Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1252143 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: May 11

Aspers, PA

#879896 Mar 26, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you mean like all you elderly Democrats that are putting our kids in debt by doubling the national debt soon? Is that your defenition of a caring parent, Democrat?
Do you mean like the Republicans actually doubling the debt under Bush?

I mean really, is your right whiner memory that short?

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#879897 Mar 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Another right whiner who has never managed squat.
Companies hire people to do jobs. They constantly strive for efficiency.
To think that a company would hire more people because they could pay them less is ridiculous.
The right whiner stance on this is to think people should make less & less & then when full time employees at these low wages still qualify for government programs or fall below the minimum to pay federal income taxes, you call them lazy moochers.
The study was done by the Employment Policies Institute, a free market think tank specializing in wage issues. Take it up with them.
Jane Says

New York, NY

#879898 Mar 26, 2013
As spring break begins for schoolchildren across the country, thousands of students will travel to Washington, DC. The trips, funded by bake sales and other events throughout the year, will allow the students to take in Washington's historic landmarks.

One premier destination is off-limits this year, however. A few weeks ago, the Obama Administration announced it was suspending public, self-guided tours of the White House as a result of the automatic sequester cuts that the administration proposed in 2011. While America's students stand outside the White House fence, the First Daughters, Sasha and Malia, are enjoying spring break with friends at the Atlantis Resort on Paradise Island in the Bahamas.

Breitbart News' Matt Boyle broke the news Monday morning that numerous sources have reported seeing the First Daughters in the Bahamas this weekend. Presumably, the Obamas are paying the costs of the resort out of their own pockets. THE ROBUST SECRET SERVICE DETAIL THAT MUST ACCOMPANY THE FIRST DAUGHTERS, HOWEVER, IS FUNDED BY TAXPAYERS.

THE PRINCIPAL REASON THE WHITE HOUSE CANCELED PUBLIC TOURS WAS TO SAVE MONEY ON SECRET SERVICE STAFF.

The White House reported that suspending the tours would save $74,000 a week. Other reports have put the savings at just $18,000 a week.

Whichever the true amount, the Secret Service detail necessary to protect the First Daughters on their spring break could likely have been used to keep the White House open to the rest of America's school children. Judicial Watch reported that Malia Obama's Spring Break in Mexico last year cost taxpayers over $115,000. That amount would cover 2-6 weeks of White House tours.

At the very least, it would ensure that, this spring break, thousands of America's students could cap their trip to DC with a uniquely American tradition--a tour of the White House.

Since: May 11

Aspers, PA

#879899 Mar 26, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"homo"
Sorry he you are bankrupt. Why do you not get off your dead ass and correct your problem?
Peace
KMA
F*cking POS bigoted Easy Eed. I get it, you hate homosexuals & make sure everyone knows it.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#879900 Mar 26, 2013
flack wrote:
Study: Elizabeth Warren's Minimum Wage Argument 'Makes Zero Economic Sense'
In fact unlike Warren's $22 hour minimum wage the study says raising the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour will cost poor people 400,000 to 450,000 jobs and 1000's of small businesses to close. Libtards are SO ftiggin' stupid!!!!
The Trader Joe's Lesson: How to Pay a Living Wage and Still Make Money in Retail

Companies that invest in higher salaries for low-level employees find success in a competitive market

The average American cashier makes $20,230 a year, a salary that in a single-earner household would leave a family of four living under the poverty line. But if he works the cash registers at QuikTrip, it's an entirely different story. The convenience-store and gas-station chain offers entry-level employees an annual salary of around $40,000, plus benefits. Those high wages didn't stop QuikTrip from prospering in a hostile economic climate. While other low-cost retailers spent the recession laying off staff and shuttering stores, QuikTrip expanded to its current 645 locations across 11 states.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2...
WaxmanIdiot

United States

#879901 Mar 26, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>These liberals oppose your belief and right to bear arms: Hitler, Castro, Stalin, Amin, Lenin, Mao, Chavez, Obama. Who do you trust dummy?
certainly not the rightwhiners.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#879902 Mar 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Another right whiner who has never managed squat.
Companies hire people to do jobs. They constantly strive for efficiency.
To think that a company would hire more people because they could pay them less is ridiculous.
The right whiner stance on this is to think people should make less & less & then when full time employees at these low wages still qualify for government programs or fall below the minimum to pay federal income taxes, you call them lazy moochers.
I've owned a few businesses. I managed a few also. You are a clueless twit.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#879903 Mar 26, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> The study was done by the Employment Policies Institute, a free market think tank specializing in wage issues. Take it up with them.
a conservative free market 'think' tank.
WaxmanIdiot

United States

#879904 Mar 26, 2013
Jane Says wrote:
<quoted text>while FDR rounded up Japanese Americans and put them in camps. definitely liberal.
better off a liberal than a retard, stay retard jane, you proved it on nov. 6 2012.

Since: May 11

Aspers, PA

#879905 Mar 26, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> I've owned a few businesses. I managed a few also. You are a clueless twit.
This in the internet.

There is no way you ran a successful company with employees. None.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#879906 Mar 26, 2013
Many employers believe that one of the best ways to raise their profit margin is to cut labor costs. But companies like QuikTrip, the grocery-store chain Trader Joe's, and Costco Wholesale are proving that the decision to offer low wages is a choice, not an economic necessity. All three are low-cost retailers, a sector that is traditionally known for relying on part-time, low-paid employees. Yet these companies have all found that the act of valuing workers can pay off in the form of increased sales and productivity.

"Retailers start with this philosophy of seeing employees as a cost to be minimized," says Zeynep Ton of MIT's Sloan School of Management. That can lead businesses into a vicious cycle. Underinvestment in workers can result in operational problems in stores, which decrease sales. And low sales often lead companies to slash labor costs even further. Middle-income jobs have declined recently as a share of total employment, as many employers have turned full-time jobs into part-time positions with no benefits and unpredictable schedules.

QuikTrip, Trader Joe's, and Costco operate on a different model, Ton says. "They start with the mentality of seeing employees as assets to be maximized," she says. As a result, their stores boast better operational efficiency and customer service, and those result in better sales. QuikTrip sales per labor hour are two-thirds higher than the average convenience-store chain, Ton found, and sales per square foot are over 50 percent higher.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2...

Since: May 11

Aspers, PA

#879907 Mar 26, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> The study was done by the Employment Policies Institute, a free market think tank specializing in wage issues. Take it up with them.
"free market"? Its run by a lobbyist.

No, I'm taking it up with you. You posted it as YOUR argument against a higher minimum wage.

I see you are duped by all these tilted think tanks because their name sounds official. No wonder you're so uninformed.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#879908 Mar 26, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
The Trader Joe's Lesson: How to Pay a Living Wage and Still Make Money in Retail
Companies that invest in higher salaries for low-level employees find success in a competitive market
The average American cashier makes $20,230 a year, a salary that in a single-earner household would leave a family of four living under the poverty line. But if he works the cash registers at QuikTrip, it's an entirely different story. The convenience-store and gas-station chain offers entry-level employees an annual salary of around $40,000, plus benefits. Those high wages didn't stop QuikTrip from prospering in a hostile economic climate. While other low-cost retailers spent the recession laying off staff and shuttering stores, QuikTrip expanded to its current 645 locations across 11 states.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2...
from your article.

Trader Joe's streamlines operations by offering a limited number of products and very few sales promotions. Costco stacks products on pallets, as warehouses would. And the QuikTrip model requires investors to have the fortitude to accept possible short-termed drops in profit.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#879909 Mar 26, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> from your article.
Trader Joe's streamlines operations by offering a limited number of products and very few sales promotions. Costco stacks products on pallets, as warehouses would. And the QuikTrip model requires investors to have the fortitude to accept possible short-termed drops in profit.
and this....

To see what happens when workers are devalued, look no further than Borders or Circuit City. Both big-box retailers saw sales plummet after staff cutbacks, and both ultimately went bankrupt.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#879910 Mar 26, 2013
There are also trade-offs to investing in employees. Businesses that spend more on their workers have to cut costs elsewhere. Trader Joe's streamlines operations by offering a limited number of products and very few sale promotions. Costco stocks products on pallets, as a warehouse would. And the QuikTrip model requires investors to have the fortitude to accept possible short-term drops in profits. "You have to take a loss for a little bit," says Maureen Conway, executive director of the Economic Opportunities Program at the Aspen Institute. "You have to pay above market. You have to change how you do business."

At the upper echelons of the American workforce, salaries have soared. Companies are accustomed to thinking of their highest-level employees as "talent," and fighting to hire and reward people who will help grow the company. Now Trader Joe's and QuikTrip are proving that lower-level employees can be assets whose skills improve the bottom-line as well.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2...

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#879911 Mar 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
"free market"? Its run by a lobbyist.
No, I'm taking it up with you. You posted it as YOUR argument against a higher minimum wage.
I see you are duped by all these tilted think tanks because their name sounds official. No wonder you're so uninformed.
Look it's really simple math and I really don't care to argue with you about it. If I have a labor cost of $35 an hour for my 3 employees and the minimum wage goes up $2.85 1 person is getting laid off. No way around it. Simple math.

Raising the minimum wage is about two things. Union wages and increased taxes.
Jane Says

New York, NY

#879912 Mar 26, 2013
WaxmanIdiot wrote:
<quoted text> AND YOU AND YOUR PARTY OF CLOWNS LOST THE ELECTION, STAY IGNORANT AND DEFEATED YOU DUMBFKK! YOU DESERVED WHAT YOU'VE GOT.
yep, like ObamaCare. i personally can't wait :) to hear the obots complain. at least the ones who aren't handed everything for FREE.

'Democrats hope to retake the House of Representatives in next yearís elections. They wonít ó and theyíll have themselves to blame, because 2014 is when ObamaCare kicks in.

With a vengeance.

The authors of the Obama health law postponed the pain until AFTER the 2012 election. Some popular provisions went into effect immediately, such as allowing children to stay on their parentís plan until age 26. And the White House granted 1,472 WAIVERS to various companies and unions, exempting them from insurance reforms so they wouldnít drop coverage for employees and members BEFORE the presidential contest.

Yet a majority of voters on Election Day still opposed the health law (though, obviously, it wasnít the deciding issue in the presidential race). And opinion will only sour more as the law takes full force starting in January.

People in their 20s and 30s will be clobbered ó their health-insurance premiums will double (or more), insurers report. Nineteen percent of the presidentís 2012 voters came from this age group. The biggest problem: The Obama law forces insurers to charge young, healthy people more to cover the cost of insuring the middle-aged and those with pre-existing conditions.

Read more: Disaster for Dems - NYPOST.com http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolu...

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#879913 Mar 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
This in the internet.
There is no way you ran a successful company with employees. None.
Sorry you are so incompetent. I ran my businesses. I even ran businesses while running other people's businesses. I retired at fifty with not a care in the world. Sorry about your luck.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#879914 Mar 26, 2013
The Promise of More: Why We Should Raise the Minimum Wage

How have we gotten to a place where people can work tirelessly and still not make ends meet? In large part itís the result of political ambivalence to the conditions of poverty and the wages of our lowest paid workers. As the minimum wage has remained flat, productivity has increased, and so too have corporate profits. If the minimum wage of the 1960s had increased with productivity, it would stand at around $15/hour. If it increased with inflation, it would be more than $10/hour.

While the economic arguments for raising the minimum wage are important, we should also not forget to think about the morality of our economy. We all derive not just wages from our labors, but purpose, meaning and a sense that we are part of something greater than ourselves: by supporting our family, helping our co-workers, and participating in the shared enterprise of community. Yes, the minimum wage should be higher. But itís not just because itís good for the economy and will help raise the wages of even non-minimum wage workers. Itís because there is a value to work that is deeper than money. And we cheapen that value if at the end of working a long day, our fellow Americans still live in poverty, with little hope of escape, and no promise of just a little bit more next year.

Read more: http://ideas.time.com/2013/02/21/the-promise-...
Forum

Hobbs, NM

#879915 Mar 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
This in the internet.
There is no way you ran a successful company with employees. None.
Is it just a joke that a man wants to marry another
man or a woman wants to marry another woman?

Or is it just dumb.

They should be forced to get mental help.
Letting them near children is wrong.
They are ill.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 5 min Jacques Ottawa 192,427
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 16 min nag 6,149
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 19 min nag 1,671
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr RACE 99,906
aggy-6-30-15 1 hr RACE 14
Dear Abby July 3, 2015 1 hr RACE 8
Ask Amy 7-5-15 2 hr RACE 6
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages