Barack Obama, our next President

[John Galt]

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
Oops! Almost forgot. Galt likes Tiger; he's into black men.
Meanwhile, a little trouble here on the Treasure Coast this weekend:
TREASURE COAST - Military jets have now diverted a total of three small planes that stumbled too close above President Barack Obama's Treasure Coast golf outings.
The latest wayward aircraft ended up in restricted airspace near the Floridian at 9:30 a.m. on Sunday. The Cessna plane left the no-fly zone, landed at Okeechobee Airport and was met by local authorities, said U.S. Army Lt. Col. Mike Humphreys.
F-16s intercepted the first plane, registered with a business at the Plant City Airport, at 11:55 a.m. Saturday and it landed at Witham Field. The Secret Service questioned the pilot, but agency spokesman Brian Leary said "the restricted air space violation does not appear to be of protective interests at this time."
A Coast Guard helicopter and military jets intercepted the second aircraft at 5:09 p.m. But that plane, a two-passenger Lancair 320, left the restricted area and carried on to its destination, Humphreys said. The aircraft was flying from Boca Raton to DeLand, the FAA reported.
The FAA's investigation of all three is ongoing.
Read more: http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/region_st_lucie_...

Obama should stay in Washington and stop interfering in the lives of American citizens.

The pilots are lucky that Obama didn't order their summary execution by drone for disturbing his golf game.

All Hail, Lord Obama!

[Anonymous of Indy]

discordian wrote:

<quoted text>
The treasury had $7 trillion dollars in 2003 to "loot"? Damn.
How long have you hated the elderly and wanted them to die for lack of drugs?

They made that choice to depend on the Federal Government and now you sound like a Modern Liberal wanting somebody else or the Federal Government to do the providing which is what Lenin thought too that was governments role to provide a level of Social Security too instead of people providing for themselves and I know alot of elderly that planned economically to be able to provide for themselves instead of depending on the Welfare Assistance from the Federal Government which they didnt trust the Federal Government to begin and the smart ones and know that Social Security & Medicare can be reduced or eliminated at anytime because both programs are based on a tax.

Social Security’s Sham Guarantee

How many times during the recent debate over Social Security reform have you heard someone refer to Social Security’s “guaranteed benefit”? The AARP says “Social Security is the guaranteed part of your retirement plan.” Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader in the House, touts the system’s “guaranteed retirement benefit.” The liberal activist group ProtectYourCheck.org , headed by former Clinton chief of staff Harold Ickes, is running ads calling Social Security “a guarantee you earned.”

But Social Security benefits are not guaranteed.

They are not guaranteed legally because workers have no contractual or property rights to any benefits whatsoever. In two landmark cases, Flemming v. Nestor and Helvering v. Davis, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Social Security taxes are not contributions or savings, but simply taxes, and that Social Security benefits are simply a government spending program, no different than, say, farm price supports. Congress and the president may change, reduce, or even eliminate benefits at any time.

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/s...

[John Galt]

Realtime wrote:

<quoted text>They mean something to ticket purchasing NASCAR fans, as well as advertisers.
Obama has four years left and what appears to be a full plate on his hands just trying to restore the nation to Clinton era standards.
I don't think any of our nationally elected were prepared for Sandy Hook or considered that Obama would take on immigration reform__surprise surprise.
The economy is improving by leaps and bounds, his health care initiative is beginning to show some positive results and he's kept us out of new military conflicts. He's like a brown Ike Eisenhower.
What's not to like?

A rotten economy and Obamacare.

[new hammer time]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
Where are those oil subsidies you lie about?
Tell us about those oil subsidies that don't exist.
Then, tell us why Obama ordered everyone to sit still while he watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on the live video feed.
Then, tell us why Obama lied for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States.
Then, tell us where the money will come from to pay for Obama's govenment.
Then, tell us how the f**k someone like Obama can be put on the faculty of the University of Chicago Law School teaching Constitutional Law when he'd never passed the bar or ever even seen the inside of a court room as a lawyer, and if you listen to him and whatch what he does, he has never even read the Constitution in his life.

you don't get around much, do you? your extreme tunnel vision is registered too FOX.

[lily boca raton fl]

Homer 2016 wrote:

A sampling of rightwingers er Nascar fans comments on nascar.com regarding Danica winning the pole -
'That's the wrong pole she should be working. Get her off the track. Go back to you know- taking off your clothes.'
'She'll crash in the twins on Thur, Back of the pack on Sun'
'She's on the pole yey. Now if she doesn't finish in the top 10 then stop putting the cameras in her face so she can blame the other drivers for her inabilaty to drive a nascar.'
'You actually want us to believe that Johnson,Gordon, Earnhart or Kahne didn't have enough car to beat "Ms. Wonderful". How much "palm greasing" has been going on over the past 3 months. Talk about a kick in the groin. I host a Daytona party every year for family, friends and fellow racers.We do a driver "blind draw" for a buck and the person with the winning drivers name gets $42.00 and the last place person gets their buck back as a consolation prize. I guess for this year I will add the " On what lap will she cause the BIG ONE". She will take out some great cars and the race will become a drag having to listen to her whining the rest of the race about how "They were rubbing all over me".'
'I think it is a set up. I don't expect her to be any better than20th by the end of the first lap.'

Rightwing men hate women, almost as much as they hate blacks, hispanics and gays, muslims jews.....

[John Galt]

lily boca raton fl wrote:

MARTIN COUNTY — Martin County Sheriff’s Office deputies are responding to a plane crash in western Martin County.
About 11:30 a.m. Monday, deputies received a call about a crash in the 27000 block of Southwest Warfield Boulevard.
Read more: http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/region_martin_co...

Shot down by Obama drone?

[new hammer time]

lily waxman raton fl wrote:

<quoted text> That would be you...you're the one who voted twice for the incompetent, inexperienced, unqualified community organizing failure (but he's half black and more recently from Chi-Town) LOL

and your point is/

[lily boca raton fl]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama should stay in Washington and stop interfering in the lives of American citizens.
The pilots are lucky that Obama didn't order their summary execution by drone for disturbing his golf game.
All Hail, Lord Obama!

They should have shot them down

[new hammer time]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
Tell us about those oil subsidies that don't exist.
Reach into that bag of lies the Demcorats fill every day and tell us about those oild subsidies that don't exist.

take the time and google for the info....those subs. are for real and amount to billions of dollars.

[Lincoln]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Unlike Obama, Tiger Woods never blames anything or anyone but himself for his occasional failures.
Obama should take a lesson.

nobama off topic picking up his food stamps today?

[Nuculur option]

Called the Close Big Oil Tax Loopholes Act, the bill sought to repeal about $21 billion worth of tax breaks to oil companies over 10 years with the stipulation that all revenues generated would be used to reduce the federal budget deficit or the public debt. The five companies targeted were: Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Shell, ConocoPhillips and BP.

The Senate voted 52-48 in favor of moving the bill forward, meaning it failed to get the 60 votes needed to bring the measure up for debate. Votes largely broke along party lines, with all but two Republicans and three Democrats voting against it.

----------

Now, are you stupid enough to believe they would write a bill to eliminate subsidies that don't exist??

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Apparently!!

BTW, wingnut, I've listed 3 specific subsidies repeatedly.

you're copying Dweeb's ignorance and pretending you don't see things.

Again, SPECIFICALLY;

1./ Foreign tax credit ($15.3 billion)

2./ Credit for production of non-conventional fuels ($14.1 billion)

3./ Oil and Gas exploration and development expensing ($7.1 billion)

Your stupid act is tiresome, but genuine. Your stupidity is legendary, which is why you spend your life on this thread.

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Still no identification of a specific subsidy.

[John Galt]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Still denying oil subsidies exist?
Going to electric cars is good for this country. The subsidies will help this product grow its market share & thereby attract more private investment & advancements. Electric car makers are not recording record profits & the industry needs some help to develop faster.
The more we utilize electric cars, the less we depend on foreign oil, the less we need to give a crap about the Middle East, the less money we export every year and the fewer greenhouse gas emissions.

Still unable to identify any subsidy for the oil industry not available to other industries.

Keystone pipeline would reduce reliance on Middle East oil. So would more offshore drilling.

[lily boca raton fl]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
Where are those oil subsidies you lie about?
Tell us about those oil subsidies that don't exist.
Then, tell us why Obama ordered everyone to sit still while he watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on the live video feed.
Then, tell us why Obama lied for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States.
Then, tell us where the money will come from to pay for Obama's govenment.
Then, tell us how the f**k someone like Obama can be put on the faculty of the University of Chicago Law School teaching Constitutional Law when he'd never passed the bar or ever even seen the inside of a court room as a lawyer, and if you listen to him and whatch what he does, he has never even read the Constitution in his life.

Where did the money come from to pay for Bush's Government.

You haven't answered that yet.

[new hammer time]

lily waxman raton fl wrote:

<quoted text> So Obama gave us his sloppier seconds.

suffice it to be said, you deserve the seconds for not wanting to pay for a better quality.

[Lincoln]

Romney lost with these ideas.

Republicans oppose anything that assists the Middle Class

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>They made that choice to depend on the Federal Government and now you sound like a Modern Liberal wanting somebody else or the Federal Government to do the providing which is what Lenin thought too that was governments role to provide a level of Social Security too instead of people providing for themselves and I know alot of elderly that planned economically to be able to provide for themselves instead of depending on the Welfare Assistance from the Federal Government which they didnt trust the Federal Government to begin and the smart ones and know that Social Security & Medicare can be reduced or eliminated at anytime because both programs are based on a tax.
Social Security’s Sham Guarantee
How many times during the recent debate over Social Security reform have you heard someone refer to Social Security’s “guaranteed benefit”? The AARP says “Social Security is the guaranteed part of your retirement plan.” Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader in the House, touts the system’s “guaranteed retirement benefit.” The liberal activist group ProtectYourCheck.org , headed by former Clinton chief of staff Harold Ickes, is running ads calling Social Security “a guarantee you earned.”
But Social Security benefits are not guaranteed.
They are not guaranteed legally because workers have no contractual or property rights to any benefits whatsoever. In two landmark cases, Flemming v. Nestor and Helvering v. Davis, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Social Security taxes are not contributions or savings, but simply taxes, and that Social Security benefits are simply a government spending program, no different than, say, farm price supports. Congress and the president may change, reduce, or even eliminate benefits at any time.
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/s...

[Lincoln]

Same retarded post every day

bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhaaaaa

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
Where are those oil subsidies you lie about?
Tell us about those oil subsidies that don't exist.
Then, tell us why Obama ordered everyone to sit still while he watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on the live video feed.
Then, tell us why Obama lied for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States.
Then, tell us where the money will come from to pay for Obama's govenment.
Then, tell us how the f**k someone like Obama can be put on the faculty of the University of Chicago Law School teaching Constitutional Law when he'd never passed the bar or ever even seen the inside of a court room as a lawyer, and if you listen to him and whatch what he does, he has never even read the Constitution in his life.

[John Galt]

Nuculur option wrote:

The three largest fossil fuel subsidies were:
Foreign tax credit ($15.3 billion)
Credit for production of non-conventional fuels ($14.1 billion)
Oil and Gas exploration and development expensing ($7.1 billion)
The three largest renewable fuel subsidies were:
Alcohol Credit for Fuel Excise Tax ($11.6 billion)
Renewable Electricity Production Credit ($5.2 billion)
Corn-Based Ethanol ($5.0 billion)
----------
""According to the OECD, subsidies supporting fossil fuels, particularly coal and oil, represent greater threats to the environment than subsidies to renewable energy. Subsidies to nuclear power contribute to unique environmental and safety issues, related mostly to the risk of high-level environmental damage, although nuclear power contributes positively to the environment in the areas of air pollution and climate change. Subsidies to renewable energy are generally considered more environmentally beneficial, although the full range of environmental effects should be taken into account.""

"Foreign tax credit" sounds like something available to all industries, as well as individuals on their tax returns.

"Credit for production of non-conventional fuels" sounds like green energy program.

All businesses expense R&D costs.

[lily boca raton fl]

McCain and Graham prepare to quit fighting Hagel and move on to their next hissy fit

The McCain-Graham relationship on this one is, as Politico paints it, its own little Greek tragedy in the making: McCain was reportedly planning to vote for Hagel until Graham prevailed on him to join the filibuster.


By reversing himself, McCain effectively sacrificed his own credibility to buy Graham more time to continue his campaign against Hagel—an issue that plays to Graham’s advantage as he prepares to run for reelection in 2014.
“This is just a bone thrown to Lindsey Graham, who keeps painting himself into corners and then pleading with friends to crawl in there with him in a vain attempt to save a little face,” one Republican insider told POLITICO.

http://www.dailykos.com/

[new hammer time]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama should stay in Washington and stop interfering in the lives of American citizens.
The pilots are lucky that Obama didn't order their summary execution by drone for disturbing his golf game.
All Hail, Lord Obama!

you should've borrowed a plane and interfered in the air space over the FL golf course and refused to come down. BOOM BOOM Mothrafudder!!!!!!

[John Galt]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text> This from the idiot who claimed that paying government workers less would have no effect of the quality of employees.

Government employees, except for the military, do not contribute anything of value, so quality is not an issue.