Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1278100 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

John Galt

Temecula, CA

#870707 Mar 8, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>The Democrats are going to loose in 2014 and Obama knows it they should have left the gun issue alone and now they are going repear the losses just like in 1994.
Obama has already buried the gun control issue, knowing it to be a loser.

A few of the fools still pushing this turkey will pay the price.

“We're doing better...”

Since: Jul 08

we've got to do more

#870708 Mar 8, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
On my own dollar, with a doctor of my choice, not pot luck at some moldy government clinic, waiting in line.
You're self-insured? No UCS requirements or deductibles for you?(I tend to believe Nucular; you're obviously not working and old enough to be on Medicare.) Where did you get your ideas of waiting in line at a moldy government clinic.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870709 Mar 8, 2013
Shovelhead already spotted you for the dickhead you are.

I just want to make sure he understands what a nasty piece of scum you are, and not waste his time on an old fool and liar.

You live off Gov't handouts, all the while bitchin' about anyone else who gets Gov't money.

Nobraina thinks all of the Gov't payouts should only go to ancient white fools like him!!

Someday, you'll figure out how to spell my name properly. Another indication of your failing eyesight.
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you should discuss this with "Nucular", a/k/a Demos/Tenzing.
He/she seems to want to be your Mommy.
(Sequester is good.)

“We're doing better...”

Since: Jul 08

we've got to do more

#870710 Mar 8, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>The Democrats are going to loose in 2014 and Obama knows it they should have left the gun issue alone and now they are going repear the losses just like in 1994.
We are going to "loose" and "repear" the losses, huh? Chicagoan by Birth/Ignorant by Choice, is that you?
The Slayer

Findlay, OH

#870711 Mar 8, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you should discuss this with "Nucular", a/k/a Demos/Tenzing.
He/she seems to want to be your Mommy.
(Sequester is good.)
Yes sequester is a good thing...but I want to see some
real cuts in spending.
Some very large and painful real (not just base line) cuts in spending.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870712 Mar 8, 2013
You haven't figured out that Nobraina NEVER tells th etruth about anything??

C'mon, Leo, you know better than to pretend this troll is anything other than a serial liar.
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>You're self-insured? No UCS requirements or deductibles for you?(I tend to believe Nucular; you're obviously not working and old enough to be on Medicare.) Where did you get your ideas of waiting in line at a moldy government clinic.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870713 Mar 8, 2013
Is obesity hereditary.....Nope....bad eating habits definitely are, it is the eating habits you have been accustomed to that leads to obesity.

Stop using excuses, don't believe that this is how you were built and there is nothing you can do about it, there is always a solution, small steps, small changes to your lifestyle will go a long way.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#870714 Mar 8, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Another stupid statement from Nobraina.
Heredity is a contributing factor, but is far from a major cause.
the American sugar diet is the biggest cause. Ask Carol, in her more lucid moments, she admits to being fat and diabetic from overuse of sugar and cigarettes.
Proof being that obesity rates are still going up, which heredity can't be responsible for. DUH
But you are stupid enough to fight the First Ladies attempts to get Americans to eat healthier.
You wouldn't have to spend your entire waking life on Topix if you were in better health.
Heredity is a bit of an excuse__the math clearly shows that folks with lousy diets and lifestyles beget younguns of the same ilk and the cycle repeats.

Often TYPE II diabetes can be reversed or the bodies sugar/insulin levels can be stabilized but that requires regular and costly doctors visits along with lifestyle changes or at least trade offs/sacrifices which some folks are just not willing to make.

Fried food with a Lipitor chaser ain't going to work.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Lincoln

United States

#870715 Mar 8, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Never said all Democrats voted against civil rights legislation.
Just the Southern bloc. Some Republicans voted against it as well.
But had it not been for a Republican congressman, Senators Everett Dirksen (R-IL), however, who worked tirelessly behind the scenes, it might not have passed.
In the House (for-against):
Southern Democrats: 7–87
Southern Republicans: 0–10
Northern Democrats: 145–9
Northern Republicans: 138–24
*Democrats - 152 out of 248 voted "for"
*Republicans - 138 out of 172 voted "for"
Based on percentages, Republicans passed the bill in the House with a difference of 96 Democrats against compared to 34 Republicans against.
In the Senate (for-against):
Southern Democrats: 1–20
Southern Republicans: 0–1
Northern Democrats: 45–1
Northern Republicans: 27–5
*Democrats - 46 out 67 voted "for"
*Republicans - 27 out of 33 voted "for"
Again, based on percentages, Republicans passed the bill in the Senate with a difference of 21 Democrats against compared to 6 Republicans against.
In other words, there were fewer republicans in congress than democrats but because more republicans voted for than against compared to democrats, the republican percentage passed the bill.
(Whew! Sure hope you appreciate all my effort in trying to help you understand this.)
President Lyndon B John (D) had the bill passed into law with the help of northern Republicans.
Racist Southern Democrats then became Republicans.

“We're doing better...”

Since: Jul 08

we've got to do more

#870716 Mar 8, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The subject was loopholes and subsidies for shipping jobs overseas.
Name them.
"On paper, the U.S. has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. But in practice, corporations pay far less. The Government Accountability Office (PDF) estimated the average tax burden at 25.2 percent, and some of the largest corporations, such as General Electric and Wells Fargo, pay no taxes at all. This is possible because the tax code is riddled with exceptions and loopholes, created at the behest of lobbyists and exploited by teams of tax experts, many of whom used to work for the IRS and the Treasury. With the help of Citizens for Tax Justice, The Daily Beast rounded up some of the most egregious corporate tax loopholes.

Deferral of Overseas Income

Multinational companies don’t have to pay U.S. income taxes on overseas profits until they transfer them back home. But in reality, companies just leave their profits in overseas tax havens, deferring taxes indefinitely. Not only that, an accounting scheme known as “transfer pricing” allows companies to move profits from the U.S. to offshore havens so they’re counted as overseas earnings. For example a pharmaceutical company could sell a drug patent to a subsidiary in the Cayman Islands for a nominal fee, then have the subsidiary charge the parent company huge licensing fees. The company can then deduct the licensing fees from its taxable income in the U.S. and send the profits to its foreign subsidiary, where taxes can be indefinitely deferred. Some 83 percent of top 100 publicly traded companies had tax-haven units in 2009, according to the GAO. General Electric, Google, Pfizer, and many other companies use this technique. The federal government loses an estimated (PDF)$100 billion a year through offshore tax abuses.

Deductions for Shipping Jobs Overseas

At first glance it doesn’t seem particularly egregious that corporations can deduct moving expenses, but that changes when the break is applied to companies moving operations overseas. President Obama proposed ending this exemption for companies moving overseas while giving a credit to companies moving back to the U.S."

There's more but I know you never honestly read a link or anything else you don't like...BTW, maybe you'd better not wait until you have an "ailment" to avoid the appearance of health care, or not.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#870717 Mar 8, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>You're self-insured? No UCS requirements or deductibles for you?(I tend to believe Nucular; you're obviously not working and old enough to be on Medicare.) Where did you get your ideas of waiting in line at a moldy government clinic.
Whether Galt pays the premiums or is self-insured, it is still Galt's dollar. Relatively high deductibles make economic sense, particularly for those who rarely have medical expenses.

No freakin idea what "UCS" is.

The future of US medicine is long lines at moldy government clinics.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
The Slayer

Findlay, OH

#870718 Mar 8, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>We are going to "loose" and "repear" the losses, huh? Chicagoan by Birth/Ignorant by Choice, is that you?
Squawk!!!

“We're doing better...”

Since: Jul 08

we've got to do more

#870719 Mar 8, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
You haven't figured out that Nobraina NEVER tells th etruth about anything??
C'mon, Leo, you know better than to pretend this troll is anything other than a serial liar.
<quoted text>
I was being sarcastic again...that Shinning Sock sure has some problems with that one.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Jimmy

Newington, CT

#870720 Mar 8, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
Is obesity hereditary.....Nope....bad eating habits definitely are, it is the eating habits you have been accustomed to that leads to obesity.
Stop using excuses, don't believe that this is how you were built and there is nothing you can do about it, there is always a solution, small steps, small changes to your lifestyle will go a long way.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Talking to yourself again, nutjob?

Judged:

11

11

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870721 Mar 8, 2013
Stock market still hitting new records.

Nitwits like Flake and Nobraina not talking about it.

About time, they've spent enough time making fools of themselves!!

Obama sure has made monkeys out of the nitwits who tried to kill the economy to get back at him!!

Which nitwits?? Start with Bonehead and no-chin McConnell.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#870722 Mar 8, 2013
The Slayer wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes sequester is a good thing...but I want to see some
real cuts in spending.
Some very large and painful real (not just base line) cuts in spending.
Got to take what you can get.

But Galt agrees with you.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Jane Says

New York, NY

#870723 Mar 8, 2013
THE POPE wrote:
THE UNITED STATES IS THE ONLY INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD THAT DOES NOT PROVIDE SOME FORM OF UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE FOR ITS CITIZENS. AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM PRESUMABLY.
you're absolutely right. let's stop paying to protect the entire free world militarily. then we can pretend we're enlightened and mature like say, Belgium and provide cradle to grave everything for our citizens. of course, we'll all be speaking mandarin or russian and be completely enslaved by the despots that run the UN.
The Slayer

Findlay, OH

#870724 Mar 8, 2013
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>I was being sarcastic again...that Shinning Sock sure has some problems with that one.
SQUAAAAAAWK!!!!!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#870725 Mar 8, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Heredity is a bit of an excuse__the math clearly shows that folks with lousy diets and lifestyles beget younguns of the same ilk and the cycle repeats.
Often TYPE II diabetes can be reversed or the bodies sugar/insulin levels can be stabilized but that requires regular and costly doctors visits along with lifestyle changes or at least trade offs/sacrifices which some folks are just not willing to make.
Fried food with a Lipitor chaser ain't going to work.
Federal government standards that declare a person "obese" based on strict age/height/gender/weight tables are ridiculous, taking no account of muscular structure and overall physical fitness.

Many people would need to starve themselves and in fact ruin their bodies to get down to what the bureaucrats consider to be "normal" weight.

Does anyone really believe that a 6-ft male who weighs 180 lb is overweight?

Standards are written by AIDS victims.
Jimmy

Newington, CT

#870727 Mar 8, 2013
The Slayer wrote:
<quoted text>
SQUAAAAAAWK!!!!!
LOL!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 17 min Into The Night 54,594
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 20 min Rogue Scholar 05 197,070
News Should prostitution be less illegal-or more? 24 min beastman 2
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr RACE 6,442
abby9-3-15 3 hr Kuuipo 9
abby9-2-15 3 hr boundary painter 6
amy 9-3-15 3 hr boundary painter 8
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr RACE 100,672
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages