Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#859804 Feb 15, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
More lies from Dumbfuckwaiter.
The Senate passed a budget in April of 2009. Obama took office ion January of 2009.
Obama has submitted a budget every year. Not just two, dumbass.
So tell me how a pretend geologist existing on government subsidies got to be so GD stupid.
Post something that proves what you post, Davey Boie?? We're not looking for Huf-Po horsehockey?

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#859805 Feb 15, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
competing with FreedomWorks for stupid conservative of the week....
Limbaugh Mocks Rep. Jackson Lee's "Freed Slave" Remarks By Asking Who Owned And Sold Her
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/02/14/limba...
Rush will explain tomorrow that it was a 'joke'.
Rush tells lots of jokes.
Surely you jest... Shela Jackson Lee is owned by the people in her district, just ax 'em... She is another in the mold of Barack Hussein Obama, Jesse(Jackass)Jackson, and Jesse(Jackass)Jackson JR, never had a job, never needs a job, and the taxpayers pick up the bill, while he laughs all the way to the bank....

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#859806 Feb 15, 2013
Which President other than Obama had three of his budgets voted down? Reagan.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#859807 Feb 15, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>Surely you jest... Shela Jackson Lee is owned by the people in her district, just ax 'em... She is another in the mold of Barack Hussein Obama, Jesse(Jackass)Jackson, and Jesse(Jackass)Jackson JR, never had a job, never needs a job, and the taxpayers pick up the bill, while he laughs all the way to the bank....
your response will also need a 'joke' disclaimer.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#859808 Feb 15, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
she's not the ignorant one.
so how the hell did you become so ignorant? voted for Bush and you're trying to compensate for that bit of stupidity by doubling down?
but we know why you're pissed: no one cares about what conservatives have to say anymore. and in reading your fictional screeds, it's not hard to see why.
Let's see... Bush or Gore....
Like I'm going to vote for someone who's obviously unbalanced and promotes fraudulent science and says "green energy" but lives "carbon footprint" and was the only reason Clinton wasn't convicted when he was impeached because the Senate didn't want to make Gore president.
And, like I'm going to vote for a "sex-crazed poodle" for president.

And... Bush or Kerry....
Like I'm going to vote for a proven treasonous fraud and liar who assisted the enemy of the United States during the Cold War in their attempt to end our existence and burglarized his opponent's campaign headquarters.

Please tell us just how many bills were passed in the House that Harry Reid obstructed from being voted on in the Senate.
And, please tell us why the Democrats in the Senate haven't passed a budget since Obama took office.
And, please tell us why the two budgets Obama submitted to Congress of the four budgets he should have submitted got a sum total of ZERO votes. That's NADA, NONE, ZILCH.
Then, tell us how the f**k this woman who is a goddam teacher became so goddam ignorant?

Now, back to the issue you are running away from like a heterosexual male page from Barney Frank's office:

Please tell us just how many bills were passed in the House that Harry Reid obstructed from being voted on in the Senate.
And, please tell us why the Democrats in the Senate haven't passed a budget since Obama took office.
And, please tell us why the two budgets Obama submitted to Congress of the four budgets he should have submitted got a sum total of ZERO votes. That's NADA, NONE, ZILCH.

Then, tell us how the f**k this woman who is a goddam teacher became so goddam ignorant?
new yawk

Buffalo, NY

#859809 Feb 15, 2013
Not that I approve of the unscrupulous ...

But what was it Hillary Clinton said about the Benghazi debacle that resulted in the deaths of 4 Americans:

"What's the difference"? < Ask their Families, they'll tell her >.

So, what's the difference what is said or done about that sell out?

The liberals had no problem with sexually trashing Conservative Women: Palin, Bachmann, Malkin, Coulter, and a host of others.
AND their children.

Who gives a gott-damn about that bytch with a dyck.

My condolences are with The Panda!
sonicfilter wrote:
The Lynchian Panda-Clinton Oral Sex Video Produced by a Powerful Tea Party Group
FreedomWorks, the influential Tea Party political action committee, has fallen on hard times since its former chair Dick Armey staged a literal armed coup in an ultimately unsuccessful attempt to wrest control from president Matt Kibbe. It's a shame, too, because they were doing such good work—like making experimental films featuring a panda performing oral sex on Hillary Clinton!
http://gawker.com/5984234/the-lynchian-panda+...
the left wing blogs are having a bit of fun today.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#859810 Feb 15, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
your response will also need a 'joke' disclaimer.
How so? You think it's the Giverment's money, I don't. It's my money.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#859811 Feb 15, 2013
OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm afraid we're going to have to add Avoidant Personality Disorder to your perseveration, schizophrenia and paranoia diagnosis:
Avoidant personality disorder is characterized by feelings of extreme social inhibition, inadequacy, and sensitivity to negative criticism and rejection.
http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/avoidant-p...
It's like dealing with my kids. I keep asking the same questions until they give me a goddam answer.
If they continually avoid answering the questions, I am certain that they are hiding a truth that they know will condemn them universally.
So, how about you Democrats not act like my kids when they are trying to hide something really bad from me.
Answer the questions.
Remind us...
When's the last time the Democrats in the Senate passed a budget?
In other words, when's the last time the Democrats even had a goddam plan for government?
And, just why would Obama order no support be given to the Americans in Benghazi while he watched Al Qaeda kill them on the live video feed?
Then, why would Obama lie for two weeks covering up an Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
And, why haven't the Democrats had a plan for government in four goddam years?
And, where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
And, why is Obama trying to disarm the American people not living in Democrat districts?
And, why do you constantly lie about Obama passing the bar and ever seeing the inside of a court room as a lawyer?
... and;
What does your psychiatrist say about your characteristic propensity to digress when answering a question proves you to be fullofshit?

I'm afraid we're going to have to add Avoidant Personality Disorder to your perseveration, schizophrenia and paranoia diagnosis.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#859812 Feb 15, 2013
Ted Cruz slanders war hero, embarrasses Texas and violates Armed Services Committee tradition

The hearings to consider the nomination of former Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) began with two great statesmen endorsing Hagel and ended with a freshman Republican senator embarrassing his state and the Armed Services Committee with a performance that illustrates why Republicans have lost three of the last four national elections and why Texas Democrats have good odds of a historic revival.

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/lawmake...

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#859813 Feb 15, 2013
WalMart reports softer spending due to higher taxes and gas prices. Lowers expectations for first quater sales.

Uh Oh!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#859814 Feb 15, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>How so? You think it's the Giverment's money, I don't. It's my money.
The 16th amendment more or less declares that all of our income is the property of the Federal government. Any amount they let us keep is the result of the benevolence of Congress. The Courts have ruled as such throughout the history of the income tax. This includes any income, from gifts to fringe benefits. If your employer pays for a business lunch, the Federal government can tax you for 100% of your lunch if they so desire. There are of course loopholes and all sorts of deductions and write offs. But those are all by the grace of Congress. According to the Courts and the 16th amendment Congress doesn’t have to write any deductions into law. They’re entitled to everything.

http://stevenbirnspeaks.com/2012/06/29/the-re...
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#859815 Feb 15, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>How so? You think it's the Giverment's money, I don't. It's my money.
racism has become something that's so commonplace with conservatives that you don't even thinks it's racism anymore.

one thing i know you can see clearly...no more Republicans in the WH unless you all can figure out a way to get blacks to vote for conservatives.

and accusing liberals of being racist doesn't seem to much impress the black folks near as much as it does the 8% club.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#859816 Feb 15, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>The 16th amendment more or less declares that all of our income is the property of the Federal government. Any amount they let us keep is the result of the benevolence of Congress. The Courts have ruled as such throughout the history of the income tax. This includes any income, from gifts to fringe benefits. If your employer pays for a business lunch, the Federal government can tax you for 100% of your lunch if they so desire. There are of course loopholes and all sorts of deductions and write offs. But those are all by the grace of Congress. According to the Courts and the 16th amendment Congress doesn’t have to write any deductions into law. They’re entitled to everything.
http://stevenbirnspeaks.com/2012/06/29/the-re...
Absolutely 100% correct. That's why we need the Fair Tax.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#859817 Feb 15, 2013
new yawk wrote:
Not that I approve of the unscrupulous ...
But what was it Hillary Clinton said about the Benghazi debacle that resulted in the deaths of 4 Americans:
"What's the difference"? < Ask their Families, they'll tell her >.
So, what's the difference what is said or done about that sell out?
The liberals had no problem with sexually trashing Conservative Women: Palin, Bachmann, Malkin, Coulter, and a host of others.
AND their children.
Who gives a gott-damn about that bytch with a dyck.
My condolences are with The Panda!
<quoted text>
no, you mean: your condolences are with the girl who was forced to wear a Panda mask.

though that is in no way sexist.

??????????
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#859818 Feb 15, 2013
Tea-Party Interns Starred in Video of Hillary Clinton Having Sex With Panda

"How was that not some form of sexual harassment?" a former FreedomWorks official said to Corn.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/02/...

ok right wing talking head women, let's hear it!

[crickets]
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#859820 Feb 15, 2013
Rubio’s Dangerous Idea of What U.S.“Leadership” Should Be

Marco Rubio is unhappy with the attention Obama gave foreign policy issues in the State of the Union address:

During Tuesday night’s State of the Union address, President Barack Obama had an opportunity to engage in the debate about America’s role in the world. Unfortunately, he failed to do so.

Since Rubio also had nothing to say about America’s role in the world, except for using the phrase “indispensable nation,” this is an odd complaint to make about the speech. If this debate was so important and Obama’s supposed neglect of it so unfortunate, why didn’t Rubio include any of these arguments in his own speech? I assume that Rubio ignored foreign policy for the same perfectly good reason that it took up relatively little space in the president’s address: it isn’t a top priority for the public, there are more pressing and relevant domestic matters to discuss, and it doesn’t make sense to review a host of international problems at length in what are properly domestic political speeches for the sake of reviewing them. It’s also possible that Rubio knows that his peculiar understanding of global interdependence (in which Syria is “integral” to U.S. interests and events in Mali may soon be felt in Middle America) is not very popular with most Americans and hasn’t been for some time. Whatever the reason for it, it’s significant that Rubio couldn’t bother himself to include any discussion of foreign policy beyond reciting a slogan when he had the opportunity, but still thinks we should care about his interventionist and hegemonist preferences.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...

Rubio’s article includes a notable difference from his response speech. His Tuesday speech was filled with standard movement conservative arguments about the need for a smaller role for government, which is fine as far as it goes, but then he demands an extremely activist and much more powerful government abroad. Rubio writes:

The biggest foreign policy problem facing the United States right now is not too much U.S. engagement, but the danger of a world in which we increasingly refuse to lead.

So Rubio believes that America’s biggest foreign policy problem is that the U.S. is not involved enough in the rest of the world and is not “leading” as much as it should be. Most Americans don’t agree with that. For that matter, most Republicans apparently don’t agree with it, either. According to Rasmussen, just 22% of Republicans say the U.S. is not involved enough in the Middle East. Rubio doesn’t speak for a majority of his own party, much less a majority of the country. More important, this claim is simply not true.
new yawk

Buffalo, NY

#859821 Feb 15, 2013
Forced? Sexist?

??????????

As if your concern is altruistic about either with regard to Tea Party, Republican or Conservative Persons, especially Women.

Fact Is: That video made a mockery out of "What difference does it make?" Clinton. She deserves any and all rebuke she receives.

She should be slandered to the bone.
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
no, you mean: your condolences are with the girl who was forced to wear a Panda mask.
though that is in no way sexist.
??????????
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#859822 Feb 15, 2013
Fake giant Pandas having sex with Hillary Clinton. Is this the best the Right Wing can do against her?

http://theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2013/0...

pretty much.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#859823 Feb 15, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Rubio’s Dangerous Idea of What U.S.“Leadership” Should Be
Marco Rubio is unhappy with the attention Obama gave foreign policy issues in the State of the Union address:
During Tuesday night’s State of the Union address, President Barack Obama had an opportunity to engage in the debate about America’s role in the world. Unfortunately, he failed to do so.
Since Rubio also had nothing to say about America’s role in the world, except for using the phrase “indispensable nation,” this is an odd complaint to make about the speech. If this debate was so important and Obama’s supposed neglect of it so unfortunate, why didn’t Rubio include any of these arguments in his own speech? I assume that Rubio ignored foreign policy for the same perfectly good reason that it took up relatively little space in the president’s address: it isn’t a top priority for the public, there are more pressing and relevant domestic matters to discuss, and it doesn’t make sense to review a host of international problems at length in what are properly domestic political speeches for the sake of reviewing them. It’s also possible that Rubio knows that his peculiar understanding of global interdependence (in which Syria is “integral” to U.S. interests and events in Mali may soon be felt in Middle America) is not very popular with most Americans and hasn’t been for some time. Whatever the reason for it, it’s significant that Rubio couldn’t bother himself to include any discussion of foreign policy beyond reciting a slogan when he had the opportunity, but still thinks we should care about his interventionist and hegemonist preferences.
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...
Rubio’s article includes a notable difference from his response speech. His Tuesday speech was filled with standard movement conservative arguments about the need for a smaller role for government, which is fine as far as it goes, but then he demands an extremely activist and much more powerful government abroad. Rubio writes:
The biggest foreign policy problem facing the United States right now is not too much U.S. engagement, but the danger of a world in which we increasingly refuse to lead.
So Rubio believes that America’s biggest foreign policy problem is that the U.S. is not involved enough in the rest of the world and is not “leading” as much as it should be. Most Americans don’t agree with that. For that matter, most Republicans apparently don’t agree with it, either. According to Rasmussen, just 22% of Republicans say the U.S. is not involved enough in the Middle East. Rubio doesn’t speak for a majority of his own party, much less a majority of the country. More important, this claim is simply not true.
When you say "involved", do you mean things like Obama arming Wahabist terrorists in the Muslim Brotherhood?

Or, do you mean things like Obama ordering all military units specifically prepositioned to respond to an attack specifically on our embassy specifically in Libya to disregard their default orders and hang the Americans out to dry while he watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real-time video feed?

You have to be more specific.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#859824 Feb 15, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
racism has become something that's so commonplace with conservatives that you don't even thinks it's racism anymore.
one thing i know you can see clearly...no more Republicans in the WH unless you all can figure out a way to get blacks to vote for conservatives.
and accusing liberals of being racist doesn't seem to much impress the black folks near as much as it does the 8% club.
YOU still have not told us why the inner city ghettos and projects are 'Blue Magnets' for blacks? How or why that happened?

With friends like a racist Al Sharpton, on MSNBC wanting the government to have absolute control over you and your twin deranged lives, all good Marxist sheep believe their handler's propaganda. It's how and why you and your imaginary twin stay on the reservation. Definitely Liberal.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 6 min Rogue Scholar 05 182,037
At least 3 wounded in Chicago shootings 16 min reality is a crutch 1
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 43 min mdbuilder 49,306
Santa Claus delayed in Chicago after getting th... 4 hr ChicagOpinion 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr ChicagOpinion 98,871
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 9 hr J RULES 71,188
Chicago Pizza Blows 11 hr joey 2
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 1:40 pm PST

NBC Sports 1:40PM
Cutler realizes Bears could be in for changes - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 8:22 PM
Bears re-sign Austen Lane to replace Willie Young
Bleacher Report10:09 PM
Bears vs. Vikings: Breaking Down Minnesota's Game Plan
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Breaking Down Colts' Game Plan vs. Titans
Bleacher Report 5:00 AM
Can't-Miss Picks and Matchup Guide