Barack Obama, our next President

[TheIndependentMa jority]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
Spoken like the true idiot you are.
McCain will serve as long as he chooses.
Graham will also.
It's Rand Paul and Ted Cruz who're on their first and last terms as Senators.
Why?? Because they're as stupid as folks like you and Carol!!

Have you ever written a book? If so, Please provide the link for critiquing porpoises. If not, stuff one in yer crystalabawl piehole of cluelessduhm.

[sonicfilter]

Rand Paul’s Drone Filibuster Sparks GOP Civil War

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/03/ra...

[TheIndependentMa jority]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Perhaps Christie is just a stealth candidate who kissed Obama to suck you guys in, but remains a fiscal conservative.

Christie for POTUS 2016.

Rand Paul should like him too lol.

[Cway]

Waxman wrote:

Chavez cried "please don't let me die" just before having the massive heart attack that killed the coward. Typical socialist wimp couldn't croak in a dignified manner, but like a baby juvenile libtard.

You're a real cheap-shot artist, aren't you?

[Dem idiots]

TheIndependentMajority wrote:

<quoted text>
Have you ever written a book? If so, Please provide the link for critiquing porpoises. If not, stuff one in yer crystalabawl piehole of cluelessduhm.

Nuculur is an lD 10 T

[TheIndependentMa jority]

sonicfilter wrote:

Rand Paul’s Drone Filibuster Sparks GOP Civil War
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/03/ra...

Mr McCain looks pleased...

(He warcthing Rand :-)....)

“Lindsey Grahamnesty”(now that's a good one lol)

Hail the results of OKennedy's wide open door policy of the 60's-Grahamnesty fer everone!

[TheIndependentMa jority]

Dem idiots wrote:

<quoted text>Nuculur is an lD 10 T

Well so long as he not trying to pass of as a ID base 10 T. Dey no such ting in dat democraptic voter applause type maff !!

[TheIndependentMa jority]

and since it actually was a "an" morning, make the evening an I D 10 T too sometimes
typo edit!!

Thirteen hours... is good self control :-).

[Cway]

TheIndependentMajority wrote:

<quoted text>
Kind of like this-
Major Harold Kushner said, "I think the purposes of Fonda and Clark were to hurt the United States, to radicalize our young people, and to undermine our authority."

First, the origins of the Vietnam anti-war movement stem from returning Vietnam veterans who spo at college campuses about the crimes of fellow soliders they witnessed.

This is where people like Jane Fonda got their information.

With the publishing of the "The Pentagon Papers", the American public discovered the Gulf of Tonkin Incident was in response to covert provocations initiated by our side under the 34A Plans.

In his book, "The Secret Team", Colonel Fletcher Prouty, an Air Force liason to the CIA, mentions that the 34A plans made use of unmarked U.S. ships and aircraft.

So in the final analysis, the Vietnam War was launched by rightwing fanatics in the CIA and Pentagon as part of their no-holds barred philosophy against communism.

Once U.S. regular forces began pouring in, the dirtiest methods imaginable were used. Agent orange was sprayed everywhere, contaminating the water supply. Napalm and artillery strikes were called in with brutal indiscrimination, hitting friend and foe alike. U.S. and CIA personnel made regular use of torture and throwing prisoners from helicopters.

The reason for such terror tactics is that the Vietnamese people were against us. Terror was the means by which we tried to cut off their support for the North.

So as much as you rightwingers grind your teeth and howl at the likes of Jane Fonda and Tom Hayden, they were right. And thousands of returning U.S. veterans would agree.

Vietnam was a dirty little murder mission designed to prop up a rightwing tyranny, falsely label it a democracy to the American public, and then further conceal the horrors used to prop it up.

All under the "noble banner" of anti-communism.

[sonicfilter]

TheIndependentMajority wrote:

<quoted text>
Mr McCain looks pleased...
(He warcthing Rand :-)....)
“Lindsey Grahamnesty”(now that's a good one lol)
Hail the results of OKennedy's wide open door policy of the 60's-Grahamnesty fer everone!

did the idiom come before or after?

[Cway]

TheIndependentMajority wrote:

<quoted text>
Kind of like this-
Major Harold Kushner said, "I think the purposes of Fonda and Clark were to hurt the United States, to radicalize our young people, and to undermine our authority."
From:
The "Apology" of Jane Fonda
After Jane Fonda called Yorktown sailors
and other US Navy sailors
"war criminals"
By Bruce Herschensohn
This article appeared in the July 7, 2000 edition of The Washington Times.
Americans are in a hurry to be done with the past and go on to tomorrow. It's why we read the Sunday newspapers on Saturday. It would be all right if we weren't in a hurry to forget the past, but we do forget the past.....
http://www.aspecialdayguide.com/yorktown/apol...

I read the linked article.

Fonda was totally right.

The Wingnuts hate her because she challenged their legitimacy. A false legitimacy which was finally laid to rest by "The Pentagon Papers".

Anyone who thinks U.S. involvement in Indochina was anything close to honorable doesn't know the facts.

It was a CIA set-up and 58,000 young men paid the price.

[Waxman]

Cway wrote:

<quoted text>
You're a real cheap-shot artist, aren't you?

I have no respect for you pathetic socialists. You have no dignity and love to spread hate. Piss off loser.

[Cway]

LOL,

I see the little GOP judge-it elfs are in action.

Boys, I could care less about the mute, emasculated quality of a judge-it.

Come out into the open and challenge what I say with facts, not cute little smiley faces.

That is... if you can.

[Lily Boca Raton Fl]

Realtime wrote:

Al Alwaki had renounced his US citizenship__so is that like a hurry up deal? Or does it have to pass review somewhere?
Whatever__now Curls Paul is calling McCain and Graham out for their anti American foolishness.

Ugh

[Waxman]

Cway wrote:

<quoted text>
I read the linked article.
Fonda was totally right.
The Wingnuts hate her because she challenged their legitimacy. A false legitimacy which was finally laid to rest by "The Pentagon Papers".
Anyone who thinks U.S. involvement in Indochina was anything close to honorable doesn't know the facts.
It was a CIA set-up and 58,000 young men paid the price.

Wrong azzwhole. Democrats who lied (Gulf of Tonkin) sent 50,000 kids to die in Vietnam for a war Democrats started that had no impact on our national security you lying weasel.

You are an idiot!

[Lily Boca Raton Fl]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
Spoken like the true idiot you are.
McCain will serve as long as he chooses.
Graham will also.
It's Rand Paul and Ted Cruz who're on their first and last terms as Senators.
Why?? Because they're as stupid as folks like you and Carol!!

Bingo

[Cway]

Waxman wrote:

<quoted text>
I have no respect for you pathetic socialists. You have no dignity and love to spread hate. Piss off loser.

First, I'm not a socialist. Although socialism does work in some countries.

Second, I have no respect for you fascist-pig Republicans, whose loyalty is to corporations and not the country.

Third, you have no dignity or brains for that matter.

Fourth, you go piss off, turkey. I'm not going anywhere.

[Cway]

Waxman wrote:

<quoted text>
Wrong azzwhole. Democrats who lied (Gulf of Tonkin) sent 50,000 kids to die in Vietnam for a war Democrats started that had no impact on our national security you lying weasel.
You are an idiot!

No, dikweed. You're the idiot.

The Gulf of Tonkin was set up by the CIA.

This is proven by Fletcher Prouty's book, "The Secret Team" and "The Pentagon Papers".

The CIA consists of ultra-right wingers. So in the final analysis, the right started the Vietnam War.

What are you, stupid? When I mention "The Secret Team" and "The Pentagon Papers", these are UMIMPEACHABLE SOURCES.

In fact, the CIA tried to keep "The Secret Team" from ever being published. Nixon had his attorney general file an injunction against the NY Times to quash further disssemination, and the case went all they way to the Supreme Court.

In both instances, the rightwing screamed that national security was at stake. We now know the only thing at stake was concealment of their guilt.

[carol]

Charles Krauthammer once again makes sense. Reminding us the Democrats haven't proposed a budget since the iPad (notwithstanding Obama's two proposals which were summarily rejected by all Democrats in the Senate) and saying it would be nice if the Senate would come up with one just as Ryan and the Republicans have done so they can share some of the scrutiny which they are happy to let the Republicans take while they do absolutely nothing.

That is precisely why Senate Democrats won't come up with a budget. It might come under scrutiny and it's better to do nothing and blame republicans who are trying to do something than risk losing votes.

In other words, they are cowards.

[carol]

Cway wrote:

<quoted text>
First, I'm not a socialist. Although socialism does work in some countries.
Second, I have no respect for you fascist-pig Republicans, whose loyalty is to corporations and not the country.
Third, you have no dignity or brains for that matter.
Fourth, you go piss off, turkey. I'm not going anywhere.

If you don't think Democrats have the same loyalities to corporations, you're more brainwashed than I imagined.

The Republicans' loyalty, by the way, is to a free market. Minimal government oversight to protect consumers is all that's needed.