Barack Obama, our next President

[ShuddupDickwad]

DBWriter wrote:

correction typo
What does an employer want more than anything else from an employee?

To see her tits. Or to show his to her.

[Jane Says]

No Surprize wrote:

<quoted text>Bush couldn't waterboard terrorist, but obama can kill American citizens.

I mostly agree with what Obama is doing, except the killing of American citizens needs to have some checks and balances. Ralph Peters said it best:

'Bam’s wise kill-don’t-capture rule
Posted: 10:39 PM, February 6, 2013

Americans who believe America’s always wrong are all but fainting this week. More evidence emerged, in the form of a leaked Justice Department white paper on targeted killings, that their president doesn’t share the belief that Islamist terrorists deserve all the rights and protections accorded American citizens, as well as catered halal diets, ObamaCare and Social Security benefits.

Let’s get one thing straight: The right of a state and its people to self-defense trumps every other aspect of international law, treaties and practices. The foundation of the moral legitimacy of the state is its role in protecting its citizens from violence, foreign or domestic. All else is secondary.

When attacked, we may do whatever it takes to defend ourselves. We have been attacked, repeatedly, by Islamist terrorists. And the fellow believers of those who attacked us publicly, regularly and venomously announce that they intend to attack us again.

It’s not only our government’s right, but its duty, to kill them before they harm us.

[Nj raider 1]

Truth is no SIN wrote:

Carson encouraged discussion about societal issues, also pointing out education as an essential conundrum the country needs to confront. He highlighted his own path from poverty to success, sharing very personal details about his parents and early family life and subsequently described the importance of helping students seeking to advance academically through his Carson Scholars Fund.
The speech took an interesting turn when the doctor cautioned that moral decay and fiscal irresponsibility can have dire consequences — even for powerful countries like America. Here, he became even more pointed and impassioned.
“I think particularly about ancient Rome. Very powerful — nobody could even challenge them militarily…they destroyed themselves from within,” Carson continued.“Moral decay. Fiscal irresponsibility.”
While he said America’s issues are dire, he was positive that the nation can fix its ways, as there are bright and innovative people who simply need to come together to address the problems at hand.
“And one of our big problems right now…our deficit is a big problem,” he said, as Obama watched him intently.”Think about it — and our national debt —$16 and a half trillion dollars.”
JIM CROW KKK LIB DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING TO TAKE OUR FREEDOMS AWAY FOR PEOPLE WHO ENTER THE COUNTRY BY BREAKING THE LAW, A GAY AGENDA AN ANTI PEOPLE OF COLOR POLICY, HE VIOLATES HUMAN RIGHTS AROUND THE WORLD WITH THE SAME GEORGE BUSH REASONS HE IS A CRIMINAL BARAK OBAMA CARPETBAGGER NO HISTORY IN THE BLACK COMMUNITY NON

Do you ready believe that reading history books can solve today's problem? Had President Obama went into office with a black agenda, people like you would've been his biggest obsticle in opposition with everything he would try & accomplish, not to mention the fact that he would've f cked it up for any furore black person to run for office. There's a such thing as being educated but stupid. You fit both criteria to the T! Your hate for the blackman in charge Darkens your vision like tented windows. You see a shadow over the President in whatever he does. You would talk shyt if he had a black agenda, yet you blame him for not having 1. Can't win for losing in your eyes. Whats crazy is, you don't even notice that you often talk in circles!

[Eman]

Nuculur option wrote:

You're the only one who mntioned 'occupation'.
Yoiu really don't even understand the conversation, do you??
As usual, you just come here to make stupid
<quoted text>

Wrong. Just ask tenzing.

[John Galt]

Realtime wrote:

<quoted text>He was lying then as you are now.
Enbridge

http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman...

"Taylor has crunched the numbers and determined that these elements mean the true cost of wind power is more like double the advertised numbers.

He explains that he started with 8.2 cents per kWh, reflecting total installation costs of $2,000 per kw of capacity. Then backed out an assumed 30-year lifespan for the turbines (optimistic), which increases the cost to 9.3 cents per kwh. Then after backing out the effect of subsidies allowing accelerated depreciation for wind investments you get 10.1 cents. Next, add the costs of keeping gas-fired plants available, but running at reduced capacity, to balance the variable performance of wind — 1.7 cents. Extra fuel for those plants adds another 0.6 cents. Finally, tack on 2.7 cents for new transmission line investments needed to get new wind power to market. The whole shebang adds up to 15 cents per kwh.

Ouch.

As Taylor figures it, natural gas would need to cost upwards of $20 per mmBTU before gas-fired power would cost as much as wind."

[Homer 2016]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
American football is without a doubt my favorite sport.
What do you think Alex Smith is going to do?
And, Matt Flynn?
I think those two are the biggest chips in the free agent market now. Houston needs a different quarterback. Shaub isn't bad, but there are better QBs available.
And, I expect Sean Payton to make a really big stsatement to Roger Goodell. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Saints and 49ers play for the NFC championship.
I've always like the Giants, all the way back to the days of Y A Tittle and Fran Tarkenton. I really had them picked early in the season to be in the NFC championship game.
I'm an LSU fan. But, with Les Miles, LSU will never win another championship. And, they just gave him a 7-year extension. I don't think I'll even watch college football until Les Miles goes.

Dunno where Smith and Flynn might be going, I suppose of they let Vick go then they might bring in one or the other in Philly to fight for the job, I think Flynn has the better upside, I was never sold on Smith and apparently neither was Harbaugh. I am starting to agree on Schaub, he's had plenty of chances to shine but can't seem to get it done. I expect the Giants will be better next year along with the Saints, Payton is one of the best coaches out there. I think Washington sinks back to the bottom with RG3 out for an extended time and the Cowboys will never win with Romo. I don't follow college as much, try and see most of the Rutgers games though. Am disappointed with the lack of good bowl games all day long on New Year's Day, that was a great tradition.

[Eman]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
Why??
He didn't kill anyone, except inthe minds of nitwits.
Show me the charges and results of the murder trial or STFU, dummy.
You like changing the subject when your ignorance traps you.

You're right. The water did. I forgot to think like a liberal.

[flack]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Can't have a black man like Carson who strays off the plantation. Carson better watch out or some "high-ranking government official" may decide to take him out with a drone.

Drives them bat shit crazy doesn't it? LMAO!!!

[Forum]

Not Surprized wrote:

<quoted text>
Subversive Barry wrote:
<quoted text>
What a rediculous thing to say. You obviously are deficient in this area.
nostrilis waxman wrote:
another rediculous assert by a clueless moron:
<quoted text>
Nostrilis Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
What is it like being dead Ghost?
You may do things on rare occassions but you live here. I feel sorry for you.
What is it like? Do you feel dead?
#632047
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
He lives here just like the Ghost does.
Tell me. What is it like being dead?

The Apocalypse
Chapter 14
13 And I heard a voice from heaven, saying to me
: Write : Blessed are the dead, who die in the Lord.
From henceforth now, saith the Spirit, that they may rest from
their labours ; for their works follow them.

[John Galt]

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>Ameican Left wouldnt do that which Nazism is no where close to American New Left in Ideaology which is a whole different of thinking.
Nazism (German: Nationalsozialismus; English long form National Socialism) was the ideology of the Nazi Party in Germany and related movements outside Germany. It is a variety of fascism that incorporates biological racism and antisemitism.
Nazism developed in Germany from the influence of the FAR-RIGHT racist Völkisch German nationalist movement and the anti-communist Freikorps paramilitary culture
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism

You can post all the Wikipedia opinion (not fact) that you want, but it doesn't change the fact the the American left presently sides with those who are dedicated to killing all Jews.

[Eman]

Nuculur option wrote:

Isn't that sweet!!
We've a budding romance between two of the most clueless on Topix.
And they share an obsession!!
Their gutter level hatred towards Lily and Leosnana, who regularly make them look the fools they are.
So when ya packin' and moving to KY, Emaam??
A great chance to get away from the liberals that control your overtaxed state!! Get away from the Stench the Niners left!!
She'll teach you to make shake n' bake!!
HAHAHAHAHA
----------
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Cut leo some slack. She's admitted to being OCD, she just has never admitted to getting help for it.
<quoted text>

You're starting to lose it, nuc. Maybe time for a break?

[Jane Says]

What about about the thug-huggers’ concerns?
Dissect the issues, 1 by 1:

Kill, don’t capture. We owe America’s lefties a big wet kiss for forcing the Obama administration into this highly effective policy. By making a cause celebre out of the imaginary suffering of blood-drenched terrorists at Gitmo, they inspired candidate Obama to promise to close the facility within the 1ST year of his presidency.

But no can do. Gitmo’s still open & not just because Congress wouldn’t let him close it. Our legal system benefits terrorists; they’re briefed on how to beat our laws. So President Obama & Co. figured out fast that captured terrorists are another “unfunded liability.” In office, Obama also learned that the terrorists aren’t kidding. The obvious answer? Just kill ’em.

Thank you, left-wing champions of injustice!

But killing terrorists only makes them martyrs. Hogwash. The opposite’s true. Imprison a terrorist & you WILL make him a martyr. Kill him & he’s dead.

Nobody’s attacking us in the name of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi these days (remember the Butcher of Baghdad?) & when terrorists seized a remote natural-gas facility in Algeria last mo., they weren’t yelling,“Remember Osama bin Laden!”

Instead, they demanded the release of the “Blind Sheik,” the mastermind of the 1ST Twin Towers attack, from a US prison.

Misplaced mercy inspires more attacks but killing terrorists deprives us of intelligence. As a former intel officer, I have some theoretical sympathy with this point but given our hopelessly prissy rules for interrogation today, there would be 0 value in taking even top terrorists prisoner.(Obama didn’t even try to capture Osama.) They follow our politics & policies & know that a CIA interrogator can’t lay a glove on them without going to jail.

By insisting that we had to treat captured terrorists like prep-school kids caught in a food fight, leftists forced Obama to send in the drones. The result is that “core al Qaeda” has been rendered ineffectual.

But no president should murder American citizens. Tell it to Abe Lincoln, Hollywood’s celebrity-president of the season, who invaded the South (which had not even threatened acts of terror).
The result? Perhaps 750,000 dead Americans. I believe Lincoln was our greatest president after Washington, but he wasn’t just about emancipation.

Our president has the authority to quell insurrections by force. American-born terrorists engage in insurrection. Case closed.
Consider the late Anwar al-Awlaki. Lefties argue he didn’t pose a sufficient threat to merit killing. Really? Here’s a traitor who joined our most virulent enemies & used his knowledge of our country to encourage, plan & facilitate attacks. His guilt was greater than that of some poor sap who strapped on a suicide bomb —just as crime bosses bear a heavier guilt than their trigger-men.

& if a foreign power can’t or won’t control its own territory, we have a legal right to intervene under the accepted conventions of warfare.

The same principle applies as in police work: If a criminal points a gun & won’t drop it, you shoot him. Awlaki could’ve saved his life by abjuring terrorism. Instead, he took his 16-year-old son along to make war on America. Then we got “outrage” over the boy’s death in a drone strike. Well, daddy shouldn’t have taken the kid on jihad.

This is not a difficult issue: When Americans turn violently against the United States, they lose the benefits of citizenship. When German-Americans served in Hitler’s military in World War II, we didn’t call a pre-battle time-out so American traitors could identify themselves and lawyer up.

But ... but ... the drone program’s counter-productive ...
No, the drone program’s the ONLY Obama-era policy that works.

Bam’s wise kill-don’t-capture rule - NYPOST.com http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolu...

[Eman]

Nuculur option wrote:

TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Hag face must've been talking about herself, to herself again?
Sorry I missed the anTICS lol.(NOT)
<quoted text>
I guess sharing an obsession is enough to start a romance between these two nitwits, eh??

How many posts until this becomes an obsession? You're sure are a bitter little feller today.

[Homer 2016]

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, that scent is the exhaust from the old truck used to deliver the mail out to you hill billies.

Could be, I think they have one of those pine trees hanging from their mirror. You can't throw a rock out by me without hitting a hillbilly sorta like this thread.

[Homer 2016]

Realtime wrote:

The NE blizzard conditions are apparently playing havoc with this thread (topix #1 btw) shutting down East coast and, cough, West coast posters alike.
Oh Well
Time Magazine has pronounced Marco aka Mark Rubio the GOP savior__they also loved Jindal and of course Rand Paul. This love affair too will pass right after Marco shows his stuff as head rebutter to Obama's state of the union address.
Drone hearings are beginning presently for those that like their info first hand.

They were calling for 4 to 10, they just upped it to 10 - 16 inches of snow. Guess I know what I will be doing on Saturday morning, Homer clears his driveway the old fashioned way, with a shovel. Anybody have the number for FEMA?

[Truth is no SIN]

Nj raider 1 wrote:

<quoted text>Do you ready believe that reading history books can solve today's problem? Had President Obama went into office with a black agenda, people like you would've been his biggest obsticle in opposition with everything he would try & accomplish, not to mention the fact that he would've f cked it up for any furore black person to run for office. There's a such thing as being educated but stupid. You fit both criteria to the T! Your hate for the blackman in charge Darkens your vision like tented windows. You see a shadow over the President in whatever he does. You would talk shyt if he had a black agenda, yet you blame him for not having 1. Can't win for losing in your eyes. Whats crazy is, you don't even notice that you often talk in circles!

LOOK YOU HAVE VERY LITTLE LOGIC YOU ARE NOT VERY BRIGHT SUCK SOME ONE ELSE NOW YOU REALLY CAN'T TURN ME ON I TRIED BUT YOU HAVE VERY LITTLE SKILLS SUCK UR ASS AWAY FROM HERE GO BACK TO SCHOOL YOU ARE A DUNCE NOBODY LIKES YOU DUNCE YOU ARE CONFUSED BECAUSE YOU DONT COMpREHEND WELL U CAN't BE USED YOU ARE USELESS no challenge in talkinging with you u boring same dum thought process I just HOPE IM not TAKING ADVANTAGE OF A TEENAGER BECAUSE THEN I WOULD FEEL LIKE *HIT ABUSING A CHILD BUT YOU PRESENT YOURSELF AS AN ENLIGHTENED GEN MOO MOO WATEVER

[Surprizedswaneen ut]

Not Surprized wrote:

I'll try this again using a different sock. Helloooo, can anyone see my posts? Hellooooo, have I been shadowbanned again?
NO one will answer me!!!! Am I in an echochamber??
HELLOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! ANYONE??????

Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO!

[Eman]

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
The natural resources should belong to the American people and profits distributed to them.

They would never get developed under you plan

[Realtime]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman...
"Taylor has crunched the numbers and determined that these elements mean the true cost of wind power is more like double the advertised numbers.
He explains that he started with 8.2 cents per kWh, reflecting total installation costs of $2,000 per kw of capacity. Then backed out an assumed 30-year lifespan for the turbines (optimistic), which increases the cost to 9.3 cents per kwh. Then after backing out the effect of subsidies allowing accelerated depreciation for wind investments you get 10.1 cents. Next, add the costs of keeping gas-fired plants available, but running at reduced capacity, to balance the variable performance of wind — 1.7 cents. Extra fuel for those plants adds another 0.6 cents. Finally, tack on 2.7 cents for new transmission line investments needed to get new wind power to market. The whole shebang adds up to 15 cents per kwh.
Ouch.
As Taylor figures it, natural gas would need to cost upwards of $20 per mmBTU before gas-fired power would cost as much as wind."

WTF is that? NG is cheap presently because it's become plentiful, that doesn't mean that the future won't include wind, solar and wave technology. And one more time the costs for electricity varies by region of the nation and then region of the globe. It ain't all about yours or Flack's self centered azzes pal, there are people in faraway places that can no longer afford electricity generated by fossil fuels__and you don't have to look very far.

[Eman]

Nuculur option wrote:

Typical of your ignorance.
Under Obama, America is producing far more oil and natural gas than ever imagined by 'oilman' Bush.
More production than in the past 15 years, in fact.
Bush and Co. were into procuring oil by invasion.
How'd that work?? They didn't get any for a Trillion Dollar war!!
Did I mention that Bush was a failure in the oil business??
<quoted text>

Oil production on federal land is down. Thank advances in fraking technology for the increase in oil production, not obama. Profits are driving technological advancements in oil production.