Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#878679 Mar 23, 2013
It proves nothing.

FL and TX used Federal Stimulus money to balance their budgets, while complaining about the stimulus at the same time. I'm sure the rest did the same, but won't bother to look.

----------

""NEW YORK (CNNMoney)-- Texas Gov. Rick Perry likes to tell Washington to stop meddling in state affairs. He vocally opposed the Obama administration's 2009 stimulus program to spur the economy and assist cash-strapped states.

Perry also likes to trumpet that his state balanced its budget in 2009, while keeping billions in its rainy day fund.

But he couldn't have done that without a lot of help from ... guess where? Washington.

Turns out Texas was the state that depended the most on those very stimulus funds to plug nearly 97% of its shortfall for fiscal 2010, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Even budget deficits are bigger in Texas
Texas, which crafts a budget every two years, was facing a $6.6 billion shortfall for its 2010-2011 fiscal years. It plugged nearly all of that deficit with $6.4 billion in Recovery Act money, allowing it to leave its $9.1 billion rainy day fund untouched.

"Stimulus was very helpful in getting them through the last few years," said Brian Sigritz, director of state fiscal studies for the National Association of State Budget Officers, said of Texas.

Even as Perry requested the Recovery Act money, he railed against it. On the very same day he asked for the funds, he set up a petition titled "No Government Bailouts."

"Join our fight and add your voice to a growing list of several thousand Americans who are fed up with this irresponsible spending that threatens our future," Perry wrote on his blog on Feb. 18, 2009.""

----------

As usual, you're full of shit, Waxturd.
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
But it proves a balanced budget can be done and it proves lily's scoffing about the fed doing it is not logical, nutjob. So what if it's only 20%- that is not an insignificant percentage, unless you are a mindless nutcase like you are.
Actually, in Connecticut, we have a balanced budget amendment, so there is one more state. The caveat is the being a Democrat state, the corrupt Democrats simply ignore the amendment and find ways to subvert the constitution.
http://aconnecticutlawblog.com/2011/05/connec...
You are a moron, nutcular nutcase.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#878680 Mar 23, 2013
Peggy Noonan:“War Almost Killed the GOP”

The quote in my title is actually from the deck of her article, so she probably didn’t write those words. But they capture the gist of her column on the Iraq War:

It muddied up the meaning of conservatism and bloodied up its reputation. No Burkean prudence or respect for reality was evident. Ronald Reagan hated the Soviet occupation of the Warsaw Pact countries—really, hated the oppression and violence. He said it, named it, and forced the Soviets to defend it. He did not, however, invade Eastern Europe to liberate it. He used military power sparingly. He didn’t think the right or lucky thing would necessarily happen. His big dream was a nuclear-free world, which he pursued daringly but peacefully.

Noonan notes, in parallel with TAC‘s cover story, that the war blew the GOP’s reputation as the party of sober foreign policy and economic stewardship. It also “stoked an atmosphere in which doubters and critics were dismissed as weak, unpatriotic, disloyal.… A conservative movement that had prided itself, in the 1970s and 1980s, on its intellectualism … seemed no longer capable of an honest argument.”

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccart...

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#878681 Mar 23, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Why Tea Partiers Are Boycotting Fox News
Is Fox News going soft?
That is what a number of Tea Party activists are saying and they are organizing a boycott to protest the conservative station’s coverage, especially what they view as the network’s relative silence in investigating the attacks on a diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.
“Particularly after the election, Fox keeps turning to the left,” said Stan Hjerlied, 75, of Fort Collins, Colo., and a participant in the boycott. He pointed to an interview Fox News CEO Roger Ailes gave after the election in which he said that the Republican Party and Fox News need to modernize, especially around immigration.“So we are really losing our only conservative network.”
The three-day boycott lasted Thursday morning through Sunday morning, and is the second time this group of activists have gone Fox-free in an effort to steer the coverage. Organizers say a two-day boycott earlier this month knocked 20 percent off of the network’s regular viewership.(A Daily Beast analysis of the same data showed that the boycott had little effect.)
A spokeswoman for Fox News did not respond to a request for comment.
A leader of the boycott, Kathy Amidon, of Nashville, declined an interview, instead directing The Daily Beast to a website, Benghazi-Truth. The website, a single-page, 23,000-word manifesto complete with multicolored fonts, supposedly incriminating videos of Fox News’s complicity in a coverup, and communist propaganda photographs, is kept by someone who identifies himself online as “Proe Graphique,” and who other members of boycott described as someone who works “in New York media.”
By way of explanation, the website reports:“People ask why not all mainstream media? Why just Boycott FOX? The answer, again, is that FOX needs the Tea Party/conservatives more than the conservatives need FOX after FOX turned left, basically selling out the people who made FOX successful in an attempt to earn an extra buck. FOX is extremely vulnerable to these boycotts while the rest of the MSM doesn’t need us at all, to speak of.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/03...
it's real shame that reality has crept into the FOX rhetoric.
but losing an election that FOX said could not be lost will do that to people. well, except for those who are still living in Limbaughland.
FOX is Controlled by the Modern Liberals Which Rupert Murdoch is one.

Rupert Murdoch Political activities in Australia

Murdoch found a political ally in John McEwen, leader of the Australian Country Party (now known as the National Party of Australia), who was governing in coalition with the larger Menzies-Holt Liberal Party. From the very first issue of The Australian Murdoch began taking McEwen's side in every issue that divided the long-serving coalition partners.(The Australian, 15 July 1964, first edition, front page: "Strain in Cabinet, Liberal-CP row flares.") It was an issue that threatened to split the coalition government and open the way for the stronger Australian Labor Party to dominate Australian politics. It was the beginning of a long campaign that served McEwen well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Murdoch#P...

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#878682 Mar 23, 2013
Beware the National Fertilizer Association

Let's check in for a moment with the far-left fringes of the gun debate, the kind of people who apparently can't read or don't understand the meaning of words like "shall not be infringed."

"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose." These are words of an extremist.

Only some liberal could come up with this argument, which continues by claiming that any number of prohibitions and restrictions on guns passed by various legislatures, state and federal, are well within the rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

Who could have such obvious disrespect toward the clear meaning of the Founding Fathers?

Unfortunately for the gun lobby, this was the argument put forth by none other than Antonin Scalia, associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, considered by many people to be the foremost conservative legal mind in America today. His position on almost everything (except when he finds it inconvenient) boils down to taking the words of the Constitution literally. There is no interpretation needed, really -- the words mean what they mean and that's that, regardless of changing times.

His argument in this case comes from a decision in 2008 that overturned a local ban against owning firearms for personal use in Washington, D.C. The 5-4 decision codified the notion that the Second Amendment refers to a person's individual right to bear arms, not just in the context of a militia.

Of course, not everyone agrees with the court on this, but it is, until further notice, the law of the land. That's how it works with the Supreme Court. There's no further appeal, and its decision stands unless a future Supreme Court wants to disagree or the Constitution is amended.

But it does put the lie to what many gun-rights supporters consider their trump card. It's a widespread belief that because gun rights are in the Constitution, that's the end of the story.

You can argue whether the various proposals currently on the table are a good idea. That's what's going on, supposedly, in the state Assembly and in Congress. But the argument that these discussions are illegitimate is a losing one.

Read more: http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Hugh-Baile...
carol

Orlando, FL

#878683 Mar 23, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Your abortion stance with regard to politics is mindless because the issue is entirely in the hands of the courts. Electing "pro-life" politicians accomplishes nothing, particularly imbeciles like Todd Akin.
Your only hope is long-term changes in public opinion.
The focus for conservatives at the present time should only be on the survival of the economy and the nation. Things will fall into
place in due time once sanity and common sense is restored.

However, as long as we condone the killing of the most vulnerable among us simply because of irresponsible behavior in too many instances, we can never expect anything good to come out of it.

Complacency and self-absorption has been the undoing of many societies in the past and empires have fallen for the same reasons.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#878685 Mar 23, 2013
Yet another issue Repugnants will lose future elections over.

You've lost elections over your stupid policies towards immigrants.

You've lost elections over your stupid policies towards women.

You've lost elections over your stupid policies towards gays.

Soon you will lose elections over Climate Change.

Nitwits like you and Carol appear to enjoy losing elections.

It gives you something to bitch and whine about.

----------
""Is there a scientific consensus on climate change?

The major scientific agencies of the United States — including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)— agree that climate change is occurring and that humans are contributing to it. In 2010, the National Research Council concluded that "Climate change is occurring, is very likely caused by human activities, and poses significant risks for a broad range of human and natural systems".[1] Many independent scientific organizations have released similar statements, both in the United States and abroad. This doesn't necessarily mean that every scientist sees eye to eye on each component of the climate change problem, but broad agreement exists that climate change is happening and is primarily caused by excess greenhouse gases from human activities.

Scientists are still researching a number of important questions, including exactly how much Earth will warm, how quickly it will warm, and what the consequences of the warming will be in specific regions of the world. Scientists continue to research these questions so society can be better informed about how to plan for a changing climate. However, enough certainty exists about basic causes and effects of climate change to justify taking actions that reduce future risks.""

http://epa.gov/climatechange/facts.html

----------

Want proof how bad your beliefs will be for your party??

""For the first time since the United States entered a deep recession five years ago, 70% of Americans now say they believe global warming is a reality, according to researchers.

In a report released Thursday by the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, authors wrote that America’s concern about global warming is now at its highest level since 2008, and that 58% of Americans expressed worries about it""

----------

You lost the debate, now it will cost you deniers plenty.
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
But there is no political mileage in the truth.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#878686 Mar 23, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>FOX is Controlled by the Modern Liberals Which Rupert Murdoch is one.
Rupert Murdoch Political activities in Australia
Murdoch found a political ally in John McEwen, leader of the Australian Country Party (now known as the National Party of Australia), who was governing in coalition with the larger Menzies-Holt Liberal Party. From the very first issue of The Australian Murdoch began taking McEwen's side in every issue that divided the long-serving coalition partners.(The Australian, 15 July 1964, first edition, front page: "Strain in Cabinet, Liberal-CP row flares.") It was an issue that threatened to split the coalition government and open the way for the stronger Australian Labor Party to dominate Australian politics. It was the beginning of a long campaign that served McEwen well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Murdoch#P...
there's always the Daily Caller or Breitbart.

but if you're into bikini pics, the Caller is the way to go.

but if you're into Alex Jones type conspiracy theories, Breitbart would be the choice.

but if you're Galt, WND is the only way to go.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#878688 Mar 23, 2013
Nucular Nutjob...

for sure...
Not Surprized wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong again wetbrain!!!! Keep guessing "moonbat"!
"all of us here"??? As in "The Waxturd Trolling Carnival of Sockpuppets", "all of us"???
"WAXTURD" The turd that just wont flush.
Nostrilis Waxman/Floriduh/No Surprise aka known as the stalker "WAXBALLS topix troll clusterfvck, same troll-multiple id's==Delusional army of one:
Demidiots, TSM, Forum, Old Crazy Goober, Proud2bewhite, No Surprise, Jimma Carter, Impeach Obama, Arguingwithidiots, loulee rat mouth fl, Barney Frank , fake Dem, Lt Dan, LOL, lily's children, LOL, Floriduh, fukutu, Ignoramus, Liberals Eat Feces, DEM idiots, Billy Carter,, Warturds, CAE, Fetch N Stepinit, Rectal Liberal, Commie DemocRATs, Wartime, Billy C, Subversive Barry, Groucho, FUBO, King George, Patrick, Democrats are Fascists, Gay Ghost, VAGITARIAN, Jimmy, Bronach, Pete, King George, PTBW Forever, The Real Truth, WorthlessWhore, Louise, Cheryl
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's how rediculous you are.
Subversive Barry wrote:
<quoted text>
What a rediculous thing to say. You obviously are deficient in this area.
nostrilis waxman wrote:
another rediculous assert by a clueless moron:
<quoted text>
Nostrilis Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
What is it like being dead Ghost?
What is it like? Do you feel dead?
#632047
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
He lives here just like the Ghost does.
Tell me. What is it like being dead?
Groucho wrote:
Lehighton, PA
<quoted text>
Hiya Woofie. Ya got me confused with someone else.
Nostrilis Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh sure You also have a Unicorn in the back yard,right? Toodles, ape man.
Democrats are Fascists wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you ride your Unicorn often, liberal?
577856 Democrats are Fascists wrote: Have a nice day Richard Cranium. <quoted text>
Grey Moron wrote: <quoted text> What a perfect description of the typical liberal. Good job, Richard Cranium.
Nostrilis Waxman wrote:#395210 Jul 17, 2011 <quoted text> Look Richard Cranium. I already told you, NOT INTERESTED in you. It's obvious to me you were born from the anal canal (spelling police - what a moron - like I'm going to spell check posting to a loser).
Nostrilis Waxman 395208 Jul 17, 2011 No. Liberals who cannot adapt to society like you are homo-schooled Richard Cranium. Let me guess about you... You are an Obama voter?
Grey Moron Fairview, NJ ..and we thought you couldn't see past your bulbous nose. I guess that's not a problem when your eyes are on the side of your head. Oh, what a long tounge you have!
Grey Moron Fairview, NJ |#441048 Bored. You say a lot, but it means nothing. One can only deal with a moron like you in limited doses. I'm sure you've encoutered this before, like when you approach people at a party. Did you ever wonder why they scatter? Zzzzz.
Nostrilis Waxman Windsor, Ct #395266 Jul 17, 2011 I'm sure you're used to it. After all, when you walk up to people at a party, don't they go the other way too?
Nostrilis Waxman #93787 Mar 7, 2011 When you walk up to a group at a party, does everyone walk away from you? July 17, 2011
Nostrilis Waxman #395266 I'm sure you're used to it. After all, when you walk up to people at a party, don't they go the other way too? Is it sad liberal moron?
Nwaxman wrote: <quoted text> By the way, do like it Greek? I'll be gentle with you. I know you Democrats like to avoid talking about Greece! Can I call you my little Greeker?
Nwaxman wrote:
<quoted text>If you've got any balls, then spit them out because they're definitely not yours.
Dman wrote:
<quoted text>How's it going, Spork? Still have a mouthful of Barry?
Time for some chocolate cake and ice cream!
VAGITARIAN wrote:
<quoted text>
You can stand in line with the rest of the libtards and await your ass-pounding from the mods.
[nwaxman]I like big sweaty co ock in my azz whole!
Nwaxman wrote:
<quoted text>butt-crack
carol

Orlando, FL

#878689 Mar 23, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Your church people stayed home because they didn't like Romney's religion. You elected Obama.
And you can prove that how?

Blacks and Hispanics make up a significant number of "church people". Who do you suppose most of them voted for?

Conservative Christians would have voted for anyone besides Obama and I can pretty much guarantee most did.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#878690 Mar 23, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
With Obama economics, there is no interest on your money, anyway.
Meanwhile they lie, claiming there is no inflation.
I know I go grocery shopping every day. The prices go up or the product gets smaller or both.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#878691 Mar 23, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
The focus for conservatives at the present time should only be on the survival of the economy and the nation. Things will fall into
place in due time once sanity and common sense is restored.
However, as long as we condone the killing of the most vulnerable among us simply because of irresponsible behavior in too many instances, we can never expect anything good to come out of it.
Complacency and self-absorption has been the undoing of many societies in the past and empires have fallen for the same reasons.
The numbers prove it: The GOP is estranged from America

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-nu...

there's what your version of sanity and common sense will get ya.
Cway

United States

#878692 Mar 23, 2013
TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
Nuculur correct me if I’m Wrong!! But didn’t Liberals and the Media write Off the Republican Party in 2010?
No, they didn't.

We were quite aware of the short-term drawbacks of healthcare reform in 2010,

But as you can see, the tide has begun to turn.
carol

Orlando, FL

#878694 Mar 23, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
The number of murders isn't a disgrace??
The number of poor with no healthcare is a national disgrace.
The way we treat Americans is a national disgrace.
We have more people in prison, per capita, than any other major nation, including communist China and Russia. That's a national disgrace.
You stupidly want to force women to have babies they don't want and can't afford.
Then you offer nothing to help them, allowing these infants to grow up in poverty and end up committing crimes because they have nothing.
Your entire policy is a sham, designed to punish women, not help them.
The Supreme Court declared Abortion to be legal almost 40 years ago.
Yet you wingnuts have done your level best to make the law of the land impotent. Everyone sees it, old white men making laws for women.
And stupid old harpies like you imposing your moral values on others.
While you smoke, eat junk and expect the rest of us to pay for your medical expenses, all self destructive.
But have another piece of pie and a cigarette, you hypocrite!!
Jesus Christ hates people like you, who pervert his beliefs.
<quoted text>
This is directed at Lily too who posted something about this earlier.

$9 trillion has been spent on the War on Poverty since the Johnson era.

Statistics show there are only three ways to avoid poverty:
1. Finishing school.
2. Delaying parenthood.
3. Getting a job (any job).

High school dropouts are three times more likely to end up in poverty. One of the most common reasons teens drop out of high school is out-of-wedlock births. Single mothers are the most dependent on welfare with over half of all welfare money spent on families that began with a teen birth.

So tell me how do you suppose we end poverty with these statistics if $9 trillion over the past four decades hasn't even made a dent?
Cway

United States

#878696 Mar 23, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
The numbers prove it: The GOP is estranged from America
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-nu...
there's what your version of sanity and common sense will get ya.
The Repukes think they wage war by lies, out CIA agents and wreck the economy, then get re-elected by pointing the finger and going:

"WAHHHHHHH! Clinton did it!"
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#878697 Mar 23, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Led by Sen. Mike Enzi, Republicans Will Vote to Raise Taxes & Tax iTunes Downloads
One day I will have a scorecard for conservatives. And those Republicans who vote for the Marketplace Fairness Act in any form will be blackballed from that scorecard. Until then, I hope groups like Club for Growth and Heritage Action will score against it. It is a damnable piece of legislation whose backers are a who’s who of major corporations.
http://www.redstate.com/2013/03/20/led-by-sen...
speaking of reality on FOX....thanks Eric.
The Senate vote to allow states to tax internet sales (which is what this is about) passed by 75-24, so lots of Democrats must have voted "yes."

This is a really bad idea.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#878698 Mar 23, 2013
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
I will repeat: 80% of welfare recipients are single white women with children. There is no such thing as cradle to grave welfare. Poverty is never comfortable, wanting your fellow Americans and children to go hungry is a sickness inherent in the mind of the rightwinger, who is one step away from poverty himself, it's your biggest fear.
A healthy educated population benefits all of society. Without social safety nets crime increases. You're obviously of limited intellect.
We give $10 million a day to Israel, not to mention all the other countries aid as well, Israel has socialized medicine and education, we pay for that, yet, you hate your own fellow Americans because you have some misguided notion that you are special because you are white?
You should be embarrassed at your ignorance
You should be embarrassed at your ignorance. But you aren't and that is puzzling.

You will repeat: 80% of welfare recipients are single white women with children. So what? We're talking about per capita numbers. He just told you about this and it flies right through your ears like everything else.

"Blacks make up 13% of the population, 64% receive welfare, compared to 11% of the white population."

Similar ratios crop up with black crime, rape, murder and prison populations.

You should be embarrassed at your ignorance. But you aren't and that is puzzling.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#878699 Mar 23, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Beware the National Fertilizer Association
Let's check in for a moment with the far-left fringes of the gun debate, the kind of people who apparently can't read or don't understand the meaning of words like "shall not be infringed."
"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose." These are words of an extremist.
Only some liberal could come up with this argument, which continues by claiming that any number of prohibitions and restrictions on guns passed by various legislatures, state and federal, are well within the rights guaranteed under the Constitution.
Who could have such obvious disrespect toward the clear meaning of the Founding Fathers?
Unfortunately for the gun lobby, this was the argument put forth by none other than Antonin Scalia, associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, considered by many people to be the foremost conservative legal mind in America today. His position on almost everything (except when he finds it inconvenient) boils down to taking the words of the Constitution literally. There is no interpretation needed, really -- the words mean what they mean and that's that, regardless of changing times.
His argument in this case comes from a decision in 2008 that overturned a local ban against owning firearms for personal use in Washington, D.C. The 5-4 decision codified the notion that the Second Amendment refers to a person's individual right to bear arms, not just in the context of a militia.
Of course, not everyone agrees with the court on this, but it is, until further notice, the law of the land. That's how it works with the Supreme Court. There's no further appeal, and its decision stands unless a future Supreme Court wants to disagree or the Constitution is amended.
But it does put the lie to what many gun-rights supporters consider their trump card. It's a widespread belief that because gun rights are in the Constitution, that's the end of the story.
You can argue whether the various proposals currently on the table are a good idea. That's what's going on, supposedly, in the state Assembly and in Congress. But the argument that these discussions are illegitimate is a losing one.
Read more: http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Hugh-Baile...
Flogging a dead horse.

How about doing something possible, like getting violently mentally ill killers off the streets?

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#878700 Mar 23, 2013
NJ raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> When presented with facts, I figured some Asshole would respond with some dumshit! Giving an ultimatum of live in poverty or play the game, I'd choose the game everytime! Your phoney stats only points to the ignorance of you & your kind, but comments like yours shows fear because change is evident & in progress as we speak ie. Black President. White House occupied by black folks, BBQs on the White House lawn. Not only the black president, but elected twice over the status quo! And your kind won't sniff that office again! What hurts you the most ignoramus is it was your kids that got the president elected both times. Chew on that shit!
You sound just like Jesse Sharpton! Avoid the issues at all costs and play the Race Card instead.
NuculurNutsurpri Zed

Pompano Beach, FL

#878701 Mar 23, 2013
Not Surprized wrote:
<quoted text>
I am wrong again with my wetbrain!!!! I keep guessing I'm a "moonbat"!
"all of me here"??? As in "The Rejected Woman Trolling Carnival of Sockpuppets", "all of me"???
I am the turd that just wont flush.
I am madly in love with and crave the attention of:
Demidiots, TSM, Forum, Old Crazy Goober, Proud2bewhite, No Surprise, Jimma Carter, Impeach Obama, Arguingwithidiots, loulee rat mouth fl, Barney Frank , fake Dem, Lt Dan, LOL, lily's children, LOL, Floriduh, fukutu, Ignoramus, Liberals Eat Feces, DEM idiots, Billy Carter,, Warturds, CAE, Fetch N Stepinit, Rectal Liberal, Commie DemocRATs, Wartime, Billy C, Subversive Barry, Groucho, FUBO, King George, Patrick, Democrats are Fascists, Gay Ghost, VAGITARIAN, Jimmy, Bronach, Pete, King George, PTBW Forever, The Real Truth, WorthlessWhore, Louise, Cheryl
I wrote
<quoted text>
Here's how rediculous you are.
<quoted text>
What a rediculous thing to say. You obviously are deficient in this area.
another rediculous assert by a clueless moron
<quoted text>
What is it like being dead Ghost?
What is it like? Do you feel dead?
#632047
:
<quoted text>
He lives here just like the Ghost does.
Tell me. What is it like being dea
Lehighton, PA
<quoted text>
Hiya Woofie. Ya got me confused with someone else.
<quoted text>
Oh sure You also have a Unicorn in the back yard,right? Toodles, ape man.
<quoted text>
Do you ride your Unicorn often, liberal?
577856 Have a nice day Richard Cranium. <quoted text>
Grey Moron wrote: <quoted text> What a perfect description of the typical liberal. Good job, Richard Cranium.
Nostrilis Waxman wrote:#395210 Jul 17, 2011 <quoted text> Look Richard Cranium. I already told you, NOT INTERESTED in you. It's obvious to me you were born from the anal canal (spelling police - what a moron - like I'm going to spell check posting to a loser).
395208 Jul 17, 2011 No. Liberals who cannot adapt to society like you are homo-schooled Richard Cranium. Let me guess about you... You are an Obama voter?
..and we thoughront you couldn't see past your bulbous nose. I guess that's not a problem when your eyes are on the side of your head. Oh, what a long tounge you have!
|#441048 Bored. You say a lot, but it means nothing. One can only deal with a moron like you in limited doses. I'm sure you've encoutered this before, like when you approach people at a party. Did you ever wonder why they scatter? Zzzzz.
#395266 Jul 17, 2011 I'm sure you're used to it. After all, when you walk up to people at a party, don't they go the other way too?
#93787 Mar 7, 2011 When you walk up to a group at a party, does everyone walk away from you? July 17, 2011
#395266 I'm sure you're used to it. After all, when you walk up to people at a party, don't they go the other way too? Is it sad liberal moron?
<quoted text> By the way, do like it Greek? I'll be gentle with you. I know you Democrats like to avoid talking about Greece! Can I call you my little Greeker?
I also wrote:
<quoted text>If you've got any balls, then spit them out because they're definitely not yours.
<quoted text>How's it going, Spork? Still have a mouthful of Barry?
Time for some chocolate cake and ice cream!

<quoted text>
You can stand in line with the rest of the libtards and await your ass-pounding from the mods.
[nwaxman]I like big sweaty co ock in my azz whole!
I wrote:
<quoted text>butt-crack
Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO!
GW Bush

United States

#878702 Mar 23, 2013
Clinton froze my brain.

That was why I couldn't do anything for six weeks before the attack, even though George Tenet told me it was coming.

It's all Clinton's fault. Him and his brain-freezer gun. I'm still recovering from it.

Whuh... whuh... whuh...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 7 min Rogue Scholar 05 181,720
Deat Abby 12-16 9 min Mister Tonka 61
Obama pardons 2 Illinoisans, including former M... 18 min Le Duped 3
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 41 min PEllen 98,832
CHICAGO BEARS ARE SHYT. Boycott them 54 min Sublime1 21
Abby 12-18 55 min RACE 2
Amy 12-18 1 hr RACE 2
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 7:06 am PST

NFL 7:06AM
Charles Tillman: Bears players still have faith in Cutler
NBC Sports 7:20 AM
Will Jimmy Clausen fare better than Jay Cutler as Bears' QB?
NBC Sports 7:35 AM
What do the Bears do with Jay Cutler moving forward?
ESPN 7:40 AM
Sources: Bears 'confused' at coach's discipline
NBC Sports 7:45 AM
Jarrett Payton: Stop talking about Jay Cutler's potential