Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Comments (Page 39,435)

Showing posts 788,681 - 788,700 of1,034,037
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Nude Surprized

Pompano Beach, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855050
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Not Surprized wrote:
<quoted text>
ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz. I posted this yesterday using the WAXMAN moniker. No one cared then, no one cares now. I gotta go hit some judgit Cartoons. More my speed since I'm a troll.
Nostrilis Waxman Windsor,CT:
Do you own a penthouse in Manhatten lib overlooking CP?
http://www.t opix.com/for um/nyc/T50ESIT30OD 77D4FO/p2621 #c56397
Can I spell Surprized? Nope!
It's duh culture!
Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855051
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Except that drones didn't exist!! DUH!!
And Nixon was Ayer's friend.
Yes, drones existed then. A variety of guided drones were used in Vietnam, to include some with video cameras for guidance.

And that's why Ayers was bombing all those government targets while Nixon was president.
Where the fuck did you ever get the idea that Ayers was a friend of Nixon?
You've got to show me this...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855052
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm assuming you didn't read me post where it says most tax breaks given to big oil are actually general tax breaks afforded every company in america.
That's a good point, do we occupy the Persian Gulf to support the sugar industry?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855053
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2011/08/...
A list of Bush drone strikes.
Bush did not put those children at risk, their terrorist link did.
None of those strikes were targeted assassinations of American citizens, which makes a difference.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855054
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
Your Ministry of Propogana had no choice to "FINALLY" cover the story, nitwit.
I guess it went right over your pointed head, didn't it?
Is it even clear that the "mainstream media" does a poorer job of being adversarial than the conservative press?

Consider Lewis's claim that "the establishment press" cared more about Seamus the dog's rooftop journey than "the fact that an Obama-authorized drone strike killed a 16-year-old American."

There's something important missing from that analysis. Tom Junod wrote the definitive piece about that 16 year old, Abdulrahman al-Awlaki, in Esquire. I wrote about him here at The Atlantic on numerous occasions. The New Yorker covered the killing here. The New York Times and The Washington Post both published coverage of his death. Those stories and many others from publications in the "establishment press" treated Awlaki's death far more critically than anything that I saw in any conservative outlet. And some of the most critical pieces written about Obama killing a teenaged American citizen were published by avowedly progressive writers like Glenn Greenwald in the liberal online magazine Salon and staffers at publications like Mother Jones and The Nation, often citing left-leaning civil-libertarian organizations like the ACLU or center-left international affairs academics.

On various subjects that ought to trigger automatic scrutiny from any adversarial press outlet, like apparent violations of federal law, actions that directly contradict a campaign promise, aggressive retaliation against whistleblowers, and unprecedented assertions of secrecy, establishment outlets like The New York Times, The New Yorker, and The Washington Post, along with avowedly liberal publications like Salon, Mother Jones, and The Guardian, did far more to uncover facts, raise awareness, and publish criticism of Obama than the conservative media.

To be sure, there was a schizophrenia to the coverage in some of these publications. The New Yorker must have dedicated hundreds of thousands of dollars to top-flight journalism about various Obama Administration transgressions against civil liberties, the rule of law, and good government. Its editors presumably submitted some of those stories for National Magazine Awards. The same can be said for The New York Times and the Pulitzer Prizes. Yet pre-election editorials in those same publications didn't merely posit that Obama was the lesser of two evils -- they left painstakingly reported transgressions unmentioned, as if they weren't relevant, and issued glowing endorsements that read as if Obama is an especially noble president.

I've been an outspoken a critic of that seeming contradiction.

But when it comes to holding Obama accountable for those unusually consequential, unchecked acts, the conservative media is far inferior, partly because of the time it wastes on birtherism, Kenyan anti-colonialism, and a National Review contributor's theory that Obama is allied with our Islamist enemy in a "grand jihad" against America; but mostly because much of the conservative movement behaves as if the War on Terrorism confers unlimited power to spy without warrants, to violate the War Powers Resolution, to extra-judicially kill American citizens, and to treat even the legal justification for executive branch actions as if they're state secrets. On all those questions, they defer to the Obama Administration.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2...

all sources linked.

bonus....

First detailed publicly by NBC News late Monday, the memo....

Read more: http://nation.time.com/2013/02/05/memo-gives-...

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855055
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Are you a masochist??

You thrive on looking stupid!!

I popsted it yesterday, but you ran away.

Last time for this truly ignorant question, from the Dept. of the Treasury.

PAY ATTENTION!!

----------

""The Department of the Treasury is an executive department and the treasury of the United States federal government. It was established by an Act of Congress in 1789 to manage government revenue. The Department is administered by the Secretary of the Treasury, who is a member of the Cabinet.
The first Secretary of the Treasury was Alexander Hamilton, who was sworn into office on September 11, 1789. Hamilton was asked by President George Washington to serve after first having asked Robert Morris (who declined, recommending Hamilton instead). Hamilton almost single-handedly worked out the nation's early financial system, and for several years was a major presence in Washington's administration as well. His portrait is on the obverse of the U.S. ten-dollar bill while the Treasury Department building is shown on the reverse.
Besides the Secretary, one of the best-known Treasury officials is the Treasurer of the United States whose signature, along with the Treasury Secretary's, appears on all Federal Reserve notes.
The Treasury prints and mints all paper currency and coins in circulation through the Bureau of Engraving and Printing and the United States Mint. The Department also collects all federal taxes through the Internal Revenue Service, and manages U.S. government debt instruments.""

"The basic functions of the Department of the Treasury mainly include:

Producing all currency, coinage and postage stamps of the U.S.;

Collecting taxes, duties and money paid to and due to the U.S.:

Paying all bills of the U.S.;

Managing the federal finances;

Managing government accounts and the United States public debt;

Supervising national banks and thrift institutions;

Advising on domestic and international financial, monetary, economic, trade and tax policy (fiscal policy being the sum of these, and the ultimate responsibility of Congress);

Enforcing federal finance and tax laws;

Investigating and prosecuting tax evaders;

Publishing statistical reports.

----------

Note the third duty of the Treasury;

""Paying all bills of the U.S.;""

Now STFU and go away with your torrent of lies and ignorance.
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>Since you have all the answers, answer this question:
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
All you have to do is identify a simple source of money to answer that question.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855056
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

5

4

4

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I am aware it was not the same time as the father.
Was he targeted & if so why?
Ask your Fuehrer.

“It's all about the struggle”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855058
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I love it when you right whiners defend terrorists who plot against America & send suicide bombers to kill Americans.
Just like you backed Ghadafi & even Bin Laden.
Liberals are the ones who want Al Jazeera to have a voice in the American media. Go ask Al Gore what his problem is.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855059
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
RealDave do you have a problem with GE paying No Taxes?
As well as Government Motors.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855061
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

History 101 wrote:
<quoted text>
Republicans haven't had a chance at bat yet since the economic fallout. How can you even say that with certainty?
Because I was paying attention when the debt went over $1 trillion for the first time in our history under Reagan. I was paying attention when the debt went over $4 trillion under HW Bush. I was paying attention when Clinton produced 4 years of budget surplus. I was paying attention when once Bush was given the WH with Clinton's Congress they promptly drove up the deficit and ultimately doubled the debt. You can make all the excuses you want but recent history tells us that if you gave them all three houses again you'd have to dream up an entirely new set of excuses.

I'm sick of excuses.

If you weren't such a party hack you'd be even more sick of making excuses for the people YOU elect.
TSM

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855062
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

Nuculur option wrote:
Are you a masochist??
You thrive on looking stupid!!
I popsted it yesterday, but you ran away.
Last time for this truly ignorant question, from the Dept. of the Treasury.
PAY ATTENTION!!
----------
""The Department of the Treasury is an executive department and the treasury of the United States federal government. It was established by an Act of Congress in 1789 to manage government revenue. The Department is administered by the Secretary of the Treasury, who is a member of the Cabinet.
The first Secretary of the Treasury was Alexander Hamilton, who was sworn into office on September 11, 1789. Hamilton was asked by President George Washington to serve after first having asked Robert Morris (who declined, recommending Hamilton instead). Hamilton almost single-handedly worked out the nation's early financial system, and for several years was a major presence in Washington's administration as well. His portrait is on the obverse of the U.S. ten-dollar bill while the Treasury Department building is shown on the reverse.
Besides the Secretary, one of the best-known Treasury officials is the Treasurer of the United States whose signature, along with the Treasury Secretary's, appears on all Federal Reserve notes.
The Treasury prints and mints all paper currency and coins in circulation through the Bureau of Engraving and Printing and the United States Mint. The Department also collects all federal taxes through the Internal Revenue Service, and manages U.S. government debt instruments.""
"The basic functions of the Department of the Treasury mainly include:
Producing all currency, coinage and postage stamps of the U.S.;
Collecting taxes, duties and money paid to and due to the U.S.:
Paying all bills of the U.S.;
Managing the federal finances;
Managing government accounts and the United States public debt;
Supervising national banks and thrift institutions;
Advising on domestic and international financial, monetary, economic, trade and tax policy (fiscal policy being the sum of these, and the ultimate responsibility of Congress);
Enforcing federal finance and tax laws;
Investigating and prosecuting tax evaders;
Publishing statistical reports.
----------
Note the third duty of the Treasury;
""Paying all bills of the U.S.;""
Now STFU and go away with your torrent of lies and ignorance.
<quoted text>
Nuculur hes asked a Simple question now put your thinking Cap On and Try Again!!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855063
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
I know, I try to invest only in profitable companies.
You should buy stock in green energy companies like Solyndra, the wave of the future.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855064
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

History 101 wrote:
<quoted text>
Menendez just might be the bullet that ends up shooting his party in the foot.
that Caller story is already falling apart.

the folks over there are not happy with me.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855065
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

History 101 wrote:
<quoted text>
The entire article was only about Obama using drones to kill American citizens on his command.
I'm just glad the tables have turned. This president was ready to prosecute GW Bush and Cheney for helping him get the credit for killing Osama after waterboarding only 3 bad guys.
But you probably don't have any problem with the accelerated use of drones by this president either.
Told you to read the White Paper, do I have to do everything for you?

Here:

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/ne...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855067
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

History 101 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's just a bit hypocritical. Actually, it's a lot hypocritical.
Drones can cause suffering and mutilations to a lot of people who are just too close to the target if it doesn't kill them right off the bat - but that's more acceptable than pouring water up 3 bad guys' noses with an M.D. standing by.
If you read the White Paper maybe you'll get the point.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855068
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

Nuculur option wrote:
The Post Office is required by the Constitution. DUH
Obamacare was found to be Constitutional by the Conservative Supreme Court.
You lose again.
<quoted text>
You are an idiot.
The Constitution allows the government to create a post office.
The Constitution does not command the government to create a post office.
If the government WANTS to create a post office, the Constitution gives the government the authority to do so.

As for the constitutionality of ObamaKare, there are many grounds on which it is unconstitutional. The ruling of the Supreme Court actually blatantly emphasized one point in which the law is obviously unconstitutional.
Vagueness and ambiguity.
As ruled by the Supreme Court:
"Vague laws offend several important values. First, because we assume that man is free to steer between lawful and unlawful conduct, we insist that laws give the person of ordinary intelligence a reasonable opportunity to know what is prohibited, so that he may act accordingly. Vague laws may trap the innocent by not providing fair warnings. Second, if arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement is to be prevented, laws must provide explicit standards for those who apply them. A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges, and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory applications."

Let's put the ObamaKare law to this test:

Those that wrote the law, the ultimate authority on what the law means, and the intent of the law: "It's not a tax. It's a penalty."

Those that read that same law, the interpretation from the text: "It's a tax."

If those who wrote the law specifically state their intent that the provision isn't a tax, but it is a penalty, then the intent of the law is a penalty.
But, when the law is read, which the Supreme Court obviously did (or should have done), their interpretation of the law is it is a tax.

You cannot have a better example of a law that demonstrates vagueness and ambiguity than this.

Just on this basis, aside form all the other contentions, the entire law is very obviously unconstitutional.

So, now wew are faced with the question of why the Supreme Court ruled an obviously unconstitutional law constitutional.

Congress isn't the only institution we need to fix.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855069
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said Tuesday that "there is oversight" on the Obama administration's drone strikes against U.S. citizens who are believed to be senior al-Qaeda leaders.

"I review all of the air strikes that we use under this title of the law," he told MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell. Rogers added that Americans who decide to join al-Qaeda become enemies of the U.S. "If you have someone who has joined this organization, and they may not be engaged in plot a today, but part of an organization plotting to kill Americans, and so they've joined the enemy. So you don't just kill the enemy when they're at the gate."

Rogers insisted there is not a long list of Americans on any "kill list." "I can candidly tell you that," he said.

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/g...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855071
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
That's exactly what it means.
Thought so.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855072
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a whole 'nother topic.
Alaska makes oil companies companies pay Alaskans for the resources they took out of the ground. It's called royalty payments.
Yet the oil companies still made tremendous profits!!
Palin was all for it, too! So it should be part of the TP plank!!
The oil and ng belongs to all Americans, not oil companies.
They should be allowed to drill for it and sell it, but just as in Alaska, we the people should get a share of the money.
But the Rclowns don't even want to take away big oil's tax breaks and subsidies, much less make them pay royalties to Americans.
The oil, ng, and coal belongs to whoever has the mineral rights to that piece of property. Can't you ever get anything right?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#855073
Feb 6, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

discordian wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, those poor babies, if only you could have been there with one of your many hair dryers to dry them off after their horrible experience. Oh wait, they might have strangled you with the cord, given the chance.
Would you be talking like that if you were imprisoned and tortured? How about if you were dodging the executioner drone? I know, you right wingers have so much faith in your government that you're certain they'd never use this power inappropriately.

Gee, wish I had that kinda faith.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 788,681 - 788,700 of1,034,037
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

39 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 12 min A Bitter Pill 96,112
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 28 min wojar 167,569
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 38 min cartooni 67,192
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 41 min litesong 42,983
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 57 min lol 47,058
Song Title Game (Dec '11) 1 hr Velvet MJK 1,022
Music Artists A to Z 1 hr Velvet MJK 91
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••