You're running away again. Quit stalling. Fill in the blanks. Just for you, I'll change the category of future spending to "projected expenditure", and I put "sequester" in quotation marks, meaning that is what idiots like you and Obama are calling it.
THERE IS NO PLAN TO REDUCE GOVERNMENT SPENDING.
The only thing that is being discussed is whether to borrow 8.5 trillion dollars over the next 10 years, or to borrow only 7 trillion dollars over the next 10 years.
There is no plan to pay for the government. The only plan for government being discussed is about having a government that can never be paid for.
Obama is a pathological liar.
Let's go over this again....
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "SEQUESTER".
THERE IS NO PLAN TO CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING.
And, Obama is a pathological liar.
Or, I could be wrong. Help us understand the so-called "sequester".
Fill in the blanks for us here:
2012 (total expenditure)
___with "sequester"_/_ without "sequester"___
Thank you for educating the readers here.
Now, tell us why Obama is spewing an obvious lie about having to fire people because of "cuts" that don't exist.
You forgot to answer my question.
If there is no such thing as the sequester, how can there be a with sequester and without sequester option?
Its a simple question.