Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#863782 Feb 25, 2013
Here's the next question the Democrats will run away from like a dog escaping from Michael Vick's house:

What plan do the Democrats have to increase the number of people paying income taxes?
It should be obvious to anyone with any common sense that half the country paying all the income taxes for the entire population will never work.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#863783 Feb 25, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
Troll: A deranged liberal who posts a deliberately provocative cut-n-paste message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption, a mind without matter, causing a delusional argument, running on empty.
like using other peoples quotes so you can look like an intellect?

but after the Topix wingnut election flame-out i can see the need to change tactics from stupid to 'now we're really smart'.

problem is....you weren't faking stupid.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#863784 Feb 25, 2013
Obama is a pathological liar, or doesn't have a clue what's going on in government, or both.
I tend to believe both.

Here's evidence. Compare Obama's lies about the so-called "sequester" against these facts:

Look at the table at the top of page 3 of the Congressional Budget Office document that the national sequester discussion is stemming from,“THE BUDGET AND ECONOMIC OUTLOOK: FISCAL YEARS 2013 TO 2023″. The document is available online at: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofil... .
Notice that even with the “sequester”, the total revenue is forecast to go up each and every year and total spending is forecast to do the same. There aren’t really cuts! Also notice that at the end of 10 years we plan on having borrowed an additional 7 Trillion dollars on top of our current debt. What is being called the sequester is that we had planned on borrowing an additional 8.2 Trillion dollars, not merely 7 Trillion. Even though we plan on borrowing 7 Trillion dollars more than we take in, because we are not borrowing 8.2 Trillion dollars, the 1.2 Trillion dollar difference is being called a “sequester”. But the numbers speak for themselves. There are no income cuts or spending cuts in the next 10 years.
What does this mean? It means that if you are in the Military or Border Patrol and your salary is being reduced, it’s not because of a spending cut or “sequester”. It’s because your area of the budget is not a priority and the current administration is defunding it so they can move those funds to other budget items.
Doing this and then purposely trying to sell it to the American people as a “cut” or a “sequester” is a blatant lie.

Study Obama when he gives this obvious lie to the American population. He is one of the most well-trained liars that has ever existed. I don't recall any reference in history of anyone who was trained to this degree to lie and was this skilled at it.

There is no "sequester". It's a lie invented by the Democrats to dupe the population with.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#863785 Feb 25, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
like using other peoples quotes so you can look like an intellect?
but after the Topix wingnut election flame-out i can see the need to change tactics from stupid to 'now we're really smart'.
problem is....you weren't faking stupid.
Being true to yourself is better than being a liar just to impress everyone loser.

YOU still have not told us why the inner city ghettos and projects of modern America are 'Blue Magnets' of racism, poverty, abortion, and killing fields for blacks? How or why that happened?
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#863786 Feb 25, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Just what makes you think I hate the president who turned around the Cold War and beat the Democrats? What makes you think I hate the president who steered government money in the direction of everyone who developed the technologies that made the dot-com boom happen?
Why do you hate Reagan?
Now, tell us about the plan the Democrats have to increase the number of people paying income taxes in the United States. It's an obvious fact that half the population paying all the income taxes for the entire population won't last.
Ronald Reagan Didn't Share the GOP's '47 Percent' Problem

Reagan criticizing the tax laws he inherited for raising taxes on the poor.

Reagan praising his tax reform for freeing families in poverty from taxation.

Reagan promising in his 1985 State of the Union address to make families "living at or near the poverty line ... totally exempt" from federal income taxes.

Reagan characterizing his plan to make poor families tax free as "pro-family".

And here's President George W. Bush ten years later promising to remove millions of families from income tax rolls.

Today's weird GOP obsession with raising taxes on the poor while other Republicans promise $500,000 tax cuts for the rich is not only a tone-deaf display of supply-side economics ad absurdum, but also a dramatic departure from very recent history.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2...

democrats didn't cause the problem so why should they be the ones who need to fix it?

and they're getting tired of fixing problems left behind by republicans.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#863787 Feb 25, 2013
The so-called "sequester" is a lie invented by the Democrats.

There is no sequester.
What is being called a "sequester" is the Democrats' plan to borrow and additional 7 trillion dollars to pay for their dictatorship instead of borrowing 8.5 trillion dollars over a 10-year period of time.

Again, Obama gives the population an obvious lie.

Does Obama ever open his mouth and not lie?
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#863788 Feb 25, 2013
sequester....

The new Tea Party senator from Texas, Ted Cruz, says,“I think we have to be prepared to go so far as to shut the government down if we don’t get some serious policies to stop the out-of-control spending to tackle the debt.” OK, let’s start by shutting down federal spending in Texas. Federal funds account for 32 percent of the Lone Star State’s budget. Oh, and how about Fort Hood? At 340 square miles, it is the biggest Army base in the free world and the largest single employer in Texas. All that federal spending must be sapping the souls of my fellow Texans. So let’s move Fort Hood to, oh, say, Nevada. Sen. Harry Reid actually believes in federal investments, and the Nevada desert might provide good terrain for Fort Hood’s tanks.

This could be fun. Oklahoma so hates Obama’s big spending that every single county in the state voted for Mitt Romney. Oklahoma has twice the percentage of federal employees than the U.S. average, and Okies get $1.35 back from Washington for each dollar they pay in taxes. So close the massive FAA center in Oklahoma City. Move it to Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco district, where they love big government.

Two years ago I made a similar argument about Kentucky, calling on Republican Sens. Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul to put the Bluegrass State in detox for its addiction to local pork. No such luck. But perhaps the principle can apply to the sequester: only enforce it in states whose elected representatives won’t support the taxes needed to fund the spending they want.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2013/02...
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#863789 Feb 25, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
Obama is a pathological liar, or doesn't have a clue what's going on in government, or both.
I tend to believe both.
Here's evidence. Compare Obama's lies about the so-called "sequester" against these facts:
Look at the table at the top of page 3 of the Congressional Budget Office document that the national sequester discussion is stemming from,“THE BUDGET AND ECONOMIC OUTLOOK: FISCAL YEARS 2013 TO 2023&#8243;. The document is available online at: http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofil... .
Notice that even with the “sequester”, the total revenue is forecast to go up each and every year and total spending is forecast to do the same. There aren’t really cuts! Also notice that at the end of 10 years we plan on having borrowed an additional 7 Trillion dollars on top of our current debt. What is being called the sequester is that we had planned on borrowing an additional 8.2 Trillion dollars, not merely 7 Trillion. Even though we plan on borrowing 7 Trillion dollars more than we take in, because we are not borrowing 8.2 Trillion dollars, the 1.2 Trillion dollar difference is being called a “sequester”. But the numbers speak for themselves. There are no income cuts or spending cuts in the next 10 years.
What does this mean? It means that if you are in the Military or Border Patrol and your salary is being reduced, it’s not because of a spending cut or “sequester”. It’s because your area of the budget is not a priority and the current administration is defunding it so they can move those funds to other budget items.
Doing this and then purposely trying to sell it to the American people as a “cut” or a “sequester” is a blatant lie.
Study Obama when he gives this obvious lie to the American population. He is one of the most well-trained liars that has ever existed. I don't recall any reference in history of anyone who was trained to this degree to lie and was this skilled at it.
There is no "sequester". It's a lie invented by the Democrats to dupe the population with.
Obama: I Will Veto Attempts To Get Rid Of Automatic Spending Cuts.

http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml

LOL..Obama treats us like men. He wants us wear earrings.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#863790 Feb 25, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
The so-called "sequester" is a lie invented by the Democrats.
There is no sequester.
What is being called a "sequester" is the Democrats' plan to borrow and additional 7 trillion dollars to pay for their dictatorship instead of borrowing 8.5 trillion dollars over a 10-year period of time.
Again, Obama gives the population an obvious lie.
Does Obama ever open his mouth and not lie?
Living in a NO work zone. Waiting for the food stamps to come in. Talking on a free obamaphone, wasting away in obamaville. Definitely liberal.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#863791 Feb 25, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
sequester....
The new Tea Party senator from Texas, Ted Cruz, says,“I think we have to be prepared to go so far as to shut the government down if we don’t get some serious policies to stop the out-of-control spending to tackle the debt.” OK, let’s start by shutting down federal spending in Texas. Federal funds account for 32 percent of the Lone Star State’s budget. Oh, and how about Fort Hood? At 340 square miles, it is the biggest Army base in the free world and the largest single employer in Texas. All that federal spending must be sapping the souls of my fellow Texans. So let’s move Fort Hood to, oh, say, Nevada. Sen. Harry Reid actually believes in federal investments, and the Nevada desert might provide good terrain for Fort Hood’s tanks.
This could be fun. Oklahoma so hates Obama’s big spending that every single county in the state voted for Mitt Romney. Oklahoma has twice the percentage of federal employees than the U.S. average, and Okies get $1.35 back from Washington for each dollar they pay in taxes. So close the massive FAA center in Oklahoma City. Move it to Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco district, where they love big government.
Two years ago I made a similar argument about Kentucky, calling on Republican Sens. Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul to put the Bluegrass State in detox for its addiction to local pork. No such luck. But perhaps the principle can apply to the sequester: only enforce it in states whose elected representatives won’t support the taxes needed to fund the spending they want.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2013/02...
Spammer: The act of obnoxiously doing repeated cut-n-paste for attention or in order to disturb others, a deranged dumbass on a forum, running on empty, a moron posting inane crap or delusional spam of no relevance for only their deranged amusement. Definitely liberal.

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#863792 Feb 25, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Boehner is a Democrat, dufus.
And, yes, the TEA Party favors increasing the tax revenue. The first thing that needs to be done is make more people pay taxes. Half the country paying all the income taxes for the entire population will never work.
So, what plan do the Democrats have to increase the number of people paying income taxes?
We're going to put people to work in the funeral business as soon as you start your civil war.
What's the hold up?
TSM

El Paso, TX

#863793 Feb 25, 2013
This WH has become Comedy Central!! Last Night for the first time in Oscars history the President wife, first lady ‘ Michelle’ has ever presented an Academy Award, America there’s a lot of Jokes in this WH… all Bad from the President down!!

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#863794 Feb 25, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>Obama: I Will Veto Attempts To Get Rid Of Automatic Spending Cuts.
http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml
LOL..Obama treats us like men. He wants us wear earrings.
Of course, thew dumbass FloriDUH takes something out of context.

CONGRESS installed the sequester to insure that spending cuts are made. The cuts were supposed to be so horrible that Congress would want to pass spending cuts.

Obama was talking about vetoing any effort by Congress to renege on spending cuts.

You know, spending cuts. Like the ones you right whiners have been bitching about.

Obama promises to make them happen & you right whiners have a freaking fit.

Just how dumb are you people.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#863795 Feb 25, 2013
OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
We're going to put people to work in the funeral business as soon as you start your civil war.
What's the hold up?
Due to recent Obama sequestration cuts, the light at the end of your tunnel will be turned off.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#863796 Feb 25, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
The so-called "sequester" is a lie invented by the Democrats.
There is no sequester.
What is being called a "sequester" is the Democrats' plan to borrow and additional 7 trillion dollars to pay for their dictatorship instead of borrowing 8.5 trillion dollars over a 10-year period of time.
Again, Obama gives the population an obvious lie.
Does Obama ever open his mouth and not lie?
So Congress will debate another mythical item? There is no sequester like there are no oil industry subsidies?

You just keep making up sh*t.

Why am I subsidizing your salary?

Funny. Republicans in the House keep approving the spending as they have since Jan 2011. All debt since Jan 2011 belongs to Boehner according to you.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#863797 Feb 25, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
sequester....
The new Tea Party senator from Texas, Ted Cruz, says,“I think we have to be prepared to go so far as to shut the government down if we don’t get some serious policies to stop the out-of-control spending to tackle the debt.” OK, let’s start by shutting down federal spending in Texas. Federal funds account for 32 percent of the Lone Star State’s budget. Oh, and how about Fort Hood? At 340 square miles, it is the biggest Army base in the free world and the largest single employer in Texas. All that federal spending must be sapping the souls of my fellow Texans. So let’s move Fort Hood to, oh, say, Nevada. Sen. Harry Reid actually believes in federal investments, and the Nevada desert might provide good terrain for Fort Hood’s tanks.
This could be fun. Oklahoma so hates Obama’s big spending that every single county in the state voted for Mitt Romney. Oklahoma has twice the percentage of federal employees than the U.S. average, and Okies get $1.35 back from Washington for each dollar they pay in taxes. So close the massive FAA center in Oklahoma City. Move it to Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco district, where they love big government.
Two years ago I made a similar argument about Kentucky, calling on Republican Sens. Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul to put the Bluegrass State in detox for its addiction to local pork. No such luck. But perhaps the principle can apply to the sequester: only enforce it in states whose elected representatives won’t support the taxes needed to fund the spending they want.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2013/02...
The so-called "sequester" is a lie invented by the Democrats.

There is no sequester.
What is being called a "sequester" is the Democrats' plan to borrow and additional 7 trillion dollars to pay for their dictatorship instead of borrowing 8.5 trillion dollars over a 10-year period of time.

Again, Obama gives the population an obvious lie.

Does Obama ever open his mouth and not lie?

“Amor patriae.”

Since: Feb 08

Eastern Oregon

#863798 Feb 25, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course, thew dumbass FloriDUH takes something out of context.
CONGRESS installed the sequester to insure that spending cuts are made. The cuts were supposed to be so horrible that Congress would want to pass spending cuts.
Obama was talking about vetoing any effort by Congress to renege on spending cuts.
You know, spending cuts. Like the ones you right whiners have been bitching about.
Obama promises to make them happen & you right whiners have a freaking fit.
Just how dumb are you people.
Here...Dave.... see if this makes any sense to you.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/Li0no7O9zmE
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#863799 Feb 25, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>Spammer: The act of obnoxiously doing repeated cut-n-paste for attention or in order to disturb others, a deranged dumbass on a forum, running on empty, a moron posting inane crap or delusional spam of no relevance for only their deranged amusement. Definitely liberal.
Broken Record: What to Say When Dementia Causes Them to Repeat

But, while these repetitive litanies can be obnoxious, Snow says that they are an important communication technique for a person who is losing their memory. Your loved one wants to engage with you, but, to them it may seem as though you (the caregiver) is always in charge of the conversation, which makes them feel anxious and stupid. So, they will pick old stories that they know they will remember so they can talk have a dialogue with you, instead of being talked at all the time.

http://www.agingcare.com/Articles/respond-whe...

did you say something?
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#863800 Feb 25, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course, thew dumbass FloriDUH takes something out of context.
CONGRESS installed the sequester to insure that spending cuts are made. The cuts were supposed to be so horrible that Congress would want to pass spending cuts.
Obama was talking about vetoing any effort by Congress to renege on spending cuts.
You know, spending cuts. Like the ones you right whiners have been bitching about.
Obama promises to make them happen & you right whiners have a freaking fit.
Just how dumb are you people.
RealDave has seen his shadow, so it's still 6 more weeks of guilt-making.

Obama: I Will Veto Attempts To Get Rid Of Automatic Spending Cuts.

http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml

RealDave has NO fear of perfection, you'll never reach it..

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#863801 Feb 25, 2013
mdbuilder wrote:
<quoted text>
Here...Dave.... see if this makes any sense to you.
http://www.youtube.com/embed/Li0no7O9zmE
Being the dumbass you are, I am sure it made sense to you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 44 min wojar 182,116
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Earthling-1 49,334
For a meat-centric dinner, meet at Skrine Chops (Jan '08) 2 hr Reddog 6
delhi female 5 hr yatharth 1
Fight at Navy Pier 5 hr joey 1
abby 12-26 6 hr Mister Tonka 4
amy 12-26 6 hr Mister Tonka 4
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:00 am PST

Bleacher Report 4:00AM
Colts' Complete Week 17 Preview vs. Titans
Bleacher Report 6:00 AM
Bears vs. Vikings: What Experts Are Saying About Chicago
NBC Sports 6:03 AM
Jim Caldwell: No concerns about starting a rookie center
Bleacher Report 8:46 AM
What Are Experts Saying About Vikings?
NBC Sports11:28 AM
Bears extend Roberto Garza through 2015