Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Comments (Page 39,559)

Showing posts 791,161 - 791,180 of1,033,692
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858040
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

17

16

16

Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Gagagoogoolalacacabazookamooka
lily...Occupy Movement and Socialists demand more government. Government Cops happy to oblige.

Isn't it funny how red, white and blue represent freedom and patriotism to liberals...until they're flashing gestapo behind you? YES...lily is that stupid.
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858041
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

16

16

16

N Y Post hahahahahahah
Jane Says wrote:
'Work, the only Answer...continued...
...The conventional wisdom is that those reforms shifted the paradigm once and for all. Not so. Though welfare proved the signal failure of the redistributionist vision, it was only one of the redistribution schemes.
Disability insurance also assists those otherwise without income. In the past 30 years, the number of people on disability has skyrocketed, while medical care has significantly improved. A significant body of research shows that the increase of the disability rolls is in large part due to scamming the system and an easing of eligibility requirements.
According to Nicholas Eberstadt’s “A Nation of Takers ,” in 1960, only 0.65% of the working-age population was receiving disability; that compares with 5.6% today. Additionally, the government has become much more lenient in its definition of “disabled,” making it harder to bar undeserving applicants.
And what of the poverty programs we so bitterly fought for? There is precious little to show for the trillions spent over half a century. Even programs proven to have failed, like job/skill training programs and Head Start — where the Department of Health and Human Services’ own studies show minimal gains for recipients after a year out of the program — continue to garner wide support.
We should have known all along: Work is the optimal solution. Why? Work maximizes a person’s capacity to achieve economic self-reliance. Work socializes people and instills a sense of personal responsibility. Work connects behavior with consequences and permits people to earn the admiration and respect of their spouses and children by supporting them.
None of this is accomplished by handouts or by government-run programs.
My nearly 50 years in the fight against poverty have led me to a radical proposal that could do much to lessen poverty while also saving the nation trillions of dollars: End all welfare and poverty programs — except the Earned Income Tax Credit, which incentivizes work — and use the money saved to create jobs, by the millions, for the disadvantaged.
The first attempt would be to find private-sector work through wage subsidies to employers. If this is not possible, a job in the public sector would be temporarily created. These jobs would involve public works, such as repairing infrastructure around the U.S.
Ideally, 11 million such jobs would be created, bringing workforce levels and unemployment back to normal levels.
Along these lines, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s programs created more than 11 million jobs in 8 years. America’s population has since doubled. Through receiving a paycheck for work, millions more Americans would be paying taxes, not taking.
Poverty solved. Unnecessary dependence eliminated. Billions saved.
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/work-answe...

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858042
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

http://newsok.com/president-barack-obama-has-...

He fails to support unity.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858043
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

17

17

17

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the "Super Barny" theory. Where a fat gay man destroyed the county from a minority position in the House.
You are a liar. in 2003, the Democrats did not want an increase in oversight. Not no oversight.
Why do I need to subsidize your salary?
You really are dumb. Let's go over this again....

The Republicans controlled the House and Senate.
The Republicans wanted the Democrats to support the war in Iraq.
The Democrats wanted no effective oversight of their Marxist CRA program that was an obvious failure even in 2003.

Now, pay close attention here. You may need to write this down if you can't remember it.

The Demcorats traded their support for the war in Iraq in exchange for the Republicans ignoring the fact that the CRA was an obvious failure and a threat to the economy and virtually eliminated any oversight of the Democrats' Marxist CRA program.

I do hope you have the ability to read and comprehend the English language....

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858044
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

17

17

17

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I knew you wre too stupid to read about that timeline.
Give us the time line, idiot.
Post that time line here. Tell us what happened. Put your bullshit here on the board for everyone to read.
Don't forget to put in all caps when the spontaneous demonstration that Obama lied about for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States happened.

Here's the post for your convenient reference again:

One of the questions still not answered:
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on the live video feed?
And, why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
It is obvious that the Al Qaeda attack in Benghazi was the result of a sophisticated plan.
The Al Qaeda assault on the location where the American ambassador was seemed to be intended to kidnap the American ambassador, not kill him. Stevens died of smoke inhalation when Al Qaeda attempted to smoke him out of a room instead of blowing the doors off and lighting him up with their AKs.
There was another Al Qaeda team prepositioned for an ambush to repulse the Americans that would respond to the initial assault on the location where they were attempting to kidnap Stevens. When it was obvious there would not be an assault on the Al Qaeda team attempting to kidnap the American ambassador, the Al Qaeda team responsible for ambushing the American relief force repositioned and attacked the subject team they initially intended to ambush at the location the American security team never left because they received orders to not assist the American ambassador.
And the White House watched this on real-time video.
Which leads to many other questions.... like:
Why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up an Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Somewhere in there is Americans seeking permission to attack Al Qaeda and being told to stand down, and Americans asking "where the f**k is the Specter" knowing it was on station and should have been blowing away the Al Qaeda mortors they were lighting up, before Al Qaeda finally zeroed in on them and killed them.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House hung the Americans out to dry and watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real-time video feed?
Why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858045
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

16

16

16

Voters did not fall
for this line of Malarky
in the
2012
Election
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You really are dumb. Let's go over this again....
The Republicans controlled the House and Senate.
The Republicans wanted the Democrats to support the war in Iraq.
The Democrats wanted no effective oversight of their Marxist CRA program that was an obvious failure even in 2003.
Now, pay close attention here. You may need to write this down if you can't remember it.
The Demcorats traded their support for the war in Iraq in exchange for the Republicans ignoring the fact that the CRA was an obvious failure and a threat to the economy and virtually eliminated any oversight of the Democrats' Marxist CRA program.
I do hope you have the ability to read and comprehend the English language....

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858046
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

17

17

17

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
This is what I love about you pathetic right whiners.
You would throw money down the drain because you were duped by your own party.
A geothermal ground loop HVAC system can pay for itself in 8 years without any tax credits.
Then after that, its money your pocket.
But hey, remain stupid. You people are good at it.
I suppose you're taliking about the inversion that occurs at about 72 degrees.
To cool a house, heat has to be removed from the house and dissipated into the geologic member.
Here's where you loose all contact with the real world.

When a cluster of houses are dissipating heat into a single geologic member, the temperature of that geologic member rises. Ultimately, there will be no cooling effect after sufficient heat has been dissipated from the cluster of houses into the geologic member for the closed system to reach an equilibrium temperature.

You are an uneducated fool, and indicative of the loonacy coming out of this administration. Any engineer knows this.

However, for an isolated dwelling, the heat dissipated can be transferred through mass transfer in the geologic member at the rate of aquifer replinishment due to aquifer drainage into the geology down-dip.
This places a constraint on the size of the structure dissipating heat.

Nothing is free... even in the laws of physics.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858048
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

14

14

14

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Look it up. Maybe you can be informed. Pentagon timeline Benghazi. Really even a dumbasss like you can look it up.
You have proof it was Al Qaeda? Of course not. To a dumbass like you all terrorists are Al Qaeda.
You forgot to post that timeline again, dufus.
Post your timeline here for us to read. All you ahve to do is copy and paste it.
Post your bullshit for us to read.

It's put up or shut up time, idiot.

Since: Nov 09

Alamo, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858049
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

14

14

14

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Give us the time line, idiot.
Post that time line here. Tell us what happened. Put your bullshit here on the board for everyone to read.
Don't forget to put in all caps when the spontaneous demonstration that Obama lied about for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States happened.
Here's the post for your convenient reference again:
One of the questions still not answered:
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on the live video feed?
And, why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
It is obvious that the Al Qaeda attack in Benghazi was the result of a sophisticated plan.
The Al Qaeda assault on the location where the American ambassador was seemed to be intended to kidnap the American ambassador, not kill him. Stevens died of smoke inhalation when Al Qaeda attempted to smoke him out of a room instead of blowing the doors off and lighting him up with their AKs.
There was another Al Qaeda team prepositioned for an ambush to repulse the Americans that would respond to the initial assault on the location where they were attempting to kidnap Stevens. When it was obvious there would not be an assault on the Al Qaeda team attempting to kidnap the American ambassador, the Al Qaeda team responsible for ambushing the American relief force repositioned and attacked the subject team they initially intended to ambush at the location the American security team never left because they received orders to not assist the American ambassador.
And the White House watched this on real-time video.
Which leads to many other questions.... like:
Why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up an Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Somewhere in there is Americans seeking permission to attack Al Qaeda and being told to stand down, and Americans asking "where the f**k is the Specter" knowing it was on station and should have been blowing away the Al Qaeda mortors they were lighting up, before Al Qaeda finally zeroed in on them and killed them.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House hung the Americans out to dry and watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real-time video feed?
Why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Perseveration in schizophrenia.
Crider A. Source Dept. of Psychology, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.
Abstract:
Perseveration in schizophrenia may take a variety of forms, which can be conceptualized as varying manifestations of an underlying neurocognitive deficit. Comparative studies have demonstrated higher than normal levels of perseverative responding among schizophrenia patients on capacity-demanding tasks, including prompted discourse, reversal learning, and the generation of guessing sequences. There is little evidence that perseveration is associated with deficit signs of schizophrenia. However, perseveration appears to covary with both positive thought disorder and voluntary motor disturbance. Perseveration in schizophrenia thus appears to be a productive sign elicited by a failure to mobilize cognitive resources in situations requiring controlled information processing and the concomitant inhibition of activated but task-inappropriate responses. An information-proces sing model proposed by Shallice (1988) attributes perseveration to a failure of a higher level executive control system to modulate a lower level response selection system under a requirement for novel response generation. This model suggests that perseveration is the consequence of a failure of frontal specification of striatal outputs during controlled processing, resulting in the continued reselection of previously activated outputs

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858050
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

14

14

13

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Give us the time line, idiot.
Post that time line here. Tell us what happened. Put your bullshit here on the board for everyone to read.
Don't forget to put in all caps when the spontaneous demonstration that Obama lied about for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States happened.
Here's the post for your convenient reference again:
One of the questions still not answered:
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on the live video feed?
And, why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
It is obvious that the Al Qaeda attack in Benghazi was the result of a sophisticated plan.
The Al Qaeda assault on the location where the American ambassador was seemed to be intended to kidnap the American ambassador, not kill him. Stevens died of smoke inhalation when Al Qaeda attempted to smoke him out of a room instead of blowing the doors off and lighting him up with their AKs.
There was another Al Qaeda team prepositioned for an ambush to repulse the Americans that would respond to the initial assault on the location where they were attempting to kidnap Stevens. When it was obvious there would not be an assault on the Al Qaeda team attempting to kidnap the American ambassador, the Al Qaeda team responsible for ambushing the American relief force repositioned and attacked the subject team they initially intended to ambush at the location the American security team never left because they received orders to not assist the American ambassador.
And the White House watched this on real-time video.
Which leads to many other questions.... like:
Why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up an Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Somewhere in there is Americans seeking permission to attack Al Qaeda and being told to stand down, and Americans asking "where the f**k is the Specter" knowing it was on station and should have been blowing away the Al Qaeda mortors they were lighting up, before Al Qaeda finally zeroed in on them and killed them.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House hung the Americans out to dry and watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real-time video feed?
Why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
I posted the time line at least 6 GD times tin the past 4 weeks.

You were too f*cking stupid to read it then so you are likely too stupid to read it now.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858051
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

13

OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
Perseveration in schizophrenia.
Crider A. Source Dept. of Psychology, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.
Abstract:
Perseveration in schizophrenia may take a variety of forms, which can be conceptualized as varying manifestations of an underlying neurocognitive deficit. Comparative studies have demonstrated higher than normal levels of perseverative responding among schizophrenia patients on capacity-demanding tasks, including prompted discourse, reversal learning, and the generation of guessing sequences. There is little evidence that perseveration is associated with deficit signs of schizophrenia. However, perseveration appears to covary with both positive thought disorder and voluntary motor disturbance. Perseveration in schizophrenia thus appears to be a productive sign elicited by a failure to mobilize cognitive resources in situations requiring controlled information processing and the concomitant inhibition of activated but task-inappropriate responses. An information-proces sing model proposed by Shallice (1988) attributes perseveration to a failure of a higher level executive control system to modulate a lower level response selection system under a requirement for novel response generation. This model suggests that perseveration is the consequence of a failure of frontal specification of striatal outputs during controlled processing, resulting in the continued reselection of previously activated outputs
How many times have you been told to stop your self-diagnosis. Let the professionals do that for you.
I'm thinking the diagnosis from them will include the word "projection".
Jane Says

New York, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858052
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

13

Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh oh, janesays is getting evicted. Look out homeless people!
if i lived in Boca Boca Porpoise Spit, i would never about being homeless. your tireless work,hospitality and sharing of your home with the less fortunate is so commendable. no one suffers when Lily is around. and with all that, you manage to post on Topix 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. you're a regular Mother Theresa and proof that liberals always put their money where their mouths are.
Jane Says

New York, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858053
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

13

Lincoln wrote:
Voters did not fall
for this line of Malarky
in the
2012
Election
<quoted text>
no, most were totally engrossed in the premiere episode of Honey Boo Boo.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858054
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

13

Nj raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> It's public knowledge that Clinton left a 5/6 trillion dollar surplus. Are you denying that? My post had nothing to do with the democrats & everything to do with the contrast between President Obama & bush. Are you denying the 7 attacks under bush & dozens killed? Are you denying bush's motives behind the iraqi invasion? Are yiu denying that bush lied about wmds & I dont want to her nothing about Valerie Plame, Dick Cheney, or anyone else. Bush was president! Why do you describe it as Obama's government, then turn around & put the blame on the democrats under bush's gov't? Don't pick through the post & try & find grounds to stand on. You've asked your question 100 times now it's your turn to answer some questions!
Oh, my God. And I was thinking reality-challenged dave was the most ignorant person here.

Here's a link for you to acquire factual information about spending, defits and the total public debt:

http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/

In that source of factual information, you will see that the total public debt at the end of Clinton's tenure was 5 trillion dollars.
Jane Says

New York, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858055
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

13

13

13

Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
President Obama 50.5 % of the popular vote
Gov. Romney 47 %
Republican House approval rating 7%
President Obama approval rating 58%
yes, it was a great day for The Takers. if Obama ran for President of Greece or Zimbabwe, he would have won more of the popular vote.
Nj raider 1

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858056
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You really are dumb. Let's go over this again....
The Republicans controlled the House and Senate.
The Republicans wanted the Democrats to support the war in Iraq.
The Democrats wanted no effective oversight of their Marxist CRA program that was an obvious failure even in 2003.
Now, pay close attention here. You may need to write this down if you can't remember it.
The Demcorats traded their support for the war in Iraq in exchange for the Republicans ignoring the fact that the CRA was an obvious failure and a threat to the economy and virtually eliminated any oversight of the Democrats' Marxist CRA program.
I do hope you have the ability to read and comprehend the English language....
Need I post it again or are you going to answer damn questions? You spent 2months posting the same 2 questions which were answered numerous times & even started out this morning with 1 of those lame questions. Do you or dont you have an answer to the questions posed to you DB Almighty?

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858057
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

11

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose you're taliking about the inversion that occurs at about 72 degrees.
To cool a house, heat has to be removed from the house and dissipated into the geologic member.
Here's where you loose all contact with the real world.
When a cluster of houses are dissipating heat into a single geologic member, the temperature of that geologic member rises. Ultimately, there will be no cooling effect after sufficient heat has been dissipated from the cluster of houses into the geologic member for the closed system to reach an equilibrium temperature.
You are an uneducated fool, and indicative of the loonacy coming out of this administration. Any engineer knows this.
However, for an isolated dwelling, the heat dissipated can be transferred through mass transfer in the geologic member at the rate of aquifer replinishment due to aquifer drainage into the geology down-dip.
This places a constraint on the size of the structure dissipating heat.
Nothing is free... even in the laws of physics.
Well, well,well, the pretend geologist proves once again he is either no geologist or the dumbest f*cking geologist on the planet.

There are commercial buildings with a grids of 300 to 500 holes up to 500 foot deep. Holes are around 15' apart. They have been studied & tested & they prove you to be wrong.

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858058
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose you're taliking about the inversion that occurs at about 72 degrees.
To cool a house, heat has to be removed from the house and dissipated into the geologic member.
Here's where you loose all contact with the real world.
When a cluster of houses are dissipating heat into a single geologic member, the temperature of that geologic member rises. Ultimately, there will be no cooling effect after sufficient heat has been dissipated from the cluster of houses into the geologic member for the closed system to reach an equilibrium temperature.
You are an uneducated fool, and indicative of the loonacy coming out of this administration. Any engineer knows this.
However, for an isolated dwelling, the heat dissipated can be transferred through mass transfer in the geologic member at the rate of aquifer replinishment due to aquifer drainage into the geology down-dip.
This places a constraint on the size of the structure dissipating heat.
Nothing is free... even in the laws of physics.
This is entirely true. Nothing is free. Positronium will be the last atom in existance in the very far future and even that will come at great cost.
Jane Says

New York, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858059
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't wait to read your reaction!! Is he weatherboarding himself?
If the next pope is black or Spanish, jane'll totally go batshit kerraaazzy
it is so exciting. i don't mind as long as they don't dumb down the Pope Test and switch the mass to Ebonics or start sacrificing goats on the altar. and, you'll have a hell of a good time making the affirmative action ambulance chaser change from wearing his Treyvon hoodie to bed to wearing papal robes. maybe he'll come home this weekend and you'll finally have something (or someone) to do.
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#858060
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I posted the time line at least 6 GD times tin the past 4 weeks.
You were too f*cking stupid to read it then so you are likely too stupid to read it now.
another republican troll ...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 791,161 - 791,180 of1,033,692
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

72 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 15 min Sublime1 96,093
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 15 min Poppo 167,531
Amy 4-18 23 min j_m_w 26
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 26 min Eric 65,113
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr Uzi 67,188
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr CDC 47,054
Abby 4-17 1 hr Mister Tonka 44
•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••