Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
797,961 - 797,980 of 1,081,727 Comments Last updated 7 min ago
Florida

Hollywood, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866921
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

18

18

18

Kentucky hoover wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't be that stupid, can you?
LOL.. I'd love to have a 'battle of wits' with you...but you do appear unarmed?
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866922
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

21

21

21

Florida wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a very special kind of stupid aren't you?
You would probably look a lot less so if you could address the facts in my post as not being factual.

But you won't because you can't.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866923
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

22

22

22

carol wrote:
While Obama is still blaming Republicans for everything that has ever gone wrong in his administration - somehow forgetting Democrats had control of Congress the last two years of the Bush administration, the first two years of the Obama administration, and who resisted any effort to rein in Fannie and Freddie for years leading up to the crisis - the Republicans washed their hands of the mess insisting the bills they passed in the last Congress to avert the cuts were passed with little to no Democratic support and were never taken up by the Senate.
So let's get this straight:
It was Republicans who tried to reign in Fannie and Freddie and Democrats who fought it every step of the way...It was Democrats who controlled Congress two years leading up to the crisis and two years after the crisis...And it was Republicans who passed bills in the House to avert the cuts with no support by the Democrats or never even taken up by the Senate.
How is anyone not getting this?
Because it's not true and simply more idiocy that you're trying to recycle for your own amusement.
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866924
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

22

22

22

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
not getting it?
telling the truth would help.
Let's do a who's not getting it test.

1. Did or did not the Democrats control Congress the last two years of the Bush administration and the first two years of the Obama administration before and after the crisis?

A. Did.
B. Did not.

2. Did or did not the Democrats resist any effort to rein in Fannie and Freddie in the years leading up to the crisis?

A. Did.
B. Did not.

3. Did or did not the Democrats pass a budget in the past four years?

A. Did.
B. Did not.

4. Did or did not the Senate refuse to bring up or vote on any bills passed by the House to avert the automatic spending cuts?

A. Did.
B. Did not.

The only way you could fail the "who's not getting it" test is if you weren't honest.
Florida

Hollywood, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866925
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

18

18

18

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
The Democrats really have made a mess of things, haven't they?
First, they resisted reining in Fannie and Freddie in the face of numerous warnings in the years leading up to the crisis.
They controlled Congress prior to and after the crisis.
They never passed a budget or proposed any solutions the past four years rejecting Obama's budget proposals twice.
They didn't take up any bills passed by the House to avoid the recent embarrassment.
And they still don't want to cut spending.
So explain to me again how Democrats aren't held responsibile for any of this mess and everything - I mean everything - is simply all the Republicans' fault?
It makes things nice and tidy for the Democrats to point fingers and come out smelling like a rose, but is it really as nice and tidy as they would have you believe?
A deranged rumor goes in your ear Polly Parrot, straight out of your mouth..
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866926
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

21

21

21

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
The Democrats really have made a mess of things, haven't they?
First, they resisted reining in Fannie and Freddie in the face of numerous warnings in the years leading up to the crisis.
They controlled Congress prior to and after the crisis.
They never passed a budget or proposed any solutions the past four years rejecting Obama's budget proposals twice.
They didn't take up any bills passed by the House to avoid the recent embarrassment.
And they still don't want to cut spending.
So explain to me again how Democrats aren't held responsibile for any of this mess and everything - I mean everything - is simply all the Republicans' fault?
It makes things nice and tidy for the Democrats to point fingers and come out smelling like a rose, but is it really as nice and tidy as they would have you believe?
you're like a FOXbot robot.

The White House’s Fannie and Freddie “one-finger-salute”

A former Republican lawmaker says the White House and Greenspan sabotaged legislation aimed at fixing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

http://www.salon.com/2008/09/10/greenspan_bus...

co-sponser...Barney Frank. 2005.

i'd just say you're totally clueless, but that's not the first time i've posted that take down of another right wing myth.

so why is it you ignore facts?
TSM

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866927
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

21

21

21

Obama is the prodigy of Liberal Parents!! This president wouldn’t know the Truth if it Slap Him in the Face!!
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866928
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

18

18

18

Overseer58 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, Obama is not a dictator, but he sure as hell wants to be and he sure as hell acts like it when he pisses on the United States Constitution at every opportunity.
He was probably thinking "I'm not a dictator...because those stupid Republicans keep getting in my way."
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866929
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

18

18

18

Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Because it's not true and simply more idiocy that you're trying to recycle for your own amusement.
What part isn't true? It's easy to say something isn't true if you can't explain why it isn't.
Florida

Hollywood, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866930
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

16

16

16

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
You would probably look a lot less so if you could address the facts in my post as not being factual.
But you won't because you can't.
A deranged rumor goes in your ear Polly Parrot, straight out of your mouth..
Milw TaXpayer

Waukesha, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866933
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Jay Carney Admits Sequester Was The President's Idea ...
www.realclearpolitics.com/.../02/12/jay_carne ... Carney Admits Sequester Was The President's Idea. JAY CARNEY:...

SOTU: President Says Sequester ‘A Really Bad Idea’ Hours After ...
patdollard.com/...sequester-a...after-carney -...» Politics » SOTU: President Says Sequester ‘A Really Bad Idea’

Hours After Carney Admits It Was Obama’s Idea
Obama says sequester a ‘really bad idea’ hours after Carney ...
www.conservativenewscentral.com/2013/02/obama ... says sequester a ‘really bad idea’ hours after Carney admits it was Obama’s plan. February 13, 2013.... Tags Barack Obama, Jay Carney, Sequester.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866934
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

16

16

15

SpacePortAmerica
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866935
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

15

15

15

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's do a who's not getting it test.
1. Did or did not the Democrats control Congress the last two years of the Bush administration and the first two years of the Obama administration before and after the crisis?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
2. Did or did not the Democrats resist any effort to rein in Fannie and Freddie in the years leading up to the crisis?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
3. Did or did not the Democrats pass a budget in the past four years?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
4. Did or did not the Senate refuse to bring up or vote on any bills passed by the House to avert the automatic spending cuts?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
The only way you could fail the "who's not getting it" test is if you weren't honest.
1. Crisis started in 2001.

2. Did not.

3. Obama submitted budgets. Republicans and Democrats decided not to pass them. Reasons?.....
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...

4. Spending bills are supposed to originate in the House no matter the theater act put on by 'no one can blame me if I try to blame everyone else' Boehner.
dem

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866936
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

16

15

15

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
True, until Christie kissed Obama. So what? The collapse of the Episcopal Church as a result of leftwing theology is a reality.
A mediocre ex-governor would have made a mediocre president, don't blame christie for the budget deficits romney had as ex-governor of massachussetts, america was just not ready for another recession cutting taxes to the wealthy and multiplying the national deficit, we spoke , and is for the best.
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866941
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

17

17

16

shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
The Jerk-In-Chief treats the country the same way he treats the deficit: "Hell, it ain't *MY* money!!"
Funny you should say that. I was reminded last night of the movie "Trading Places" when Eddie Murphy conned everyone until he was given Dan Akroyd's home and all his valuable things.

When he invited his friends over for a party, he became very obsessive about them stealing his things and trashing his home.

That's how I see this president. He doesn't see this country as his home. It's more of an experiment to test his personal vision. If everything is destroyed in the process, oh well. He has no personal connection or vestment in it anyway.

In fact, I think he even resents the "home" he was given charge over. That's my honest opinion.

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866942
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

15

15

14

WILL OBAMA LIE AGAIN wrote:
In an effort to remove the hot-potato issue of excessive government spending from the 2012 presidential campaign, and calling the bluff of congressional Republicans who always seem to favor domestic spending cuts but increased military spending, President Obama suggested the concept of "sequester" in late 2011.
His idea was to reduce the rate of increased spending by 2 percent across the board—on domestic and military spending. To his surprise, the Republicans went along with this. They did so either because they lacked the political fortitude and the political will to designate specifically the unconstitutional and pork barrel federal spending projects to be cut, or because they thought that with the debt of the federal government then approaching $15 trillion (it is now $16.6 trillion and growing), any reductions in spending money the government doesn't have are preferred to no reductions. So, instead of enacting a budget, and instead of recognizing that much of its spending is simply not authorized by the Constitution, Congress enacted the so-called sequester legislation, and the president signed it into law.
The reductions the sequesters require are reductions in the rate of increased spending from those originally planned by Obama and authorized by Congress. Since the federal government has not had a budget in four years, even though federal law requires it to have one every year, these are planned expenditures, not budgetary items, on which the president wants to spend more money. Congress does not feel bound to obey the laws it has written; hence it has disregarded the legal requirement of a budget. Without a budget, the president has great leeway as to how to allocate funds within each department of the executive branch of the federal government.
Nevertheless, even if these sequesters do kick in, the feds will spend more in 2013 than they spent in 2012. That's because the sequesters are not cuts to spending; rather, they are reductions in planned increases in spending. The reductions amount to about two cents for every planned dollar of increased spending for every federal department.
The question remains: What part of each federal department (Justice, Defense, Homeland Security, Agriculture, etc.) will suffer these reduced increases? Here is where this sequester experiment gets dicey.
The president—who once championed the idea of sequesters and even threatened to veto any congressional effort to dismantle them—now has decided he can't live without that additional 2 percent to spend. So, he has gone about the country trying to scare the daylights out of people: Prisoners will be released from federal prisons, soldiers won't have enough bullets in their weapons, we will need to endure five-hour waiting lines at the airports, Social Security checks will be late, and similar nonsense.
The purpose of the sequester was to force Congress to act. To act to make spending cuts in a way not to harm the economy.

Part of that was to form a committee to decide where these cuts would take place. They failed.

Then Congress failed.

What Obama promised to Veto was any plan that avoided the sequester by dodging making any cuts at all. Congress could have just repealed the sequester.

You right whiners should think about quit lying abut these things & look at your own dysfunctional party.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866945
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

16

16

16

Tax Reform Now GOP Excuse Not to Negotiate

Obama has turned this rhetoric back on the Republicans. You hate all these special interest breaks, you say? Okay, why don’t we close some of them, in return for the entitlement cuts you say are so vital. And in fact Republicans don’t actually want to cut any loopholes out of the tax code at all. This has left them stuck.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/03/...
Realtime

Deltona, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866947
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

13

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
What part isn't true? It's easy to say something isn't true if you can't explain why it isn't.
Well sonic just explained it to you again and even provided a link to an easy to understand article. We've only been discussing the subject for four years doll__give it a rest.

If you're looking for amusement check out some of the game threads or the religion forum.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866948
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

14

14

14

How the aging of America is hurting the Republican Party

"Even beyond the Ryan plan, the Tea Party championed causes dear to the hearts of retirees and near-retirees. Remember, the issue that launched the Tea Party in the summer of 2009 was…opposition to Medicare cuts for current beneficiaries. That’s a strange rallying cry for a purportedly limited government movement. Once you begin to think of the Tea Party as a vehicle for advancing the economic interests of the old against the young, though, a lot of otherwise mysterious behaviors suddenly begin to make sense."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#866949
Mar 2, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

12

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's do a who's not getting it test.
1. Did or did not the Democrats control Congress the last two years of the Bush administration and the first two years of the Obama administration before and after the crisis?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
2. Did or did not the Democrats resist any effort to rein in Fannie and Freddie in the years leading up to the crisis?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
3. Did or did not the Democrats pass a budget in the past four years?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
4. Did or did not the Senate refuse to bring up or vote on any bills passed by the House to avert the automatic spending cuts?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
The only way you could fail the "who's not getting it" test is if you weren't honest.
I have some news.

Every time the House passes a bill that reduces the availability of abortions, repeals parts of the ACA or waters down the financial Reform law, they know it will go no where in the Senate.

All they do is dupe the feeble minded.

Republican ideas for spending cuts were aimed at the ACA & watering down the financial reform bill.

Thy knew it would go no where.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

77 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Abby 7-28 9 min Mister Tonka 5
Six-year-old girl watches in horror as police '... 10 min Albuquerque 4
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 10 min LRS 174,884
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 17 min RACE 97,552
2 men charged with attempted murder in shooting... 24 min reality is a crutch 1
Weapons of mass production 26 min Alexandra Klausner 1
Chicago mayor vows to shelter 1,000 undocumente... 43 min Hope you can afford it 1
•••

Beach Hazards Statement for Cook County was issued at July 28 at 3:19AM CDT

•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••