Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1459758 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#875200 Mar 17, 2013
Leaving ancient history aside, tell us what happened in the 2012 election cycle!!

Oh yeah, your side got your asses kicked!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
Nuculur No Essay’s Please!! The short and long of it! After Obama’s victory in 2008 Liberals was riding high one could even say ‘Cocky,’ Obama had a 76% approval rating!! Liberals still arrogant from Obama’s win pushing their ‘Tax/Spend Agenda in 2010 as today, we know the outcome!! Nuculur I believe the Media described the Republicans Win as ‘Historic’ it was simply a Wipe Out!! The only party I know that’s attacking SS/Medicare…Liberals/Democrats !!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#875201 Mar 17, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Think your way back thru that nonsense you just posted Galt.
Obama was going to get his ass kicked out of office in 2012 and then hauled to the pillory until he could be tried for treason and crimes against humanity according to your dumbaas. Instead he smacked Mitt down by a record margin.
Are you saying that the Republican centrists didn't notice and eagerly await another line up of (R) POTUS candidates just as sorry as those who showed up last time?
Rick Perry
Ron Paul
Herman Cain
Michelle Bachmann
Mitt Romney
Newt Gingrich
Jon Huntsman
and
Da Donald
and Galt thinks that gangrene infected wound will heal without an amputation?
Hah!
None of the 2012 candidates was a viable Conservative.

Besides, how does any of that relate to the 2014 election?

As for 2016, Republicans have several viable candidates. Democrats have none other than Hillary, a lot to risk on a 69-year old with a questionable medical history.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#875202 Mar 17, 2013
Silver Sneakers is not paid for by Medicare, but by some (not all) private insurance programs, whether they be supplemental to traditional Medicare or Medicare Advantage.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#875203 Mar 17, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Think your way back thru that nonsense you just posted Galt.
Obama was going to get his ass kicked out of office in 2012 and then hauled to the pillory until he could be tried for treason and crimes against humanity according to your dumbaas. Instead he smacked Mitt down by a record margin.
Are you saying that the Republican centrists didn't notice and eagerly await another line up of (R) POTUS candidates just as sorry as those who showed up last time?
Rick Perry
Ron Paul
Herman Cain
Michelle Bachmann
Mitt Romney
Newt Gingrich
Jon Huntsman
and
Da Donald
and Galt thinks that gangrene infected wound will heal without an amputation?
Hah!
Gslt agrees with Democrat Realtime only to the extent that the Republicans must stop caving in to the religious right.

Romney and all other elected Republicans should have publicly demanded that Akin withdraw from the race, instead of just suggesting so. Either that or take him on a picnic to Fort Marcy Park.

The 2016 party platform would do well to ignore the abortion issue.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#875204 Mar 17, 2013
Better than Reagan, the Alzheimers patient who was eating jelly beans and pretending to be President for 8 years.

While Nancy made the decisions by consulting her astrologist!!
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
None of the 2012 candidates was a viable Conservative.
Besides, how does any of that relate to the 2014 election?
As for 2016, Republicans have several viable candidates. Democrats have none other than Hillary, a lot to risk on a 69-year old with a questionable medical history.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#875206 Mar 17, 2013
Doubling down on your lies again, Nobraina??

Go for it. You didn't read what I posted. Now I will use it to prove you a liar and a fool once again;

"Many private plans require no additional monthly premiums, yet the government pays an average of $849.90 in monthly subsidies to insurance companies for a person on Medicare Advantage, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. That is about 14 percent more than the government spends on people with standard Medicare, according to the nonpartisan Medicare Payment Advisory Commission."

Keywords being "the government paid...."

You've been caught in another lie, Nobraina. Give it up.
John Galt wrote:
Silver Sneakers is not paid for by Medicare, but by some (not all) private insurance programs, whether they be supplemental to traditional Medicare or Medicare Advantage.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#875207 Mar 17, 2013
To Nobraina, only Josef Stalin would be conservative enough..........but he's a Commie.
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
None of the 2012 candidates was a viable Conservative.
Besides, how does any of that relate to the 2014 election?
As for 2016, Republicans have several viable candidates. Democrats have none other than Hillary, a lot to risk on a 69-year old with a questionable medical history.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#875208 Mar 17, 2013
As I recall, you were 'pretty optimistic' about 2012, weren't you??

In fact, you predicted a Rmoney win, right here on Topix.

A good indicator of how ignorant your predictions are.

So, how'd that work out for you and Willard??

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
I’m pretty optimistic about the Senate in 2014!! After Four Years Liberals are actually putting forth a Budget whether than Lip Service!! Now Liberals running in 2014 will actually have to defend their party’s Radical ‘Tax/Spend ‘agenda!! There’s Light at the other End!!
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#875209 Mar 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
None of the 2012 candidates was a viable Conservative.
Besides, how does any of that relate to the 2014 election?
As for 2016, Republicans have several viable candidates. Democrats have none other than Hillary, a lot to risk on a 69-year old with a questionable medical history.
Polls show Hillary beats anyone; who've you got? Rand Paul? LOL

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#875211 Mar 17, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
Yeah, your Phillis Diller impersonation is really sick.
<quoted text>
You're really diggin deep there, Boie?
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#875212 Mar 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
None of the 2012 candidates was a viable Conservative.
Besides, how does any of that relate to the 2014 election?
As for 2016, Republicans have several viable candidates. Democrats have none other than Hillary, a lot to risk on a 69-year old with a questionable medical history.
Hillary is old and ailing, her hubby Bill is looking like death warmed over__that's what public office at it's highest levels does to people which is why going forward health should be considered no matter ones party affiliation.

Your problem is that without the religious right nutjobs the (R) party can't muster enough votes to win another Presidency and that the moderates/centrists are taking notice.

Frankly, fools like Carol knocking doors while spewing venom is not working anymore.

Ralph Reed continues to be a Republican party spokesperson__go fix that and we'll talk eh?
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#875213 Mar 17, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Polls show Hillary beats anyone; who've you got? Rand Paul? LOL
Hey Airhead. Polls showed Hillary beating Obama once too. We all know how that turned out.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#875214 Mar 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Gslt agrees with Democrat Realtime only to the extent that the Republicans must stop caving in to the religious right.
Romney and all other elected Republicans should have publicly demanded that Akin withdraw from the race, instead of just suggesting so. Either that or take him on a picnic to Fort Marcy Park.
The 2016 party platform would do well to ignore the abortion issue.
Well, you'd better hurry up and write them a letter; because ever since the election, this is what your leaders have been saying:

Despite the deep unpopularity of fetal personhood bills in 2012, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has again decided to cosponsor the Sanctity of Human Life Act, a bill that gives full legal rights to human zygotes from the moment of fertilization.

Ryan, who reportedly has 2016 presidential ambitions, had to de-emphasize his opposition to abortion without exceptions during the 2012 election to align his position with presidential candidate Mitt Romney. But this year, Ryan has been tapped as a keynote speaker for the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List's sixth annual Campaign for Life Gala, and he is re-upping his support for the most extreme anti-abortion legislation in the country.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/09/paul...

John Boehner: Ending Abortion Is 'One Of Our Most Fundamental Goals This Year'

Posted: 01/25/2013 3:56 pm EST | Updated: 01/26/2013 12:17 pm EST

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/25/john...
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#875215 Mar 17, 2013
Below is a list of the last names of the 138 Republican members of the House who voted against the Senate version of the extension of the Violence Against Women Act that was passed by the House of Representatives on Thursday (known as H.R. 11), as compiled by the Atlantic Wire:
http://www.ibtimes.com/who-voted-against-2013... #
138 republicans voted against VAWA; women are watching.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#875216 Mar 17, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Airhead. Polls showed Hillary beating Obama once too. We all know how that turned out.
gfy gunner
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#875217 Mar 17, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Polls show Hillary beats anyone; who've you got? Rand Paul? LOL
Hillary will not be the nominee, perhaps even not a candidate.

Got a backup?

Joe Biden?

Michelle Obama?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#875218 Mar 17, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Hillary is old and ailing, her hubby Bill is looking like death warmed over__that's what public office at it's highest levels does to people which is why going forward health should be considered no matter ones party affiliation.
Your problem is that without the religious right nutjobs the (R) party can't muster enough votes to win another Presidency and that the moderates/centrists are taking notice.
Frankly, fools like Carol knocking doors while spewing venom is not working anymore.
Ralph Reed continues to be a Republican party spokesperson__go fix that and we'll talk eh?
The religious right didn't vote this time around, so we have nothing to lose by dumping this baggage.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#875219 Mar 17, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, you'd better hurry up and write them a letter; because ever since the election, this is what your leaders have been saying:
Despite the deep unpopularity of fetal personhood bills in 2012, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has again decided to cosponsor the Sanctity of Human Life Act, a bill that gives full legal rights to human zygotes from the moment of fertilization.
Ryan, who reportedly has 2016 presidential ambitions, had to de-emphasize his opposition to abortion without exceptions during the 2012 election to align his position with presidential candidate Mitt Romney. But this year, Ryan has been tapped as a keynote speaker for the anti-abortion group Susan B. Anthony List's sixth annual Campaign for Life Gala, and he is re-upping his support for the most extreme anti-abortion legislation in the country.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/09/paul...
John Boehner: Ending Abortion Is 'One Of Our Most Fundamental Goals This Year'
Posted: 01/25/2013 3:56 pm EST | Updated: 01/26/2013 12:17 pm EST
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/25/john...
Red meat for the idiots, just like gun control and homosexual marriage for your team.
carol

Orlando, FL

#875221 Mar 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The religious right didn't vote this time around, so we have nothing to lose by dumping this baggage.
I totally agree, better get to it... goddam worthless religious right. Say, um, you wanna tell carol, Emom, an' the dumb Sicilian or should I?
Lincoln

United States

#875222 Mar 17, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
Below is a list of the last names of the 138 Republican members of the House who voted against the Senate version of the extension of the Violence Against Women Act that was passed by the House of Representatives on Thursday (known as H.R. 11), as compiled by the Atlantic Wire:
http://www.ibtimes.com/who-voted-against-2013... #
138 republicans voted against VAWA; women are watching.
Good to see the republican standing up for the rich.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 13 min District 1 231,166
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr RACE 104,545
Word (Dec '08) 2 hr Homer 6,840
News Community Mourns Chicago Boxer After Fatal Shoo... 2 hr But But But 3
danielle 6 hr Curious 1
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 6 hr IB DaMann 7,947
last post wins! (Apr '13) 7 hr Hatti_Hollerand 1,966

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages