Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
791,261 - 791,280 of 1,082,426 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago
Battle of Bull

Rochelle, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859598
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Sheila Jackson Lee is a freed slave and I am a Civil War survivor LMFAO

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859599
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Injudgement wrote:
<quoted text>Cutting tax rates puts more money in Swiss and Cayman Island accounts. Next I suppose you are going to tell us all about the Bush Tax cuts creating jobs in America. The US had the lowest tax rates in its history for 10 years. How'd that work out for America?
Raising taxes does that.

What was the unemplotment rate during the bush years?

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859600
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not only the most ignorant person here, you are the biggest liar.
The battle was over 7 hours long. The only reference you mentioned was some meeting at 11:00. The real-time video was being watched in the White House. Where was Obama while the White House watched the real-time video of Al Qaeda killing Americans?
The question remains unanswered.
How about you answer the question. All you have to do is give the location of Obama during the time the White House was watching live Al Qaeda kill Americans.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real-time video feed?
Let's work on your reading and comprehension of the written English language.
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
To answer the question, you have to state "where".
There is nothing in the question about "who" receives the money. Because the verb "pay" is used in the infinitive, you assume whomever receives the money will use it to, as the question specifically identifies, "pay for Obama's government". Who pays is inconsequential. Who handles the money is inconsequential.
The only significant part of the question is "where will the money come from".
To give an idiotic answer like "the Treasury Department" proves your ignorance. You have to identify a source of money, not the repository of the money collected from the source of money.
The Treasury Department is not a source of money, idiot.
So, the question remains unanswered:
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
It's a simple question. All that is required to answer it is to identify a simple source of money that will be collected from to pay for Obama's government.
You idiots do have a goddam plan, don't you? Please don't tell us you clowns don't even have a plan.

----------
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Pentagon Time Line.
Read it.
at 11:00 PM Benghai time, an hour & 20 minutes after the attack began, Obama was in a meeting at the White House with Panetta & the head of the Joint Chiefs.
You know this because , despite you numerous lies, you read that time line I posted earlier. The one you now claim never to have seen.
Yet you still are running in circles waving your arms & screaming "Where was Obama" "where was Obama". We;ll Dickbreath, if you bothered to even read some of your own GD posts, you admitted where he was. In that meeting.
That same time line that you refuse to acknowledge, said there were two attacks.
But hey, don't let facts get in the way of your immense stupidity. Dumbass.
Read it and quit asking for it over and over, you idiot!!

It proves you're the moron we all know.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859601
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Your entire position that the poor don't pay taxes is pure bullshit.
As with most all of what you post.
Try and keep up. A person making $9 per hour, 40 hours per week, earns $18,720, before any taxes.
Assuming this is the poor Rmoney family, and Ann stays home with the kids, which you nitwits all thought was a wonderful thing, it means the Rmoneys would pay no Federal Income Taxes. DUH
That is the tax code as established by Republiclowns!!
But to say the poor Rmoneys pay NO taxes is idiotic, but expected.
Sales taxes, State and local taxes, property taxes, etc., etc.
You still don't understand my and lily's conversation. Oh well, I can't fix that.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859602
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
Well what a coincidence. Nutcracker shows up when other sockpuppets do. How interesting (and boring).
Waxturd, check this out, FOX says cop killer Dorner A 'Pathological Narcissist'. Bet you can relate to a fellow self-aggrandizer that nobody liked.

http://www.myfoxla.com/story/21085769/ex-fbi-...

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859603
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"silly"
They should pay no taxes? They should not;
- Pay sales taxes
- Pay property taxes
- Pay automobile taxes
- Pay taxes on alcoholic beverages
- Pay taxes on cigarettes
- Pay Social Security taxes
- Pay medicare/medicade taxes
Currently most if not all making minimum wage pay no Federal Income tax.
Peace
Easy, under the Fair Tax no one would pay ANY tax up to the poverty line for the family size they have. No one!
Homer 2016

Stroudsburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859604
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is, the constitutionalists are a minority of the population these days. Those that aren't constitutionalists don't care enough about the Constitution to learn what is written in it - like Obama, for example.
This could result in a very severe problem. Mass ignorance always causes catastrophies.
Sen. Obama, who has taught courses in constitutional law at the University of Chicago, has regularly referred to himself as "a constitutional law professor," most famously at a March 30, 2007, fundraiser when he said, "I was a constitutional law professor, which means unlike the current president I actually respect the Constitution."

UC Law School statement: The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as "Senior Lecturer." From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School’s Senior Lecturers have high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/03/obama-a-cons...
Homer 2016

Stroudsburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859605
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is, the constitutionalists are a minority of the population these days. Those that aren't constitutionalists don't care enough about the Constitution to learn what is written in it - like Obama, for example.
This could result in a very severe problem. Mass ignorance always causes catastrophies.
'Mass ignorance always causes catastrophies.' See Bush re-election.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859606
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

Happy Valentines Day!

http://townhall.com/political-cartoons/

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859607
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

You keep doubling down on your stupidity!!

I like that!!

"The United States government rejected secession as illegal. Following the Confederate attack at Fort Sumter, the Union used military action to defeat the Confederacy. No foreign nation officially recognized the Confederacy as an independent country, but several did grant belligerent status."

Not only did the USA consider the Confederacy illegal, but no foreign nation ever recognized the Cpnfederacy as a legal entity.

The Confederacy was NEVER another country, it was merely a breakaway region that the Union had to bring back into the USA, when it illegally seceded. DUH

You lose again, Dweeb!!

You can't even make up a convincing story!!
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
West Virginia was clearly the only part of the legislature of Virginia that could be considered as representation for the state of Virginia in the federal republic.
In case you are ignorant of history, the other members of the legislature of Virginia became a functioning element of another country. According to the Constitution, such joining with a foreign country is prohibited. Therefore, the legislators that joined that other country could not have been part of the legislature that didn't join that other country. The part of the legislature that remained part of the federal republic became the legislature of the state of Virginia and representation in the federal republic.
Therefore, they had the constitutional right to petition to split the state which they were the sole representation of in the federal republic. And, Congress had the right to grant that wish.
Thus, the state of West Virginia was born in accordance with the Constitution.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859608
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

9

8

8

You said everyone should have skin in the game.

I proved they do.

NEXT!!
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
You still don't understand my and lily's conversation. Oh well, I can't fix that.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859609
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Everyone who begins as a trainee gets a minimum wage. If someone is still relying on minimum wage after being in the workforce for a short period of time, that's all they are worth - if that.
Why should employers be forced to pay more for the same worthless employee?
This is just another Marxist idea from the Democrats to spread the wealth around to people who do nothing to earn it.
how about we get rid of the minimum wage entirely? That would motivate people to become worth something in the economy.
A person is paid according to their worth. If you want to be paid more, make the choices that will increase your worth.
Alternatively, you can choose to be poor. The choice is yours. The money is out there for you if you just make the choices to earn it.
This is the Socialist dialogue in America today: "I am uneducated, unmotivated and a mindless consumer. I don't produce anything but sewer effluents, carbon monoxide and parent-less children. The Boy Messiah says that he'll give me a free cellphone and high wages if I get off my fat ass to pick up the phone and the paycheck. He's my man!"

Walter Williams - Minimum Wage's Discriminatory Effects: http://tinyurl.com/6bcjtev

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859610
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh Fer krissaakes, get lost
Misery loves company.
Jimmy

Hartford, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859611
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"Jimmy"
No one and I mean no one can dumb it down enough so "real dumb" understands.
Peace
How about to the comatose level of the typical Obama worshipping libtard? Naaaa.... You're right, even that would be giving DumbDave too much credit.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859612
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

Homer 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Great, we'll keep em down at the local armory and when the British invade again we'll hand em out.
How do you feel about the Unconstitutionality of the state of West Virginia?
Article 4 Section 3
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress.
"...keep em down at the local armory..." is infringing upon the right of the people to keep and bear those arms.

Liberals have low to nonexistent comprehension skills. They need the Jerk-In-Chief to interpret things for them. Or Access Hollywood. Or ET. Or the NY Times. Or Sesame St.

I don't.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859613
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

Nuculur option wrote:
You said everyone should have skin in the game.
I proved they do.
NEXT!!
<quoted text>
In response to lily saying they should pay NO taxes.

Hopefully "next" will get you unstuck from your stupid.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859614
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Homer 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>A rightwinger telling a normal person to keep up with technology.
Homer has now seen it all folks.
You've only seen the fuzz inside of your navel and the pig-hair at the end of your nose.
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859615
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

5

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
GM should pay back the taxpayers before handing out bonuses.
Bailout reelected President Obama as Romney tried to change his stance?
Homer 2016

Stroudsburg, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859616
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
"...keep em down at the local armory..." is infringing upon the right of the people to keep and bear those arms.
Liberals have low to nonexistent comprehension skills. They need the Jerk-In-Chief to interpret things for them. Or Access Hollywood. Or ET. Or the NY Times. Or Sesame St.
I don't.
How is it infringing? Let's hear your argument.
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#859617
Feb 14, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

5

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
High taxes in the US are the reason that Swiss and Cayman Island accounts exist.
nobama blames everything on the democrats while posting from the welfare line?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

12 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 28 min SamBee 68,416
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Brian_G 45,849
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr Rogue Scholar 05 174,967
Voting Whites NO LONGER hold majority in Ohio. 2 hr WeBlacksOutBirthedWhitey 2
Chicago Train Robbery 3 hr StarNazisDontFOOKWithMe 6
Strategy 3 hr ItTakesBalls2BNo1 7
Children were thrown to hungry crocodiles 3 hr AskACroc-KidsTasteGood 5
•••
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••