Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

“"Luke...... I'm your father!..”

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#864766 Feb 26, 2013
Jimmy wrote:
Are the good for nothing socialist Democats takers behaving today?
No... because we haven't finish taking yet... we are going to take as much as the Republican conservative losers took when they started in 1980 under the brain dead president Reagan... So, 4+4=8 times 4 more terms... Hillary, Biden and another democratic Hispanic for another 4+4=8... So get ready you repugnantcans...

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#864767 Feb 26, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
There's no talking to this idiot. I was thinking more in terms of a cayenne pepper tennis ball!
There are legal measures yoy can take, your attorney husband should know this.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#864768 Feb 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Only a Flacktard dumbass eman would think that extra $50 in his pocket would be different either way.
My God you right whiners are dumber than sh*t.
Who was the Commie Socialist Marxist liberal who said" A penny saved is a penny earned"?
Who was it?
Let me think.....
You're running away from the truth again.

You forgot to answer this post, proving Obama is a pathological liar:

Fill in the blanks for us here:

Government spending

2012 (total expenditure)

then,_with sequester_/_without sequester

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022

Thank you for educating the readers here.
VeryNotSurpriZed

Pompano Beach, FL

#864769 Feb 26, 2013
waxywaxturd wrote:
I admit it is me judging my own and everyone else's posts. I have admitted to it before. I spend my day doing it. I am inviting you and all my topix friends to join me in this and so far no one has taken the bait. It does begin to make me feel mentally ill but so far it hasn't stopped my insane desire to do it. I use my multiple sock puppets and various phony topix accounts for this. It's fun!! Why not give it a try?
I have nothing else to do with my life so please stop criticizing me for this and try to understand what it is like to be me, someone who lives in a delusional topix fantasy world where I feel like what I do matters. It's all I have left. My lies, my sockpuppets and my judgits.
Can I get your phone numbers so we can chit chat about this?
Hugs, Not Surprized!
Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO!
o dark thirty

Denver, CO

#864770 Feb 26, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Please tell us which political party elected a member of Congress running from an insane asylum.
... funny, isn't it? If someone can run for Congress form an insane asylum, I'm sure they have computers in there.
So, which party elected a member of Congress from an insane asylum?
Hopefully free internet to lazy fleabagging libs will be the first to go on Friday..
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#864771 Feb 26, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
Special Reports
Who wrecked the economy?
Foreclosure Phil
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2008/05/f...
And the schmuck was not even in office when he came up third on the list of the persons most responsible for the mortgage meltdown. His place on the banking committees set the collapse in motion__economist my azz.

A thinking President would have seen the calamity coming and called a time fking out.

Too bad we didn't have one that could think when the wheels started coming off.

Gramm-Leach-Bliley___sounded like a good idea right? Clinton signed it on his way out of the oval office wtf it was going to pass anyway.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#864772 Feb 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Spending in the future isn't spending because it has not been spent & therefore you can't cut it.
Your buddy Galt said that. Is that what you meant about no sequester?
Perhaps a road show president obama, complete with carnival barkers, shooting deranged fish in a barrel, and an obnoxious rooftop clown called RealDave. You have have no fear of perfection, you're bigoted ass will never achieve it.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#864773 Feb 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Spending in the future isn't spending because it has not been spent & therefore you can't cut it.
Your buddy Galt said that. Is that what you meant about no sequester?
Quit stalling. Fill in the blanks. Just for you, I'll change the category of future spending to "projected expenditure".

"The only thing that is being discussed is whether to borrow 8.5 trillion dollars over the next 10 years, or to borrow only 7 trillion dollars over the next 10 years."
THERE IS NO SEQUESTER.
It's all a propaganda lie.
THERE IS NO PLAN TO REDUCE GOVERNMENT SPENDING.
The only thing that is being discussed is whether to borrow 8.5 trillion dollars over the next 10 years, or to borrow only 7 trillion dollars over the next 10 years.
There is no plan to pay for the government. The only plan for government being discussed is about having a government that can never be paid for.
Obama is a pathological liar.
Let's go over this again....
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "SEQUESTER".
THERE IS NO PLAN TO CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING.
And, Obama is a pathological liar.
Or, I could be wrong. Help us understand the so-called "sequester".
Fill in the blanks for us here:

Government spending

2012 (total expenditure)

then,(projected expenditure)
___with sequester_/_ without sequester___
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Thank you for educating the readers here.
For Real

El Monte, CA

#864774 Feb 26, 2013
Jimmy wrote:
Are the good for nothing socialist Democats takers behaving today?
NOPE, i just won't be spending any more time arguing with FLORIDIOTS like you.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#864775 Feb 26, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
"Earned" is extra, "saved" is money that was already there. I know you don't understand the difference, after all you think every penny you have comes from the government.
If I worked a side job to earn money to buy a $2000 big screen TV & brought it home. I later took it back before I opened it & exchanged it for a lesser $1,000 model, would my $1000 refund be saved or earned?

Would it look different in my wallet if you decided it was saved or earned?
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#864776 Feb 26, 2013
Ta Setis Revenge wrote:
<quoted text>No... because we haven't finish taking yet... we are going to take as much as the Republican conservative losers took when they started in 1980 under the brain dead president Reagan... So, 4+4=8 times 4 more terms... Hillary, Biden and another democratic Hispanic for another 4+4=8... So get ready you repugnantcans...
Being challenged in life is inevitable, you being a deranged moron and living on a big government reservation, existing on a preserve is optional.

95% of Obama followers are taught ignorance, the other 5 percent, Obama's rich elite keep you that way.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#864777 Feb 26, 2013
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie became the eighth Republican governor to back expanding Medicaid under President Barack Obama's health care reform law on Tuesday.
RUSH10ME

Mathews, VA

#864778 Feb 26, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
So then you lied about your attorney husband? Typical.
I think the jig is up so to speak, but hey the law library in every penetentuary in the country is full of "lawyers" .
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#864779 Feb 26, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
There are legal measures yoy can take, your attorney husband should know this.
Yes, but then it never ends. Sometimes it's better to just let it go. Karma will get him in the end. That dog will bite someone eventually.

“"Luke...... I'm your father!..”

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#864780 Feb 26, 2013
o dark thirty wrote:
<quoted text>
these guys, aka dems wrecked it:
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
The thousands of mortgage defaults and foreclosures in the "subprime" housing market (i.e., mortgage holders with poor credit ratings) is the direct result of thirty years of government policy that has forced banks to make bad loans to un-creditworthy borrowers. The policy in question is the 1977 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), which compels banks to make loans to low-income borrowers and in what the supporters of the Act call "communities of color" that they might not otherwise make based on purely economic criteria.
The original lobbyists for the CRA were the hardcore leftists who supported the Carter administration and were often rewarded for their support with government grants and programs like the CRA that they benefited from. These included various "neighborhood organizations," as they like to call themselves, such as "ACORN" (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now). These organizations claim that over $1 trillion in CRA loans have been made, although no one seems to know the magnitude with much certainty. A U.S. Senate Banking Committee staffer told me about ten years ago that at least $100 billion in such loans had been made in the first twenty years of the Act.
So-called "community groups" like ACORN benefit themselves from the CRA through a process that sounds like legalized extortion. The CRA is enforced by four federal government bureaucracies: the Fed, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The law is set up so that any bank merger, branch expansion, or new branch creation can be postponed or prohibited by any of these four bureaucracies if a CRA "protest" is issued by a "community group." This can cost banks great sums of money, and the "community groups" understand this perfectly well. It is their leverage. They use this leverage to get the banks to give them millions of dollars as well as promising to make a certain amount of bad loans in their communities.
OOHHHHH The Dems wrecked the economy... I didn't realize that... now we can go home because the mystery has been solved... the Democratic did it...
NOT the Republican "trickle down your chin" theory of allowing the banks to become unregulated... Not the Newt Gingrich govenment shut down that was the true turning point of the peoples understanding of what it was to be a true conservative... A failure at every turn... Not the program cutting that the most needy and hungriest of children were depending on because their parents' weren't good enough to sit alongside with the the well to do conservatives' sick understand of corporate croniism... Nor the love affair with he same mega rich corporate entities who sent hundreds of thousands of jobs overseas while their political lap dogs blamed it on welfare mothers... No not them...
It was the Democratics...
God, can you send us another Christopher Dorner for the Conservative party this time?... Please, hold off on the retribution on the LAPD for now... We have a missed communication with the conservative zelots who intend to destroy any chances of the poor becoming middleclass one day...
NotForRealBama

Pompano Beach, FL

#864781 Feb 26, 2013
For Real wrote:
<quoted text> NOPE, i just won't be spending any more time arguing with FLORIDIOTS like you.
Poor Baby! LOL

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#864782 Feb 26, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>And the schmuck was not even in office when he came up third on the list of the persons most responsible for the mortgage meltdown. His place on the banking committees set the collapse in motion__economist my azz.
A thinking President would have seen the calamity coming and called a time fking out.
Too bad we didn't have one that could think when the wheels started coming off.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley___sounded like a good idea right? Clinton signed it on his way out of the oval office wtf it was going to pass anyway.
What list?
The two people most responsible for the economic collapse were the people in Congress responsible for oversight of the financial institutions that caused the economic collapse: Christopher Dodd and Barney Frank.
After two years of oversight by these two criminals, the Democrats' subprime housing mortgage underwriting program collapsed the economy.

The Glass Steagall Act was analogous to an economic immune system. Repealing it wasn't the economic disease. What repealing it did was allow the Democrats' subprime housing mortgage underwriting program to infect the entire economy.
Without the Demcorats subprime housing loan program, the economy doesn't collapse.

There were two attempts to re-instate the Glass Steagall Act. In 2004 it didn't have enough support from Republicans to get on the Senate floor for a vote, that being the year after the Democrats traded their support for the war in Iraq in exchange for no effective oversight of their subprime housing loan program that collapsed the economy. In 2006 it gained enough support to get to the floor for a vote, but Christopher Dodd threatened to fillibuster the re-instatement.
Barack Obama was standing very prominently at Dodd's immediate side for the photo op of the threat to fillibuster.
Then, lo and behold, and typical of Obama not having a clue what he does in Washington, in 2009 immediately after the inauguration Obama makes a public statement specifically calling for the re-instatement of that very same Glass Steagall Act he threatened to fillibuster.
If you hadn't figured out Obama doesn't have a clue what he does in government, that should have clued you in right there. How in the hell can a person forget they threatened to fillibuster something in the Senate?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#864783 Feb 26, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If I worked a side job to earn money to buy a $2000 big screen TV & brought it home. I later took it back before I opened it & exchanged it for a lesser $1,000 model, would my $1000 refund be saved or earned?
Would it look different in my wallet if you decided it was saved or earned?
You're running away again. Quit stalling. Fill in the blanks. Just for you, I'll change the category of future spending to "projected expenditure".

"The only thing that is being discussed is whether to borrow 8.5 trillion dollars over the next 10 years, or to borrow only 7 trillion dollars over the next 10 years."
THERE IS NO SEQUESTER.
It's all a propaganda lie.
THERE IS NO PLAN TO REDUCE GOVERNMENT SPENDING.
The only thing that is being discussed is whether to borrow 8.5 trillion dollars over the next 10 years, or to borrow only 7 trillion dollars over the next 10 years.
There is no plan to pay for the government. The only plan for government being discussed is about having a government that can never be paid for.
Obama is a pathological liar.
Let's go over this again....
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "SEQUESTER".
THERE IS NO PLAN TO CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING.
And, Obama is a pathological liar.
Or, I could be wrong. Help us understand the so-called "sequester".
Fill in the blanks for us here:

Government spending

2012 (total expenditure)

then,(projected expenditure)
___with sequester_/_ without sequester___
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022

Thank you for educating the readers here.

Now, tell us why Obama is spewing an obvious lie about having to fire people because of "cuts" that don't exist.

“"Luke...... I'm your father!..”

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#864784 Feb 26, 2013
If any one believes that ACORN was involved in any nefarious activeties... I'll show you a Catholic Preist who never witnessed a thing...
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#864785 Feb 26, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
So then you lied about your attorney husband? Typical.
Florida leash law says all dogs have to be on a leash; my daughters dog ran out of the house without a leash. Nothing we can do about it. A normal neighbor would have gladly paid the bill; but, as I said, that guy is not normal.
Just because my husband is an attorney doesn't mean that he spends his time on stuff like this. We don't need his money to pay the vet bill, we'd rather live in peace and leave it alone.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 6 min Eric 69,522
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 15 min Scrutiny 178,587
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 23 min Earthling-1 47,008
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 hr D-U-H 50,041
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 4 hr Mandela 68,560
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr RACE 98,345
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 6 hr RACE 639

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]