too.

Judged:

11

11

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“wake up”

Since: Jan 10

utica ny

#882034 Mar 30, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You already admitted to being a bigot.
Being homosexual does not mean you are more likely to be a pedophile as you indicated.
davey you're still trying to twist the truth. Is truth realy that hard for a liberal such as yourself to grasp? I never said that at all.but yes ,if my thinking that a man who puts his manhood into another man poop is a man who has mental problems makes me a bigot in your mind ,then so be it.. oh , 1 more question for you. When was it that homosexuals became their own race?

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#882035 Mar 30, 2013
TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
No you gotta love him because he gave us 25 yrs. of Prosperity not 5 yrs. of H*LL!!
Well, there's that too.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#882036 Mar 30, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you need to lighten' up a bit?
O'Reilly went to Harvard too.
Difference with O'Reilly and the rest of them is they were dropped on their head as a kid so the left part of the brain has lost it's ability for logical thinking. Much like yourself and the rest of the Fox drones.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#882037 Mar 30, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
Difference with O'Reilly and the rest of them is they were dropped on their head as a kid so the left part of the brain has lost it's ability for logical thinking. Much like yourself and the rest of the Fox drones.
I'd much rather take my chances having been dropped on my head as a child than to be born with the congenital defect of having to sit on my head throughout my entire life like you have.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
The Slayer

Findlay, OH

#882038 Mar 30, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
Your own stupidity proves you wrong!!
""One of the many attacks on our country from the Religious Right is the claim that our country is a Christian Nation...not just that the majority of people are Christians, but that the country itself was founded by Christians, for Christians. However, a little research into American history will show that this statement is a lie. Those people who spread this lie are known as Christian Revisionists. They are attempting to rewrite history, in much the same way as holocaust deniers are. The men responsible for building the foundation of the United States were men of The Enlightenment, not men of Christianity. They were Deists who did not believe the bible was true. They were Freethinkers who relied on their reason, not their faith.
If the U.S. was founded on the Christian religion, the Constitution would clearly say so--but it does not. Nowhere does the Constitution say: "The United States is a Christian Nation", or anything even close to that. In fact, the words "Jesus Christ, Christianity, Bible, Creator, Divine, and God" are never mentioned in the Constitution-- not even once. Nowhere in the Constitution is religion mentioned, except in exclusionary terms. When the Founders wrote the nation's Constitution, they specified that "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." (Article 6, section 3) This provision was radical in its day-- giving equal citizenship to believers and non-believers alike. They wanted to ensure that no religion could make the claim of being the official, national religion, such as England had. ""
The earliest Americans came here to escape what??
Religious persecution.
The religion happened to be Christian. Those are the folks that the first Americans were escaping from.
You remain a clueless right wing nitwit.
<quoted text>
WOW!! What a distortion of what I have posted.
To start with I posted our country was founded on Christian principles not founded on the Christian religion.
And that Constitution does not say anything about baseball being
American favorite national pass time, still many people think
that it is.
Harley DAVIDSON is a American icon, but that Constitution says
nothing about that.
You are taking my opinion way out of context and distorting it.
Fact is Christianity is by far our country most common
religion.
And our country was founded on Christian principles, example of
that was given in some of your post, our founding
fathers were freethinkers.....that is a Christian principle.
BTW....Most of the Founders were very much Christians.
We our very much a Christian country and this is GOD's country.

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#882039 Mar 31, 2013
The Slayer wrote:
<quoted text>
WOW!! What a distortion of what I have posted.
To start with I posted our country was founded on Christian principles not founded on the Christian religion.
And that Constitution does not say anything about baseball being
American favorite national pass time, still many people think
that it is.
Harley DAVIDSON is a American icon, but that Constitution says
nothing about that.
You are taking my opinion way out of context and distorting it.
Fact is Christianity is by far our country most common
religion.
And our country was founded on Christian principles, example of
that was given in some of your post, our founding
fathers were freethinkers.....that is a Christian principle.
BTW....Most of the Founders were very much Christians.
We our very much a Christian country and this is GOD's country.
But was America founded on Christian principles? Just read the first words of the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident; that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

From the beginning, America's founders accepted the reality that basic rights were inseparable from human beings and they recognized that those inalienable rights were not given by government nor acquired by force, but that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are the gifts of the Creator.

In 1844, the Court said, "Christianity is part of our common law."

In 1892, the Supreme Court said this: "No purpose of action against religion can be imputed to any legislation, state or national because this is a religious people. This is historically true."

In 1930, the U.S. Supreme Court said this: "We are a Christian people, according to our motto."

In 1952, the U.S. Supreme Court said, "We are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being.

The question isn't - Was America founded on Christian principles? The question is - what world view has given birth to and sustained America? The answer to that question is simple: Christianity.

http://www.aproundtable.org/issues.cfm...

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
liberal media Nazi

Gum Spring, VA

#882040 Mar 31, 2013
Name one communist country, or one despotic dictatorship, where gun ownership among the civilian population is a cherished right? Of course you can't. That type of tyranny only flourishes in an environment where the population is weak, and unable to stand up for itself. In the 1930's, after Hitler came to power, the NAZI government made the ownership of guns among private civilians illegal. They then proceeded to confiscate all the guns so that the German people would be weak, and unable to stand up against the tyrannical activities of their own government.

The Nazi(LIBERALS) disarmament campaign began as soon as Hitler assumed power in 1933. It started with the creation of large volumes of written rules and regulations. Yet it was not until March 1938, the same month that Hitler annexed Austria, that the Nazis created their own Weapons Law. On November 9, 1938, the Nazis(LIBERALS) launched the Kristallnacht, and unarmed Jews all over Germany were attacked by government-sponsored mobs. In conjunction with Kristallnacht, the government used the administrative authority of the 1938 Weapons Law to require immediate Jewish surrender of all firearms and edged weapons, and to mandate a sentence of death or 20 years in a concentration camp for any violation. Do you think if the Jews in Nazi Germany were well armed, and offered feirce resistance, that the holocaust would have happened on a scale that it did? Of course not. They offered very little resistance, and were not armed. Also during Hitlers reign, the Germans invaded country after country in Europe. However, one country they would not invade was Switzerland. Why? Switzerland was the only country left in Europe that still allowed it's people to freely keep and bear arms. The NAZI's(LIBERALS), being afraid of widespread armed resistance, left them alone.
Waxman

Stratford-upon-avon, UK

#882041 Mar 31, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
How dare we!!
After all, we wouldn't want to mention Mitt Rmoney's TWO degrees from Haw-vard now, would we??
Naw, liberals don't talk about Rmoney's elite, liberal education, do we??
And you voted for the fool, making you a liberal!!
HAHAHAHA
You're so stupid, you just walked full speed into a wall, moron!!
That sudden stop really hurt, eh wingnut??
You're as dull as a spoon.
<quoted text>
Nutjob option has lost it. It claims to be in England with me and hasn't posted yet and it's already 9:38am

Every post is hahahahaha.

Nutjob option/not surprized has melted down, fot sure.
truman

Boise, ID

#882042 Mar 31, 2013
liberal media Nazi wrote:
Name one communist country, or one despotic dictatorship, where gun ownership among the civilian population is a cherished right? Of course you can't. That type of tyranny only flourishes in an environment where the population is weak, and unable to stand up for itself. In the 1930's, after Hitler came to power, the NAZI government made the ownership of guns among private civilians illegal. They then proceeded to confiscate all the guns so that the German people would be weak, and unable to stand up against the tyrannical activities of their own government.
The Nazi(LIBERALS) disarmament campaign began as soon as Hitler assumed power in 1933. It started with the creation of large volumes of written rules and regulations. Yet it was not until March 1938, the same month that Hitler annexed Austria, that the Nazis created their own Weapons Law. On November 9, 1938, the Nazis(LIBERALS) launched the Kristallnacht, and unarmed Jews all over Germany were attacked by government-sponsored mobs. In conjunction with Kristallnacht, the government used the administrative authority of the 1938 Weapons Law to require immediate Jewish surrender of all firearms and edged weapons, and to mandate a sentence of death or 20 years in a concentration camp for any violation. Do you think if the Jews in Nazi Germany were well armed, and offered feirce resistance, that the holocaust would have happened on a scale that it did? Of course not. They offered very little resistance, and were not armed. Also during Hitlers reign, the Germans invaded country after country in Europe. However, one country they would not invade was Switzerland. Why? Switzerland was the only country left in Europe that still allowed it's people to freely keep and bear arms. The NAZI's(LIBERALS), being afraid of widespread armed resistance, left them alone.
NRA Propaganda Parrot.
Have cracker Polly!
JESUS KINGS OF KINGS

Gum Spring, VA

#882043 Mar 31, 2013

Welcome
Christ Is Risen!

Matt 28:5-6 And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified.

Matt 28:6 He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay.

Easter is a holiday when most people think of the Easter bunny, decorating eggs, dressing up in your best Sunday outfit and going to church.

Easter should be more than just another holiday to a Christian. It's the Sunday set aside to recognize the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ. GOD sent his WORD in the form of a child, being born to Mary the Virgin as God's only Begotten Son. He lived a very short time on earth, having been a carpenter and then God's messenger the last three years or so of his life. He was crucified, nailing all our sins to the cross, covering them with his precious blood. If we believe on him, accept his free gift of salvation, then we too will see him in all his Glory one day!

Jesus was compelled to bear his own cross, to travel to Golgotha, where they placed upon his head a crown of thorns and proclaimed him "THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS!". They placed him between two thieves hanging on a cross, drove nails through his hands and feet, later piercing his side to make sure he was dead. They took his garments to draw lots to see who would get them.

Mark 15:33 And when the sixth hour was come, there was darkness over the whole land until the ninth hour.

Mark 15:34 And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani? which is, being interpreted, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? "

He was mocked and given vinegar to drink instead of water.

John 19:28 After this, Jesus knowing that all things were now accomplished, that the scripture might be fulfilled, saith, I thirst.

John 19:30 When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.

Mark 15:38 And the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom.

Mark15:39 And when the centurion, which stood over against him, saw that he so cried out, and gave up the ghost, he said, Truly this man was the Son of God.

Mark 16:1 And when the sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the [mother] of James, and Salome, had bought sweet spices, that they might come and anoint him.

Mark 16:2 And very early in the morning the first [day] of the week, they came unto the sepulchre at the rising of the sun.

Mark 16:3 And they said among themselves, Who shall roll us away the stone from the door of the sepulchre?

Mark 16:4 And when they looked, they saw that the stone was rolled away: for it was very great.

Mark 16:5 And entering into the sepulchre, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment; and they were affrighted.

Mark 16:6 And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him.
truman

Boise, ID

#882044 Mar 31, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Do ya right whiners EVER quit blaming Obama for the effects of the Bush recession.
Whenever you freaking bozos quit doing that, I'll quit reminding you.
Oh,these Right Bent Puss-Heads are in utter DENIAL over the catastrophic damage their party's idealocally driven policies have caused this Nation.
And the fact is they really dont care.
They know as well as any body its delusional to create such a mess then essentially sit back and throw crap at the guy who has to clean it up but again they dont care.
They want back in power period.
So they can make the world a better place for Golden Parachute CEO's and they have decided that the truth is completly irrellevant and if telling and beleiving Lies furthers your Agenda then so be it.
They are Sick Hypocrites in every sense of the word.
Waxman

Stratford-upon-avon, UK

#882045 Mar 31, 2013
truman wrote:
<quoted text>Oh,these Right Bent Puss-Heads are in utter DENIAL over the catastrophic damage their party's idealocally driven policies have caused this Nation.
And the fact is they really dont care.
They know as well as any body its delusional to create such a mess then essentially sit back and throw crap at the guy who has to clean it up but again they dont care.
They want back in power period.
So they can make the world a better place for Golden Parachute CEO's and they have decided that the truth is completly irrellevant and if telling and beleiving Lies furthers your Agenda then so be it.
They are Sick Hypocrites in every sense of the word.
do you mean the ceos like Democrat jon corzine who lost billions of other peoples money and then after became a money bungler for obama?

wow err yoo err smert libewal! how clear in thought!

Judged:

20

20

20

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#882046 Mar 31, 2013
liberal media Nazi wrote:
Name one communist country, or one despotic dictatorship, where gun ownership among the civilian population is a cherished right? Of course you can't. That type of tyranny only flourishes in an environment where the population is weak, and unable to stand up for itself. In the 1930's, after Hitler came to power, the NAZI government made the ownership of guns among private civilians illegal. They then proceeded to confiscate all the guns so that the German people would be weak, and unable to stand up against the tyrannical activities of their own government.
The Nazi(LIBERALS) disarmament campaign began as soon as Hitler assumed power in 1933. It started with the creation of large volumes of written rules and regulations. Yet it was not until March 1938, the same month that Hitler annexed Austria, that the Nazis created their own Weapons Law. On November 9, 1938, the Nazis(LIBERALS) launched the Kristallnacht, and unarmed Jews all over Germany were attacked by government-sponsored mobs. In conjunction with Kristallnacht, the government used the administrative authority of the 1938 Weapons Law to require immediate Jewish surrender of all firearms and edged weapons, and to mandate a sentence of death or 20 years in a concentration camp for any violation. Do you think if the Jews in Nazi Germany were well armed, and offered feirce resistance, that the holocaust would have happened on a scale that it did? Of course not. They offered very little resistance, and were not armed. Also during Hitlers reign, the Germans invaded country after country in Europe. However, one country they would not invade was Switzerland. Why? Switzerland was the only country left in Europe that still allowed it's people to freely keep and bear arms. The NAZI's(LIBERALS), being afraid of widespread armed resistance, left them alone.
The Hitler gun control lie

Gun rights activists who cite the dictator as a reason against gun control have their history dangerously wrong

The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did.“The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition,” Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years.

The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works — Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns don’t kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).

Besides, Omer Bartov, a historian at Brown University who studies the Third Reich, notes that the Jews probably wouldn’t have had much success fighting back.“Just imagine the Jews of Germany exercising the right to bear arms and fighting the SA, SS and the Wehrmacht. The [Russian] Red Army lost 7 million men fighting the Wehrmacht, despite its tanks and planes and artillery. The Jews with pistols and shotguns would have done better?”

http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/stop_talking_...

Judged:

19

19

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#882047 Mar 31, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
The Hitler gun control lie
Gun rights activists who cite the dictator as a reason against gun control have their history dangerously wrong
The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did.“The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition,” Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years.
The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works — Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns don’t kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).
Besides, Omer Bartov, a historian at Brown University who studies the Third Reich, notes that the Jews probably wouldn’t have had much success fighting back.“Just imagine the Jews of Germany exercising the right to bear arms and fighting the SA, SS and the Wehrmacht. The [Russian] Red Army lost 7 million men fighting the Wehrmacht, despite its tanks and planes and artillery. The Jews with pistols and shotguns would have done better?”
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/stop_talking_...
Myths, lies and stupidity.. that's liberal...

Judged:

21

21

20

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#882048 Mar 31, 2013
An America that is losing faith with religion

There is a close relationship between culture and cult — between the shared attitudes and values of a people and their religious views and practices. American culture is increasingly shaped by men and women who would rather sleep in or play golf on a Sunday morning.

The nation’s religious composition — as revealed in a recent presentation by Luis Lugo of the Pew Research Center — is changing. In 2012, America ceased to be a majority Protestant country — the result, mainly, of a decline in the numbers of mainline Protestants (though there have been smaller losses among white evangelicals as well). Catholicism is holding its own with a stable 22 percent of the public, but its ethnic composition has shifted dramatically — about half of all Catholics younger than 40 are Latino.

One group, however, has swelled: those with no religious affiliation, also known as “nones”(as in “none of the above”). In the 1950s, this was about 2 percent of the population. In the 1970s, it was about 7 percent. Today, it is close to 20 percent. These gains can be found in all regions of the country, including the South. The trend is particularly pronounced among whites, among the young and among men.

....Though the nones are varied, and occasionally confused, their overall growth has been swift and unprecedented. This has occasioned scholarly disagreement over the causes. Clearly, the social stigma against being religiously unaffiliated has faded. America used to have plenty of Protestant agnostics and Catholic agnostics — people who identified with a faith tradition culturally but not theologically. Such cultural attachment has become less expected and less common. But the decline of religious conformity is itself a major social development, requiring some explanation.

One theory: The accelerated growth of the nones coincided with the rise of the religious right in the 1990s, leading some scholars to assert a connection. Though causality is hard to establish, many nones hold a very dim view of religious conservatives — asserting that churches are too focused on rules and money and too involved with politics. It is easy to imagine some of the unaffiliated looking at the movement led by Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson and concluding:“If this is religion, I want no part in it.”

But the trend appears to run deeper. As Lugo points out, declining trust in religious institutions since the 1990s has been accompanied by declining trust in most institutions (with the notable exception of the military). Confidence in government and big business has simultaneously fallen — and the public standing of both is lower than that of the church. Americans may be less affiliated with religious organizations because they have grown generally more individualistic and skeptical of authority.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/michae...

Judged:

19

19

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#882049 Mar 31, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>Myths, lies and stupidity.. that's liberal...
If You Believe These Right Wing Lies, You Shouldn’t Own a Gun

....In summation, if you believe easily debunked hysteria offered up by right wing cons and grifters (aka,“pundits”,“politicians” and “entertainers”), you are a victim of your own failure to think and hence should not be allowed to own a dangerous weapon. If you are threatening to murder people (including Democratic Congresspeople – new low,“patriots” don’t threaten to murder people over legislation. Really.) who disagree with your version of reality, you are only bringing attention to the fact that you should not own a gun because you are a threat to other citizens.

Remember, patriots, your second amendment does not trump others’ first amendment rights. When you show respect for all of the amendments and the rights of other human beings, you will be making a much better argument for paying attention to what you have to say.

No, I’m not an elitist, but if you think I am, you’re just demonstrating how low you set the bar for yourself. Man up, patriots. It costs nothing to educate yourselves and yes, we expect a modicum of sanity and working brain cells before we hand you weapons of mass destruction because guess what, our right to live trumps your right to be an idiot. Cry us a river.

Psst: Real, lasting liberty is won through ideas, not guns.“Loving your country” for real implies that you be educated about basic history and civics (immigrants have to know these things when they become citizens, why not you American exceptionalists?). Ponder that the next time you refer to yourself as a patriot.

Prove your worthiness by sounding somewhat reasonable, and then you won’t frighten the nation so much and they won’t awaken to the threat you pose in your primitive state. You’d better pray that nothing happens to any of the people you’re threatening right now, because if it does, it’s all over for your rights to own a weapon of mass destruction (Reagan/Brady ringing a bell?). It’s called losing big time. Go with sanity — it’s better for everyone.

Happy Gun Appreciation day, patriots.

Notice for Patriots: The Dixie Gun and Knife Show has been closed today due to an accidental shooting. Rinse, repeat.

http://www.politicususa.com/no-hitler-conquer...

Judged:

19

18

18

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 9 min jh4freedom 192,354
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 10 min boundary painter 1,669
Fun Song Combos (Sep '12) 12 min boundary painter 443
Music Artists A to Z (Feb '14) 14 min boundary painter 429
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 16 min boundary painter 963
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 20 min boundary painter 6,146
aggy-6-30-15 24 min boundary painter 13
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages