#874886 Mar 16, 2013
Topix and Mary Noble said it so it must be true.
The Iraq war cost $2.2 Trillion and 190,000 lives and before it's all over it could cost the over $6 Trillion.
Who is this Mary Noble person? Her pieces also appear on other aggregates at a very impressive rate.
#874887 Mar 16, 2013
Lame Obama,,,he wont last
#874888 Mar 16, 2013
While I appreciate the positive judgeits just for ( My ) Screen Name recognition ...
This was the last post I wrote last night ( Below )
All others written in My Screen Name, were from my FAKE new yawk who also wrote many in carol's name as well, that also received positive judgeits.
While YOU allowed the real carol's posts to receive negative judgeits.
If this thread does not start to discern accurately, I am going to tear IT apart.
You won't need to "worry" about the FAKE new yawk.
I state this because I've studied "the judgeit pattern" ... Conservatives are doing the judging.
Get it right or I am going to start outing ALL of your socks.
I will pitch this mutha' straight down the strike zone.
PS Posts written to Chicagoan By Birth, Eed and carol IN MY SCREEN NAME that were very incendiary, I DID NOT WRITE. So, why in ALL of your brilliance would YOU insult those posters by judging THOSE posts as Brilliant, Interesting and Agree? And DO NOT come back with the lame ass reply that it was liberals who judged these posts.
The judgeit pattern speaks for itself and belies that claim.
And YOU are playing right into the FAKE new yawk's strategy of Divide and Conquer ... And looks to me as if FAKE is winning, making a fool out of you, BUT you are helping. Because those offensive posts were meant to silence Conservative posters.
And cause dissension, confusion and chaos.
Now, once again, I will contact Topix to straighten out the NO ISP problem.
Until then ... I believe an apology to carol, Eed and Chicagoan By Birth is owed for your show of stupidity via positive judgeits on posts that insulted them. I also take into account that some of the posts written by the FAKE new yawk were more difficult to discern.
MY LAST POST LAST NIGHT:
Buona Serra Thread ...:)
Any posts after this one wont be written by me.
My faithful fan imposter may strike again.
I really don't need nor want any more groupies, fans, admirers and adorers.*O, Pieta Me! LOL!
Have A Good Night All!
~ new yawk owt ...:)
*Italian Slang: The Satirical "O, Woe is Me".
< Hand Femininely Placed On Forhead, On Fainting Couch With Theatrical Flair > !
#874889 Mar 16, 2013
The racism against Irish and Italians ...
Hatred for Chinese Children ...( I have Chinese Nieces )!
Slanty-Eyed Kids ...
And the Evil Eye Mozzarella comment was the dead give away.
This post should have been "easily" discerned.
#874890 Mar 16, 2013
#874891 Mar 16, 2013
if you're considering more debt,more taxes,more people living in poverty,more unemployment ,more people on welfare,presidential treason and the disreguard for the constitution as a rescue , well then , in your own demented mind , you are correct.
#874892 Mar 16, 2013
This post was less discernible.
Playing the Conservative.
Playing? You decide.
John Galt wrote:
The effete New York media has convinced the Democrats that gun confiscation is a popular issue.
FAKE new yawk wrote:
No, actually, it's great. We're never going to give up our guns so we'll just collect the little ones the liberals still have.
#874893 Mar 16, 2013
Eed, I appreciated your post.
You set the facts straight RE: the discussion sonic and I were having regarding Fox News ratings.
FAKE new yawk's post demeaning you should have been a no brainer to discern.
Just checkout "Cable New Viewers" and you will see in every age group Fox news has more viewers than any other outlet. These numbers apply to Baire, Shep, O'Reilly, Hannity and Greta. In most cases it is at least 2 times more viewers watching Fox News.
FAKE new yawk wrote:
Actually, honey, Fox "News" has almost as many viewers as the NRA has registered members. It could be a coincidence, but you clowns are nothing if not consistent. Now go away and count your money, dear.
“It's always darkest 'fore dawn”
Since: Jul 08
#874895 Mar 16, 2013
"It is now being reported"??? Passive/aggressive, racist dumb carol hides behind passive voice to lie and besmear. Just HOW did YOU know that most of the BLACK neighborhood was on welfare? You loony ol' biddies really crack me up...
#874896 Mar 16, 2013
Why would you insult Chicagoan By Birth?
Clueless, Spam, Nuts ... Why of course you have to judge my spot on discernment as such, less you be outed. Just check the "judgeit pattern" on this page where this post to Chicagoan was judged Brilliant, Interesting, Agree ...
All Conservative posts judged positive.
All Liberal posts judged negative.
So, using logical deduction and critical thinking skills ... WHO judged the posts?
YOU doubled down on this insult.
Chicagoan, I didn't write this post to you.
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>What's racist about it? You regularly post racist remarks. White persons aren't the only racists.. You come in a close second.
FAKE New Yawk wrote:
W'sup y'ole grifter? Used any 5-year-olds as your toilet swabber lately, or ya gettin' too old for that stuff now. You got your own ancient infant to see to now ...
Since: Sep 09
In Charming CA
#874901 Mar 16, 2013
No one cares, foamy. But feel free to continue spitting 'big ones' on your kitchen floor. For that matter feel free to lick them off of it, too.......... or to use them as hair gel. Whatever tickles your knickers.
#874902 Mar 16, 2013
Rand Paul wins in the coveted CPAC straw poll.
#874903 Mar 16, 2013
That's good, because you're posting to the FAKE "New Yawk".
So, you've just insulted your butty, debil!
Good For You!
#874906 Mar 16, 2013
no,, you know future it dependend those time situtaion ,! Nd enjoy ur present not think future. Ok take care
#874907 Mar 16, 2013
Rand Paul has an interesting, solid message.
Though his Libertarian Social Views may not play well with the GOP Guard ... That's the area I believe "may" cause him problems in the GOP voting base. BUT, then again, may appeal to younger Republicans/Conservatives.
Rubio's message reflects Republican values more than Paul's.
#874908 Mar 16, 2013
On Friday, conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh praised Pat Caddell, the frustrated Democrat who has often spoken out against the political establishment, for his thunderous speech at CPAC on Thursday condemning the Republican consultant class.
Caddell accused GOP consultants of caring more about money than winning elections or principles and engaging in acts that could border on racketeering.
Limbaugh said Caddell "launched both barrels at CPAC" and let the Republican consultant class "have it" while blowing "the lid off of CPAC" with what Limbaugh described was a message that "the Republican consultant class is taking the party down the tubes, that they're making filthy amounts of money--$150 million a campaign--whether the candidate wins or loses."
#874909 Mar 16, 2013
O, I like the Suki Tawdry! Lotta Lenya, you're refering to leo.
You remembered my post: "Chins Up, Orthopedics On, and get to hobblin', Knock-Knees".
And my post calling "a prticular poster": Suki Tawdry!
By Jove, I Like It, Jenny DIVER!!
Calls for A Song Celebration:
[QUOTE who=""]<quoted text>
YOU'VE been added to my HIT LIST, Suki Tawdry, and like Lotta Lenya, I have daggers in my orthopedic shoes.
#874910 Mar 16, 2013
Did'ja have a stroke?
What's with the gibberish?
Got Fetch's dead sock stuck, mumble mouth!
#874911 Mar 16, 2013
Daily Kos at CPAC....
.....the days here have left me with the impression (have I said this before? I forget, at this point) that it is the social conservatives, talking about social conservative issues, that are the most belligerent and, shall we say, the least engaged with reality. The anti-tax people are anti-tax, period. The pro-life people, and the anti-gay-marriage people, and the people yelling about Obamacare as a near-fascist assault on their moral freedoms: these are the people who are most disingenuous in their arguments, most prone to spouting Known Facts that have been disproven as Known Facts time and time again, and so on. And yes, that would be the Tea Party crowd.
It's a goddamn odd feeling to have the Ron Paul/Rand Paul crowd seem like the more reasonable people in any given room, trust me, but there it is. Maybe it's just a sign of how irredeemable the older crowd is, and how the younger crowd, in general, is not as devoted to being gullible.
#874912 Mar 16, 2013
lily and sel?
leo and shovelhead?
you and any one of the above?
but we all know you have a thang for carol.
I said Jenny DIVER, HO! HO!
Didn't I tell you this wasn't between you and I?
[QUOTE who=""]Oh my gawd, this is funnier than 2 fat ladies doing soixant-neuf under a blanket![/QUOTE]
Add your comments below
|Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08)||37 min||Eric||69,397|
|Last word + 2 (Mar '12)||2 hr||andet1987||621|
|Double Word Game (Dec '11)||2 hr||andet1987||1,473|
|Four letter word game (Dec '11)||2 hr||andet1987||1,280|
|Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08)||2 hr||dont drink the ko...||46,696|
|Ferguson police shoot another black unarmed man!||3 hr||Daily Schadenfreude||35|
|Amy 9-18||4 hr||edogxxx||35|
|BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09)||4 hr||loose cannon||178,068|
|Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09)||6 hr||edogxxx||98,231|
Find what you want!
Search Chicago Forum Now