Barack Obama, our next President

[flack]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
so how ya doing buddy?
full circle eh?

I have absolutely no problem with them blowing terrorist away with a drone strike. I never believe the terrorist s should be brought here so I don't understand your point. You people keep trying to fit me into the rightwing hole. It won't happen because I'm not. I believe what I believe because that is the way things look to me not because someone else says so. The problem is most real solutions are conservative. Taxing more, spending more, and borrowing more is never the answer. You'll just keep playing that left/right game the progressives have set up for you and they will lead you to your own doom. You are seeing the progressives in both parties right now but are to blind to recognize it.

[Not Surprized]

Navy Corpseman wrote:

<quoted text>
You and O'suckface took care of us wing nuts at the polls!Obama our Prophet,the shadow of Jesus Christ,and Hillary did a good job in Benghazi too!
50 million on welfare,stock market is booming,crime is down in Chicago with gun control...
You'll be in the bread lines with yuz homies dummy!
BOYCOTT BLACK Business's!

dem wrote:

<quoted text>
Did I say you could speak hillbilly teabagger?
Whah, Whah, Whah. Fer christs sake, quit whining like a crybaby.
I do the same thing and you do too, hypocrite.
Now go chase some squirrels fer breakfast.

Jimmy wrote:

<quoted text>
Usually the problem lies with the person that accuses everyone else of something. Have a mirror handy?

Aphelion wrote:

<quoted text>
Or do the judge its, represent the voice of reality disturbing your blissful liberal coma.

No Surprize wrote:

<quoted text>Homer saw his shadow, so it's 6 more weeks of guilt-making.

Waxman/Floriduh sockpuppets so far today.

Stay tuned folks, plenty more where these came from!!!!!!!!!!

[TheIndependentMa jority]

sonicfilter wrote:

Rubio accidentally loads 2016 Tea Party Convention speech in TelePrompTer.
—@davidaxelrod via Twitter for iPhone

GOOD.

Maybe the Duh A Veys of the USA will get a REAL clue then :-).

(Open yer windows tweehuggin' Duh A Vey-and let some fresh, HEALTHY air in!!!)

[Truman]

TheIndependentMajority wrote:

<quoted text>
And PS: Actually, I sleep very well at night. Being a NON-manipulating, NON-coniving, NON-parasite, has ALWAYS been good for that!

Hahahah...What a BURDEN you have to SUFFER!!
Being the only WORKING person surrounded by PARASITES!!!!
You TRY SOOOO hard and NO-ONE apreciates how GREAT
You Really ARE!!!!
All the while men are only interested in women with Souls and Personalities a who dont smell bad....and they dont CARE how Conservative you are!

POOR you!
A tragedy!All the while Obama sits in the Oval Office laughing at you!
How do you TAKE it???

[sonicfilter]

not at FOX Nation you don't!!

Fact-checking Marco Rubio’s State of the Union response

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/marco-r...

[OldRaider]

Jimmy wrote:

<quoted text>
Usually the problem lies with the person that accuses everyone else of something. Have a mirror handy?

Its only 7:30 a.m. and waxturd has used three names already, No Surprise, Jimmy and dem and has awarded himself almost 100 brilliant judge-its. This is a cry for help from a very very very disturbed individual. Won't some of you on the right come to his aid and tell him how sick he is? This lunatic will be shooting up Connecticut if someone doesn't step up.

[flack]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
FOX Nation.
classy.
so now we know why you didn't post the link.
but it's still funny.

I never post links. If you are to lazy to type in the headline then so be it. If you notice it was an AP story reported on Fox Nation. What is it about you libtards and reading comprehension???

[Aphelion]

Not Surprized wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Waxman/Floriduh sockpuppets so far today.
Stay tuned folks, plenty more where these came from!!!!!!!!!!

Never stops being amusing when the losers on the left have nothing in the way of a credible reply so they just accuse everyone on the board that doesn't agree with their bent thinking as being the same person.

I know that it will come as a surprise to you simpletons but many in this country do not agree with you or the current administrations position.

[Jimmy]

OldRaider wrote:

<quoted text>
Its only 7:30 a.m. and waxturd has used three names already, No Surprise, Jimmy and dem and has awarded himself almost 100 brilliant judge-its. This is a cry for help from a very very very disturbed individual. Won't some of you on the right come to his aid and tell him how sick he is? This lunatic will be shooting up Connecticut if someone doesn't step up.

Don't worry sockpuppet hypocrite. Jimmy is not a Democrat so everyone is safe. When is the funeral for your Democrat buddy who is the most recent Democrat to commit multiple murders with any gun available?

[Not Surprized]

Aphelion wrote:

<quoted text>
Never stops being amusing when the losers on the left have nothing in the way of a credible reply so they just accuse everyone on the board that doesn't agree with their bent thinking as being the same person.
I know that it will come as a surprise to you simpletons but many in this country do not agree with you or the current administrations position.

Uh-huh.

[sonicfilter]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> I have absolutely no problem with them blowing terrorist away with a drone strike. I never believe the terrorist s should be brought here so I don't understand your point. You people keep trying to fit me into the rightwing hole. It won't happen because I'm not. I believe what I believe because that is the way things look to me not because someone else says so. The problem is most real solutions are conservative. Taxing more, spending more, and borrowing more is never the answer. You'll just keep playing that left/right game the progressives have set up for you and they will lead you to your own doom. You are seeing the progressives in both parties right now but are to blind to recognize it.

settle down. i know you're not a FOXbot.

look, i'm a fiscal conservative. deficit hawk to be precise. but the data shows that cutting taxes in this economy doesn't add anything to the economy.

so what's driving the deficit? lost revenue. check this....

The money that went “missing” in your paycheck as the payroll tax holiday expired last month helped fuel a $3 billion budget surplus for January.
http://www.bizjournals.com/albany/morning_cal...

and this....

It is a standard talking point of Republicans and deficit hawks of all political stripes that federal spending is out of control; that major surgery is needed, especially on entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, to get the budget on a sustainable course.

In fact, our long-term deficit situation is not nearly as severe as even many budget experts believe. The problem is that they are looking at recent history and near-term projections that are overly impacted by one-time factors related to the economic crisis and massive Republican tax cuts that lowered revenues far below normal.

Taking a longer-term view, such as that in a recent Treasury Department report, shows that our longer-term fiscal problem is in fact quite manageable.
Read more at http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2013/01...

so what game are you playing that recognizes the 'real problem'?

[sonicfilter]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> I never post links. If you are to lazy to type in the headline then so be it. If you notice it was an AP story reported on Fox Nation. What is it about you libtards and reading comprehension???

i read it at Huffpost.

reads the same. until you get to the comments.

i'm pretty sure the Secret Service doesn't monitor Huffpost.

[leosnana]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
You are not only the most ignorant person here, you are the biggest liar.
The battle was over 7 hours long. The only reference you mentioned was some meeting at 11:00. The real-time video was being watched in the White House. Where was Obama while the White House watched the real-time video of Al Qaeda killing Americans?
The question remains unanswered.
How about you answer the question. All you have to do is give the location of Obama during the time the White House was watching live Al Qaeda kill Americans.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real-time video feed?
Let's work on your reading and comprehension of the written English language.
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
To answer the question, you have to state "where".
There is nothing in the question about "who" receives the money. Because the verb "pay" is used in the infinitive, you assume whomever receives the money will use it to, as the question specifically identifies, "pay for Obama's government". Who pays is inconsequential. Who handles the money is inconsequential.
The only significant part of the question is "where will the money come from".
To give an idiotic answer like "the Treasury Department" proves your ignorance. You have to identify a source of money, not the repository of the money collected from the source of money.
The Treasury Department is not a source of money, idiot.
So, the question remains unanswered:
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
It's a simple question. All that is required to answer it is to identify a simple source of money that will be collected from to pay for Obama's government.
You idiots do have a goddam plan, don't you? Please don't tell us you clowns don't even have a plan.

Look, Damnably Bad Writer, as long as you continue your miserable existence, the answer to "You are not only the most ignorant person here, you are the biggest liar." will be hotly contested by you, Methmouth, and the Warturds drawer...

[flack]

Comcast buys the rest of NBC from GE. Say goodbye MSNBC. What are you libtards gonna do?

[sonicfilter]

Is Marco Rubio Capable of More Than Bromides?

His smoothly delivered State of the Union response showed his major weakness as a speaker: the staleness of his rhetoric.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2...

[leosnana]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> I never post links. If you are to lazy to type in the headline then so be it. If you notice it was an AP story reported on Fox Nation. What is it about you libtards and reading comprehension???

Our reading comprehension is very good? That what you meant to say?(BTW, it's TOO lazy TO type...NC)

[flack]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> I have absolutely no problem with them blowing terrorist away with a drone strike. I never believe the terrorist s should be brought here so I don't understand your point. You people keep trying to fit me into the rightwing hole. It won't happen because I'm not. I believe what I believe because that is the way things look to me not because someone else says so. The problem is most real solutions are conservative. Taxing more, spending more, and borrowing more is never the answer. You'll just keep playing that left/right game the progressives have set up for you and they will lead you to your own doom. You are seeing the progressives in both parties right now but are to blind to recognize it.

The problem I have is when they start blowing people away in this country. I think it will get too easy to just kill people rather than arrest, try, and jail people. Slippery slopes are hard to stop once you start sliding.

[sonicfilter]

Aphelion wrote:

<quoted text>
Never stops being amusing when the losers on the left have nothing in the way of a credible reply so they just accuse everyone on the board that doesn't agree with their bent thinking as being the same person.
I know that it will come as a surprise to you simpletons but many in this country do not agree with you or the current administrations position.

many...but not enough.

[flack]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
settle down. i know you're not a FOXbot.
look, i'm a fiscal conservative. deficit hawk to be precise. but the data shows that cutting taxes in this economy doesn't add anything to the economy.
so what's driving the deficit? lost revenue. check this....
The money that went “missing” in your paycheck as the payroll tax holiday expired last month helped fuel a $3 billion budget surplus for January.
http://www.bizjournals.com/albany/morning_cal...
and this....
It is a standard talking point of Republicans and deficit hawks of all political stripes that federal spending is out of control; that major surgery is needed, especially on entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare, to get the budget on a sustainable course.
In fact, our long-term deficit situation is not nearly as severe as even many budget experts believe. The problem is that they are looking at recent history and near-term projections that are overly impacted by one-time factors related to the economic crisis and massive Republican tax cuts that lowered revenues far below normal.
Taking a longer-term view, such as that in a recent Treasury Department report, shows that our longer-term fiscal problem is in fact quite manageable.
Read more at http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2013/01...
so what game are you playing that recognizes the 'real problem'?

$3 billion dollars is a lot of money out of people's pockets that need. Money that would have been spent on food, a night out, or repairs. The government need to cut spending and let people keep the money they earn.

[OldRaider]

Not Surprized wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Waxman/Floriduh sockpuppets so far today.
Stay tuned folks, plenty more where these came from!!!!!!!!!!

Damn, I missed two of them. On the plus side for me, I'm leading you this morning with 14 peanuts to your 13 spams. I wonder if he thinks by giving us different judge-its no one will notice they are coming from the same moron?