Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1251707 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#867411 Mar 3, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Dismembering the government is a noble objective.
Time to end the oppression of a domineering federal bureaucracy.
Down with the IRS!!!
so says the minority.

and who's listening? the minority.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Florida

Miami, FL

#867412 Mar 3, 2013
OldRaidCan wrote:
<quoted text> Wish I could say the same for you, but you are the complete idiot...all parts are missing, which is why you continue to cast your vote for the most incompetent president since Jimma Carter. LOL
Ever get the feeling your brain trotted off without loser?
-
It's scary when you start posting noise, the same noises as a coffee maker you idiot...
-
It's the culture...

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#867413 Mar 3, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Bob Woodward and the Rules of Washington Morality
Why does Bob Woodward get to lie—twice!—and still be Bob Woodward?
Just keep killing off your own, one at a time.

We are patient and will survive.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#867414 Mar 3, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
so says the minority.
and who's listening? the minority.
Time to starve the government beast.

NO NEW TAXES!!!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Florida

Miami, FL

#867415 Mar 3, 2013
carol wrote:
MANDATE "UNCONSTITUTIONAL"!! !!
WHOOP! WHOOP! WHOOP! WHOOP! WHOOP!
carol wrote:
HALLELUJAH! HALLELUJAH! HALLELUJAH!
HALL-EEEE-U-LAH!
FOR LILY: HALLELUJER!
(I'm not gloating...)
Misinformed Foxbot.

Dick Morris, "Romney in a landslide".

I don't know which is worse, the liars or the idiots who believe those lies.

It's the culture.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#867416 Mar 3, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact remains that the resolution would not have passed with Democrat votes, so the credit and/or blame is shared.
Voting based upon faulty information. Bush & Cheney are to blame for selling the war based on lies.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#867417 Mar 3, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Please hold your breath, dumbass.
I gave you an opportunity to back up your bullsh*t.

No surprise that you couldn't do it.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#867418 Mar 3, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Time to starve the government beast.
NO NEW TAXES!!!
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy

...In reality, states that levy personal income taxes, including the states with the highest top rates, have seen more economic growth per capita and less decline in their median income level over the last ten years than the nine states that do not tax income. Unemployment rates have been nearly identical across states with and without income taxes.

– Four of the nine states without income taxes are actually doing worse than the average state in regards to economic growth per capita: Texas, Tennessee, Florida, and Nevada.

– Five of the nine states without income taxes are doing worse than average in terms of median income growth: New Hampshire, Florida, Tennessee, Alaska, and Nevada.

– Six of the nine states without income taxes had higher than average annual unemployment rates over the last decade: Texas, Florida, Tennessee, Washington, Alaska, and Nevada.

http://www.itep.org/pdf/lafferhighrate.pdf

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#867419 Mar 3, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Tax increases are not spending reductions.
Obama already forced huge tax increases in Obamacare and January 1 of this year.
Hooray for the sequester: finally some spending cuts.
Here's hoping you get furloughed.
Loopholes cost the government money.

Too bad the Republicans couldn't find a single loop hole to close.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#867420 Mar 3, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Just keep killing off your own, one at a time.
We are patient and will survive.
so how old are you? FOXbot demo?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#867421 Mar 3, 2013
NBC's David Gregory and House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) butted heads during an interview when the speaker insisted that President Obama did not have a plan to replace sequestration and Gregory disagreed. The interview was taped Friday afternoon after Boehner met with the president to discuss sequestration and aired on "Meet the Press" Sunday.

"Mr. Speaker, that's just not true," Gregory said. "They've made it very clear, as the president just did, that he has a plan that he's put forward that involves entitlement cuts, that involves spending cuts. That you've made a choice, as have Republicans, to leave tax loopholes in place and you'd rather have those and live with all these arbitrary cuts."

Boehner called Gregory's objection "nonsense."

"Well David, that's just nonsense. If they had a plan, why wouldn't Senate Democrats go ahead and pass it," he said.

Boehner returned to this point throughout the interview, insisting that Democrats do not have a plan because the Democratic-controlled Senate has not voted on one.

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/d...

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#867423 Mar 3, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy
...In reality, states that levy personal income taxes, including the states with the highest top rates, have seen more economic growth per capita and less decline in their median income level over the last ten years than the nine states that do not tax income. Unemployment rates have been nearly identical across states with and without income taxes.
– Four of the nine states without income taxes are actually doing worse than the average state in regards to economic growth per capita: Texas, Tennessee, Florida, and Nevada.
– Five of the nine states without income taxes are doing worse than average in terms of median income growth: New Hampshire, Florida, Tennessee, Alaska, and Nevada.
– Six of the nine states without income taxes had higher than average annual unemployment rates over the last decade: Texas, Florida, Tennessee, Washington, Alaska, and Nevada.
http://www.itep.org/pdf/lafferhighrate.pdf
The unemployment rate in Texas is 6.1%, compared to 7.8% nationally.

The unemployment rate in California, with sky-high taxes, is 9.8%.
Cway

United States

#867424 Mar 3, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact remains that the resolution would not have passed with Democrat votes, so the credit and/or blame is shared.
No, not really.

Because Bush obtained support on the basis of lies.

So you can't blame Democrats for voting the wrong way because Bush deceived them.

And face facts. Over 2/3 of the pro war vote came from Republicans.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#867425 Mar 3, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Loopholes cost the government money.
Too bad the Republicans couldn't find a single loop hole to close.
Which "loophole" do you want to close: home mortgage interest deduction, state and local tax deductions, or charitable deductions?
TSM

El Paso, TX

#867426 Mar 3, 2013
If we were Tracking Obama’s Pinocchio’s they would reach from the USA to China!! Obama and his administration remind most of us of that movie ‘The Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight’ each day more Spin more Lies!!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#867427 Mar 3, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
so how old are you? FOXbot demo?
Galt is ageless, but will certainly outlive you (and Obama).

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#867428 Mar 3, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Boehner called Gregory's objection "nonsense."
"Well David, that's just nonsense. If they had a plan, why wouldn't Senate Democrats go ahead and pass it," he said.
Boehner returned to this point throughout the interview, insisting that Democrats do not have a plan because the Democratic-controlled Senate has not voted on one.
True

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#867429 Mar 3, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Still running from your posts.
The topic was my response to one of your dumbass right whiner buddies who claimed that Obama submitted on two budgets.
Then you jumped in having a GD fit screaming about these budgets.
So it was you that changed the subject while failing to admit that Obama did indeed submit budgets every year.
You still can't admit t.
What a pathetic POS loser.
GFY
"real dumb"
It's Sunday. Calm down, don't let your crap get so hot. Hey "real dumb" I commented not at all on how many budgets that president nobama presented, I did comment they were so inane he could not get a single vote to support the crap he offered. The subject was budgets, I did not change the topic I simply said the loser occupying the white house has nary a clue. In your dim world president nobama offered budgets in the mind of the sane those who actually thing he presented fantasy.
The question in my mind is when is the president going to make a decision on the pipeline. Two questions actually, who is going to piss off?
- The unions by not okaying the pipe line and the thousands of high paying jobs it would provide, or
- The eco idiots who piss and moan.
Should be interesting.
Peace
KMA
TSM

El Paso, TX

#867430 Mar 3, 2013
The whiner and Chief out blaming Republicans again demonstrating his ineptness to Lead!! The president has the latitude to pick and choose where and what to Cut but he chooses to play Politics … Good grief, the entire sequester would have reduced last year’s deficit from $1.33&#8201;trillion to $1.24&#8201;trillion. A fraction of a fraction!!

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#867431 Mar 3, 2013
You May Have Seen These Fox Graphics Before -- In A GOP Press Release

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/03/02/you-m...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 10 min ROTO ROOTER 192,286
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 40 min OzRitz 53,988
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 45 min Sublime1 99,902
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 7 hr RACE 6,144
Word (Dec '08) 7 hr RACE 5,325
Dear Abby July 3, 2015 7 hr RACE 5
Amy July 3, 2015 9 hr mrs gladys kravitz 3
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages