Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Forum

Hobbs, NM

#859624 Feb 14, 2013
Me importas tu.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#859625 Feb 14, 2013
Old Crazy Goober wrote:
DOH! Where's my judgeits?
You should stick with this sock puppet waxturd, or something with the word crazy in it.
Have you noticed that not one loony right winger wants anything to do with your crazy ass? Just like your narcissistic home boy cop killer Dorner. Outcasts!
Forum

Hobbs, NM

#859626 Feb 14, 2013
Happy Valentines

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#859627 Feb 14, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
And Democrats then became Carpetbaggers with blacks in tow.
Little has changed since then.
True after the Civil War and the Progressive Republicans wanted nothing to do with the Conservative Democrats either and the Republicans made Progressivism the new standard too after the Civil War too.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#859628 Feb 14, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
150 years out of date
Agreed. Democrats need to catch up to this century.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#859629 Feb 14, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>True after the Civil War and the Progressive Republicans wanted nothing to do with the Conservative Democrats either and the Republicans made Progressivism the new standard too after the Civil War too.
Truth is stranger than fiction.

...and yet, under this Jerk-In-Chief, fiction is more popular....

Truth is stranger than fiction....

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#859630 Feb 14, 2013
Senate Republicans Make a Spectacle of Themselves

The impressive thing about the anti-Hagel effort is how politically tone-deaf it is. Itís not just that their opposition is misguided, but they stand to gain nothing from it. No one outside of a small core of hard-liners sympathizes with what Senate Republicans are doing. While they may not be losing any votes over this, they are making sure that all of the moderates, independents, and realists that they have alienated over the last ten years will keep running away from them. Except for dedicated partisans, no one can look at the display most Senate Republicans have put on over the last eight weeks and conclude that these people should be in the majority.

Many of Hagelís most vocal Senate critics right now were elected in the last two elections. For example, Cruz, Ayotte, and Lee have nothing personally at stake in defending the Iraq war or the wisdom of the ďsurge.Ē None of them voted to support either of these, and many of them werenít in the Senate when Hagel was. I might be able to understand the hostility of older members that bear a grudge against Hagel, but the hostility of the new members is much stranger. They are damaging their reputations to defend the legacy of other Republicansí failures. Partisan loyalty I can understand. Itís the attachment to the worst mistakes of the worst postwar Republican administration that I canít fathom.

Thereís no question that Republicans in Washington are desperate for a winning issue, but Senate Republicans seem to be missing the point that stalling Hagelís confirmation (which will happen eventually) isnít a winning issue for them. In the short-term, they will take a justified beating in the press for their ridiculous tactics, and they are ensuring that the GOP continues to be perceived as nothing more than a party of bombastic hard-liners. The entire episode shows them to be hopelessly beholden to people whose foreign policy views have led to disaster for the country and contributed to three major Republican defeats. Another consequence will be that future Republican Cabinet nominees for major posts are now much more likely treated in the same way. That wonít be good for future Republican administrations or the government as a whole. With a few notable exceptions, Senate Republicans are needlessly wounding their party and making a spectacle of themselves in the process.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Seriously Misguided Democrat”

Since: Oct 12

Chicago Thugtown

#859631 Feb 14, 2013
Forum wrote:
Me importas tu.
Thanks - same to you too.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#859633 Feb 14, 2013
Right-wing Group FreedomWorks' Creepiness Extends to Simulated Panda Sex With Hillary Clinton

You read that right. Female interns were recruited to wear panda mask and Hillary mask and simulate oral sex.

http://www.alternet.org/rightwing-freedomwork...

tea party porn.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Seriously Misguided Democrat”

Since: Oct 12

Chicago Thugtown

#859634 Feb 14, 2013
Left-wing Group FreedomWorks' Creepiness Extends to Simulated Alligator Sex With Hillary Clinton

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#859635 Feb 14, 2013
Homer 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>Too gimmicky.
Oh by the way I should have said federal taxes. Gimmicky? Yeah, getting rid of the IRS, giving everybody a prebate check every month for the taxes pain every month, causing the US to become the largest tax haven in the world, creating so many jobs we would have to import 10 million people a year is gimmicky. Yeah what we have now is working so great!!!!

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#859636 Feb 14, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Right-wing Group FreedomWorks' Creepiness Extends to Simulated Panda Sex With Hillary Clinton
You read that right. Female interns were recruited to wear panda mask and Hillary mask and simulate oral sex.
http://www.alternet.org/rightwing-freedomwork...
tea party porn.
You'd have no problem with that if it was done at a gay pride parade.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#859638 Feb 14, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not only the most ignorant person here, you are the biggest liar.
The battle was over 7 hours long. The only reference you mentioned was some meeting at 11:00. The real-time video was being watched in the White House. Where was Obama while the White House watched the real-time video of Al Qaeda killing Americans?
The question remains unanswered.
How about you answer the question. All you have to do is give the location of Obama during the time the White House was watching live Al Qaeda kill Americans.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real-time video feed?
Let's work on your reading and comprehension of the written English language.
...You idiots do have a goddam plan, don't you? Please don't tell us you clowns don't even have a plan.
----------
<quoted text>
Read it and quit asking for it over and over, you idiot!!
It proves you're the moron we all know.
here's the post again:
Pentagon Time Line.
Read it.
at 11:00 PM Benghai time, an hour & 20 minutes after the attack began, Obama was in a meeting at the White House with Panetta & the head of the Joint Chiefs.
You know this because , despite you numerous lies, you read that time line I posted earlier. The one you now claim never to have seen.
Yet you still are running in circles waving your arms & screaming "Where was Obama" "where was Obama". We;ll Dickbreath, if you bothered to even read some of your own GD posts, you admitted where he was. In that meeting.
That same time line that you refuse to acknowledge, said there were two attacks.
But hey, don't let facts get in the way of your immense stupidity. Dumbass.
A time line consists of multiple times through a period of time.
ONE F**K*NG TIME DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TIME LINE, YOU GODDAM IDIOT.
The battle was over 7 hours long.
Where was Obama during the battle?
A "meeting"?
A 7-hour meeting?
The real-time video was being watched in the White House.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the real time video was being watched in the White House?
The answer: Watching the real-time video with Panetta and the head of the Joint Chiefs.
Do you know what you are saying?
Orders came from the White House for the AC-130 and Force Recon Marines to disregard their default orders they were prepositioned with specifically to respond to an attack specifically in Libya specifically on the embassy.
Obama was the senior person present. Therefore, Obama was the ONLY person who could have given those orders.
I've got another question. Why didn't Panetta mention this in his testimony?
According to his testimony, he was the senior person at that time. That means Obama wasn't with him.
So, you say Obama was with Panetta, and Panetta says he was the senior person there.
One of you is lying.
Either Obama gave the orders to hang the Americans in Libya out to dry while he watched Al Qaeda kill them on the live video feed, or he wasn't even there.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#859639 Feb 14, 2013
Old Crazy Goober wrote:
Left-wing Group FreedomWorks' Creepiness Extends to Simulated Alligator Sex With Hillary Clinton
you wanna go? ok goober.

The anti-masturbation, pro-bestiality Tea Party Movement has arrived!

http://www.openleft.com/diary/20158/the-antim...

you couldn't make that one up.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#859640 Feb 14, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
here's the post again:
Pentagon Time Line.
Read it.
at 11:00 PM Benghai time, an hour & 20 minutes after the attack began, Obama was in a meeting at the White House with Panetta & the head of the Joint Chiefs.
You know this because , despite you numerous lies, you read that time line I posted earlier. The one you now claim never to have seen.
Yet you still are running in circles waving your arms & screaming "Where was Obama" "where was Obama". We;ll Dickbreath, if you bothered to even read some of your own GD posts, you admitted where he was. In that meeting.
That same time line that you refuse to acknowledge, said there were two attacks.
But hey, don't let facts get in the way of your immense stupidity. Dumbass.
A time line consists of multiple times through a period of time.
ONE F**K*NG TIME DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TIME LINE, YOU GODDAM IDIOT.
The battle was over 7 hours long.
Where was Obama during the battle?
A "meeting"?
A 7-hour meeting?
The real-time video was being watched in the White House.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the real time video was being watched in the White House?
The answer: Watching the real-time video with Panetta and the head of the Joint Chiefs.
Do you know what you are saying?
Orders came from the White House for the AC-130 and Force Recon Marines to disregard their default orders they were prepositioned with specifically to respond to an attack specifically in Libya specifically on the embassy.
Obama was the senior person present. Therefore, Obama was the ONLY person who could have given those orders.
I've got another question. Why didn't Panetta mention this in his testimony?
According to his testimony, he was the senior person at that time. That means Obama wasn't with him.
So, you say Obama was with Panetta, and Panetta says he was the senior person there.
One of you is lying.
Either Obama gave the orders to hang the Americans in Libya out to dry while he watched Al Qaeda kill them on the live video feed, or he wasn't even there.
Nuculur is stuck in Jamie Foxx mode and will apologize for the Jerk-In-Chief until his last odorous breath.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#859641 Feb 14, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Truth is stranger than fiction.
...and yet, under this Jerk-In-Chief, fiction is more popular....
Truth is stranger than fiction....
I know that is what gets me too.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#859642 Feb 14, 2013
Oh and make April 15th just another spring day.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#859645 Feb 14, 2013
A nanocopter camera that follows you around, streaming video to your smartphone
Arch Villain Private Dick

Orlando, FL

#859646 Feb 14, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you choose to be so vulgar?
Because the alternative is to be like you and regress to the point where you abbreviate or hint at the filth you're trying to convey instead of just coming right out and saying what you mean. GFY means, "go fuck yourself," and this is the same expression used by Dick Cheney and John Boehner most recently. These prominent conservative notables did not resort to childish hints at what they were trying to say, they just came right out and said it. They came right out and said it because that's how adults on this planet talk nowadays. The fact that you can't wrap your head around that fact indicates your dick is an inch and half long and your balls have shriveled away to invisibility. How vulgar is that, dickless?
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#859647 Feb 14, 2013
flack wrote:
A nanocopter camera that follows you around, streaming video to your smartphone
so you can see what you're looking at?

?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 10 min wojar 179,280
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 29 min RJS 7,820
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 35 min Eric 69,980
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 56 min Grau 68,636
Remember Quantitative Easing?..................... 1 hr Go Blue Forever 3
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr HAHAHA 50,595
last post wins! (Apr '13) 1 hr Hatti_Hollerand 350
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]