Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1275358 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

carol

Orlando, FL

#866239 Feb 28, 2013
carol wrote:
So far you've had a burglar and liar for President, a traitor selling weapons to Iran of all places, a dried up old man, and a drunk and a druggie who failed to perform military service because he was spending the month in jail picking up garbage during the daytimes in a striped fuckin' suit. If I understand you scum correctly, we've had two Democratic Presidents one of whom had sex outside of marriage (doesn't everybody?) and one of whom is guilty of being black. Hahahahahahahahahaha, you're diggin' your asses out of a mighty deep hole ain't you, boys?
Men who are insecure:

A man who doesn't know his manhood or hasn't reached it yet can't work under a female; are very intimidated by a strong woman that they can't take advantage of; feel the need to constantly highlight their manly strongpoints; feel the need to show out in small situations where their manliness is tested to prove to people that they're a man and not a coward.

And steal women's identities because they feel intimidated by them.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#866240 Feb 28, 2013
Waxman wrote:
uh oh libtards - according to the doomsdayer in the white house, the world is ending in less than three hours
Better head for the hills - the sequester is coming
Baawwwaaaahhhhhh
Democrats are so full of shit
Obama: I Will Veto Attempts To Get Rid Of Automatic Spending Cuts.

Obama Sequestration Cuts Signed into Law by Obama to get re-elected. LOL..Where's Bush when you need him?

Judged:

12

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#866241 Feb 28, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
You Hillary fans should take heed of the trashing of Woodward. When Obama selects his successor, his media dogs will crucify the stroke-addled old lady.
Homer, lily, and sonic will be among the first to drive the Obama bus over Hillary.
Three people in the same week reporting threats from senior officials in the White House.

One prominent democrat - Lanny Davis
One former democrat press secretary - Robert Gibbs
One renowned democrat sympathizer journalist - Bob Woodward

Pretty important people to turn on this administration in the same week.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#866242 Feb 28, 2013
Shakalaka wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh MY! Really??? Well Damn! I'll be sure to stay outta your neighborhood. Thanks for the warning.
The inner city ghettos, projects, and the urban preserves of modern America are the breeding ground 'Blue Magnets' of hate filled liberalism. Your culture of violence, racism, bigotry, ignorance, poverty, abortion, and killing fields for blacks. How or why that happened?

Being challenged in life is inevitable stupid, you being a deranged moron and remaining on a urban preserve is optional idiot.

Judged:

13

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Shakalaka

Morrow, GA

#866243 Feb 28, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>The inner city ghettos, projects, and the urban preserves of modern America are the breeding ground 'Blue Magnets' of hate filled liberalism. Your culture of violence, racism, bigotry, ignorance, poverty, abortion, and killing fields for blacks. How or why that happened?
You might be a Republican if ...

You ever told a child that Oscar the Grouch "lives in a trash can because he is lazy and doesn't want to contribute to society."

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#866244 Feb 28, 2013
AFF wrote:
<quoted text>
"What good fortune for governments that the people do not think." - Adolf Hitler
It's not the elected but the people who elect them.
World Champion

Brooklyn, NY

#866245 Feb 28, 2013
Have you ever tried farting while doing jumping jacks? Its like 1 2 spleeep 1 2fraaarp 1 2 lpooweepoopoowop 1 2
carol

Orlando, FL

#866246 Feb 28, 2013
Should say pretty important people to "blow the whistle" on this administration in the same week.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
DEM Crybaby

Pompano Beach, FL

#866247 Feb 28, 2013
Shakalaka wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh MY! Really??? Well Damn! I'll be sure to stay outta your neighborhood. Thanks for the warning.
This is the best news I done heard since findin out Obammy ain't be runnin again in 2016! hahahahahahaha
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#866248 Feb 28, 2013
ooooooooouuuuuuhhhhhhhhwwwwwee eeeeeeeeee!!!!!!

The sequester is almost here democrats!!!!

Quick! Run to the fallout shelter!!!

Oooohhhhhh Nooooooooooo!!!!

Democrats are panicking!!!!

Baaawwwaaaaahhhhhhh!!!

Judged:

15

15

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#866249 Feb 28, 2013
Shakalaka wrote:
<quoted text>
You might be a Republican if ...
You ever told a child that Oscar the Grouch "lives in a trash can because he is lazy and doesn't want to contribute to society."
When you blame other people for the things that go wrong in your miserable life, remember this moron..... Things will continue to go wrong in your miserable life.

You can fake your smiles and laughter Shakalaka, but can never fake your stupid and ignorance.

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#866250 Feb 28, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama: I Will Veto Attempts To Get Rid Of Automatic Spending Cuts.
Obama Sequestration Cuts Signed into Law by Obama to get re-elected. LOL..Where's Bush when you need him?
I know. Obama is so full of shit.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#866251 Feb 28, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
I know. Obama is so full of shit.
The hardest thing obama has had to learn is which bridge to cross and which -- To burn.

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#866252 Feb 28, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama: I Will Veto Attempts To Get Rid Of Automatic Spending Cuts.
Obama Sequestration Cuts Signed into Law by Obama to get re-elected. LOL..Where's Bush when you need him?
Astonishing really. This president came up with the idea of sequestration, signed it into law and then scares the phooey out of people when it's about to happen because he won't come to the table to cut spending responsibly and says it's all the republicans' fault.

This president claims transparency but it's the people who can't see the only transparency is the transparency of hypocrisy seems like we're in a bad B-rated movie.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#866253 Feb 28, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Bless you, my son.
Is it the blizzard that's energizing you this week, or the moon?

Judged:

11

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#866254 Feb 28, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Astonishing really. This president came up with the idea of sequestration, signed it into law and then scares the phooey out of people when it's about to happen because he won't come to the table to cut spending responsibly and says it's all the republicans' fault.
This president claims transparency but it's the people who can't see the only transparency is the transparency of hypocrisy seems like we're in a bad B-rated movie.
Obama's second term will not be as easy as his first. The lame stream media will sooner or later, eventually throw obama under the bus.

Judged:

13

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#866255 Feb 28, 2013
NYT David Brooks on his Sequestration Column:'I probably went a bit too far'

After being called out by the Washington Post's Ezra Klein, New York Times' conservative columnist David Brooks added a "postscript" to his column on the sequester to admit that one of his points wasn't "fair to suggest."

Klein published a Q & A with Brooks this past week in which he challenged Brooks' opinion column, claiming

"The president hasnít actually come up with a proposal to avert sequestration, let alone one that is politically plausible."

Klein argued that there have been "various budgets and plans to replace the sequester" and Brooks admitted that he "probably went a bit too far" with his claim. Brooks told Klein:

"First, the column was a bit of an over-the-top lampooning column about dance moves. I probably went a bit too far when saying the president didnít have a response to the sequester save to raise taxes on the rich. In the cool light of day, I can say thatís over the top. Thereís chained CPI and $400 billion in health proposals. So I should say I was unfair. Iím going to attach a note to the column, if itís not up already."

The now-attached "postscript" reads in full:

"The above column was written in a mood of justified frustration over the fiscal idiocy that is about to envelop the nation. But in at least one respect I let my frustration get the better of me. It is true, as the director of the Congressional Budget Office has testified, that the administration has not proposed a specific anti-sequester proposal that can be scored or passed into law. It is not fair to suggest, as I did, that tax hikes for the rich is the sole content of the presidentís approach. The White House has proposed various constructive changes to spending levels and entitlement programs. These changes are not nearly adequate in my view, but they do exist, and I should have acknowledged the balanced and tough-minded elements in the presidentís approach."

http://www.imediaethics.org/News/3776/Nyt_dav...

"various constructive changes to spending levels and entitlement programs"

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#866256 Feb 28, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
NYT David Brooks on his Sequestration Column:'I probably went a bit too far'
After being called out by the Washington Post's Ezra Klein, New York Times' conservative columnist David Brooks added a "postscript" to his column on the sequester to admit that one of his points wasn't "fair to suggest."
Klein published a Q & A with Brooks this past week in which he challenged Brooks' opinion column, claiming
"The president hasnít actually come up with a proposal to avert sequestration, let alone one that is politically plausible."
Klein argued that there have been "various budgets and plans to replace the sequester" and Brooks admitted that he "probably went a bit too far" with his claim. Brooks told Klein:
"First, the column was a bit of an over-the-top lampooning column about dance moves. I probably went a bit too far when saying the president didnít have a response to the sequester save to raise taxes on the rich. In the cool light of day, I can say thatís over the top. Thereís chained CPI and $400 billion in health proposals. So I should say I was unfair. Iím going to attach a note to the column, if itís not up already."
The now-attached "postscript" reads in full:
"The above column was written in a mood of justified frustration over the fiscal idiocy that is about to envelop the nation. But in at least one respect I let my frustration get the better of me. It is true, as the director of the Congressional Budget Office has testified, that the administration has not proposed a specific anti-sequester proposal that can be scored or passed into law. It is not fair to suggest, as I did, that tax hikes for the rich is the sole content of the presidentís approach. The White House has proposed various constructive changes to spending levels and entitlement programs. These changes are not nearly adequate in my view, but they do exist, and I should have acknowledged the balanced and tough-minded elements in the presidentís approach."
http://www.imediaethics.org/News/3776/Nyt_dav...
"various constructive changes to spending levels and entitlement programs"
"Learn to Read" isn't it? LMAO!!! puppet!

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#866257 Feb 28, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
NYT David Brooks on his Sequestration Column:'I probably went a bit too far'
After being called out by the Washington Post's Ezra Klein, New York Times' conservative columnist David Brooks added a "postscript" to his column on the sequester to admit that one of his points wasn't "fair to suggest."
Klein published a Q & A with Brooks this past week in which he challenged Brooks' opinion column, claiming
"The president hasnít actually come up with a proposal to avert sequestration, let alone one that is politically plausible."
Klein argued that there have been "various budgets and plans to replace the sequester" and Brooks admitted that he "probably went a bit too far" with his claim. Brooks told Klein:
"First, the column was a bit of an over-the-top lampooning column about dance moves. I probably went a bit too far when saying the president didnít have a response to the sequester save to raise taxes on the rich. In the cool light of day, I can say thatís over the top. Thereís chained CPI and $400 billion in health proposals. So I should say I was unfair. Iím going to attach a note to the column, if itís not up already."
The now-attached "postscript" reads in full:
"The above column was written in a mood of justified frustration over the fiscal idiocy that is about to envelop the nation. But in at least one respect I let my frustration get the better of me. It is true, as the director of the Congressional Budget Office has testified, that the administration has not proposed a specific anti-sequester proposal that can be scored or passed into law. It is not fair to suggest, as I did, that tax hikes for the rich is the sole content of the presidentís approach. The White House has proposed various constructive changes to spending levels and entitlement programs. These changes are not nearly adequate in my view, but they do exist, and I should have acknowledged the balanced and tough-minded elements in the presidentís approach."
http://www.imediaethics.org/News/3776/Nyt_dav...
"various constructive changes to spending levels and entitlement programs"
Spare the spam above...

sonicfilter is not lazy, his deranged mind enjoys doing nothing, cut-n-paste, blaming others.

Judged:

11

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#866258 Feb 28, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Is it the blizzard that's energizing you this week, or the moon?
"I'll take the moon for $600, Alex."
"And the answer is, "It's round and white, covered with impact craters, and almost devoid of gravity.""

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 26 min Earthling-1 54,503
Black lives matter 26 min Pride in ones self 1
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Dr Guru 196,961
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 5 hr Whiny1 6,408
ask amy 8-29-15 7 hr Julie 4
abby 8-28-15 8 hr Mister Tonka 4
Steve Wilkos : talk show host ? or simple mi... (Feb '08) 9 hr Tvlover 406
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages