Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#854118 Feb 5, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Would you be talking about that same Justice Department that is running guns for the Mexican drug cartels?
So, what you're saying is, anyone in government can use the authority of the government to just start killing Americans at their whim, right?
It makes sense that these fascist dictator wannabes would have a justice department that would promote that absolute nonsense.
How about you think for yourself. Tell us why the government has the authority to just start slaughtering Americans at their whim.
... well?????
They don't have any legal authority, that's the point nitwit.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#854120 Feb 5, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Afghanistan attacked us on 9/11(2001)
Iraq was just the most convenient place to fight the Arab jihad in their own backyard, plus it split the Islamist Terrorist Empire that stretched unbroken from Morocco to Tibet in half, and it got rid of Saddam Hussein.
You're not really so goddam stupid you'd leave Saddam Hussein in your rear with a rebuilt war machine, are you?
Never ceases to amaze ...

There's clueflucked then there's CLUEFLUCKED ...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#854121 Feb 5, 2013
Cantor: GOP Needs To Explain Party’s Positions To Voters

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/c...

yes, that is different than explaining why we should hate Obama.

say what Mitt? or rather...say what Mitt who?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#854123 Feb 5, 2013
FreedomWorks On New Rove Group:‘The Empire Is Striking Back’

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/f...
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#854124 Feb 5, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Thank God for American Crossroads and the Conservative Victory Project
American Crossroads is creating a new Super PAC to crush conservatives, destroy the tea party, and put a bunch of squishes in Republican leadership positions. Thank God they are behind this. In 2012, they spent hundreds of millions of rich donors’ money and had jack to show for it.
It is interesting though. The people who brought us No Child Left Behind, Medicare Part D, TARP, the GM bailout, Harriet Miers, etc., etc., etc. are really hacked off that people have been rejecting them. In 2012, about the only successful Republican candidates were the ones who directly rejected the legacy of these people.
http://www.redstate.com/2013/02/04/thank-god-...
"directly rejected" the legacy of Bush.
anyone who doesn't isn't a conservative according to the man who now works for FOX.
Why the name change LTR? LMAO!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#854125 Feb 5, 2013
Homer 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>Wow! Talk about buying into all the bullsh!t! They sold it to you hook, line, and sinker.
Amazing idn't it?

Mornin' Homer.

I'm having a problem, maybe you can help ...

Should I vote for the party that says I have no legal rights and that they can imprison and torture me at will or do I vote for the party that says I have no legal rights and that they can execute me at will? I'm kinda leaning towards death over torture and imprisonment.

Need an answer, 2014's just around the corner.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#854126 Feb 5, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You have a severe problem reading and comprehending the written English language.
How about this concept: The money the government spends doesn't belong to Obama.
The Treasurey Department isn't a source of money. It is a repository for money collected from a source of money. Besides, the Treasury Department doesn't have any money. It's 16.5 trillion dollars in debt.
And, with answers like that, as well as the answers the idiots in the Obama government come up with like setting up an unconstitutional alternate government and funding it with something right out of Machiavelli's "The Prince" will collapse the government.
I mean, give me a break. Minting trillion dollar coins and trading them with the Federal Reserve, that's also probably broke, to fund a government different from the constitutional government...
What the f**k will you ignorant idiots think of next...
That's just another indication of how ignorant Obama and that entire administration is. If they knew what they planned was directly from Machiavelli's "The Prince", they would have tried to disguise it, and not just throw it out there where anyone with an education would recognize it.
How about telling us what the plan is.
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
All you havfe to do is identify a source of money to answer the question.
The Treasury Dept.

Sheesh, I think somebody called you "birdbrain" ... I like it.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#854127 Feb 5, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Reagan considered the EITC to be the centerpiece of his legacy. Should probably also mention that Bush II increased the credit.
It's easy to pander to the billionaires and corporations to get elected; then the real work begins and you have to be the President for all of the people. The problems of poverty don't disappear because a handful of hateful rich rightwingers have disdain for them; they only get worse if they're not dealt with.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#854128 Feb 5, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
oh yeah, creative.
like asking the same questions over and over ad naseum.
like using another person's Topix name because your old name got blown up because of pre-election 'predictions'.
like posting that that has long ago been debunked as matter of fact.
like acting like you're the smartest person in the room when all of the above prove otherwise.
LOL... the smartest person in the room?? You another AOL user...

Your life isn't about how to survive the storm, it's all about how to dance in the rain...

You still have not told us why the ghettos and projects are magnets for blacks??

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#854129 Feb 5, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battel between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the real-time video was being watched in the White House?
Who in the White House gave the orders for the AC-130 and Marine Force Recon units specifically prepositioned to respond to specifically an attack on the embassy in specifically Libya to disregard their default orders while they watched Al Qaeda kill Americans on real-time video?
Got an answer for these questions, dufus?
... empty chair....
Uhhhh, the White House and nobody.

Do I win something?
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#854130 Feb 5, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Cantor: GOP Needs To Explain Party’s Positions To Voters
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/c...
yes, that is different than explaining why we should hate Obama.
say what Mitt? or rather...say what Mitt who?
Well, he explained exactly nothing. Boehner said his number one agenda is to abolish abortion forever. Like that's his worst problem. I like this from the comments:

just do not think sucking the di*k of every super-wealthy societal parasite is ever going to be a big winner for the Republican Party, but I could be wrong. Maybe that is what the American people want?
TSM

El Paso, TX

#854131 Feb 5, 2013
GhostofRaygun wrote:
<quoted text>You got that right. When you see 750,000 jobs per month being lost again like in 2008 and the stock market lost of 60% in two days you get back with us on not seeing anything yet.
More Liberal platitudes ….Still stuck on Stupid!!
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#854132 Feb 5, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
The Treasury Dept.
Sheesh, I think somebody called you "birdbrain" ... I like it.
I can't stand it. Feel sorry for Svetlana

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#854133 Feb 5, 2013
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you've backed off of your dishonest asertion about Afghanastan, eh libtard?
OK - one out of two down.
Now let's discuss Iraq. Remeber that one. I's the one all the Democrats were warning us about. Yes, the same one the Democrats voted for military force on.
Here you go dishonest political hack clown:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =Cwqh4wQPoQkXX
Don't you lefty losers get it???

The Republicans didn't commit one of the most insanely idiotic and costly foreign policy blunders in our history 'cause some Democrats voted to do it.
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#854134 Feb 5, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Never ceases to amaze ...
There's clueflucked then there's CLUEFLUCKED ...
Homer convinced DBWriter lives in some kind of alternate reality.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#854135 Feb 5, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Amazing idn't it?
Mornin' Homer.
I'm having a problem, maybe you can help ...
Should I vote for the party that says I have no legal rights and that they can imprison and torture me at will or do I vote for the party that says I have no legal rights and that they can execute me at will? I'm kinda leaning towards death over torture and imprisonment.
Need an answer, 2014's just around the corner.
Well, you can do what you usually do; not vote. Ouch! But I'd choose death too.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#854136 Feb 5, 2013
Bruised from Battling Obama, Eric Cantor Softens His Tone in Domestic Policy Speech

Eric Cantor is acutely aware that the GOP has an image problem.

For the past year-and-a-half, the House majority leader and his colleagues have been manning the barricades of negativity: "No" to Obamacare. "No" to immigration reform. "No" to gun control. "No" to higher taxes on the wealthy. "No" to just about anything the White House wants.

Now Cantor is trying to soften his hard-edged reputation, portraying the Republican Party as caring deeply about education, health care and innovation.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02...

"No" won't win elections.
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#854137 Feb 5, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Amazing idn't it?
Mornin' Homer.
I'm having a problem, maybe you can help ...
Should I vote for the party that says I have no legal rights and that they can imprison and torture me at will or do I vote for the party that says I have no legal rights and that they can execute me at will? I'm kinda leaning towards death over torture and imprisonment.
Need an answer, 2014's just around the corner.
I would go with death depending on your tolerance for pain as torture can be painful.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#854138 Feb 5, 2013
TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
More Liberal platitudes ….Still stuck on Stupid!!
I think Homer has some Stupid Grease so you can get unstuck.

Homer, can ya help a brother out?
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#854139 Feb 5, 2013
Death - 2

Torture - 0

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
ISIS Plans to Blow Up an Entire American City a... 5 min hands on AR 100
Abby 10-22 10 min Mister Tonka 2
Amy 10-21 40 min Community Disorga... 7
Emanuel set to outline re-election agenda in fi... 57 min Le Jimbo 1
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 58 min jacques Ottawa 179,286
Rattlesnake Logic 1 hr C and P an Paste 19
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr Grau 68,644
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]