Barack Obama, our next President

[Truth is no SIN]

Like boxers instructed at the beginning of every fight to “protect yourselves at all times”, MHP knows her obligation is to protect the Democratic party elite, and the president, and to protect millions of voters who supported Barack Obama and his party from knowing what they really voted for. In this case that meant drawing attention away from the charter school profiteers and sugar daddies, and their intimate ties with this president, his secretary of education, and a whole layer of Democratic and often black politicians. So where the lead story on school closings should have on what's causing the public school closings, who's pushing and profiting from the public school closings, who is resisting those forces and how we can stop school closings and protect public education, Melissa Harris-Perry buried that lead. She just pronounced it all a hot racist mess, and hosted a rambling and pointless discussion about an “epidemic” without pointing to preventions, treatments or cures. What a waste. PERRY IS AN ELITE WHO DOESN'T BLACKS TO HAVE A VOICE

[flack]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
Would that be a Janet Napolitano terrorist, or a real terrorist?

It didn't say. Probably both.

[Death of Tenzing]

Truth is no SIN wrote:

A lot of what we say and do becomes habit-forming. Groundhog Day 2013 could serve as a reminder that some political habits should be kicked. Here are a few:
**“Defense budget”
No, it’s not a defense budget. It’s a military budget.
But countless people and organizations keep saying they want to cut “the defense budget” or reduce “defense spending.”
Anyone who wants to challenge the warfare state should dispense with this misnomer. We don’t object to “defense”— what we do oppose, vehemently, is military spending that has nothing to do with real defense and everything to do with killing people, enforcing geopolitical control and making vast profits for military contractors. And no, they’re not “defense contractors.”
President Eisenhower’s farewell address didn’t warn against a “defense-industrial complex.”
The fact that there’s something officially called the Department of Defense — formerly the Department of War, until 1947 — doesn’t make its huge budget a “defense budget,” any more than renaming the Bureau of Prisons “the Bureau of Love” would mean we should talk about wanting to cut the “love budget.”
**“Pro-life”
Last week, midway through a heated debate on the PBS “NewsHour,” the president of NARAL Pro-Choice America said that some politicians get elected while hiding their extreme anti-abortion positions — but would be rejected at the ballot box “if they ran on their pro-life values.”
“Pro-life” values? Not a label that abortion-rights advocates should use for opponents of a woman’s right to choose an abortion. One of the main reasons those opponents keep calling themselves “pro-life” is they want to imply that supporters of abortion rights are anti-life. Why help?
**“Globalization”
In many realms, globalization can be positive, even essential. For instance, wonderful results flow from globalizing solidarity among workers around the world. Likewise, the planetary spread of awareness and cooperation among people taking action to protect the environment, stop human-rights abuses and end war.
Corporate globalization is another matter. Its destructive effects are lashing every continent with voracious commercialization along with exploitive races to the bottom for cheap labor, extraction of raw materials, privatization, flattening of protective tariffs, overriding of national laws that protect workers and replacement of democratic possibilities with the rule of big money.
Putting “corporate” before “globalization” may seem cumbersome, but it’s worth another three syllables. There’s a world of difference between globalization for human cooperation and corporate globalization. Blurring it all together misses the chance to clarify the distinct possibilities.

I like it except for the indictment of corporate globalization. Especially the bit about the misnomer: "pro-life". What a crock, a leftover from an old ad campaign.

[DBWriter]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
See I knew you would run from it.
Pathetic.

You seem to be delusional. I'll bring you back to reality. Here's the post again, just for your reference:

It seems even you can't even deduce a simple source of money from that article. All that is required to answer the question is a simple source of money. Who is going to pay?

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

It's a simple question. A simple source of money will suffice for the answer. What is the source of money stated in your reference?
If it's too complicated for you to understand, then why would you realistically expect the average person in the population to understand?

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

[Truth is no SIN]

TO BLACK TO STRONG TO LIE FOR LIB LILLY KKK JIM CROW DEMS AND THEIR LAP DOGS SAMMIE AND QUIMBIE,Like boxers instructed at the beginning of every fight to “protect yourselves at all times”, MHP knows her obligation is to protect the Democratic party elite, and the president, and to protect millions of voters who supported Barack Obama and his party from knowing what they really voted for. In this case that meant drawing attention away from the charter school profiteers and sugar daddies, and their intimate ties with this president, his secretary of education, and a whole layer of Democratic and often black politicians. So where the lead story on school closings should have on what's causing the public school closings, who's pushing and profiting from the public school closings, who is resisting those forces and how we can stop school closings and protect public education, Melissa Harris-Perry buried that lead. She just pronounced it all a hot racist mess, and hosted a rambling and pointless discussion about an “epidemic” without pointing to preventions, treatments or cures. What a waste.

[Eman]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
In those e-mails, the tipster repeatedly puts off in-person or telephone meetings with both Chavez, and reporters from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and ABC News. He also resists their attempts to establish direct contact with the alleged prostitutes.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-poli...
because we wouldn't want Bob to get charged with a crime???
oh please. we'll never know the name of the 'tipster'. but nonetheless on the word of 'someone' you guys will never let it go.
does anyone wonder why the GOP thinks it needs a rebrand? there's a perfect example.

How will you feel if this turns out to be more than just allegations?

[DBWriter]

leosnana wrote:

<quoted text>How could they know what weapons the mob had in its hands BEFORE the attack? Carol, you ignorant slut, why don't you just offer all your integrity up on a silver platter to the fictional historian Orally, and quit slandering a good public servant with your lies.(We've all seen that you're none too bright, but no one is this mislead without his consent.)

There was no mob, dupe.
The video of Al Qaeda killing Americans was watched real-time in the White House. Everyone in the White House knew there was no mob. That lie Obama was pushing got shoved up his ass pretty far. That's why he stopped pushing that lie after two weeks.
Simply put, there was no mob. Obama was lying.

[RepubliCLOWNS]

discordian wrote:

Topix libs/nazis/fascists are sooooo stupid.

starting with republicans' failed policies and unwillingness to bring this country forward, keep supporting the party of failure nitwitt, you will never get anywhere unless you're filthy rich.

[Death of Tenzing]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
This is interesting.
Is Obama white, or black?

I can smell what comes next.

Did Real Brother get racial reassignment surgery and come back as a racist, white midget?

[shinningelectr0n]

RealDave wrote:

NASA _ Global Warming
http://climate.nasa.gov/causes

NASA? Isn't that the government dept. run by the Boy Messiah's boy Charles F. Bolden, Jr.? The guy who said upon his appointment that the first thing he'd like to do is pursue racist politics by apologizing to Muslims and hire more of them?

Puhleeeze. Don't tell me that NASA is trying to be Politically Correct to make the Jerk-In-Chief happy!

Global Warming? Must be hurting Muslims so we gotta fix it,eh?

Credibility can't be manufactured, ImaginaryDave. At least not REAL credibility.

[Death of Tenzing]

Need Advice wrote:

My doctor has given me bewteen 3 to 6 months to live due to cancer. I owe the IRS $358,467.00 I have explained to them I don't have the money and will be dying soon. They said they would seize my body at death and will not release it to my family until my taxes are paid, is this something they can really do?

Flack???

[Demo KKK Rats]

RepubliCLOWNS wrote:

<quoted text> thanks for your update scumbag.

As Eman said, when are you going to use your Nutcase Option MPD friend?

You've been busy today hiding. Don't be Surprized now!

One retard is enough.

[Truth is no SIN]

At last: a revolutionary African analysis of Django, a movie that “does not have the ability to criticize the institution of slavery.” Jamie Foxx’s character “does not enlist his captive brothers and sisters in the enterprise of ending slavery or their own enslavement.” And, he is disconnected, choosing only “to free his wife and to exact revenge for wrongs done to her.”



Django Unchained, Or,“Killing Whitey While Protecting White Power”: A Review

by Omali Yeshitela

This article originally appeared in Uhuru News.

“The main problem with Django is its function as a cover for slavery and capitalism.”

It has been a long time since a movie has sparked as much controversy as Django Unchained.

Written and directed by Quentin Tarantino, the movie stars Jamie Foxx as Django, a vengeance-motivated cowboy “ex”-slave.

Also appearing are Leonardo DiCaprio as Calvin Candie, a notoriously sadistic plantation slave owner; Christoph Waltz as Dr. King Shultz, a German bounty hunter who purchases, befriends and accompanies Django on his odyssey; Samuel L. Jackson as Stephen, the depraved “Uncle Tom” house negro; and Kerry Washington as Broomhilda, Django’s enslaved wife, whose sale and forced separation from Django is the motivation for his quixotic blood hunt.

[sonicfilter]

Continuing a downward spiral that began last September during the Democratic National Convention, Fox News primetime ratings, in the key 25-54 year old demographic, have declined to numbers they haven’t seen since August of 2001. These are numbers that revert Fox back to the George Bush, pre-9/11 era when Fox was struggling for attention.

....Of course, as the ratings race heats up, Fox may decide to stop standing around watching their lead disappear. They will need to take bold steps to keep up with the competition. While O’Reilly is still pulling in decent numbers, Hannity is ratings loser and an embarrassment in terms of credibility. He has to be the first to go. Greta Van Susteren’s claim to fame was as an O.J. Simpson groupie who has never risen out of the tabloid mold in which she was formed. Now that her best pal and frequent guest (55 times), Sarah Palin, has been dumped by Fox, Van Susteren would be wise to update her resume. The most likely candidate to fill one of those vacancies would be Megyn Kelly, who has emerged as Fox’s most stridently biased anchor in the daytime.

There are those at Fox who know that a big part of the explanation for their decline is that the audience at large is no longer interested in the vitriolic smear jobs that Fox has specialized in for most of the past decade. They just watched President Obama get reelected, along with Democratic gains in both houses of Congress, despite their fierce determination to kneecap the Democrats and prop up the flailing GOP. They did the best they could to install a Republican regime with a coordinated campaign of propaganda and hate speech, but they failed miserably even in races they were expected to win. So they are aware that the public has rejected their best arguments and lies.

http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/...

[Demo KKK Rats]

RepubliCLOWNS wrote:

<quoted text> starting with republicans' failed policies and unwillingness to bring this country forward, keep supporting the party of failure nitwitt, you will never get anywhere unless you're filthy rich.

Wow! The zombie really buys into the class warfare stuff.

Just because you made poor decisions in life and are a dumb, lazy libtard, don't blame the rich, loser. You earned what you have and have nobody to blame except yourself, taker.

[Truth is no SIN]

THIS MOVIE WAS GARBAGE COMPARED TO BUCK AND THE PREACHER Adding to this bit of verbal Mandingo mud wrestling, Dick Gregory criticized Lee for criticizing the movie, calling Lee a “little thug.”

Not to be left out of the fray, Luther Campbell of 2 Live Crew said of Lee’s criticism,“Spike is upset because Samuel L. Jackson’s character in the movie is just like him: a conniving and scheming Uncle Tom.”

Other critics have complained about its historical inadequacies, such as the ability of Django, masquerading as a freed slave, to sit at a table with whites in Mississippi and enjoy other social amenities that would have been unheard of at the time—and which are problematic even today in the U.S.

The movie’s portrayal of violence is another cause of controversy, especially in the wake of the December 2012 Newtown, Connecticut, massacre of whites by one of their own, which has caused a new uproar about guns in the hands of anyone not wielding State power.

Some other reviews have been personal and subjective; noted author, Ishmael Reed, claimed that Jackson plays himself in the role of Stephen, the treacherous house slave.

[sonicfilter]

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
How will you feel if this turns out to be more than just allegations?

come on man. you know how i'd feel.

how will you feel if it's just more right wing fiction?

there is an established pattern of such things.

[DemiCLOWNS]

RepubliCLOWNS wrote:

<quoted text> starting with republicans' failed policies and unwillingness to bring this country forward, keep supporting the party of failure nitwitt, you will never get anywhere unless you're filthy rich.

And you voted twice for the incompetent Obama? Bwhahahahahahahaha...

[shinningelectr0n]

Death of Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
I seem to remember an al Qaeda attack while that other fella was prez, you know, the goofy Texan? Anyway, did you declare his guilt?
Don't answer, this is the first post I've read today and I feel like I've already had my fill of stupid.

Yeah....you've been filled with stupid for a very long, long time.

[DBWriter]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
Please state where it says otherwise.

You have about as good of an understanding of what type of government we have here in the United States as Obama. Let me educate you.

We have what is known as "limited government".
In a "limited government" the government cannot do anything the Constitution does not define as a function or responsibility for one of the three branches of government. If the Constitution does not authorize the government to do something, then by default the government is not allowed to do that.
Additionally, the Constitution does give what it refers to as the "free states" all authority not specifically defined as a federal authority, responsibility or function, provided the exercise of this authority by the free state does not violate the Constitution or infringe on any of the individual rights guaranteed in the Constitution.

It is types of governments like fascist dictatorships that are applicable to your response.

It would help a lot if both you and Obama had read the Constitution at least once in your lives.

So, show us the text from the Constitution, dufus.