Barack Obama, our next President

[Leechie the GOP Leech]

Ah, credit card companies under Bush get to charge you a most reasonable 30% interest rate.

slurp-slurp-slurp

[No Surprize]

Leechie the GOP Leech wrote:

<quoted text>
I just took a quart out of his leg, so he won't be normal for a while.
But I pushed the automatic pilot on his electronic Rush Limbaugh brain, so he'll keep right on spewing nonsense.

Another rumor goes in your ear, then out of your mouth. You are a deranged idiot.

[sonicfilter]

Frustrated that House Republicans are seen in surveys as the main obstacle to resolving the stalemate over sequester, Speaker John Boehner used some unusually blunt language Tuesday morning to lay the problem at the Senate door.

“We have moved the bill in the House twice,” he said Tuesday morning as President Obama continued his public relations blitz with a visit to a military installation in Newport News, Va.“We should not have to move a third bill before the Senate gets off their asses and begins to do something.”

The beleaguered House speaker could use a refresher course in constitutional prerogatives. Passing two bills in the last Congress doesn’t count; each Congress has to start anew. And his insistence that the Senate go first is an admission that the House is incapable of finding a solution to the fiscal impasse.

“By turning over his prestige, power, and initiative to the other body, saying,‘Let the other Republicans take the pain,’ he is surrendering the constitutional power given to the House,” says Samuel Popkin, a political scientist at the University of California at San Diego.“He is admitting failure, defeat.”

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/03...

[No Surprize]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
still clueless no matter what the name.
It is a standard talking point of Republicans and deficit hawks of all political stripes that federal spending is out of control; that major surgery is needed, especially on entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, to get the budget on a sustainable course.
In fact, our long-term deficit situation is not nearly as severe as even many budget experts believe. The problem is that they are looking at recent history and near-term projections that are overly impacted by one-time factors related to the economic crisis and massive Republican tax cuts that lowered revenues far below normal.
Taking a longer-term view, such as that in a recent Treasury Department report, shows that our longer-term fiscal problem is in fact quite manageable.
Read more at http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2013/01... ]
so tell us....when was the last time BillO had a real economist on his show?

Don't worry about what "sonicfilter" thinks. He doesn't do it very often anyway Troll.

[Leechie the GOP Leech]

John Galt wrote:

For those who think 2016 is predictable, here is August 2005 polling for 2008 Dem nomination:
40% Hilary Clinton
19% John Kerry
14% John Edwards
6% Joe Biden
3% Wesley Clark
Guess who is missing?

Me! Me!

Oh wait, a bloodsucker got elected in 2000.

Drat.

[Old Crazy Goober]

Gee, it looks like there is a Democrat spamming the judgeits for every single post. Where's my ammo?

[No Surprize]

sonicfilter wrote:

Frustrated that House Republicans are seen in surveys as the main obstacle to resolving the stalemate over sequester, Speaker John Boehner used some unusually blunt language Tuesday morning to lay the problem at the Senate door.
“We have moved the bill in the House twice,” he said Tuesday morning as President Obama continued his public relations blitz with a visit to a military installation in Newport News, Va.“We should not have to move a third bill before the Senate gets off their asses and begins to do something.”
The beleaguered House speaker could use a refresher course in constitutional prerogatives. Passing two bills in the last Congress doesn’t count; each Congress has to start anew. And his insistence that the Senate go first is an admission that the House is incapable of finding a solution to the fiscal impasse.
“By turning over his prestige, power, and initiative to the other body, saying,‘Let the other Republicans take the pain,’ he is surrendering the constitutional power given to the House,” says Samuel Popkin, a political scientist at the University of California at San Diego.“He is admitting failure, defeat.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/03...

There are idiots who seem angry and continuously look for conflict. Trolling and Spammimg inane shit. The battle you are fighting is not with us, it's with your deranged self.

[Taxpayer]

Cway wrote:

You conservatives are fond of touting capitalism in its pure laissez-faire form.
As I recall, there was a very dark side to it. For example 12-hour a day, six-days-a-week child labor for pennies an hour. Employers had no responsibility for unsafe conditions in the workplace. If a worker lost a hand to an electric saw, he had no recourse. And was typically fired and replaced.
Drugs were unregulated. There were no health standards for canned goods, meat and poultry.
These issues were not addressed until enough progressive-minded politicians were elected to office and passed laws ending such conditions.

When you take from those who work and give to those who wouldn't, the democracy," or in our case the republic, "ceases to exist."
To a communist-minded diehard believer, I’d like to ask just when you think the Cuban and North Korean states are going to flower into social-anarchist models of economic and social equality. Not only is it a sick joke to suppose that such governments will ever evolve into even this shortsighted morass of inanity, but that anarchism itself will ever manifest according to such a model. Since free or freed markets are the only ones consistent with the absence of political government, it follows that socialism , at least as a universally preferred default system , would and could never endure on any large, lasting scale, absent an oppressive government bootheel to keep it hobbling along by armed force. Such is the case now. And so, we can fully expect, will it ever be in the future. Human nature, and human desire, operates along quite different lines.It is more than instructive to take note of even a percentage of what is contained in Marx’s infamous 1848 Manifesto of the Communist Party: Abolition of all private land ownership, and rights of inheritance. Government monopolization of all transportation, communications, and educational systems. Forced redistribution of population (forced assignment of place of residency). A government-monopolized central bank. A heavy graduated tax on earnings. As to this last, Marx was quoted as saying that such a tax was necessary “to crush the middle class under the guise of a need to finance the government.” In other words, Marx was in no way above blatant deception in order to garner widespread support for a tax which in truth was designed not simply to prevent financial upward mobility among the masses, but to prop up a fiat currency creation scheme with which to ensnare and enslave the world.

[leosnana]

No Surprize wrote:

<quoted text>leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>Come, carol, you ignorant slut. You actually think Debil is going to post nothing of substance and of no humor, using there, their, they're incorrectly? I think the Orlando Debil might actually be dumb carol, in a hurry.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search...
In the age of information...Your ignorance and running on empty is still a morons best choice, deranged idiot.

Look, floDUH, seems you've been "manipulating" again (didn't yo momma tell you you could go blind that way?). Maybe you should show MY words--not a changed post from RUSH2BSTUPID.
Whatev...I'll just go back to my permanent ignore list for your whole damned sock drawer. Y'all don't hurry back now, ya' hear!

[Leechie the GOP Leech]

Wait a minute. I didn't just take two quarts out of No Surprize. I emptied the whole punch bowl!He's a Republi-zombie now.

No Surprise: Oooohhhhh. Gimme brains. Gimme brains.

[sonicfilter]

No Surprize wrote:

<quoted text>Don't worry about what "sonicfilter" thinks. He doesn't do it very often anyway Troll.

lmao

'I am the King Of Topix! Heed my word or suffer the wrath of the feared floriDuh!'

and did you copy that one so you can paste it 30 or 40 times?

[TSM]

One plaque we’ll never see hung on Obama’s Wall!! Leadership ‘If It Is To Be, It Is Up To Me!’

[No Surprize]

leosnana wrote:

<quoted text>Look, floDUH, seems you've been "manipulating" again (didn't yo momma tell you you could go blind that way?). Maybe you should show MY words--not a changed post from RUSH2BSTUPID.
Whatev...I'll just go back to my permanent ignore list for your whole damned sock drawer. Y'all don't hurry back now, ya' hear!

leosnana is not lazy, her deranged mind enjoys doing nothing, blaming others. In the age of information...Your ignorance and running on empty is still a morons best choice.

[sonicfilter]

No Surprize wrote:

<quoted text>There are idiots who seem angry and continuously look for conflict. Trolling and Spammimg inane shit. The battle you are fighting is not with us, it's with your deranged self.

OMG i had better chill out! the word of The Duh comes down from on high!

this is better than birtherland.

[waxywaxturd]

Well my topix family, it's time for another time out and some much needed quality time spent in my hydrotherapy bath, the tranquilizing "chair" and the gyroscope. I think I've overdone it today with the judgits and my sockpuppets. I got overly excited and need to take a breather. These depends are pretty shot too!! Carry on the marathon judgit tourney without me till I return! As usual I will share a couple of my secrets with my topix friends:

As I have revealed, if you want to get an edge in the judgit race, doubling up on the industrial strength depends are a must. And constipating foods are a big help!! I recommend cheese and lots of it!! Multiple IP adresses are a must as well!!!!

Later boys! Waxman

PS don't ignore "No Surprise"(Florida), it's one of the reasons I need this time out!!!!(my feelings are hurt)

[Realtime]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
still clueless no matter what the name.
It is a standard talking point of Republicans and deficit hawks of all political stripes that federal spending is out of control; that major surgery is needed, especially on entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, to get the budget on a sustainable course.
In fact, our long-term deficit situation is not nearly as severe as even many budget experts believe. The problem is that they are looking at recent history and near-term projections that are overly impacted by one-time factors related to the economic crisis and massive Republican tax cuts that lowered revenues far below normal.
Taking a longer-term view, such as that in a recent Treasury Department report, shows that our longer-term fiscal problem is in fact quite manageable.
Read more at http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2013/01... ]
so tell us....when was the last time BillO had a real economist on his show?

Phil Gramm, former US senator and architect of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1999) was an economist.

Good thing for him that he rolled sevens eh? Imagine ole Phil making the political talk show rounds.

[No Surprize]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
OMG i had better chill out! the word of The Duh comes down from on high!
this is better than birtherland.

Mistakes and worthless cut and paste are proof that you are not thinking, but trying...

[John Galt]

Homer 2016 wrote:

<quoted text>Dennis Kucinich?

Kucinich was probably polling higher than the other guy at that time.

[leosnana]

SHADOW wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey dogface....what's up loooosey?
What a mouth you have these days.
Why do you always demand a link for things you don't like for some reason or another?
I like the pic, looks like you might be getting thinner...hehehehe

Hey, ShaDOH/Sam/Sham/Hanky/etc. Go back and play with the boring Kvetch All Fraudy, Jes' Spewing, and So Outta' Hair on the thread where you ran anyone semi-literate or better off long ago...you're the only ones who can stand ya'.

[John Galt]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
As movement conservatives start to sour on Christie, it might be instructive to recall what it was about him that many of them liked from 2009 through last year. For the most part, it wasn’t the content of his agenda, in which most of his admirers had little interest. It was Christie’s willingness to be combative and confrontational that won their admiration. When this was all that most movement conservatives knew about him, Christie’s future in the party seemed very bright, and his name was frequently listed along with such movement conservative heroes as Rubio and Ryan.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...
so he was fine until he started acting like he had some sense.
not a characteristic that plays well with the FOXbot crowd.

All was fine until Christie stopped being combative and confrontational and kissed Obama in public just before the election.

Christie still has a possibility of turning this around.