Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
carol

Orlando, FL

#866922 Mar 2, 2013
Florida wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a very special kind of stupid aren't you?
You would probably look a lot less so if you could address the facts in my post as not being factual.

But you won't because you can't.

Judged:

21

21

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#866923 Mar 2, 2013
carol wrote:
While Obama is still blaming Republicans for everything that has ever gone wrong in his administration - somehow forgetting Democrats had control of Congress the last two years of the Bush administration, the first two years of the Obama administration, and who resisted any effort to rein in Fannie and Freddie for years leading up to the crisis - the Republicans washed their hands of the mess insisting the bills they passed in the last Congress to avert the cuts were passed with little to no Democratic support and were never taken up by the Senate.
So let's get this straight:
It was Republicans who tried to reign in Fannie and Freddie and Democrats who fought it every step of the way...It was Democrats who controlled Congress two years leading up to the crisis and two years after the crisis...And it was Republicans who passed bills in the House to avert the cuts with no support by the Democrats or never even taken up by the Senate.
How is anyone not getting this?
Because it's not true and simply more idiocy that you're trying to recycle for your own amusement.

Judged:

22

22

22

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#866924 Mar 2, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
not getting it?
telling the truth would help.
Let's do a who's not getting it test.

1. Did or did not the Democrats control Congress the last two years of the Bush administration and the first two years of the Obama administration before and after the crisis?

A. Did.
B. Did not.

2. Did or did not the Democrats resist any effort to rein in Fannie and Freddie in the years leading up to the crisis?

A. Did.
B. Did not.

3. Did or did not the Democrats pass a budget in the past four years?

A. Did.
B. Did not.

4. Did or did not the Senate refuse to bring up or vote on any bills passed by the House to avert the automatic spending cuts?

A. Did.
B. Did not.

The only way you could fail the "who's not getting it" test is if you weren't honest.

Judged:

22

22

22

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Florida

Miami, FL

#866925 Mar 2, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
The Democrats really have made a mess of things, haven't they?
First, they resisted reining in Fannie and Freddie in the face of numerous warnings in the years leading up to the crisis.
They controlled Congress prior to and after the crisis.
They never passed a budget or proposed any solutions the past four years rejecting Obama's budget proposals twice.
They didn't take up any bills passed by the House to avoid the recent embarrassment.
And they still don't want to cut spending.
So explain to me again how Democrats aren't held responsibile for any of this mess and everything - I mean everything - is simply all the Republicans' fault?
It makes things nice and tidy for the Democrats to point fingers and come out smelling like a rose, but is it really as nice and tidy as they would have you believe?
A deranged rumor goes in your ear Polly Parrot, straight out of your mouth..

Judged:

18

18

18

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#866926 Mar 2, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
The Democrats really have made a mess of things, haven't they?
First, they resisted reining in Fannie and Freddie in the face of numerous warnings in the years leading up to the crisis.
They controlled Congress prior to and after the crisis.
They never passed a budget or proposed any solutions the past four years rejecting Obama's budget proposals twice.
They didn't take up any bills passed by the House to avoid the recent embarrassment.
And they still don't want to cut spending.
So explain to me again how Democrats aren't held responsibile for any of this mess and everything - I mean everything - is simply all the Republicans' fault?
It makes things nice and tidy for the Democrats to point fingers and come out smelling like a rose, but is it really as nice and tidy as they would have you believe?
you're like a FOXbot robot.

The White House’s Fannie and Freddie “one-finger-salute”

A former Republican lawmaker says the White House and Greenspan sabotaged legislation aimed at fixing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

http://www.salon.com/2008/09/10/greenspan_bus...

co-sponser...Barney Frank. 2005.

i'd just say you're totally clueless, but that's not the first time i've posted that take down of another right wing myth.

so why is it you ignore facts?

Judged:

21

21

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
TSM

El Paso, TX

#866927 Mar 2, 2013
Obama is the prodigy of Liberal Parents!! This president wouldn’t know the Truth if it Slap Him in the Face!!

Judged:

21

21

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#866928 Mar 2, 2013
Overseer58 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, Obama is not a dictator, but he sure as hell wants to be and he sure as hell acts like it when he pisses on the United States Constitution at every opportunity.
He was probably thinking "I'm not a dictator...because those stupid Republicans keep getting in my way."

Judged:

18

18

18

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#866929 Mar 2, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Because it's not true and simply more idiocy that you're trying to recycle for your own amusement.
What part isn't true? It's easy to say something isn't true if you can't explain why it isn't.

Judged:

18

18

18

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Florida

Miami, FL

#866930 Mar 2, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
You would probably look a lot less so if you could address the facts in my post as not being factual.
But you won't because you can't.
A deranged rumor goes in your ear Polly Parrot, straight out of your mouth..

Judged:

16

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Milw TaXpayer

Waukesha, WI

#866933 Mar 2, 2013
Jay Carney Admits Sequester Was The President's Idea ...
www.realclearpolitics.com/.../02/12/jay_carne ... Carney Admits Sequester Was The President's Idea. JAY CARNEY:...

SOTU: President Says Sequester ‘A Really Bad Idea’ Hours After ...
patdollard.com/...sequester-a...after-carney -...» Politics » SOTU: President Says Sequester ‘A Really Bad Idea’

Hours After Carney Admits It Was Obama’s Idea
Obama says sequester a ‘really bad idea’ hours after Carney ...
www.conservativenewscentral.com/2013/02/obama ... says sequester a ‘really bad idea’ hours after Carney admits it was Obama’s plan. February 13, 2013.... Tags Barack Obama, Jay Carney, Sequester.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#866934 Mar 2, 2013
SpacePortAmerica

Judged:

16

16

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#866935 Mar 2, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's do a who's not getting it test.
1. Did or did not the Democrats control Congress the last two years of the Bush administration and the first two years of the Obama administration before and after the crisis?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
2. Did or did not the Democrats resist any effort to rein in Fannie and Freddie in the years leading up to the crisis?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
3. Did or did not the Democrats pass a budget in the past four years?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
4. Did or did not the Senate refuse to bring up or vote on any bills passed by the House to avert the automatic spending cuts?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
The only way you could fail the "who's not getting it" test is if you weren't honest.
1. Crisis started in 2001.

2. Did not.

3. Obama submitted budgets. Republicans and Democrats decided not to pass them. Reasons?.....
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...

4. Spending bills are supposed to originate in the House no matter the theater act put on by 'no one can blame me if I try to blame everyone else' Boehner.

Judged:

15

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
dem

United States

#866936 Mar 2, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
True, until Christie kissed Obama. So what? The collapse of the Episcopal Church as a result of leftwing theology is a reality.
A mediocre ex-governor would have made a mediocre president, don't blame christie for the budget deficits romney had as ex-governor of massachussetts, america was just not ready for another recession cutting taxes to the wealthy and multiplying the national deficit, we spoke , and is for the best.

Judged:

16

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#866941 Mar 2, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
The Jerk-In-Chief treats the country the same way he treats the deficit: "Hell, it ain't *MY* money!!"
Funny you should say that. I was reminded last night of the movie "Trading Places" when Eddie Murphy conned everyone until he was given Dan Akroyd's home and all his valuable things.

When he invited his friends over for a party, he became very obsessive about them stealing his things and trashing his home.

That's how I see this president. He doesn't see this country as his home. It's more of an experiment to test his personal vision. If everything is destroyed in the process, oh well. He has no personal connection or vestment in it anyway.

In fact, I think he even resents the "home" he was given charge over. That's my honest opinion.

Judged:

17

17

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#866942 Mar 2, 2013
WILL OBAMA LIE AGAIN wrote:
In an effort to remove the hot-potato issue of excessive government spending from the 2012 presidential campaign, and calling the bluff of congressional Republicans who always seem to favor domestic spending cuts but increased military spending, President Obama suggested the concept of "sequester" in late 2011.
His idea was to reduce the rate of increased spending by 2 percent across the board—on domestic and military spending. To his surprise, the Republicans went along with this. They did so either because they lacked the political fortitude and the political will to designate specifically the unconstitutional and pork barrel federal spending projects to be cut, or because they thought that with the debt of the federal government then approaching $15 trillion (it is now $16.6 trillion and growing), any reductions in spending money the government doesn't have are preferred to no reductions. So, instead of enacting a budget, and instead of recognizing that much of its spending is simply not authorized by the Constitution, Congress enacted the so-called sequester legislation, and the president signed it into law.
The reductions the sequesters require are reductions in the rate of increased spending from those originally planned by Obama and authorized by Congress. Since the federal government has not had a budget in four years, even though federal law requires it to have one every year, these are planned expenditures, not budgetary items, on which the president wants to spend more money. Congress does not feel bound to obey the laws it has written; hence it has disregarded the legal requirement of a budget. Without a budget, the president has great leeway as to how to allocate funds within each department of the executive branch of the federal government.
Nevertheless, even if these sequesters do kick in, the feds will spend more in 2013 than they spent in 2012. That's because the sequesters are not cuts to spending; rather, they are reductions in planned increases in spending. The reductions amount to about two cents for every planned dollar of increased spending for every federal department.
The question remains: What part of each federal department (Justice, Defense, Homeland Security, Agriculture, etc.) will suffer these reduced increases? Here is where this sequester experiment gets dicey.
The president—who once championed the idea of sequesters and even threatened to veto any congressional effort to dismantle them—now has decided he can't live without that additional 2 percent to spend. So, he has gone about the country trying to scare the daylights out of people: Prisoners will be released from federal prisons, soldiers won't have enough bullets in their weapons, we will need to endure five-hour waiting lines at the airports, Social Security checks will be late, and similar nonsense.
The purpose of the sequester was to force Congress to act. To act to make spending cuts in a way not to harm the economy.

Part of that was to form a committee to decide where these cuts would take place. They failed.

Then Congress failed.

What Obama promised to Veto was any plan that avoided the sequester by dodging making any cuts at all. Congress could have just repealed the sequester.

You right whiners should think about quit lying abut these things & look at your own dysfunctional party.

Judged:

15

15

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#866945 Mar 2, 2013
Tax Reform Now GOP Excuse Not to Negotiate

Obama has turned this rhetoric back on the Republicans. You hate all these special interest breaks, you say? Okay, why don’t we close some of them, in return for the entitlement cuts you say are so vital. And in fact Republicans don’t actually want to cut any loopholes out of the tax code at all. This has left them stuck.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/03/...

Judged:

16

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#866947 Mar 2, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
What part isn't true? It's easy to say something isn't true if you can't explain why it isn't.
Well sonic just explained it to you again and even provided a link to an easy to understand article. We've only been discussing the subject for four years doll__give it a rest.

If you're looking for amusement check out some of the game threads or the religion forum.

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#866948 Mar 2, 2013
How the aging of America is hurting the Republican Party

"Even beyond the Ryan plan, the Tea Party championed causes dear to the hearts of retirees and near-retirees. Remember, the issue that launched the Tea Party in the summer of 2009 was…opposition to Medicare cuts for current beneficiaries. That’s a strange rallying cry for a purportedly limited government movement. Once you begin to think of the Tea Party as a vehicle for advancing the economic interests of the old against the young, though, a lot of otherwise mysterious behaviors suddenly begin to make sense."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#866949 Mar 2, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's do a who's not getting it test.
1. Did or did not the Democrats control Congress the last two years of the Bush administration and the first two years of the Obama administration before and after the crisis?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
2. Did or did not the Democrats resist any effort to rein in Fannie and Freddie in the years leading up to the crisis?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
3. Did or did not the Democrats pass a budget in the past four years?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
4. Did or did not the Senate refuse to bring up or vote on any bills passed by the House to avert the automatic spending cuts?
A. Did.
B. Did not.
The only way you could fail the "who's not getting it" test is if you weren't honest.
I have some news.

Every time the House passes a bill that reduces the availability of abortions, repeals parts of the ACA or waters down the financial Reform law, they know it will go no where in the Senate.

All they do is dupe the feeble minded.

Republican ideas for spending cuts were aimed at the ACA & watering down the financial reform bill.

Thy knew it would go no where.

Judged:

13

13

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#866950 Mar 2, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
President Obama approval rating 55%
Republican House Approval rating 9%
Woodward is getting a bit crotchity
The 55% are still holding out for free stuff and like being controlled.

In this economy that this president doesn't seem to have on his "to-do" list to fix, who can blame them?

When Obamacare kicks in next year and more money is taken out of the already diminishing take-home pay of those fortunate enough to still have jobs and the 55% find out free medical care isn't all it was cracked up to be, that number will change very quickly.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 9 min Dale 180,595
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 19 min SpaceBlues 48,358
abby 11-21 52 min Shari23 6
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 1 hr Wolverine33 692
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr KiMerde 51,234
NO CANADA OIL to TX-OK! 2 hr NO CANADA OIL TO ... 1
Need a business partner. 3 hr bulbul 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 7 hr author author 98,673
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:00 am PST

Bleacher Report 6:00AM
Predictions for Bears' Week 12 Matchup
NBC Sports 7:46 AM
Jay Cutler wants to keep on rolling (out)
NBC Sports11:16 AM
Colts rule out Dwayne Allen and Gosder Cherilus
NBC Sports12:50 PM
Rob Gronkowski fined $8,268 for bouncer move
NFL 1:30 PM
Colt McCoy 'pushing' Robert Griffin III, Gruden says