Barack Obama, our next President

[lily waxman raton fl]

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
As she clucked her dentures "You can't shake your finger at the federal government; I tried that once"
(now, give me those federal dollars)
They're all fos

Michelle all over it

[Waxman]

OldRaider wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you keep talking to me after you said you wouldn't? I have zero respect for you, you're a loser. Only a very sick narcissist would continue to hide behind multiple layers of identity, talk to his own sockpuppets and award himself brilliant judge-its. No one believes the dumbass comment above is brilliant, certainly not seven people. You're a joke. I only comment on your crazy posts to use you as an example to illustrate how pathetically desperate the right wing has become. Get some help.

So is the sky going to fall due to the sequester? OMG!!

We better run for the hills according to your fellow slobs in the White House!

[Cway]

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
The Race Card is so passe, Dood. Try another form of race-bating. Give Jesse Sharpton, Jamie Foxx or the Boy Messiah a call. They can help.

No, the racist card is not passe as the Repugnants here engage in constant racial slurs.

Don't deny it.

[shinningelectr0n]

Cway wrote:

To Mr. Galt,
1. Well, only 53% make enough to pay taxes. Hmmm. Now which president led us to that situation? Yuh think maybe eight years of chimp had something to do with it?
2. Avoids the question of who opposes Wall Street reform, doesn't it? Try to stay on topic. As for the banks, they willingly made out predatorial loans and are now being investigated for it.
3. The issue is not your irrelevant queries, but the simple fact that your kind opposes minimum wage increases. Nothing more be said. The jury is in and the verdict lies on that simple fact.
4. More evasiveness on your part which pretends to address the issue. The bottom line is that Republicans hate social security and would like nothing better than to do away with it, as they tried under Bush. In that case, to privatize it. More specifically, turning over what was a trust over to Wall Street wolves.
Well, doesn't that once more reinforce the alliance between GOPers and Wall Street?
5. More nonsensical whining on your part, with the silly concluding remark that those who pay the taxes can't afford medical care, while the poorest can. Stop, take a deep breath, and listen to your idiocy once in a while.
6. Sorry, but I fail to see the morality or legal justification for jacking up credit card rates to 30%. The people who suffer from it the most are the poor. This is one of several points I made and nothing you state above refutes it.
Profits over people, right Mr. cochroachie?
Or have you forgotten how HMOs denied legitimate, long-term clients the kind of life-saving care they needed in order to pad the bottom line? The HMOs would just cancel their subscription under the bogus excuse "pre-existing condition".
But you don't want us to know that, do you?
Face it, Republicans are the party of the rich and big business. It's their class against everyone else. Actions speak louder than specious denials.

Cway, considering how contorted you are with your eyeballs and intellect shoved up your exhaust-pipe, we'll call you HeadWay instead hitherto.

[proud2bwhite]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
I have news. Calling you out for posting a racial slur is not playing the race card.
Its identifying you to be the racist POS we all know you to be.
Why is t you GD right whiners can't post about Obama without the racial slurs? Is in inbred in you that bad? Are you really that GD ignorant?

disagreeing with the treasonous bastard is not a racial slur.

[Waxman]

Obama created the sequestor before he was against it.

Baaawwwaaahhhh!!!!

[Nuculur option]

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
Some jokes write themselves.

You're right. I really screwed that one up!!

[shinningelectr0n]

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
Rightwingers rarely have a sense of humor and they equate SNL with communism

I equate SNL with Daycare. Same with Hollywood.

And, of course, certain boca raton locations:>

[Waxman]

Cway wrote:

<quoted text>
No, the racist card is not passe as the Repugnants here engage in constant racial slurs.
Don't deny it.

How long have you been carrying the moron card in your wallet?

[EasyEed]

AFF wrote:

<quoted text>
Freeloader why are you hiding behine a party?
It does not matter Dem, Rep, tea party, Progressive. The government needs to be reducing to 1 tenth its size. Americans need to stop you communist minded freeloaders from using the government as a weapon to steal and enslaves people. Enslaving Americans who have the pride and know their responsibility to stand on their own feet and provide for themselves. Help those that need help not those looking for a free ride.

"AFF"
"sonic" and those of his ilk are concerned that the sequester spending debate amounts to a whole 1% of the trillions our government pisses away on an annual basis. Just imagine "sonic" and the other liberal loons all of a sudden discovered their annual income was going to go down be 1%, probably about 5 bucks a week. They are in anguish, what do I have to cut? The world is ending. What is the answer?
Loke everything else the liberal loons have no answer, they just have their hand out.
Peace

[JerryD]

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
How did you find out about the real world?
Your therapist told you?

Hey, was that a joke or proof that you're a full fledged member of the labotomy club?

[Waxman]

Cway wrote:

<quoted text>
No, the racist card is not passe as the Repugnants here engage in constant racial slurs.
Don't deny it.

OK. How about:

Obama is a light skinned NEGRO with no NEGRO dialect.

Are you pleased with my remark, libtard?

[shinningelectr0n]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
I have news. Calling you out for posting a racial slur is not playing the race card.
Its identifying you to be the racist POS we all know you to be.
Why is t you GD right whiners can't post about Obama without the racial slurs? Is in inbred in you that bad? Are you really that GD ignorant?

DiversionaryDave strikes again!

In desperation, anything and everything becomes a weapon for you. Even poop, lies and race-baiting.

[JerryD]

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
Cway, considering how contorted you are with your eyeballs and intellect shoved up your exhaust-pipe, we'll call you HeadWay instead hitherto.

This is what happens to retardicans who sniff too much airplane glue. They suddenly think they're "funny". In an organ grinder's monkey kind of way.

[shinningelectr0n]

Nj raider 1 wrote:

<quoted text> Its not our fault you still watch the old black & white floor model. They do have flat screen colored televisions equipt with HD. Shit they even have 3-D TVs , but you choose to see things in black & white. Upgrade outta the 50s & 60s or in your case maybe before then!

You sound just like DiversionaryDave above. Forgot what the topic was again, hey?

Were you two rags cut from the same female suppository?

[shinningelectr0n]

OldRaider wrote:

<quoted text>
I find out about the real world by not watching FOX. Did you miss the news about Jindal calling your kind stupid, McCain calling your pals jerks and Rove calling you losers?
I think it's hilarious that the Republican party is kicking you "patriots" to the curb and kissing up to the illegals. That's the real world for you, loser.
Adios!

You are hooked on the fake Fox argument just like you are hooked on the judgits thing. Myopia is deeply engrained in your eyes and in your head.

Reality, to you, is only inches away. On your TV screen.

[JerryD]

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
I equate SNL with Daycare. Same with Hollywood.
And, of course, certain boca raton locations:>

I equate you with pond scum, toxic waste and ten day-old dog food in the dish with flies crawling all over it.

Your favorite meals.

[No Surprize]

sonicfilter wrote:

Woodward Misses The Mark
....But in this case Woodward is just dead wrong. Obama and Democrats have always insisted that a balanced mix of spending cuts and higher taxes replace sequestration. It’s true that John Boehner wouldn’t agree to include new taxes in the enforcement mechanism itself, and thus that the enforcement mechanism he and Obama settled upon — sequestration — is composed exclusively of spending cuts. But the entire purpose of an enforcement mechanism is to make sure that the enforcement mechanism is never triggered. The key question is what action it was designed to compel. And on that score, the Budget Control Act is unambiguous.
First:“Unless a joint committee bill achieving an amount greater than $1,200,000,000,000 in deficit reduction as provided in section 401(b)(3)(B)(i)(II) of the Budget Control Act of 2011 is enacted by January 15, 2012, the discretionary spending limits listed in section 251(c) shall be revised, and discretionary appropriations and direct spending shall be reduced.”
Key words:“deficit reduction.” Not “spending cuts.” If Republicans wanted to make sure sequestration would be replaced with spending cuts only, that would have been the place to make a stand. Some of them certainly tried. But that’s not what ultimately won the day. Instead the, law tasked the Super Committee with replacing sequestration with a different deficit reduction bill — tax increases or no.
“The goal of the joint committee shall be to reduce the deficit by at least $1,500,000,000,000 over the period of fiscal years 2012 to 2021,” according to the BCA. The bill even provided the House and Senate instructions for advancing a Super Committee bill if it included revenue. This couldn’t be clearer. In the Super Committee’s waning hours, Republicans tried to entice Democrats into a spending-cut heavy agreement by acceding to a small amount of revenue. Democrats balked — the balance was off — but all of that just goes to show that a tax increase has always been a likely element of a replacement bill, and Republicans know it.
Woodward just biffed this one.
http://editors.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives...
David Brooks got ate up for the same thing. in his 'retraction' he pleaded 'frustration'.
happens when you write an opinion based on nothing.

you missed the bus. You have no fear of perfection, you'll never reach it.

[shinningelectr0n]

Cway wrote:

<quoted text>
No, the racist card is not passe as the Repugnants here engage in constant racial slurs.
Don't deny it.

Paranoia shows your inner workings, Dood. Even feigned paranoia is exploited by you, the Jesse Sharptons and the Boy Messiah.

In order to gather the unwashed masses onto your partisan bandwagon, it is necessary to create a common enemy. Hitler used the Jews, Stalin, Marx and Lenin used the evil Capitalists. You use white folks.

The Boy Messiah uses Conservatism and fiscal responsibility as the common enemy. You fall for it like a lady of the night chases a windblown dollar down a dark alleyway.

[Cway]

proud2bwhite wrote:

<quoted text> disagreeing with the treasonous bastard is not a racial slur.

Oh, I see.

But George Bush weakening this country by ruining its budget and launching an unnecessary war-by-lies in Iraq which killed thousands of Americans isn't treasonous?

You hypocritical SOB.