Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1460464 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870692 Mar 8, 2013
Old Crazy Goober wrote:
<quoted text>
He posted a quote and a link and you call that "rage"?
Amazing.
Waxturd has his puppets defending each other now, eh Goober??

You crack me up, Waxturd.

Only a drunken fool would attempt to weasel out of the multiple personality sockpuppets you parade around here.

Now you attempt to use one sockpuppet to defend the words of another sockpuppet.

Too funny!!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870693 Mar 8, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Heredity is a huge factor in many diseases, including both diabetes and obesity. It's very easy to denigrate overweight people, but the condition is largely hereditary.
Another stupid statement from Nobraina.

Heredity is a contributing factor, but is far from a major cause.

the American sugar diet is the biggest cause. Ask Carol, in her more lucid moments, she admits to being fat and diabetic from overuse of sugar and cigarettes.

Proof being that obesity rates are still going up, which heredity can't be responsible for. DUH

But you are stupid enough to fight the First Ladies attempts to get Americans to eat healthier.

You wouldn't have to spend your entire waking life on Topix if you were in better health.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#870694 Mar 8, 2013
shovelhead72 wrote:
<quoted text>Nice try...but I don't care to eat off your spoon either.
Apparently Congress thinks the 'political crap' known as 'loopholes' exist...and they've been steadfastly protecting same, while cheering on the sequester.
Ask them.
The subject was loopholes and subsidies for shipping jobs overseas.

Name them.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870695 Mar 8, 2013
shovelhead72 wrote:
<quoted text>Nice try...but I don't care to eat off your spoon either.
Apparently Congress thinks the 'political crap' known as 'loopholes' exist...and they've been steadfastly protecting same, while cheering on the sequester.
Ask them.
This Galt character is Nobraina or (NOBOMA), a longtime Topix troll.

He denies reality at every opportunity, lies about everything, and just makes shit up.

You'll never see him provide supporting date for his positions, because he makes them up as he goes.

He claims to be a Tea Party member, but he's really a trisexual Teabagger. On the receiving end.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870696 Mar 8, 2013
Waxturd still drunk and angry, deploying his idiot puppets as fast as he can!!
Old Crazy Goober wrote:
haha!
Now he's posting Romney is a criminal to Jimmy?
Ha! Nutoption is mine!
carol

Orlando, FL

#870697 Mar 8, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Carol, for the umpteenth time.
Look at the vote for the Civil Rights At of 1964.
You will find that Republicans & Democrats outside the Southern Block voted yes & Republicans & Democrats from the Southen Block voted no.
It was regional.
If it was party, then why didn't the Democrats outside the South vote against it.
Never said all Democrats voted against civil rights legislation.

Just the Southern bloc. Some Republicans voted against it as well.

But had it not been for a Republican congressman, Senators Everett Dirksen (R-IL), however, who worked tirelessly behind the scenes, it might not have passed.

In the House (for-against):
Southern Democrats: 7–87
Southern Republicans: 0–10
Northern Democrats: 145–9
Northern Republicans: 138–24

*Democrats - 152 out of 248 voted "for"
*Republicans - 138 out of 172 voted "for"

Based on percentages, Republicans passed the bill in the House with a difference of 96 Democrats against compared to 34 Republicans against.

In the Senate (for-against):
Southern Democrats: 1–20
Southern Republicans: 0–1
Northern Democrats: 45–1
Northern Republicans: 27–5

*Democrats - 46 out 67 voted "for"
*Republicans - 27 out of 33 voted "for"

Again, based on percentages, Republicans passed the bill in the Senate with a difference of 21 Democrats against compared to 6 Republicans against.

In other words, there were fewer republicans in congress than democrats but because more republicans voted for than against compared to democrats, the republican percentage passed the bill.

(Whew! Sure hope you appreciate all my effort in trying to help you understand this.)

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870698 Mar 8, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The subject was loopholes and subsidies for shipping jobs overseas.
Name them.
This is Nobraina's game.

He tells lies, then asks you to prove they are lies, thereby wasting your time.

If you bother to prove your point, he won't respond, he runs off when confronted with the truth.

He's done it here for over 4 years now.

He still won't admit that Rmoney isn't President!!

Don't waste your time with him, Shovelhead.

Better to mock and abuse nitwits like him.

He's all lies, all the time!!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#870699 Mar 8, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Another stupid statement from Nobraina.
Heredity is a contributing factor, but is far from a major cause.
the American sugar diet is the biggest cause. Ask Carol, in her more lucid moments, she admits to being fat and diabetic from overuse of sugar and cigarettes.
Proof being that obesity rates are still going up, which heredity can't be responsible for. DUH
But you are stupid enough to fight the First Ladies attempts to get Americans to eat healthier.
You wouldn't have to spend your entire waking life on Topix if you were in better health.
Obesity is highly hereditary.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870700 Mar 8, 2013
That's really funny, Waxturd. You must be really drunk today!!

You're done here. Everyone knows you're merely a puppet of Waxturd. Just as Floriduh was. The identical verbiage gives you away.

Own me?? You haven't come close to me, while I've destroyed your entire web of lies and puppet trolls!

As your puppet Floriduh says;

"IT's the culture""

And you don't have any.
Old Crazy Goober wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't speak for Waxturd, but I own you scitzoid. It's obvious you have lost it. Keep em coming!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#870701 Mar 8, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
And the Teabaggers will lose the House in 2014.
You really like the having the nutsack dipped into your mouth, don't you??
BWAHAHAHAHA
The Democrats are going to loose in 2014 and Obama knows it they should have left the gun issue alone and now they are going repear the losses just like in 1994.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870702 Mar 8, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Never said all Democrats voted against civil rights legislation.
Just the Southern bloc. Some Republicans voted against it as well.
But had it not been for a Republican congressman, Senators Everett Dirksen (R-IL), however, who worked tirelessly behind the scenes, it might not have passed.
In the House (for-against):
Southern Democrats: 7–87
Southern Republicans: 0–10
Northern Democrats: 145–9
Northern Republicans: 138–24
*Democrats - 152 out of 248 voted "for"
*Republicans - 138 out of 172 voted "for"
Based on percentages, Republicans passed the bill in the House with a difference of 96 Democrats against compared to 34 Republicans against.
In the Senate (for-against):
Southern Democrats: 1–20
Southern Republicans: 0–1
Northern Democrats: 45–1
Northern Republicans: 27–5
*Democrats - 46 out 67 voted "for"
*Republicans - 27 out of 33 voted "for"
Again, based on percentages, Republicans passed the bill in the Senate with a difference of 21 Democrats against compared to 6 Republicans against.
In other words, there were fewer republicans in congress than democrats but because more republicans voted for than against compared to democrats, the republican percentage passed the bill.
(Whew! Sure hope you appreciate all my effort in trying to help you understand this.)
In your ignorance, you still lie about it.

Here's what counts;

House

Southern Republicans: 0–10

----------

In the Senate

Southern Republicans: 0–1

----------

As Dave told you, it was a regional thing, as ALL SOUTHERN REPUBLICLOWNS VOTED AGAINST THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT!!

Get over your stupidity and face the fact that the Republiclown Party is filled with racists just like you.

In spite of your denials, your words here have marked you as a filthy racist.

You can play Twister all you want, bu tAmerica knows the south is still full of racism. This thread is proof.
The Slayer

Findlay, OH

#870703 Mar 8, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The subject was loopholes and subsidies for shipping jobs overseas.
Name them.
I would like to here how there is a tax loophole for
taking jobs overseas....as well.
The libs always talk about them...yet I never here of them
making a attempt to stop the this so called loophole.

If it is real....Iam sure there would plenty of support
in closing the loophole.

Like I said the hole tax code and Fed. reg is what sends
jobs overseas.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870704 Mar 8, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Obesity is highly hereditary.
Prove it.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#870705 Mar 8, 2013
shovelhead72 wrote:
<quoted text>Nice try...but I don't care to eat off your spoon either.
Apparently Congress thinks the 'political crap' known as 'loopholes' exist...and they've been steadfastly protecting same, while cheering on the sequester.
Ask them.
Perhaps you should discuss this with "Nucular", a/k/a Demos/Tenzing.

He/she seems to want to be your Mommy.

(Sequester is good.)

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870706 Mar 8, 2013
As a sockpuppet, it's your job to defend the drunken puppetmaster, or he'll put you back in the dark closet, and you'll cry for months!!

So if you're not one of Waxturd's puppets, why are you on full defgense of the rest of his sockpuppets??

Thanks. I now officially own the stable of Waxturd's sockpuppets!!
Old Crazy Goober wrote:
<quoted text>
He posted a quote and a link and you call that "rage"?
Amazing.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#870707 Mar 8, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>The Democrats are going to loose in 2014 and Obama knows it they should have left the gun issue alone and now they are going repear the losses just like in 1994.
Obama has already buried the gun control issue, knowing it to be a loser.

A few of the fools still pushing this turkey will pay the price.

Since: Jul 08

We will not go gentle

#870708 Mar 8, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
On my own dollar, with a doctor of my choice, not pot luck at some moldy government clinic, waiting in line.
You're self-insured? No UCS requirements or deductibles for you?(I tend to believe Nucular; you're obviously not working and old enough to be on Medicare.) Where did you get your ideas of waiting in line at a moldy government clinic.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#870709 Mar 8, 2013
Shovelhead already spotted you for the dickhead you are.

I just want to make sure he understands what a nasty piece of scum you are, and not waste his time on an old fool and liar.

You live off Gov't handouts, all the while bitchin' about anyone else who gets Gov't money.

Nobraina thinks all of the Gov't payouts should only go to ancient white fools like him!!

Someday, you'll figure out how to spell my name properly. Another indication of your failing eyesight.
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you should discuss this with "Nucular", a/k/a Demos/Tenzing.
He/she seems to want to be your Mommy.
(Sequester is good.)

Since: Jul 08

We will not go gentle

#870710 Mar 8, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>The Democrats are going to loose in 2014 and Obama knows it they should have left the gun issue alone and now they are going repear the losses just like in 1994.
We are going to "loose" and "repear" the losses, huh? Chicagoan by Birth/Ignorant by Choice, is that you?
The Slayer

Findlay, OH

#870711 Mar 8, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you should discuss this with "Nucular", a/k/a Demos/Tenzing.
He/she seems to want to be your Mommy.
(Sequester is good.)
Yes sequester is a good thing...but I want to see some
real cuts in spending.
Some very large and painful real (not just base line) cuts in spending.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 31 min District 1 231,241
Chicagoland bartenders and waitresses NEVER hug... 1 hr Tourism warning 1
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Dudley 7,968
last post wins! (Dec '10) 3 hr They cannot kill ... 2,764
last post wins! (Apr '13) 3 hr They cannot kill ... 1,977
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 5 hr Burn Gas for Fun 62,366
Are democrats destroyed? 5 hr enter username 17

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages