Look, jackasss, read the two reports. What was covered & what was different.<quoted text>
Oh, you mean the $900 billion was from 10 years of "revenues" (or as normal people call them...taxes) and 6 years of service? What a deal. So once we have the full 10 years of service it goes up to $2.6 trillion? I realize in your world that makes sense...in loony left winger world when 1+1=2.6 trillion, that's deficit neutral.
you sheep amaze me.
Be informed for a change.
One report looked out ten years from 2009. Not all revenue generation kicked in at the start just like the expenditures did not.
Post your report saying the costs are 2.6 trillion.