Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#858038 Feb 12, 2013

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Lily Boca Raton Fl

Boca Raton, FL

#858039 Feb 12, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>I haven't seen the, cough, art work yet__I'll go look later.
I was thinking maybe Spanish for the next Pope.
Can't wait to read your reaction!! Is he weatherboarding himself?

If the next pope is black or Spanish, jane'll totally go batshit kerraaazzy

Judged:

17

17

17

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#858040 Feb 12, 2013
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Gagagoogoolalacacabazookamooka
lily...Occupy Movement and Socialists demand more government. Government Cops happy to oblige.

Isn't it funny how red, white and blue represent freedom and patriotism to liberals...until they're flashing gestapo behind you? YES...lily is that stupid.

Judged:

17

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Lincoln

United States

#858041 Feb 12, 2013
N Y Post hahahahahahah
Jane Says wrote:
'Work, the only Answer...continued...
...The conventional wisdom is that those reforms shifted the paradigm once and for all. Not so. Though welfare proved the signal failure of the redistributionist vision, it was only one of the redistribution schemes.
Disability insurance also assists those otherwise without income. In the past 30 years, the number of people on disability has skyrocketed, while medical care has significantly improved. A significant body of research shows that the increase of the disability rolls is in large part due to scamming the system and an easing of eligibility requirements.
According to Nicholas Eberstadt’s “A Nation of Takers ,” in 1960, only 0.65% of the working-age population was receiving disability; that compares with 5.6% today. Additionally, the government has become much more lenient in its definition of “disabled,” making it harder to bar undeserving applicants.
And what of the poverty programs we so bitterly fought for? There is precious little to show for the trillions spent over half a century. Even programs proven to have failed, like job/skill training programs and Head Start — where the Department of Health and Human Services’ own studies show minimal gains for recipients after a year out of the program — continue to garner wide support.
We should have known all along: Work is the optimal solution. Why? Work maximizes a person’s capacity to achieve economic self-reliance. Work socializes people and instills a sense of personal responsibility. Work connects behavior with consequences and permits people to earn the admiration and respect of their spouses and children by supporting them.
None of this is accomplished by handouts or by government-run programs.
My nearly 50 years in the fight against poverty have led me to a radical proposal that could do much to lessen poverty while also saving the nation trillions of dollars: End all welfare and poverty programs — except the Earned Income Tax Credit, which incentivizes work — and use the money saved to create jobs, by the millions, for the disadvantaged.
The first attempt would be to find private-sector work through wage subsidies to employers. If this is not possible, a job in the public sector would be temporarily created. These jobs would involve public works, such as repairing infrastructure around the U.S.
Ideally, 11 million such jobs would be created, bringing workforce levels and unemployment back to normal levels.
Along these lines, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s programs created more than 11 million jobs in 8 years. America’s population has since doubled. Through receiving a paycheck for work, millions more Americans would be paying taxes, not taking.
Poverty solved. Unnecessary dependence eliminated. Billions saved.
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/work-answe...

Judged:

16

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#858042 Feb 12, 2013

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#858043 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
This is the "Super Barny" theory. Where a fat gay man destroyed the county from a minority position in the House.
You are a liar. in 2003, the Democrats did not want an increase in oversight. Not no oversight.
Why do I need to subsidize your salary?
You really are dumb. Let's go over this again....

The Republicans controlled the House and Senate.
The Republicans wanted the Democrats to support the war in Iraq.
The Democrats wanted no effective oversight of their Marxist CRA program that was an obvious failure even in 2003.

Now, pay close attention here. You may need to write this down if you can't remember it.

The Demcorats traded their support for the war in Iraq in exchange for the Republicans ignoring the fact that the CRA was an obvious failure and a threat to the economy and virtually eliminated any oversight of the Democrats' Marxist CRA program.

I do hope you have the ability to read and comprehend the English language....

Judged:

17

17

17

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#858044 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I knew you wre too stupid to read about that timeline.
Give us the time line, idiot.
Post that time line here. Tell us what happened. Put your bullshit here on the board for everyone to read.
Don't forget to put in all caps when the spontaneous demonstration that Obama lied about for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States happened.

Here's the post for your convenient reference again:

One of the questions still not answered:
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on the live video feed?
And, why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
It is obvious that the Al Qaeda attack in Benghazi was the result of a sophisticated plan.
The Al Qaeda assault on the location where the American ambassador was seemed to be intended to kidnap the American ambassador, not kill him. Stevens died of smoke inhalation when Al Qaeda attempted to smoke him out of a room instead of blowing the doors off and lighting him up with their AKs.
There was another Al Qaeda team prepositioned for an ambush to repulse the Americans that would respond to the initial assault on the location where they were attempting to kidnap Stevens. When it was obvious there would not be an assault on the Al Qaeda team attempting to kidnap the American ambassador, the Al Qaeda team responsible for ambushing the American relief force repositioned and attacked the subject team they initially intended to ambush at the location the American security team never left because they received orders to not assist the American ambassador.
And the White House watched this on real-time video.
Which leads to many other questions.... like:
Why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up an Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Somewhere in there is Americans seeking permission to attack Al Qaeda and being told to stand down, and Americans asking "where the f**k is the Specter" knowing it was on station and should have been blowing away the Al Qaeda mortors they were lighting up, before Al Qaeda finally zeroed in on them and killed them.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House hung the Americans out to dry and watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real-time video feed?
Why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?

Judged:

17

17

17

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Lincoln

United States

#858045 Feb 12, 2013
Voters did not fall
for this line of Malarky
in the
2012
Election
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You really are dumb. Let's go over this again....
The Republicans controlled the House and Senate.
The Republicans wanted the Democrats to support the war in Iraq.
The Democrats wanted no effective oversight of their Marxist CRA program that was an obvious failure even in 2003.
Now, pay close attention here. You may need to write this down if you can't remember it.
The Demcorats traded their support for the war in Iraq in exchange for the Republicans ignoring the fact that the CRA was an obvious failure and a threat to the economy and virtually eliminated any oversight of the Democrats' Marxist CRA program.
I do hope you have the ability to read and comprehend the English language....

Judged:

16

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#858046 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
This is what I love about you pathetic right whiners.
You would throw money down the drain because you were duped by your own party.
A geothermal ground loop HVAC system can pay for itself in 8 years without any tax credits.
Then after that, its money your pocket.
But hey, remain stupid. You people are good at it.
I suppose you're taliking about the inversion that occurs at about 72 degrees.
To cool a house, heat has to be removed from the house and dissipated into the geologic member.
Here's where you loose all contact with the real world.

When a cluster of houses are dissipating heat into a single geologic member, the temperature of that geologic member rises. Ultimately, there will be no cooling effect after sufficient heat has been dissipated from the cluster of houses into the geologic member for the closed system to reach an equilibrium temperature.

You are an uneducated fool, and indicative of the loonacy coming out of this administration. Any engineer knows this.

However, for an isolated dwelling, the heat dissipated can be transferred through mass transfer in the geologic member at the rate of aquifer replinishment due to aquifer drainage into the geology down-dip.
This places a constraint on the size of the structure dissipating heat.

Nothing is free... even in the laws of physics.

Judged:

17

17

17

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#858048 Feb 12, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Look it up. Maybe you can be informed. Pentagon timeline Benghazi. Really even a dumbasss like you can look it up.
You have proof it was Al Qaeda? Of course not. To a dumbass like you all terrorists are Al Qaeda.
You forgot to post that timeline again, dufus.
Post your timeline here for us to read. All you ahve to do is copy and paste it.
Post your bullshit for us to read.

It's put up or shut up time, idiot.

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#858049 Feb 12, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Give us the time line, idiot.
Post that time line here. Tell us what happened. Put your bullshit here on the board for everyone to read.
Don't forget to put in all caps when the spontaneous demonstration that Obama lied about for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States happened.
Here's the post for your convenient reference again:
One of the questions still not answered:
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on the live video feed?
And, why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
It is obvious that the Al Qaeda attack in Benghazi was the result of a sophisticated plan.
The Al Qaeda assault on the location where the American ambassador was seemed to be intended to kidnap the American ambassador, not kill him. Stevens died of smoke inhalation when Al Qaeda attempted to smoke him out of a room instead of blowing the doors off and lighting him up with their AKs.
There was another Al Qaeda team prepositioned for an ambush to repulse the Americans that would respond to the initial assault on the location where they were attempting to kidnap Stevens. When it was obvious there would not be an assault on the Al Qaeda team attempting to kidnap the American ambassador, the Al Qaeda team responsible for ambushing the American relief force repositioned and attacked the subject team they initially intended to ambush at the location the American security team never left because they received orders to not assist the American ambassador.
And the White House watched this on real-time video.
Which leads to many other questions.... like:
Why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up an Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Somewhere in there is Americans seeking permission to attack Al Qaeda and being told to stand down, and Americans asking "where the f**k is the Specter" knowing it was on station and should have been blowing away the Al Qaeda mortors they were lighting up, before Al Qaeda finally zeroed in on them and killed them.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House hung the Americans out to dry and watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real-time video feed?
Why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Perseveration in schizophrenia.
Crider A. Source Dept. of Psychology, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.
Abstract:
Perseveration in schizophrenia may take a variety of forms, which can be conceptualized as varying manifestations of an underlying neurocognitive deficit. Comparative studies have demonstrated higher than normal levels of perseverative responding among schizophrenia patients on capacity-demanding tasks, including prompted discourse, reversal learning, and the generation of guessing sequences. There is little evidence that perseveration is associated with deficit signs of schizophrenia. However, perseveration appears to covary with both positive thought disorder and voluntary motor disturbance. Perseveration in schizophrenia thus appears to be a productive sign elicited by a failure to mobilize cognitive resources in situations requiring controlled information processing and the concomitant inhibition of activated but task-inappropriate responses. An information-proces sing model proposed by Shallice (1988) attributes perseveration to a failure of a higher level executive control system to modulate a lower level response selection system under a requirement for novel response generation. This model suggests that perseveration is the consequence of a failure of frontal specification of striatal outputs during controlled processing, resulting in the continued reselection of previously activated outputs

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#858050 Feb 12, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Give us the time line, idiot.
Post that time line here. Tell us what happened. Put your bullshit here on the board for everyone to read.
Don't forget to put in all caps when the spontaneous demonstration that Obama lied about for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States happened.
Here's the post for your convenient reference again:
One of the questions still not answered:
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on the live video feed?
And, why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
It is obvious that the Al Qaeda attack in Benghazi was the result of a sophisticated plan.
The Al Qaeda assault on the location where the American ambassador was seemed to be intended to kidnap the American ambassador, not kill him. Stevens died of smoke inhalation when Al Qaeda attempted to smoke him out of a room instead of blowing the doors off and lighting him up with their AKs.
There was another Al Qaeda team prepositioned for an ambush to repulse the Americans that would respond to the initial assault on the location where they were attempting to kidnap Stevens. When it was obvious there would not be an assault on the Al Qaeda team attempting to kidnap the American ambassador, the Al Qaeda team responsible for ambushing the American relief force repositioned and attacked the subject team they initially intended to ambush at the location the American security team never left because they received orders to not assist the American ambassador.
And the White House watched this on real-time video.
Which leads to many other questions.... like:
Why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up an Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
Somewhere in there is Americans seeking permission to attack Al Qaeda and being told to stand down, and Americans asking "where the f**k is the Specter" knowing it was on station and should have been blowing away the Al Qaeda mortors they were lighting up, before Al Qaeda finally zeroed in on them and killed them.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the White House hung the Americans out to dry and watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real-time video feed?
Why did Obama lie for two weeks covering up the Al Qaeda attack on the United States?
I posted the time line at least 6 GD times tin the past 4 weeks.

You were too f*cking stupid to read it then so you are likely too stupid to read it now.

Judged:

14

14

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#858051 Feb 12, 2013
OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
Perseveration in schizophrenia.
Crider A. Source Dept. of Psychology, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267, USA.
Abstract:
Perseveration in schizophrenia may take a variety of forms, which can be conceptualized as varying manifestations of an underlying neurocognitive deficit. Comparative studies have demonstrated higher than normal levels of perseverative responding among schizophrenia patients on capacity-demanding tasks, including prompted discourse, reversal learning, and the generation of guessing sequences. There is little evidence that perseveration is associated with deficit signs of schizophrenia. However, perseveration appears to covary with both positive thought disorder and voluntary motor disturbance. Perseveration in schizophrenia thus appears to be a productive sign elicited by a failure to mobilize cognitive resources in situations requiring controlled information processing and the concomitant inhibition of activated but task-inappropriate responses. An information-proces sing model proposed by Shallice (1988) attributes perseveration to a failure of a higher level executive control system to modulate a lower level response selection system under a requirement for novel response generation. This model suggests that perseveration is the consequence of a failure of frontal specification of striatal outputs during controlled processing, resulting in the continued reselection of previously activated outputs
How many times have you been told to stop your self-diagnosis. Let the professionals do that for you.
I'm thinking the diagnosis from them will include the word "projection".

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Jane Says

New York, NY

#858052 Feb 12, 2013
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh oh, janesays is getting evicted. Look out homeless people!
if i lived in Boca Boca Porpoise Spit, i would never about being homeless. your tireless work,hospitality and sharing of your home with the less fortunate is so commendable. no one suffers when Lily is around. and with all that, you manage to post on Topix 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. you're a regular Mother Theresa and proof that liberals always put their money where their mouths are.

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Jane Says

New York, NY

#858053 Feb 12, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
Voters did not fall
for this line of Malarky
in the
2012
Election
<quoted text>
no, most were totally engrossed in the premiere episode of Honey Boo Boo.

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#858054 Feb 12, 2013
Nj raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> It's public knowledge that Clinton left a 5/6 trillion dollar surplus. Are you denying that? My post had nothing to do with the democrats & everything to do with the contrast between President Obama & bush. Are you denying the 7 attacks under bush & dozens killed? Are you denying bush's motives behind the iraqi invasion? Are yiu denying that bush lied about wmds & I dont want to her nothing about Valerie Plame, Dick Cheney, or anyone else. Bush was president! Why do you describe it as Obama's government, then turn around & put the blame on the democrats under bush's gov't? Don't pick through the post & try & find grounds to stand on. You've asked your question 100 times now it's your turn to answer some questions!
Oh, my God. And I was thinking reality-challenged dave was the most ignorant person here.

Here's a link for you to acquire factual information about spending, defits and the total public debt:

http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/

In that source of factual information, you will see that the total public debt at the end of Clinton's tenure was 5 trillion dollars.

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Jane Says

New York, NY

#858055 Feb 12, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
President Obama 50.5 % of the popular vote
Gov. Romney 47 %
Republican House approval rating 7%
President Obama approval rating 58%
yes, it was a great day for The Takers. if Obama ran for President of Greece or Zimbabwe, he would have won more of the popular vote.

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Nj raider 1

United States

#858056 Feb 12, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You really are dumb. Let's go over this again....
The Republicans controlled the House and Senate.
The Republicans wanted the Democrats to support the war in Iraq.
The Democrats wanted no effective oversight of their Marxist CRA program that was an obvious failure even in 2003.
Now, pay close attention here. You may need to write this down if you can't remember it.
The Demcorats traded their support for the war in Iraq in exchange for the Republicans ignoring the fact that the CRA was an obvious failure and a threat to the economy and virtually eliminated any oversight of the Democrats' Marxist CRA program.
I do hope you have the ability to read and comprehend the English language....
Need I post it again or are you going to answer damn questions? You spent 2months posting the same 2 questions which were answered numerous times & even started out this morning with 1 of those lame questions. Do you or dont you have an answer to the questions posed to you DB Almighty?

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#858057 Feb 12, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose you're taliking about the inversion that occurs at about 72 degrees.
To cool a house, heat has to be removed from the house and dissipated into the geologic member.
Here's where you loose all contact with the real world.
When a cluster of houses are dissipating heat into a single geologic member, the temperature of that geologic member rises. Ultimately, there will be no cooling effect after sufficient heat has been dissipated from the cluster of houses into the geologic member for the closed system to reach an equilibrium temperature.
You are an uneducated fool, and indicative of the loonacy coming out of this administration. Any engineer knows this.
However, for an isolated dwelling, the heat dissipated can be transferred through mass transfer in the geologic member at the rate of aquifer replinishment due to aquifer drainage into the geology down-dip.
This places a constraint on the size of the structure dissipating heat.
Nothing is free... even in the laws of physics.
Well, well,well, the pretend geologist proves once again he is either no geologist or the dumbest f*cking geologist on the planet.

There are commercial buildings with a grids of 300 to 500 holes up to 500 foot deep. Holes are around 15' apart. They have been studied & tested & they prove you to be wrong.

Judged:

12

12

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Gloria Ad Caput Venire”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#858058 Feb 12, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose you're taliking about the inversion that occurs at about 72 degrees.
To cool a house, heat has to be removed from the house and dissipated into the geologic member.
Here's where you loose all contact with the real world.
When a cluster of houses are dissipating heat into a single geologic member, the temperature of that geologic member rises. Ultimately, there will be no cooling effect after sufficient heat has been dissipated from the cluster of houses into the geologic member for the closed system to reach an equilibrium temperature.
You are an uneducated fool, and indicative of the loonacy coming out of this administration. Any engineer knows this.
However, for an isolated dwelling, the heat dissipated can be transferred through mass transfer in the geologic member at the rate of aquifer replinishment due to aquifer drainage into the geology down-dip.
This places a constraint on the size of the structure dissipating heat.
Nothing is free... even in the laws of physics.
This is entirely true. Nothing is free. Positronium will be the last atom in existance in the very far future and even that will come at great cost.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Exam C2090-310 braindumps 1 min Harryexam 1
The latest IBM C2150-201 Exam free download 2 min Harryexam 1
Exam C2150-202 questions and answers 3 min Harryexam 1
Latest IBM M2040-669 of exam practice questions... 4 min Harryexam 1
IBM certification M6040-420 the latest exam que... 5 min Harryexam 1
The latest IBM Certification M6040-427 exam tra... 6 min Harryexam 1
SAP certification C_TAW12_71 the latest examina... 9 min Harryexam 1
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 56 min WelbyMD 180,818
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 hr edogxxx 98,685
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:28 pm PST

NBC Sports 8:28PM
Report: Washington to start Colt McCoy on Sunday
Bleacher Report 8:34 PM
Report: Redskins to Start McCoy over RGIII
NFL 8:42 PM
Redskins planning to start McCoy over RGIII on Sunday
Bleacher Report 8:59 PM
Bears' Jared Allen Just 1 Sack Away from Joining All-Time Top 10
Bleacher Report 9:14 PM
Redskins vs. Colts: Complete Week 13 Preview for Washington