Barack Obama, our next President

[Taxpayer]

GOPIdiots wrote:

<quoted text>
Dropped out after 8th grade? That explains a lot.
///"To stop are enemy’s from using the government "////
Could you be any more stupid?

Typical Boob Tube communist minded Socialist statement. You can not Dispute the obvious fact that you have fail in life and want the government to steal for you.

[No Surprize]

Nj raider 1 wrote:

<quoted text> The fact that you & DB writer can overlook all the negatives in the constitution speaks volumes of the kind of POS the both of you are. I damn sure don't trust any of the racist you named & none of the rest of the people you named had any direct bearing on America besides President Obama & he did nothing to warrant distrust from me. You people are cowards! Can't sleep at night without an AR-15 under the pillow! A bunch of fear mongering blind assholes that looks into the past to gain insight on the future. How does it feel living in a world of hypotheticals?

Those who don't study history are bound to repeat it like you. You still have not answered the question?

These men support your right to bear arms: Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Hamilton. These men oppose your right to bear arms: Hitler, Castro, Stalin, Amin, Lenin, Obama. Who do you trustNj raider 1?

[OldRaider]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
You forgot to put content in you rpost. I'll help you correct your mistake. Here's the post again:
Monday morning. I guess it's time for you to do your usual clumsy dance and run away from answering these questions.
We still haven't gotten an answer to these questions:
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on the real-time video feed?
Why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
And, a new question:
Joe Biden says the government can infringe on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Where is the text in the Constitution that gives the government the authority to infringe on the right of the people to keep and bear arms?
And, another question:
Eric Holder says the government can determine who in the United States is allowed to have a firearm. Where is the text in the Constitution that gives the government the authority to decide who in the United States is allowed to own a firearm?
The questions that Democrats can't, or won't answer just keeps growing.
The answer to the first two questions may describe treason.
If the third question isn't answered, the government collapses and the existence of the United States comes to an end.
The answer to the last two questions may describe the establishment of an unconstitutional dictatorship.
These questions will ultimately be answered. Hopefully, it will be through dialogue.
How about you do your part to save the country and answer these questions....

Here's an analogy I've used that you may have missed:
Three drunks are sitting in a bar, Galt, waxturd and DBWriter. Waxturd says to Galt, "I don't have any friends so I'm going to buy drinks all night for everyone in the bar and maybe someone will like me. Will you pay for it?". Galt says, "Sure I will.". When the tab comes DBWriter, who has been listening to all this says, "I wonder where waxturd is going to get the money to pay for all those drinks?".

[Taxpayer]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
you're off message.
the Right loves drones.

The Fascist love drones

[WAXTURDS IS FLORIDUH]

No Surprize wrote:

<quoted text>Those who don't study history are bound to repeat it like you. You still have not answered the question?
These men support your right to bear arms: Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Hamilton. These men oppose your right to bear arms: Hitler, Castro, Stalin, Amin, Lenin, Obama. Who do you trustNj raider 1?

Its the culcha.

[Nj raider 1]

F ck the constitution! The mere fact that you people think a piece of paper written over 200yrs ago can guide America into this unknown future is retarded in itself. How can America ever have peace & equality living under thee rules of another time/ history where in life was far from equal & thee writers of that old ass paper of rules were racist themselves. It's true, you people are stupid & & slave minded!

[sonicfilter]

Taxpayer wrote:

<quoted text>
The Fascist love drones

correct!

Fox Analyst Defends Drones: If An American Takes Up Arms Against Fellow Citizens,‘You Kill The Sucker, Period’

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/fox-analyst-defend...

it's nice to see nutjobs pointing out Fascism in the GOP.

[sonicfilter]

Congress authorized the war against al Qaeda and its allies. While many details of the drone strikes remain secret, it can hardly be argued that Congress isn’t aware of the program’s existence or the administration’s -general legal justification for it; Attorney General Eric Holder spelled out much the same case for the program last March in a speech at Northwestern University. Nor is it possible for the administration to carry out the program without congressional authorizations, either by the intelligence or the armed services committees. And as the confirmation hearings of CIA director nominee John Brennan demonstrate, Congress has always had the ability to dig deeper if it chooses to use its oversight powers. What the critics don’t want to admit is that poll after poll indicates that the American public supports the drone program, and members of Congress, within reason, will reflect that support.

https://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/drone...

[WAXTURDS IS FLORIDUH]

Waxman wrote:

looks like OldRaider likes the "Obstructionist" word:
2008bill wrote:
I have decided to leave this thread, so that juvenile "obstructinists" Like Waxman, Dean Martin, Gregory Scott, and Chylloh, that have no desire to participate in an adult manner, can continue to sit around the pot belly stove, with gun in one hand and Bible in the other, sharing demeaning and hateful drivel about this POTUS, this Administration, and our (American) Government. Their comments repeatedly posted here, go way beyond the intent of freedom of speech, and I will no longer be involved with those that portray, vile, and gutter styled, anti-American Values. There are plenty of other threads that I can post on, and other forums as well.
http://www.topix.com/forum/source/lebanon-dai...
Good to see you back 2008bill! How is lala land?

Now here we have a totally delusional shytshow if there ever was one. Good to see he is so confused. That's what living on topix did to his minute sized brain. Filled it full of holes, swiss cheese style.

NWaxman wrote: Bwahhahhhhaaaaaahha!!!!!!!

[Taxpayer]

Fired For Being Happy wrote:

<quoted text> Obama is the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR 4 MORE YEARS, deal with it LOSER.

No he your fascist leader of the United Socialist Authority. Loser. Thanks for draging America farther in to communisms.

[sonicfilter]

Nj raider 1 wrote:

F ck the constitution! The mere fact that you people think a piece of paper written over 200yrs ago can guide America into this unknown future is retarded in itself. How can America ever have peace & equality living under thee rules of another time/ history where in life was far from equal & thee writers of that old ass paper of rules were racist themselves. It's true, you people are stupid & & slave minded!

not to worry. they don't get to interpret the Constitution. only the Court does.

whatever they have to say about following the document to the letter is pure BS. the Court has already blown up the whole gun debate by declaring there are 'dangerous and unusual' weapons in the cause of defending handguns.

and that's not the only thing they don't want to acknowledge.

Roe v Wade.

[Nj raider 1]

No Surprize wrote:

<quoted text>Those who don't study history are bound to repeat it like you. You still have not answered the question?
These men support your right to bear arms: Washington, Jefferson, Madison, Hamilton. These men oppose your right to bear arms: Hitler, Castro, Stalin, Amin, Lenin, Obama. Who do you trustNj raider 1?

Trying to force a square peg into a circle huh! Show me where Obama said he doesn't support your right to bear arms. You can't because he's never said it! So if he never said it how can you align him with legendary dictators. Like I said you live in a world of hypotheticals. Making up shyt to ease your minds anxieties. You people are crazy!

[sonicfilter]

we're always hearing about how the black folks are getting screwed by Obama, and now we know why according to those black folks.

Perhaps President Obama isn't as much of a economically empowering friend to minority Americans as we think he is? Colorlines editor Imara Jones writes that the POTUS is complicit in some of the Republicans' financially tough policies.

http://www.theroot.com/buzz/obama-complicit-e...

[RealDave]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
Damn. You are showing signs of Alzheimer's. Perhaps if you read the post one more time, you might be able to remember what's in the post long enough to generate a response.
We still haven't gotten an answer to these questions:
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on the real-time video feed?
Why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
And, a new question:
Joe Biden says the government can infringe on the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Where is the text in the Constitution that gives the government the authority to infringe on the right of the people to keep and bear arms?
And, another question:
Eric Holder says the government can determine who in the United States is allowed to have a firearm. Where is the text in the Constitution that gives the government the authority to decide who in the United States is allowed to own a firearm?
The questions that Democrats can't, or won't answer just keeps growing.
The answer to the first two questions may describe treason.
If the third question isn't answered, the government collapses and the existence of the United States comes to an end.
The answer to the last two questions may describe the establishment of an unconstitutional dictatorship.
These questions will ultimately be answered. Hopefully, it will be through dialogue.
How about you do your part to save the country and answer these questions....

There was no 7 hour battle but two separate attacks. Obama was in a meeting with Panetta & the head of the joint chiefs an hour & 20 minutes after the first attack started. Obama gets his money from the treasury department. So you say the NRA will push for private ownership of armed drones.

No wonder you need to have subsidies to survive. You're too stupid to make it on your own.

[RealDave]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you mean banks were not investing in areas that had a history of defaulting on loans? You do understand the definition of the word "history", don't you?
So, please tell us why you make the association between racial discrimination and the history of bad lonas in the areas you claim were being racially discriminated against.
In short, why did the areas banks didn't want to invest in have a history of bad loans? What was the relationship to race?
... I'll wait for your answer on this one.

The court called it racist. Why are you defending racism?? Oh that's right, you're a Tea Party racist POS.

I understand your position. You favored the voter photo ID. It wasn't that the vast majority of those who didn't have a photo ID were poor people & disproportionally black, was it? But you, being a racist f*ck, didn't care & you f*cked people out of their vote. It must because you believe in the Constitution...as long as it suits your racist agenda yet when it comes to black people buying homes & voting, you crumble it up & piss on it.

Typical Tea Bagger.

[RealDave]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
Not paying income taxes excuses you from paying for what the government spends. How about everyone who voted for Obama start paying th9ier fair share of the income taxes?
Now, back to an issue you run away from:
Tell us about those subsidies to oil companies. You still haven't done that. Or, is that just another of the propaganda lies you get indoctrinated with at your indoctrination sessions?
Tell us about those oil subsidies.

I voted for Obama & I pay both individual & corporate income taxes.

You see, I have my own company & work for my money.

I don't rely on government subsidies like you.

You know the subsidies John Boehner defended. The subsidies the head of the API ( let me know if you need help knowing what that is) said cutting subsidies would cost jobs.

But hey, you f*cking GD idiot call these people liars?

[lily boca raton fl]

sonicfilter wrote:

Congress authorized the war against al Qaeda and its allies. While many details of the drone strikes remain secret, it can hardly be argued that Congress isn’t aware of the program’s existence or the administration’s -general legal justification for it; Attorney General Eric Holder spelled out much the same case for the program last March in a speech at Northwestern University. Nor is it possible for the administration to carry out the program without congressional authorizations, either by the intelligence or the armed services committees. And as the confirmation hearings of CIA director nominee John Brennan demonstrate, Congress has always had the ability to dig deeper if it chooses to use its oversight powers. What the critics don’t want to admit is that poll after poll indicates that the American public supports the drone program, and members of Congress, within reason, will reflect that support.
https://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/drone...

That would require a person to think about what he is saying. Doesn't make for sensational headlines meant to scare the feeble minded. They'd rather believe that the black President is going to drone them to death, get whitey!!!

[TheIndependentMa jority]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
(Reagan hater.)

Dr. Carson for VP 2016!!!!

[TheIndependentMa jority]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
I voted for Obama & I pay both individual & corporate income taxes.
You see, I have my own company & work for my money.
I don't rely on government subsidies like you.
You know the subsidies John Boehner defended. The subsidies the head of the API ( let me know if you need help knowing what that is) said cutting subsidies would cost jobs.
But hey, you f*cking GD idiot call these people liars?

LibuhrulTIC game of the day-

Pick-A-Pope (to hate on)

Bring yer own matches lol.

[DBWriter]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
A fossil fuel subsidy is any government action that lowers the cost of fossil fuel energy production, raises the price received by energy producers or lowers the price paid by energy consumers. There are a lot of activities under this simple definition—tax breaks and giveaways, but also loans at favorable rates, price controls, purchase requirements and a whole lot of other things.
n the United States, credible estimates of annual fossil fuel subsidies range from $10 billion to $52 billion annually, while even efforts to remove small portions of those subsidies have been defeated in Congress, as shown in the graphic below.
President Obama has proposed cutting fossil fuel subsidies every year he’s been in office. The projections for savings have varied slightly each year but always hover around $4 billion annually. Congress has never even proposed voting on all of them.
http://priceofoil.org/fossil-fuel-subsidies/
anything else that your ignorance extends to that you need explained? always happy to do it for you.

Thank you. Now, was that so difficult?
I posted last week an article in Forbes that gave the specific exemptions given to oil companies like Exxon (that operate with a 16.5 percent profit margin), and compared those exemptions to other industries, obviously the oil companies are not given the same exemptions as, for example, Microsoft (who operates with a profit margin of 27.5 percent).

You ran away from those facts faster than a dog escaping from Michael Vick's house.
Why should an industry operating at a profit margin of 10 to 20 percent be forced to pay a bigger penalty than an industry operating with a profit margin of 25 to 50 percent?
..... well?