Hey, Wax Head.<quoted text>
That's great Dave. Now if you can learn how to apply the numbers in a context that is accurate instead of doing the usual lefty twist, you would add some value to the discussions here.
Dave just slammed you over the head with a simple rebuttal that hits a sledgehammmer.
You claimed a loss of 8.5 million jobs.
Dave makes the point that if this were so, the unemployment figures as of 2013 should be 8.5 million lower than they were back in 2009.
But that's not the case. They're about the same or slightly lower.
You're busted, dude.